Inkshed

Last updated

Inkshed (later CASLL, the Canadian Association for the Study of Language and Learning]) was a Canadian organization of teachers and scholars of writing and reading, predominantly in postsecondary institutions. It effectively began in 1982 with the publication of a newsletter, which continued in various forms until 2015. [1] The first national "Inkshed Working Conference" was held in Fredericton, New Brunswick, in August 1984, and annual conferences were held in various Canadian cities until 2015. [2]

Contents

The organization's aims, as codified when it was incorporated, in 1994, were "to provide a forum and common context for discussion, collaboration, and reflective inquiry in discourse and pedagogy in the areas of writing, reading (including the reading of literature), rhetoric, and language." [3]

The name "Inkshed" was proposed by co-founder James A. Reither, who found it in the Oxford English Dictionary as a "humorous" word, meaning "the shedding or spilling of ink; consumption or waste of ink in writing." [4] He and Russell A. Hunt, the other co-founder, explained that it was their intention to make "freewriting," a strategy popularized by composition theorist Peter Elbow, into "something dialogically transactional" [5] by embedding the writing into situations, usually in classrooms, where the freewritten texts were immediately read by others, in search of ideas or insights that impromptu writing might generate. The Inkshed conferences used this strategy in various ways over the years, the common thread being that written texts were created and read immediately, and stood in for—and underlay and promoted—some part of the oral discussion that usually characterizes academic gatherings. [6]

Context

Inkshed's origin has been characterized as in part a reaction among Canadian teachers of English to the widespread advent of the (often required) introductory composition course in US universities, [7] and the concomitant growth there of the "comp industry." As more courses were offered, more faculty was hired, more pressure exerted on young faculty to publish, more conferences in which to collaborate and present, more organizations to sponsor such conferences and more journals in which to publish. In Canada such an institution never did develop. [8] At the time of Inkshed's founding, the vast majority of first-year English courses in Canadian universities were identified as introductions to literature, and while it was often tacitly assumed that learning to write was something that such courses would afford, little attention was paid to issues at the forefront of theory and scholarship such as the cognitive processes of composition, and introductory composition courses were rare. [9] Thus, for Inkshed, in contrast to the situation in the U.S., there was no pre-existing constituency of composition teachers and thus no supporting infrastructure. [10] Canadian teachers and scholars who, for whatever reasons, were concerned with the teaching and learning of writing, typically found colleagues and collaborators by attending American conferences and reading American journals.

History

Inkshed began as an occasional newsletter, the W&R/T&P (Writing and Reading, Theory and Practice) Newsletter, circulated by mail to a group of a hundred or so subscribers. Within a year, circulation was over 250, and it was rechristened Inkshed. Eventually there were several hundred subscribers, and issues came out six times during the academic year. The associated online listserv discussion group [11] had accumulated a subscription list in the hundreds, and served as a venue for often intense and extended discussions of contentious issues, some of which were edited and published in the newsletter or online. One, for example, was an extended online conversation about the nature of inkshedding itself, which appeared in reformatted form in the February 1994 issue of the newsletter. [12] The annual conferences, usually in loose association with meetings of CCTE (the Canadian Council of Teachers of English) or the "Learneds" (the annual national meeting of university faculty, since renamed the Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences) had become an important venue for teachers and theorists to explore at length new ideas about the teaching and learning of literacy at every level. [13]

In 1994 the organization gave rise to a new initiative, Inkshed Publications, which was to become the only academic publisher of peer-reviewed books focused on Canadian writing and teaching studies, [14] publishing eleven books over the next quarter century, the two most recent in 2017. [15]

By the end of the 90s, however, the newsletter was reduced to two or three issues a year, and in 2009 it ceased publication altogether, with an issue featuring two reviews of a book detailing the life and lingering death of a bellwether writing program at a major Canadian university. [16] About the same time, the Canadian Association of Teachers of Technical Writing broadened its focus, transforming itself into the Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing, and a new association, the Canadian Writing Centre Association, also emerged. [17] This meant there were more outlets for discussion of the place of writing in Canadian universities, and more conferences. Although an online-only version of the newsletter was revived in 2012, [18] participation in online and other discussion of the kind Inkshed had fostered was declining. The CASLL list, like other similar lists, saw less sustained multivoiced discussion and an increasing proportion of institutional announcements. The final issue of Inkshed appeared just before the last conference, in Ottawa, in May 2015. [19] In 2018 the inkshed.ca Web site disappeared, and the remaining archives of the organization moved to the Web site of the Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing, who had offered to host them.

Legacy

The influence of Inkshed is felt in the continuing, active presence of Inkshed Publications, and as well in the publications and documents of the scholars and teachers involved. The ideas are still regularly revived and explored in new contexts. [20] The larger influence of the organization is found primarily in its role in the paradigm shift which theory and practice of literacy teaching underwent beginning in the 1980s. [21] This shift entailed a new recognition that writing and reading were complex processes which could be more deeply understood, and that the processes were not merely cognitive processes, occurring in isolated minds, but social events, shaped by the circumstances and participants. [22] It has been argued that Inkshed participants like Anthony Paré were at the forefront of this increasing awareness, and that many members of the organization over the years have been instrumental in this process of collaborative discovery. More generally, It has been argued that Inkshed was at the forefront of the movement away from "process-based" models of writing to external, transactive and social ones. [23]

Related Research Articles

Collaborative writing is a procedure in which two or more persons work together on a text of some kind. Success in collaborative writing involves a division of labor that apportions particular tasks to those with particular strengths: drafting, providing feedback, editing, sourcing, (reorganizing), optimizing for tone or house style, etc. Collaborative writing is characteristic of professional as well as educational settings, utilizing the expertise of those involved in the collaboration process.

The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) is a United States professional organization dedicated to "improving the teaching and learning of English and the language arts at all levels of education. Since 1911, NCTE has provided a forum for the profession, an array of opportunities for teachers to continue their professional growth throughout their careers, and a framework for cooperation to deal with issues that affect the teaching of English." In addition, the NCTE describes its mission as follows:

The Council promotes the development of literacy, the use of language to construct personal and public worlds and to achieve full participation in society, through the learning and teaching of English and the related arts and sciences of language.

Computers and writing is a sub-field of college English studies about how computers and digital technologies affect literacy and the writing process. The range of inquiry in this field is broad including discussions on ethics when using computers in writing programs, how discourse can be produced through technologies, software development, and computer-aided literacy instruction. Some topics include hypertext theory, visual rhetoric, multimedia authoring, distance learning, digital rhetoric, usability studies, the patterns of online communities, how various media change reading and writing practices, textual conventions, and genres. Other topics examine social or critical issues in computer technology and literacy, such as the issues of the "digital divide", equitable access to computer-writing resources, and critical technological literacies. Many studies by scientists have shown that writing on computer is better than writing in a book

The Conference on College Composition and Communication is a national professional association of college and university writing instructors in the United States. The CCCC formed in 1949 as an organization within the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE). CCCC is the largest organization dedicated to writing research, theory, and teaching worldwide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second language writing</span>

Second language writing is the study of writing performed by non-native speakers/writers of a language as a second or foreign language. According to Oxford University, second language writing is the expression of one's actions and what one wants to say in writing in a language other than one's native language. The process of second language writing has been an area of research in applied linguistics and second language acquisition theory since the middle of the 20th century. The focus has been mainly on second-language writing in academic settings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Writing process</span> Process in which words and phrases are formed to produce a text

A writing process is a set of mental and physical steps that someone takes to create any type of text. Almost always, these activities require inscription equipment, either digital or physical: chisels, pencils, brushes, chalk, dyes, keyboards, touchscreens, etc.; each of these tools has unique affordances that influence writers' workflows. Writing processes are very individualized and task-specific; they frequently incorporate activities such as talking, drawing, reading, browsing, and other activities that are not typically associated with writing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Composition studies</span>

Composition studies is the professional field of writing, research, and instruction, focusing especially on writing at the college level in the United States.

Linda Flower is a composition theorist. She is best known for her emphasis on cognitive rhetoric, but has more recently published in the field of service learning. Flower currently serves Carnegie Mellon University as a professor of rhetoric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First-year composition</span> Introductory core curriculum writing course in US colleges and universities

First-year composition is an introductory core curriculum writing course in US colleges and universities. This course focuses on improving students' abilities to write in a university setting and introduces students to writing practices in the disciplines and professions. These courses are traditionally required of incoming students, thus the previous name, "Freshman Composition." Scholars working within the field of composition studies often have teaching first-year composition (FYC) courses as the practical focus of their scholarly work.

David John Bartholomae was an American scholar in composition studies. He received his PhD from Rutgers University in 1975 and was a Professor of English and former Chair of the English Department at the University of Pittsburgh. His primary research interests are in composition, literacy, and pedagogy, and his work engages scholarship in rhetoric and in American literature/American Studies. His articles and essays have appeared in publications such as PMLA, Critical Quarterly, and College Composition and Communication.

Feminist theory in composition studies examines how gender, language, and cultural studies affect the teaching and practice of writing. It challenges the traditional assumptions and methods of composition studies and proposes alternative approaches that are informed by feminist perspectives. Feminist theory in composition studies covers a range of topics, such as the history and development of women's writing, the role of gender in rhetorical situations, the representation and identity of writers, and the pedagogical implications of feminist theory for writing instruction. Feminist theory in composition studies also explores how writing can be used as a tool for empowerment, resistance, and social change. Feminist theory in composition studies emerged in the late 1960s and early 1970s as a response to the male-dominated field of composition and rhetoric. It has been influenced by various feminist movements and disciplines, such as second-wave feminism, poststructuralism, psychoanalysis, critical race theory, and queer theory. Feminist theory in composition studies has contributed to the revision of traditional rhetorical concepts, the recognition of diverse voices and genres, the promotion of collaborative and ethical communication, and the integration of personal and political issues in writing.

English studies is an academic discipline taught in primary, secondary, and post-secondary education in English-speaking countries. This is not to be confused with English taught as a foreign language, which is a distinct discipline. The English studies discipline involves the study, analysis, and exploration of English literature through texts.

Jimmie Wayne Corder was a scholar of rhetoric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theories of rhetoric and composition pedagogy</span>

Theories of rhetoric and composition pedagogy encompass a wide range of interdisciplinary fields centered on the instruction of writing. Noteworthy to the discipline is the influence of classical Ancient Greece and its treatment of rhetoric as a persuasive tool. Derived from the Greek work for public speaking, rhetoric's original concern dealt primarily with the spoken word. In the treatise Rhetoric, Aristotle identifies five Canons of the field of rhetoric: invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery. Since its inception in the spoken word, theories of rhetoric and composition have focused primarily on writing

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visual rhetoric and composition</span>

The study and practice of visual rhetoric took a more prominent role in the field of composition studies towards the end of the twentieth century and onward. Proponents of its inclusion in composition typically point to the increasingly visual nature of society, and the increasing presence of visual texts. Literacy, they argue, can no longer be limited only to written text and must also include an understanding of the visual.

TESOL Quarterly is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of TESOL International Association. It covers English language teaching and learning, standard English as a second dialect, including articles on the psychology and sociology of language learning and teaching, professional preparation, curriculum development, and testing and evaluation. The editors-in-chief are Charlene Polio and Peter De Costa, both at Michigan State University. TESOL also publishes TESOL Journal.

Andrea A. Lunsford is an American writer and scholar who specializes in the field of composition and rhetoric studies. She is the director of the Program in Writing and Rhetoric (PWR) and the Louise Hewlett Nixon Professor of English Emerita at Stanford University. She is also a faculty member at the Bread Loaf School of English. Lunsford received her B.A. and M.A. at the University of Florida and completed her Ph.D. in English at the Ohio State University in 1977. Lunsford has served as Chair of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC), as Chair of the Modern Language Association (MLA) Division on Writing, and as a member of the MLA Executive Council.

Martin Nystrand is an American composer and education theorist. He is Louise Durham Mead Professor Emeritus in the Department of English at the University of Wisconsin–Madison and Professor Emeritus of Education at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Virginia M. Burke was a pioneering scholar of composition and Black literature at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She was a previous president of the Wisconsin Council of Teachers of English.

Janet Emig was an American composition scholar. She is known for her groundbreaking 1971 study The Composing Process of Twelfth Graders, which contributed to the development of the process theory of composition. Her article, "Writing as a Mode of Learning" (1977) is also frequently cited and anthologized by the Writing Across the Curriculum movement.

References

  1. ↑ Archive of the newsletter: https://casdw-acr.ca/resources/casllinkshed-archives/
  2. ↑ List of all Inkshed conferences: https://casdwacr.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/inkshed-conferences.pdf
  3. ↑ The CASLL constitution: https://casdwacr.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/casll-constitution.pdf
  4. ↑ Oxford English Dictionary"
  5. ↑ Russell A. Hunt, “What is Inkshedding?” Conversations about Writing: Eavesdropping, Inkshedding, and Joining In, Ed. M. Elizabeth Sargent and Cornelia Paraskevas. Toronto: Nelson Thompson, 2005. 134-141.
  6. ↑ Mary-Louise Craven, "Inkshed Conferences: Transforming the Conference into a Conversation." Textual Studies in Canada 6 (1996), 82-87. <http://people.stu.ca/~hunt/inkshed/TSC%201999%20Craven.pdf>
  7. ↑ "In contrast to the much documented rise of the 'Freshman Composition' course in English departments in the United States, the twentieth-century Canadian academy has never embraced the curricular concept of the 'Comp' class per se." -- Nan Johnson, "Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the Canadian Academy: An Historical Analysis," College English 50:8 (December 1988), 869.
  8. ↑ "Even though scholars working in Canada during the 1980s could rearticulate composition as humanistic study, they were unable to remove composition from the discursive field of practicality, popular culture, and Americanization." -- Kevin Brooks, "National Culture and the First-Year English Curriculum: A Historical Study of 'Composition' in Canadian Universities." The American Review of Canadian Studies (Winter 2002): 673-694.
  9. ↑ Roger Graves, “Composition in Canadian Universities.” Written Communication 10:1 (January 1993): 72-105.
  10. ↑ "first-year composition in the United States has given composition and rhetoric an identity and institutional place," whereas in Canada scholars had to "find institutional places for themselves and their work by collaborating with or joining other disciplines." -- Andrea Williams, "Voicing Scholars' Networked Identities through Interviews," Cross-Border Networks in Writing Studies, by Derek Mueller, Andrea Williams, Louise Wetherbee Phelps, and Jennifer Clary-Lemon (Inkshed Publications / Parlor Press, 2017, p. 47.
  11. ↑ Archive of CASLL-L from 1995: https://listserv.utoronto.ca/cgi-bin/wa?A0=CASLL-L
  12. ↑ "What is 'Inkshedding'? CASLL E-Mail /Excerpts." <https://casdwacr.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/inkshednewsletter12-3-1994-02.pdf>
  13. ↑ Andrea Lunsford, for example, comments that "The first Inkshed conference . . . introduced me to many other scholar/teachers of writing studies, and I continued to attend that groundbreaking conference for years." "Afterword," in Derek Mueller, Andrea Williams, Louise Wetherbee Phelps, and Jennifer Clary-Lemon, Cross-Border Networks in Writing Studies (Inkshed and Parlor Press, 2017), pp. 180-81.
  14. ↑ "Other than the Inkshed/CASLL Press, paid for by membership dues, Canada has no scholarly press devoted to the discipline, which stands in marked contrast to the variety of publishers that put out monographs and collections on American rhetoric and composition scholarship" -- Jennifer Clary-Lemon, "Shifting Tradition: Writing Research in Canada," American Review of Canadian Studies 39.2 (June 2009), 101.
  15. ↑ Roger Graves and Teresa Hyland, Writing Assignments Across University Disciplines (Inkshed Press, 2017), and Derek Mueller, Andrea Williams, Louise Wetherbee Phelps, and Jennifer Clary-Lemon, Cross-Border Networks in Writing Studies (Inkshed and Parlor Press, 2017).
  16. ↑ Inkshed: Newsletter of the Canadian Association for the Study of Language and Learning 25:2 (Winter 2009), 5-13. <https://casdwacr.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/inkshednewsletter25-2-2009-winterl.pdf>
  17. ↑ Margaret Procter, ”Inkshed and Canadian Writing Centres,”WLN: A Journal of Writing Center Scholarship Blog <https://www.wlnjournal.org/blog/2018/10/inkshed-and-canadian-writing-centres/>
  18. ↑ "Inkshed Newsletters: The Online Years". 27 January 2018.
  19. ↑ https://casdwacr.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/inkshedonlinenewsletter-2015-05.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  20. ↑ Pat Thomson, “Patter.” Blog. April 23, 2015. “Collective Free Writing – Inkshedding” Online: <https://patthomson.net/2015/04/23/4154/>; Stephen Volk, “Inksheds and Eggshells.” Center for Teaching Innovation & Excellence, Oberlin College. Blog. Online: <http://languages.oberlin.edu/blogs/ctie/tag/inkshedding/>
  21. ↑ John Trimbur, "Taking the Social Turn: Teaching Writing Post-Process." College Composition and Communication 45:1 (February 1994) 108-118.
  22. ↑ Anthony Paré, "Toward a Post-Process Pedagogy; or What's Theory Got to Do with It?" English Quarterly 26:2 (Winter 1994), 4-9.
  23. ↑ Kristopher Lotier, "Oh, Canada: The Birth of Postprocess North of the Border," PostProcess Postmortem (University Press of Colorado, 2021), 91-116. <https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/postprocess/chapter4.pdf/>
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.