Janowiec and Others v. Russia

Last updated

Janowiec and Others v. Russia (also sometimes known as the Katyn case) [1] was a case brought before the European Court of Human Rights in 2007 and concluded in 2013 concerning the issue of human right violations in the context of the Katyn massacre. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Background

In 1940, Stalin ordered the execution of over 20,000 Polish prisoners-of-war and prison inmates in what became known as the Katyn massacre, a crime that the Soviet Union denied until 1990. The case concerned whether Russia violated the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2004 by discontinuing the investigation and by classifying some documents, including about the reasons for the case being closed. [5] [6] The case was brought to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) by a number of victims' families, which unsuccessfully demanded access to the classified documents. [5] The case has been described as about the right to know the fate of the family members and the right to obtain a thorough investigation into the related crime. [5]

Verdict

The case received a ruling by the ECtHR Chamber in 2012 and by its Grand Chamber in 2013. [7] The Chamber rejected all but one of the claims of the applications ( reformatio in peius ), who referred the case to the Grand Chamber, which in turn concluded that it has "no competence" in the area, as the massacre occurred in 1940, before the ECHR was adopted over a decade later in 1953 and that Russia ratified only in 1998. [5] [6] It, however, criticised Russia for failing to provide evidence and satisfactory rationale for classification of the documents. [6] [8] [9]

Four justices dissented, stating that "a failure to prosecute war crimes that would 'turn the applicants' long history of justice delayed into a permanent case of justice denied'" [8] [10] [11] and that it makes ECtHR a failure as the "conscience" court of Europe that it was intended to be. [12] [13]

Analysis

The final verdict has been criticised by a number of scholars. Gabriella Citroni called it a "denial of justice", [7] and Yaroslav Kozheurov noted that it showed the court's "unwillingness to deal in detail with the black pages of Europe's past". [14] Susana Sanz-Caballero noted that the ECHR had "interpreted its own competence in a very restrictive manner" and ignored its other options. [5] Julia Koch noted that such options included international customary law, and she described the court's refusal to consider "unfortunate" and to result in the court failing to "protect the rights of the prisoners and their relatives" and holding "Russia accountable for its gross violation of human rights". [15] William Schabas concluded that the limited temporal view of ECHR as applicable only to events that took place after it was drafted in 1950 "is questionable, [...] the reasoning behind it is dubious, and [...] the result is a regrettable confirmation of a situation of impunity". [16]

Susana Sanz-Caballero noted that the case caused "astonishment [and] outrage" in Poland. [5]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Court of Human Rights</span> Supranational court established by the Council of Europe

The European Court of Human Rights, also known as the Strasbourg Court, is an international court of the Council of Europe which interprets the European Convention on Human Rights. The court hears applications alleging that a contracting state has breached one or more of the human rights enumerated in the convention or its optional protocols to which a member state is a party. The European Convention on Human Rights is also referred to by the initials "ECHR". The court is based in Strasbourg, France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Welfare Party</span> Islamist political party in Turkey

The Welfare Party was an Islamist political party in Turkey. It was founded by Ali Türkmen, Ahmet Tekdal, and Necmettin Erbakan in Ankara in 1983 as heir to two earlier parties, National Order Party (MNP) and National Salvation Party (MSP), which were banned from politics. The RP participated in mayoral elections at that time and won in three cities Konya, Şanlıurfa, and Van. Their vote percentage was approximately 5%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Katyn massacre</span> Soviet massacre of Polish military officers and intelligentsia in 1940

The Katyn massacre was a series of mass executions of nearly 22,000 Polish military officers and intelligentsia prisoners of war carried out by the Soviet Union, specifically the NKVD in April and May 1940. Though the killings also occurred in the Kalinin and Kharkiv prisons and elsewhere, the massacre is named after the Katyn forest, where some of the mass graves were first discovered by German Nazi forces.

Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibits torture, and "inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".

Article 3 – Prohibition of torture

No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

The European Union's (EU) Treaty of Lisbon, in force since 1 December 2009, requires the EU to accede to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Article 6 of the consolidated Treaty on European Union states "The Union shall accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Such accession shall not affect the Union's competences as defined in the Treaties." The EU would thus be subject to its human rights law and external monitoring as its member states currently are. It is further proposed that the EU join as a member of the Council of Europe now that it has attained a single legal personality in the Lisbon Treaty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latvian Human Rights Committee</span>

Latvian Human Rights Committee is a non-governmental human rights organization in Latvia. It is a member of international human rights and anti-racism NGOs FIDH, AEDH. Co-chairpersons of LHRC are Vladimir Buzayev and Natalia Yolkina. According to the authors of the study "Ethnopolitics in Latvia", former CBSS Commissioner on Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Ole Espersen "had visited LHRC various times and had used mostly the data of that organisation in his views on Latvia".

Christos Rozakis is a Greek judge, and currently the President of the Administrative Tribunal of the Council of Europe. He was formerly the first vice-president of the European Court of Human Rights. In 1996, he also served briefly as a Deputy Foreign Minister of Greece.

Tănase v. Moldova was a case decided by the European Court of Human Rights in 2010.

X and Others v. Austria, Application No. 19010/07, was a human rights case that was decided in 2013 by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The case concerned whether the Government of Austria had discriminated against Austrian citizens who were in same-sex relationships because the wording of the Austrian Civil Code did not permit unmarried same-sex couples access to legally granted second-parent adoptions, whereas it was available to unmarried heterosexual couples.

Perinçek v. Switzerland is a 2013 judgment of the European Court of Human Rights concerning public statements by Doğu Perinçek, a nationalist political activist and member of the Talat Pasha Committee, who was convicted by a Swiss court for publicly denying the Armenian genocide.

Opinion 2/13 (2014) is an EU law case determined by the European Court of Justice, concerning the accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights, and more generally the relationship between the European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights.

Zakharov v. Russia was a 2015 court case before the European Court of Human Rights involving Roman Zakharov and the Russian Federation. The Court ruled that Russia's legal provisions governing communications surveillance did not provide adequate safeguards against arbitrariness or abuse, and that therefore a violation took place of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Right to truth</span> Right for victims to know what happened

Right to truth is the right, in the case of grave violations of human rights, for the victims and their families or societies to have access to the truth of what happened. The right to truth is closely related to, but distinct from, the state obligation to investigate and prosecute serious state violations of human rights. Right to truth is a form of victims' rights; it is especially relevant to transitional justice in dealing with past abuses of human rights. In 2006, Yasmin Naqvi concluded that the right to truth "stands somewhere on the threshold of a legal norm and a narrative device ... somewhere above a good argument and somewhere below a clear legal rule".

Fedotova and Others v. Russia was a case submitted by six Russian nationals to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

Azerbaijan has been a member of the Council of Europe, an international organization that focuses on strengthening democracy and human rights, since 2001. As a member, it has attracted attention for holding political prisoners, low implementation of verdicts of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and bribing Council of Europe parliamentarians to suppress negative information about its human rights record. In 2017, the Committee of Ministers launched the first ever infringement proceeding against Azerbaijan after it refused to release opposition politician Ilgar Mammadov after a 2014 ECtHR verdict that his imprisonment was unlawful. There has also been criticism of Azerbaijan's continued membership by those who believe its lack of human rights protection undermines the credibility of the Council of Europe.

Bayev and Others v. Russia was a case brought to the European Court of Human Rights by three Russian activists—Nikolay Bayev, Aleksei Aleksandrovich Kiselev, and Nikolay Alekseyev—alleging that the Russian gay propaganda law infringed on their freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. On 20 June 2017, the court ruled that the applicants' freedom of expression had been compromised. The only dissent was from Dmitry Dedov, the judge elected with respect to Russia.

Baka v. Hungary was a case of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) heard by the second section of the court in 2014 and the Grand Chamber in 2016. Both the section and the Grand Chamber found that Hungary had violated the rights of András Baka, the former head of Hungary's supreme court who was dismissed after criticizing the government's judicial reforms.

Darian Pavli is judge at the European Court of Human Rights with respect to Albania since 7 January 2019.

References

  1. ↑ Bogush, Gleb (2016-07-29). "Russia and International Criminal Law". Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online. 15 (1): 169–180. doi:10.1163/22115897-90000064b. ISSN   2211-5897.
  2. ↑ Kaminski, Ireneusz (2013-07-25). "Amicus Curiae Briefs in Janowiec and Others v. Russia". Polish Yearbook of International Law. Rochester, NY. 32: 325–400. SSRN   2500791.
  3. ↑ Jopek-Bosiacka, Anna (2016-01-01). "The Katyń court case: Stories about history, politics, and words". Journal of Argumentation in Context. 5 (3): 271–314. doi:10.1075/jaic.5.3.03jop. ISSN   2211-4742.
  4. ↑ Kaminski, Ireneusz C. (2013). "The Katyń Massacre before the European Court of Human Rights: A Personal Account". Polish Yearbook of International Law (33): 205–226. ISSN   0554-498X.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sanz-Caballero, Susana (2013). "How Could It Go So Wrong? Reformatio in Peius before the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in the Case Janowiec and Others v. Russia". Polish Yearbook of International Law (33): 259–278. ISSN   0554-498X.
  6. 1 2 3 "Poland disappointed with European ruling over the 1940 Katyn massacre". Reuters. 2013-10-21. Retrieved 2020-10-23.
  7. 1 2 Citroni, Gabriella (2014-07-28). "Janowiec and Others v. Russia: A Long History of Justice Delayed Turned into a Permanent Case of Justice Denied". Polish Yearbook of International Law. Rochester, NY. 33. SSRN   2473117.
  8. 1 2 Dolgov, Anna (2013-10-21). "Katyn Massacre Case Thrown Out by Human Rights Court". The Moscow Times. Retrieved 2020-10-23.
  9. ↑ "Europe court criticises Russia over Katyn massacre inquiry". BBC News. 2013-10-21. Retrieved 2020-10-23.
  10. ↑ Citroni, Gabriella (2013). "Janowiec and Others v. Russia: A Long History of Justice Delayed Turned into a Permanent Case of Justice Denied". Polish Yearbook of International Law (33): 279–294. ISSN   0554-498X.
  11. ↑ Kamiński, Ireneusz C. (2015-11-01). "The Katyń Massacres before the European Court of Human Rights: From Justice Delayed to Justice Permanently Denied". East European Politics and Societies. 29 (4): 784–810. doi:10.1177/0888325415595076. ISSN   0888-3254. S2CID   147871908.
  12. ↑ Berber Bevernage; Nico Wouters (3 February 2018). The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945. Springer. pp. 111–. ISBN   978-1-349-95306-6.
  13. ↑ Nanci Adler (22 June 2018). Understanding the Age of Transitional Justice: Crimes, Courts, Commissions, and Chronicling. Rutgers University Press. pp. 68–69. ISBN   978-0-8135-9778-2.
  14. ↑ Kozheurov, Yaroslav (2013). "The Case of Janowiec and Others v. Russia: Relinquishment of Jurisdiction in Favour of the Court of History". Polish Yearbook of International Law (33): 227–246. ISSN   0554-498X.
  15. ↑ Koch, Julia (2015-04-14). "The Difficulty of Temporal Jurisdiction in Janowiec and Others v. Russia". Boston College International and Comparative Law Review. 38 (3): E. Supp. 43.
  16. ↑ Schabas, William (2013). "Do the "Underlying Values" of the European Convention on Human Rights Begin in 1950?". Polish Yearbook of International Law (33): 247–258. ISSN   0554-498X.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.