India and the International Monetary Fund

Last updated

India joined the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on December 27, 1945. [1] As a founding member, India has played a significant role in shaping the policies and functioning of the IMF over the decades. India's relationship with the IMF has been strengthened and is firmly tight because the IMF helps it overcome economic challenges and meet developmental needs. During the post-partition period, India faced significant balance of payments deficits, prompting the IMF to provide financial assistance to stabilize its economy.

Contents

Key financial engagements

Post-independence, India faced significant balance of payments challenges, particularly in the years following partition and during the conflicts with Pakistan in 1965 and 1971.The International Monetary Fund (IMF) provided crucial financial assistance during these periods to help stabilize the Indian economy. [2] In 1981, India received a substantial loan from the IMF to address a severe foreign exchange crisis, marking a period of significant financial engagement as the country grappled with persistent deficits. [3] In the early 1990s, India encountered another severe balance of payments crisis and sought the IMF's assistance. The support from the IMF contributed to stabilizing the economy by offering financial resources and policy recommendations. These recommendations included structural reforms such as the devaluation of the rupee, reduction of fiscal deficits, and liberalization of trade policies, which helped India overcome the crisis and set the stage for sustained economic growth. [4] India's proactive engagement with the IMF is evident in its response to the 1991 crisis. By adhering to the IMF's conditions, India implemented significant economic reforms, including the liberalization of its trade regime, deregulation, and privatizing state-owned enterprises. [5] These reforms played an important role in transforming India into one of the fastest-growing economies globally and enhancing its role in the international economic landscape.

Current status and contributions

India has not taken financial assistance from the IMF since 1993, completing all repayments by 2000. [6] This financial independence from IMF assistance highlights India's improved economic stability and resilience. India's current quota in the IMF stands at 13114.4 million Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), making it one of the largest contributors and giving it significant voting power. This quota determines India's financial commitment to the IMF and its voting power, which is 2.63% of the total voting shares. [7] India's financial obligations to IMF initiatives, such as the Notes Purchase Agreement (NPA) and the New Arrangement to Borrow (NAB), underscore its strategic role in supporting the IMF's lending capacity and global financial stability efforts. [8] Notably, during the 2009 London Summit of the Group of Twenty (G-20), India pledged to invest up to $10 billion through the Notes Purchase Agreement (NPA). [9] This investment supports the IMF's capacity to provide financial assistance globally.

Governance and representation

The Finance Minister of India serves as the ex-officio Governor on the Board of Governors of the IMF, with the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) acting as the Alternate Governor. [7] This high-level representation ensures that India's interests and perspectives are adequately voiced in IMF decisions. Its economic performance and quota contributions influence India's representation and voting power at the IMF. For example, the 14th General Review of Quotas, which came into effect in 2016, was a significant milestone where India's quota and voting power saw substantial adjustments. [10] Moreover, India's involvement in the IMF extends beyond financial contributions.The country has actively participated in policy discussions and decision-making processes, contributing to the formulation of global economic policies and mechanisms for financial stability. For example, India has emphasized the need for the IMF to consider the specific developmental needs and economic conditions of emerging markets when designing financial assistance programs and policy recommendations. [11]

Strategic importance

India's relationship with the IMF has been instrumental in navigating economic crises and implementing critical structural reforms. The independent scrutiny and advice from IMF specialists have significantly shaped India's financial policies and development strategies. This tailored approach to India's economic needs exemplifies the IMF's evolving role. During the 2008 global financial crisis, the IMF provided India with policy advice that helped mitigate the impact of the worldwide downturn. [8] This included measures to strengthen financial regulation and improve fiscal management, which were crucial in maintaining economic stability and promoting recovery. India's engagement with the IMF underscores its significant role in the global economic landscape. By actively participating in IMF initiatives and contributing to its resources, India has enhanced its influence in international financial affairs and strengthened its position as a significant global economy. For instance, India's liberalization policies post-1991, supported by the IMF, helped it emerge as a key exporter in various sectors, thereby gaining a stronger voice in international trade negotiations and forums. [4]

Criticism Of IMF Intervention

There are also lots of criticisms of the IMF intervention in developing countries. These criticisms mainly focus on the adverse effects of loan conditions. Structural adjustments mandated by the IMF often lead to increased poverty and inequality. For instance, privatization, trade liberalization, and fiscal austerity reforms tend to reduce government spending on social services, increase unemployment, and raise the costs of essential services. [12] These measures disproportionately affect the poorest segments of society, exacerbating poverty and social inequality. The one criticism connected with the Indian economy is that the IMF's interventions are often seen as one-size-fits-all solutions that do not consider the unique socio-economic contexts of the borrowing countries. In India, the IMF's emphasis on fiscal austerity and liberalization measures has sometimes led to economic destabilization rather than stabilization. For instance, the conditionality requiring fiscal consolidation can constrain public investment in critical sectors like health and education, vital for long-term economic growth and social stability. A critical study from the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore argues that the IMF's approach lacks customization and fails to address the specific needs and challenges of the Indian economy, leading to suboptimal outcomes. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Monetary Fund</span> International financial institution

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is a major financial agency of the United Nations, and an international financial institution funded by 190 member countries, with headquarters in Washington, D.C. It is regarded as the global lender of last resort to national governments, and a leading supporter of exchange-rate stability. Its stated mission is "working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global financial system</span> Global framework for capital flows

The global financial system is the worldwide framework of legal agreements, institutions, and both formal and informal economic action that together facilitate international flows of financial capital for purposes of investment and trade financing. Since emerging in the late 19th century during the first modern wave of economic globalization, its evolution is marked by the establishment of central banks, multilateral treaties, and intergovernmental organizations aimed at improving the transparency, regulation, and effectiveness of international markets. In the late 1800s, world migration and communication technology facilitated unprecedented growth in international trade and investment. At the onset of World War I, trade contracted as foreign exchange markets became paralyzed by money market illiquidity. Countries sought to defend against external shocks with protectionist policies and trade virtually halted by 1933, worsening the effects of the global Great Depression until a series of reciprocal trade agreements slowly reduced tariffs worldwide. Efforts to revamp the international monetary system after World War II improved exchange rate stability, fostering record growth in global finance.

In macroeconomics, a stabilization policy is a package or set of measures introduced to stabilize a financial system or economy. The term can refer to policies in two distinct sets of circumstances: business cycle stabilization or credit cycle stabilization. In either case, it is a form of discretionary policy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bretton Woods system</span> Financial-economic agreement reached in 1944

The Bretton Woods system of monetary management established the rules for commercial relations among the United States, Canada, Western European countries, and Australia and other countries, a total of 44 countries after the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement. The Bretton Woods system was the first example of a fully negotiated monetary order intended to govern monetary relations among independent states. The Bretton Woods system required countries to guarantee convertibility of their currencies into U.S. dollars to within 1% of fixed parity rates, with the dollar convertible to gold bullion for foreign governments and central banks at US$35 per troy ounce of fine gold. It also envisioned greater cooperation among countries in order to prevent future competitive devaluations, and thus established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to monitor exchange rates and lend reserve currencies to nations with balance of payments deficits.

John Harold Williamson was a British-born economist who coined the term Washington Consensus. He served as a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics from 1981 until his retirement in 2012. During that time, he was the project director for the United Nations High-Level Panel on Financing for Development in 2001. He was also on leave as chief economist for South Asia at the World Bank during 1996–99, adviser to the International Monetary Fund from 1972 to 1974, and an economic consultant to the UK Treasury from 1968 to 1970. He was also an economics professor at Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (1978–81), University of Warwick (1970–77), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of York (1963–68) and Princeton University (1962–63).

<i>Globalization and Its Discontents</i> 2002 non-fiction book by Joseph E. Stiglitz

Globalization and Its Discontents is a book published in 2002 by the 2001 Nobel laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz. The title is a reference to Freud's Civilization and Its Discontents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bank of Israel</span> Central bank of Israel

The Bank of Israel is the central bank of Israel. The bank's headquarters is located in Kiryat HaMemshala in Jerusalem with a branch office in Tel Aviv. The current governor is Amir Yaron.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bank of Korea</span> Central bank of South Korea

The Bank of Korea is the central bank of South Korea and issuer of South Korean won. It was established on 12 June 1950 in Seoul, South Korea.

Structural adjustment programs (SAPs) consist of loans provided by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) to countries that experience economic crises. Their stated purpose is to adjust the country's economic structure, improve international competitiveness, and restore its balance of payments.

A transition economy or transitional economy is an economy which is changing from a centrally planned economy to a market economy. Transition economies undergo a set of structural transformations intended to develop market-based institutions. These include economic liberalization, where prices are set by market forces rather than by a central planning organization. In addition to this trade barriers are removed, there is a push to privatize state-owned enterprises and resources, state and collectively run enterprises are restructured as businesses, and a financial sector is created to facilitate macroeconomic stabilization and the movement of private capital. The process has been applied in China, the former Soviet Union and Eastern bloc countries of Europe and some Third world countries, and detailed work has been undertaken on its economic and social effects.

The 1991 Indian economic crisis was an economic crisis in India resulting from a balance of payments deficit due to excess reliance on imports and other external factors. India's economic problems started worsening in 1985 as imports swelled, leaving the country in a twin deficit: the Indian trade balance was in deficit at a time when the government was running on a huge fiscal deficit.

Thailand joined the IMF on May 3, 1949 and has been the recipient of numerous IMF programs, most notably in its role as the source of contagion in the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Thailand currently has a quota of 3,211.9 million SDR's, which gives it the second most voting power in its constituency after Turkey. The IMF opened a technical assistance office in Thailand in 2012 to provide technical assistance and training to the Lao PDR and the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.

Mexico and the International Monetary Fund are the international relations between Mexico and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Mexico joined the IMF in 1945. As of 2022, Mexico has had 18 numbers of arraignment with the IMF.

Vietnam joined the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on September 21, 1956, under the policy of Article VIII. Their quota contributes an estimated SDR of 1,153 millions and voting power of 0.24%. As of August 2016, the current IMF Resident Representative to Vietnam is Jonathan Dunn.

Iceland joined the International Monetary Fund on Dec 27th 1945, becoming one of the IMF's founding members. As a part of the IMF, Iceland has rights in accordance with its contributions, borrowing rights which help facilitate the stability of global financial markets. Iceland's quota is 321.8 million SDR, and its Special Drawing Rights are 112 million. This is a relatively small quota and its vote share comprises only 0.09% of all IMF vote shares, or 4,683 votes to be exact.

South Korea and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) partner together to assist the country in managing its financial system. South Korea's economy is considered fundamentally sound because of the balance of their banking sector and their aim toward a zero structural balance without compromising their ability to sustain debt. The IMF Board in 2019 assessed that the policy framework and financial system in place are sturdy and firmly set.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Belarus and the International Monetary Fund</span>

Belarus and the International Monetary Fund cover the relations between the country of Belarus and the International Monetary Fund. The Republic of Belarus became a member of the International Monetary Fund on July 10, 1992, and has since taken out a significant amount of loans to stabilize its economy, manage the balance of payments and deal with hyperinflation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International Monetary Fund</span>

Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International Monetary Fund are the relations between the country of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Bosnia and Herzegovina declared independence from the state formerly known as Yugoslavia in 1992 and joined the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on December 14, 1992.

Japan joined the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on August 13, 1952. Since then, Japan has sustained a stable relationship with the IMF and supported the Fund's various work, including analysis, policy advice, financial assistance, notable technical assistance support, and capacity development.

Serbia has been a member of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since December 14, 2022 with a quota of Special Drawing Rights (SDR) 654.8 million and 8,0007 votes. Serbia is currently represented on the Executive Board by Piotr Trabinski in a constituency with Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Poland, Serbia, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan that holds 2.88% of the total vote share.

References

  1. ↑ "India and the IMF". IMF. Retrieved 2024-07-29.
  2. ↑ Jalan, Bimal (1993). India's Economic Crisis: The Way Ahead. Oxford University Press.
  3. ↑ International Monetary Fund (1981). "International Monetary Fund Annual Report 1981". Annual Report of the Executive Board. doi:10.5089/9781616351939.011. ISBN   978-1-61635-193-9. ISSN   2227-8915.
  4. 1 2 Yazawa, Nobuo (2023-08-01). Radulescu, Magdalena (ed.). "Dynamics of international Trade: A 30-year analysis of key exporting nations". PLOS ONE. 18 (8): e0289040. Bibcode:2023PLoSO..1889040Y. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289040 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   10393138 . PMID   37527258.
  5. ↑ Eichengreen, Barry (March 2019). "Trade Policy and the Macroeconomy". IMF Economic Review. 67 (1): 4–23. doi:10.1057/s41308-018-0053-9. ISSN   2041-4161.
  6. ↑ "History of Lending Commitments: India". www.imf.org. Retrieved 2024-07-28.
  7. 1 2 "IMF Members' Quotas and Voting Power, and IMF Board of Governors". IMF. Retrieved 2024-07-29.
  8. 1 2 Georgieva, Kristalina; Weeks-Brown, Rhoda (2023-03-09). "The IMF's Evolving Role Within a Constant Mandate". Journal of International Economic Law. 26 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgac064. ISSN   1369-3034.
  9. ↑ "Press Release: IMF Signs US$10 Billion Note Purchase Agreement with India". IMF. Retrieved 2024-07-28.
  10. ↑ Woods, Ngaire (2005-11-01), "Making the IMF and the World Bank More Accountable", Reforming the Governance of the IMF and the World Bank, Anthem Press, pp. 149–170, doi:10.7135/upo9780857288189.008, ISBN   978-0-85728-818-9 , retrieved 2024-07-28
  11. ↑ Reddy, Y. V. (2011). India and the International Monetary Fund: The Balancing Act. Economic and Political Weekly. pp. 46(36), 34–38.
  12. ↑ Biglaiser, Glen; McGauvran, Ronald J. (2022-09-01). "The effects of IMF loan conditions on poverty in the developing world". Journal of International Relations and Development. 25 (3): 806–833. doi:10.1057/s41268-022-00263-1. ISSN   1581-1980. PMC   9172087 . PMID   35694682.
  13. ↑ Mandal, Sourabh; Singh, Shrey (2017). "Does the IMF intervention really help the economies in crises? A critical study of the IMF's lending conditionality".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.