Javins v. First National Realty Corp.

Last updated
Javins v. First National Realty Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Seal.svg
Court United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Full case nameEthel Javins v. First National Realty Corporation
Argued January 16 1970
Decided May 7 1970
Citation(s) 428 F.2d 1071
Holding
A warranty of habitability, measured by the standards set out in the DC Housing Regulations, was implied by law into leases of urban dwelling units, and breach of the warranty gave rise to a breach of contract claim.
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Circuit Judges James Skelly Wright, Carl E. McGowan, Roger Robb
Case opinions
Majority James Skelly Wright

Javins v. First National Realty Corp., 428 F.2d 1071 (D.C. Cir. 1970), was a case decided by the D.C. Circuit that first established the warranty of habitability in landlord–tenant law. The court determined that if the premises become uninhabitable, the tenant is freed from their obligation to pay rent. [1]

A legal case is a dispute between opposing parties resolved by a court, or by some equivalent legal process. A legal case may be either civil or criminal law. In each legal case there is an accuser and one or more defendants.

Habitability is the conformance of a residence or abode to the implied warranty of habitability. A residence that complies is said to be habitable. It is an implied warranty or contract, meaning it does not have to be an express contract, covenant, or provision of a contract. There was no implied warranty of habitability for tenants at common law and the legal doctrine has since developed in many jurisdictions through housing laws and regulations. Habitability is synonymous with tenantability.

Landlord–tenant law

Landlord–tenant law is a part of the common law that details the rights and duties of landlords and tenants. It includes elements of both real property law and contract law.

Tenants of Washington, D.C.'s Clifton Terrace Apartments, including Ethel Javins, Rudolph Saunders and Stanley Gross, had refused to pay their rent due to the conditions in the building complex. First National Realty sued those three, as well as other rent strikers, for possession. The first trial took place on June 17, 1966. The tenants attempted to introduce evidence that the dwellings were uninhabitable, including bags of mouse feces, dead mice, roaches and the testimony of a housing inspector that there were more than 1000 code violations. However, Judge Austin L. Fickling disallowed the evidence, and ruled in favor of First National Realty. [2]

Washington, D.C. Capital of the United States

Washington, D.C., formally the District of Columbia and commonly referred to as Washington or D.C., is the capital of the United States. Founded after the American Revolution as the seat of government of the newly independent country, Washington was named after George Washington, first President of the United States and Founding Father. As the seat of the United States federal government and several international organizations, Washington is an important world political capital. The city is also one of the most visited cities in the world, with more than 20 million tourists annually.

Clifton Terrace

Clifton Terrace are historic structures located in the Columbia Heights neighborhood in the Northwest Quadrant of Washington, D.C. Frank Russell White and Albert Moreland Schneider designed the three building apartment complex in the Colonial Revival style. They were inspired by the garden city movement. Harry Wardman built the complex from 1914-1915 along the 14th Street streetcar line. It was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2001.

Austin LeCount Fickling was the first African-American judge of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the highest court for the District of Columbia.

Javins, Saunders, Gross and a fourth tenant, Gladys Grant, appealed the decision to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Edmund E. Fleming, the tenants' lawyer, argued that the court should find an implied warranty of habitability in the lease, based on the idea of constructive eviction. Despite the fact that briefs were submitted relatively quickly, the oral argument for the Court of Appeals case did not occur until 2 years after the initial trial. During that time, Sidney Brown, the owner of First National Realty, was put in jail for heating system code violations. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's decision, and the tenants appealed to the D.C. Circuit. [3]

District of Columbia Court of Appeals highest court of the District of Columbia, equivalent to a state supreme court

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the highest court of the District of Columbia. Established in 1970, it is equivalent to a state supreme court, except that its authority is derived from the United States Congress rather than from the inherent sovereignty of the states. The court is located in the former District of Columbia City Hall building at Judiciary Square. The D.C. Court of Appeals should not be confused with the District's federal appellate court, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The D.C. Court of Appeals and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia comprise the District's local court system.

Constructive eviction is a term used in the law of real property to describe a circumstance in which a landlord either does something or fails to do something that he or she has a legal duty to provide, rendering the property uninhabitable. A tenant who is constructively evicted may terminate the lease and seek damages.

Judge J. Skelly Wright's opinion sets up a contrast between the "old doctrines" of landlord-tenant law, which were based on feudal property law, and the modern approach to leases, which could be considered contractual relations between landlords and tenants. Wright says that leases of "urban dwelling units" should be "interpreted and construed like any other contract." [4] Therefore, as contracts for sales of goods have warranties of quality under the common law, leases create implied warranties of quality in housing. Tenants who are being sued for nonpayment of rent have the right to introduce evidence of housing code violations - if the landlord is not providing a habitable environment, the contract is breached and tenant does not have to pay rent. [5]

J. Skelly Wright American judge

James Skelly Wright was a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and previously was a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Related Research Articles

Eviction removal of a tenant from rental property by the landlord

Eviction is the removal of a tenant from rental property by the landlord. In some jurisdictions it may also involve the removal of persons from premises that were foreclosed by a mortgagee.

Lease business contract between two parties, the lessor (owner) and lessee (user), for use of property

A lease is a contractual arrangement calling for the lessee (user) to pay the lessor (owner) for use of an asset. Property, buildings and vehicles are common assets that are leased. Industrial or business equipment is also leased.

A leasehold estate is an ownership of a temporary right to hold land or property in which a lessee or a tenant holds rights of real property by some form of title from a lessor or landlord. Although a tenant does hold rights to real property, a leasehold estate is typically considered personal property.

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (TCPA) was passed by the United States Congress in 1991 and signed into law by President George H. W. Bush as Public Law 102-243. It amended the Communications Act of 1934. The TCPA is codified as 47 U.S.C. § 227. The TCPA restricts telephone solicitations and the use of automated telephone equipment. The TCPA limits the use of automatic dialing systems, artificial or prerecorded voice messages, SMS text messages, and fax machines. It also specifies several technical requirements for fax machines, autodialers, and voice messaging systems—principally with provisions requiring identification and contact information of the entity using the device to be contained in the message.

Implied warranty in common law jurisdictions, certain assurances presumed to be made in the sale of products or real property, due to the circumstances of the sale; e.g. fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability for products, workmanlike quality, habitability

In common law jurisdictions, an implied warranty is a contract law term for certain assurances that are presumed to be made in the sale of products or real property, due to the circumstances of the sale. These assurances are characterized as warranties irrespective of whether the seller has expressly promised them orally or in writing. They include an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, an implied warranty of merchantability for products, implied warranty of workmanlike quality for services, and an implied warranty of habitability for a home.

Landlord harassment is the willing creation, by a landlord or his agents, of conditions that are uncomfortable for one or more tenants in order to induce willing abandonment of a rental contract. Such a strategy is often sought because it avoids costly legal expenses and potential problems with eviction. This kind of activity is common in regions where rent control laws exist, but which do not allow the direct extension of rent-controlled prices from one tenancy to the subsequent tenancy, thus allowing landlords to set higher prices. Landlord harassment carries specific legal penalties in some jurisdictions, but enforcement can be very difficult or even impossible in many circumstances. However, when a crime is committed in the process and motives similar to those described above are subsequently proven in court, then those motives may be considered an aggravating factor in many jurisdictions, thus subjecting the offender(s) to a stiffer sentence.

Rent control in New York is a means of limiting the amount of rent charged on dwellings. Rent control and rent stabilization are two programs used in parts of New York state. In addition to controlling rent, the system also prescribes rights and obligations for tenants and landlords.

<i>Edwards v. Habib</i>

Edwards v. Habib, 397 F.2d 687, was a case decided by the D.C. Circuit that includes the first recognition of retaliatory eviction as a defense to eviction in landlord-tenant law.

Rent control in Scotland is based upon the statutory codes relating to private sector residential tenancies. Although not strictly within the private sector, tenancies granted by housing associations, etc., are dealt with as far as is appropriate in this context. Controlling prices, along with security of tenure and oversight by an independent regulator or the courts, is a part of rent regulation.

<i>Highway Properties Ltd v Kelly, Douglas and Co Ltd</i>

Highway Properties Ltd v Kelly, Douglas and Co Ltd is a leading Canadian property law case concerning commercial landlord-tenant relationships decided by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Landlord and Tenant Board is an adjudicative tribunal operated by the government of Ontario that provides dispute resolution of landlord and tenant matters under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.

Hubert B. Pair was a judge of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the highest court for the District of Columbia.

References

  1. Javins v. First National Realty Corp., 428F.2d1071 , 1073(D.C.Circ.1970).
  2. Chused, Richard (Spring 2004). "Saunders (A.K.A. Javins) v. First National Realty Corporation". Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy. 11: 208–211.
  3. Chused, Richard (Spring 2004). "Saunders (A.K.A. Javins) v. First National Realty Corporation". Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy. 11: 215–223.
  4. Javins v. First National Realty Corp., 428F.2d1071 , 1075(D.C.Circ.1970).
  5. Javins v. First National Realty Corp., 428F.2d1071 , 1083(D.C.Circ.1970).