Imprisonment for public protection

Last updated

In England and Wales, the imprisonment for public protection (IPP; Welsh : carcharu er mwyn diogelu'r cyhoedd) [1] sentence was a form of indeterminate sentence introduced by section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (with effect from 2005) by the Home Secretary, David Blunkett, and abolished in 2012. It was intended to protect the public against criminals whose crimes were not serious enough to merit a normal life sentence but who were regarded as too dangerous to be released when the term of their original sentence had expired. It is composed of a punitive "tariff" intended to be proportionate to the gravity of the crime committed, and an indeterminate period which commences after the expiry of the tariff and lasts until the Parole Board judges the prisoner no longer poses a risk to the public and is fit to be released. [2] The equivalent for under-18s was called detention for public protection, introduced by s. 226 of the 2003 Act. The sentences came into effect on 4 April 2005. [3]

Contents

Although there is no limit to how long prisoners can be detained under IPPs, and some may never be released, they may be released on review; an IPP sentence is not a sentence of life imprisonment with a whole-life tariff.

In 2007, the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court ruled that the continued incarceration of prisoners serving IPPs after tariff expiry where the prisons lack the facilities and courses required to assess their suitability for release was unlawful, [4] [5] causing concern that many dangerous offenders would be freed. [6] In 2010 a joint report by the chief inspectors of prisons and probation concluded that IPP sentences were unsustainable with UK prison overcrowding. [7] David Blunkett himself admitted in the House of Lords in 2021 that he had got it wrong. [8]

In 2011, Prime Minister David Cameron said that IPP sentences were "unclear, inconsistent and uncertain" and that the meaning of IPP sentences was not clear to the public. [9] The IPP sentence for new cases was abolished by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, enacted under the coalition government. [10] [11] From 2005 until abolition in 2012, a total of 8,711 IPP sentences were imposed by courts (with some inmates receiving more than one IPP sentence). [9] At the time of abolition of IPP sentences in new cases in 2012, approximately 6,000 inmates remained imprisoned for public protection. [11] [10] Over 4,600 remained in June 2015; [12] more than 3,000 remained by 2017, [13] and 2,909 remained as of June 2023, of whom more than half had been held for at least 10 years after the expiration of their tariff. [14] At the end of March 2023 there were approximately 1,355 offenders serving IPP sentences who had never been released from prison (many other IPP inmates had been released, but then later recalled to prison). [9] Hundreds of IPP prisoners had served five times the minimum. [12]

The government's policy was that IPP prisoners remained in prison until it was deemed that the risks they posed if released were manageable. [12] Some of the alleged victims of John Worboys whose cases were not taken up by the Crown Prosecution Service were assured that the IPP sentence in effect meant a life sentence. [15]

In 2023, Alice Jill Edwards, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, criticised IPP sentences for the psychological harm they inflicted, saying, "The resulting distress, depression and anxiety are severe for prisoners and their families." [14] According to the Prison Reform Trust, as of 2016 there were 550 incidents of self-harm for every 1,000 prisoners serving an IPP sentence. [14]

In November 2023 the Ministry of Justice announced changes under which sentences would end immediately for about 1,800 offenders released on licence once the legislation comes into force, with more becoming eligible for Parole Board consideration later. However, this would not apply to people in prison, in some cases for minor offences such as stealing a telephone. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

Life imprisonment is any sentence of imprisonment for a crime under which the convicted criminal is to remain in prison for the rest of their natural life. Crimes that result in life imprisonment are considered extremely serious and usually violent. Examples of these crimes are murder, torture, terrorism, child abuse resulting in death, rape, espionage, treason, illegal drug trade, human trafficking, severe fraud and financial crimes, aggravated property damage, arson, hate crime, kidnapping, burglary, robbery, theft, piracy, aircraft hijacking, and genocide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parole</span> Conditional release of a prisoner

Parole, also known as provisional release, supervised release, or being on paper, is a form of early release of a prison inmate where the prisoner agrees to abide by behavioral conditions, including checking-in with their designated parole officers, or else they may be rearrested and returned to prison.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder of Sarah Payne</span> 2000 abduction and murder of a child in West Sussex, England

Sarah Evelyn Isobel Payne was the victim of a high-profile abduction and murder in West Sussex, England in July 2000.

In Canada and England and Wales, certain convicted persons may be designated as dangerous offenders and subject to a longer, or indefinite, term of imprisonment in order to protect the public. Dangerousness in law is a legal establishment of the risk that a person poses to cause harm. Other countries, including Denmark, Norway, and parts of the United States have similar provisions of law.

A habitual offender, repeat offender, or career criminal is a person convicted of a crime who was previously convicted of other crimes. Various state and jurisdictions may have laws targeting habitual offenders, and specifically providing for enhanced or exemplary punishments or other sanctions. They are designed to counter criminal recidivism by physical incapacitation via imprisonment.

Some jurisdictions may commit certain types of dangerous sex offenders to state-run detention facilities following the completion of their sentence if that person has a "mental abnormality" or personality disorder that makes the person likely to engage in sexual offenses if not confined in a secure facility. In the United States, twenty states, the federal government, and the District of Columbia have a version of these commitment laws, which are referred to as "Sexually Violent Predator" (SVP) or "Sexually Dangerous Persons" laws.

Preventive detention is an imprisonment that is putatively justified for non-punitive purposes, most often to prevent further criminal acts.

In England and Wales, life imprisonment is a sentence that lasts until the death of the prisoner, although in most cases the prisoner will be eligible for parole after a minimum term set by the judge. In exceptional cases a judge may impose a "whole life order", meaning that the offender is never considered for parole, although they may still be released on compassionate grounds at the discretion of the home secretary. Whole life orders are usually imposed for aggravated murder, and can only be imposed where the offender was at least 21 years old at the time of the offence being committed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is a wide-ranging measure introduced to modernise many areas of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and, to a lesser extent, in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Large portions of the act were repealed and replaced by the Sentencing Act 2020.

In the United States, life imprisonment is the most severe punishment provided by law in states with no valid capital punishment statute, and second-most in those with a valid statute. According to a 2013 study, one of every 2,000 prison inhabitants of the U.S. were imprisoned for life as of 2012.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parole Board (England and Wales)</span>

The Parole Board was established in 1968 under the Criminal Justice Act 1967. It became an independent executive non-departmental public body (NDPB) on 1 July 1996 under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. The Parole Board is governed by the Parole Board Rules 2016 made by Parliament under the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Parole Board members are appointed by the Secretary of State for Justice, but are required to take judicial decisions independent of Government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York State Division of Parole</span> Law enforcement agency

The New York State Division of Parole was an agency of the government of New York within the New York State Correctional Services from 1930 to 2011. § 259. "1. There shall be in the executive department of state government a state division of parole" responsible for parole, the supervised release of a prisoner before the completion of his/her sentence. In 2011, the agency merged with the Department of Correctional Services to form the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision.

Indefinite imprisonment or indeterminate imprisonment is the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment with no definite period of time set during sentencing. It was imposed by certain nations in the past, before the drafting of the United Nations Convention against Torture (CAT). The length of an indefinite imprisonment was determined during imprisonment based on the inmate's conduct. The inmate could have been returned to society or be kept in prison for life.

In Germany, life imprisonment has an indeterminate length and is the most severe punishment that can be imposed. A person sentenced to life imprisonment may normally apply for parole after having served 15 years. If the parole court rejects the application, the inmate may reapply after a court determined blocking period no longer than two years. If the court has determined a "severe gravity of guilt" exists, parole is delayed for a non-specific period beyond 15 years.

Life imprisonment in Canada is a criminal sentence for certain offences that lasts for the offender’s life. Parole is possible, but even if paroled, the offender remains under the supervision of Corrections Canada for their lifetime, and can be returned to prison for parole violations.

A rehabilitation policy within criminology, is one intending to reform criminals rather than punish them and/or segregate them from the greater community.

An Order for Lifelong Restriction is a sentence that can be imposed by a judge of the High Court of Justiciary on serious violent and sexual offenders in Scotland. Such an order is an indeterminate sentence that will see the convict subject to indefinite imprisonment and supervision by electronic monitoring for the rest of their lives. An offender will only be released on licence where it is determined that the risks posed to the community can be correctly and safely managed.

The innocent prisoner's dilemma, or parole deal, is a detrimental effect of a legal system in which admission of guilt can result in reduced sentences or early parole. When an innocent person is wrongly convicted of a crime, legal systems which need the individual to admit guilt — as, for example, a prerequisite step leading to parole — punish an innocent person for their integrity, and reward a person lacking in integrity. There have been cases where innocent prisoners were given the choice between freedom, in exchange for claiming guilt, and remaining imprisoned and telling the truth. Individuals have died in prison rather than admit to crimes that they did not commit, including in the face of a plausible chance at release.

The New Zealand Parole Board is an independent statutory body established in 2002 that considers offenders for parole. Its task "is to undertake an assessment of the risk that long-term sentenced offenders might pose to the safety of the community if they were to be released before the end of their sentence". The Board also sets conditions of release for offenders so their reintegration back in to the community can be effectively managed. Once the conditions are set it becomes the responsibility of Community Corrections to manage the offender." 'Long term' is defined as more than 24 months. Short-term prisoners are automatically released after serving half their sentence.

Joseph McCann is an English serial rapist. In April and May 2019, McCann committed sexual attacks in Hertfordshire, London, Greater Manchester and Cheshire against 11 strangers, ranging in age from an 11-year-old boy to a 71-year-old woman. He evaded police, who suspect that he was sheltered by a "support network" across the country. For these crimes, he was tried at the Old Bailey and, on 6 December, convicted of 37 offences. Three days later, he was given 33 Life imprisonment#Europe|life sentences]].

References

  1. "Amau gwerth dedfrydau i ddiogelu'r cyhoedd". March 31, 2021 via www.bbc.com.
  2. Sentencing dangerous offenders. Crown Prosecution Service.
  3. "Imprisonment for Public Protection sentences and the pressure on the Parole Board". Select Committee on Justice Fifth Report. Parliament. 2008. Retrieved 2 May 2015.
  4. "High Court rules detention for indefinite sentence prisoners post-tariff is 'unlawful'". Garden Court North Chambers. 2007-07-31. Archived from the original on 2008-08-28. Retrieved 2010-01-26.
  5. Wells v The Parole Board & Anor [2007] EWHC 1835(QB) , [2008] 1 All ER 138, [2007] ACD 86(31 July 2007)
  6. Ford, Richard (August 1, 2007). "Dangerous inmates may go free after court ruling on indefinite sentences". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 2024-05-17.
  7. "Inspectors call for review of 'unsustainable' indefinite prison sentences". The Telegraph. London. 2010-05-04. Retrieved 2010-07-01.
  8. Lord Blunkett (15 November 2021). "Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill". Hansard.
  9. 1 2 3 Nicola Newson, Sentences of imprisonment for public protection: Updated action plan, House of Lords Library (May 19, 2023).
  10. 1 2 Barnes, Sophie (2012-09-18). "Indeterminate sentences: a 'stain' on the criminal justice system". The Guardian. London.
  11. 1 2 Nick Robinson (2011-06-21). "Sentence reform U-turn serves up hard cheese in prisons". BBC News.
  12. 1 2 3 Joshua Rozenberg (31 December 2015). "Gove's prison sentencing challenge". BBC News. Retrieved 31 December 2015.
  13. Prisoner 'suicidal' 11 years into 10-month jail term, BBC News (August 14, 2017).
  14. 1 2 3 Sammy Gecsoyler, UN highlights 'psychological harm' to UK man jailed since 2012 for phone theft. The Guardian (September 2, 2023).
  15. John Worboys case shone light on IPP injustice, The Guardian, 3 April 2018. Retrieved 9 August 2018
  16. Siddique, Haroon (28 November 2023). "Over 1,800 offenders to have indefinite jail sentences terminated, says MoJ". the Guardian. Retrieved 28 November 2023.