Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.

Last updated

Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co.
US-CourtOfAppeals-8thCircuit-Seal.png
Court United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Full case name Lois E. Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Company, et al.
SubmittedOctober 21, 1997
DecidedDecember 5, 1997
Citations130 F.3d 1287; 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 852,72 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) ¶ 45,174; 48 Fed. R. Evid. Ser v. 454
Case history
Prior history139 F.R.D. 657 (D. Minn. 1991); 824 F. Supp. 847 (D. Minn. 1993)
Subsequent historyRehearing en banc denied, February 18, 1998
Court membership
Judges sitting Theodore McMillian, Floyd Robert Gibson, Donald P. Lay
Case opinions
MajorityLay, joined by a unanimous panel

Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., 130 F.3d 1287 (8th Cir. 1997), [1] was the first class-action sexual harassment lawsuit in the United States. It was filed in 1988 on behalf of Lois Jenson and other female workers at the Eveleth Taconite mine in Eveleth, Minnesota on the state's northern Mesabi Range, which is part of the Iron Range.

Contents

Facts

Jenson first began working at the site in March 1975 and, along with other women, endured a continuous stream of hostile behavior from male employees, including sexual harassment, abusive language, threats, stalking and intimidation. Specifically, hostile behavior several women faced included repulsive sexual graffiti and men masturbating on women or in front of women. In one case, a man purposely kicked over a porta potty that was occupied by a female employee. [2] In another case, a woman named Judy Jarvela who also worked at the mine reported multiple instances where she came back to her locker with semen on her clothing. One of her co-workers, Diane Hodge, reported that other male co-workers would come up from behind Jarvela and grab her breasts in front of the other co-workers. [3]

It is infrequently noted that women who were not seen as “desirable” by these men still faced harassment whether sexual or not. Oftentimes, in male-dominated workplaces, when men do not look at a certain woman sexually, they will harass her in other ways to try and get her to leave, because they believe she is taking the place of a man. [4]

Their union, USW, did nothing to stop it. They worked with Eveleth's management to create a divide between the female workers in a successful attempt to get them to testify in opposition of these accusations against Eveleth. [5] On October 5, 1984, Jenson mailed a complaint to the Minnesota Department of Human Rights outlining the problems she experienced. [6] In retaliation, her car tires were slashed a week later. In January 1987, the state's agency requested that Ogelbay Norton Co., [7] a Cleveland, Ohio-based part-owner of the mine, pay US$6,000 in punitive damages and $5,000 to Jenson for mental anguish, but the company refused.

It is evident that females working in male-dominated workplaces are treated differently than their male co-workers. This is suspected to be due to sex-role spillover, a theory suggesting the carryover or spillover of gender roles or expectations into the workplace where it is not relevant. When there is an uneven gender ratio in a workplace, sex-role spillover will take place. [4] Sex-role spillover theory is relevant to the Jenson v. Eveleth case as it was the only expert testimony allowed in the case. [8]

On August 15, 1988, attorney Paul Sprenger filed Lois E. Jenson and Patricia S. Kosmach v. Eveleth Taconite Co. in the U.S. District Court in Minneapolis. Sprenger's complaint stated that Eveleth Mines was discriminatory against female employees and created as well as condoned a hostile work environment for female workers. [5] Patricia S. Kosmach was another named plaintiff for the case, and Kathy Anderson was the third named plaintiff for the Jenson v. Eveleth case. [5] Class-action status was requested at the time, and granted by James M. Rosenbaum on December 16, 1991. Jenson quit working at the mine on January 25, 1992, and was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder a short time later.

A liability trial began on December 17, 1992, in front of Judge Richard Kyle in St. Paul, Minnesota, and six months later, he ruled that the company should have prevented the misconduct. [9] The company was ordered to educate all employees about sexual harassment.

Patrick J. McNulty of Duluth was named special master a few months later to oversee a trial that would determine the amount of money owed to the women in damages. The retired federal magistrate permitted lawyers from the mine company to obtain medical records of all of the women for their entire lifetimes. Ahead of the trial, the plaintiffs endured long depositions that explored their personal lives in great detail.

The first half of the trial for damages began in Duluth on January 17, 1995 and lasted until February 10. After a break, it resumed on May 22 and ended on June 13.

On March 28, 1996, McNulty released a 416-page report that called the women "histrionic," made public details about their private lives, and awarded them an average of $10,000 each. However, the judgment was appealed and reversed by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on December 5, 1997. [1] A new jury trial on damages was ordered.

This case is not unique in that several other companies have had lawsuits against them for similar and almost identical behavior. There are many parallels between this case and other blue collar workplace cases to securities and grocery store cases. Specifically, a lawsuit made against the Mitsubishi plant in Normal, Illinois had many similarities other than the fact that the Jenson v. Eveleth case went to trial whereas the Mitsubishi case did not. [10] The main similarities between these two cases are the hostile sexual behavior that the women working for both companies faced; women at both companies reported to have experienced unwanted sexual advances, sexual graffiti, and more. [10]

Settlement

On December 23, 1998, just before the trial was set to begin, fifteen women settled with Eveleth Mines for a total of $3.5 million. One of the original plaintiffs, Pat Kosmach, died partway through the case, on November 7, 1994.

The case was documented in the 2002 book Class Action and a 2005 fictionalized film version, North Country .

See also

Related Research Articles

In United States labor law, a hostile work environment exists when one's behavior within a workplace creates an environment that is difficult or uncomfortable for another person to work in, due to illegal discrimination. However, a working environment that is unpleasant and frightening for the victim due to sexual advances that have been denied by the victim, is what constitutes hostile work environment sexual harassment. Common complaints in sexual harassment lawsuits include fondling, suggestive remarks, sexually-suggestive photos displayed in the workplace, use of sexual language, or off-color jokes. Small matters, annoyances, and isolated incidents are usually not considered to be statutory violations of the discrimination laws. For a violation to impose liability, the conduct must create a work environment that would be intimidating, hostile, or offensive to a reasonable person. An employer can be held liable for failing to prevent these workplace conditions, unless it can prove that it attempted to prevent the harassment and that the employee failed to take advantage of existing harassment counter-measures or tools provided by the employer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual harassment</span> Unwanted sexual attention or advances

Sexual harassment is a type of harassment involving the use of explicit or implicit sexual overtones, including the unwelcome and inappropriate promises of rewards in exchange for sexual favors. Sexual harassment can be physical and/or a demand or request for sexual favors, making sexually colored remarks, showing pornography, and any other unwelcome physical, verbal, or non-verbal conduct of a sexual nature. Sexual harassment includes a range of actions from verbal transgressions to sexual abuse or assault. Harassment can occur in many different social settings such as the workplace, the home, school, or religious institutions. Harassers or victims can be of any gender.

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998), is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court. The case arose out of a suit for sex discrimination by a male oil-rig worker, who claimed that he was repeatedly subjected to sexual harassment by his male co-workers with the acquiescence of his employer. The Court held that the protection of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against workplace discrimination "because of... sex" applied to harassment in the workplace between members of the same sex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Catharine A. MacKinnon</span> American feminist scholar and legal activist

Catharine Alice MacKinnon is an American feminist legal scholar, activist, and author. She is the Elizabeth A. Long Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School, where she has been tenured since 1990, and the James Barr Ames Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. From 2008 to 2012, she was the special gender adviser to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.

<i>North Country</i> (film) 2005 film by Niki Caro

North Country is a 2005 American drama film directed by Niki Caro, starring Charlize Theron, Frances McDormand, Sean Bean, Richard Jenkins, Michelle Monaghan, Jeremy Renner, Woody Harrelson, and Sissy Spacek. The screenplay by Michael Seitzman was inspired by the 2002 book Class Action: The Story of Lois Jenson and the Landmark Case That Changed Sexual Harassment Law by Clara Bingham and Laura Leedy Gansler, which chronicled the case of Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Company and USW Local 2705 which supported the employers efforts through the horrific events and ensuing legal battles.

Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), is a US labor law case, where the United States Supreme Court, in a 9–0 decision, recognized sexual harassment as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case was the first of its kind to reach the Supreme Court and would redefine sexual harassment in the workplace.

<i>Hostile Advances</i> 1996 American television film by Allan Kroeker

Hostile Advances: The Kerry Ellison Story is a 1996 American made-for-television drama film based on Ellison v. Brady, a landmark sexual harassment case. This lawsuit set the precedent for the "reasonable woman" standard in sexual harassment law which allows for cases to be analyzed from the perspective of the complainant and not the defendant. The movie stars Rena Sofer and is directed by Allan Kroeker. Written by Layce Gardner and produced for Lifetime Television.

9to5, National Association of Working Women is an organization established in 1973 that is dedicated to improving working conditions and ensuring the rights of women and families in the United States.

Equal Rights Advocates (ERA) is an American non-profit gender justice/women's rights organization that was founded in 1974. ERA is a legal and advocacy organization for advancing rights and opportunities for women, girls, and people of marginalized gender identities through legal cases and policy advocacy.

Paul C. Sprenger was an American attorney. Sprenger is best known as lead counsel of Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., a discrimination case involving female iron miners in Minnesota.

Alexander v. Yale, 631 F.2d 178, was the first use of Title IX of the United States Education Amendments of 1972 in charges of sexual harassment against an educational institution. It further established that sexual harassment of female students could be considered sex discrimination, and was thus illegal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ann Olivarius</span> British lawyer (born 1955)

Ann Olivarius is an American-British lawyer who specializes in cases of civil litigation, sexual discrimination, and sexual harassment, assault, and abuse.

Workplace harassment is the belittling or threatening behavior directed at an individual worker or a group of workers.

<i>Blakey v. Continental Airlines, Inc.</i>

Blakey v. Continental Airlines, 992 F.Supp. 731 and 164 N.J. 38 (2000), is a case concerning whether an employer must be held liable for harassment that can potentially occur on an internal internet bulletin board. The plaintiff brought action under the federal district court for claiming a hostile work environment sexual harassment under Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 and New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD). Concurrently, the plaintiff brought action under the New Jersey state court alleging that employer was liable for hostile work environment arising from allegedly defamatory statements. While the case began as a sexual harassment lawsuit, the unusual circumstances involving the piloting forum where much of the harassment took place forced the courts to explore important questions concerning liabilities for content posted in a decentralized, electronic manner as is frequently the case on the internet.

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court identified the circumstances under which an employer may be held liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for the acts of a supervisory employee whose sexual harassment of subordinates has created a hostile work environment amounting to employment discrimination. The court held that "an employer is vicariously liable for actionable discrimination caused by a supervisor, but subject to an affirmative defense looking to the reasonableness of the employer's conduct as well as that of a plaintiff victim."

The Prada Female Discrimination Case was a lawsuit filed in Japan by former Prada Senior Operations Manager, Rina Bovrisse and other female managers accusing Prada of sexual harassment and gender discrimination in the workplace. Prada denied all charges and countersued Bovrisse for defamation. In October 2012, Judge Reiko Morioka rejected by stating, “women with high compensation should accept certain level of sexual harassment.” In 2013, Prada Female Discrimination Case was filed at The United Nations High Commissions of Human Rights CEDAW. The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has called for Japan's State party to introduce new regulations that would make sexual harassment in the workplace illegal.The UN StatementUN PressVogue

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lawrance Bohm</span> American Lawyer (born 1972)

Lawrance A. Bohm is an American lawyer who is most noted for winning what is believed to be the two largest single-plaintiff employment verdicts in United States history: $185,872,719.52 in Juarez v. AutoZone Stores, Inc. and $167,730,488.00 in Chopourian v. Catholic Healthcare West. Bohm has won several other large verdicts protecting and defending civil and workplace rights. Bohm has represented clients in several high-profile cases.

Sexual harassment in the workplace in US labor law has been considered a form of discrimination on the basis of sex in the United States since the mid-1970s. There are two forms of sexual harassment recognized by United States law: quid pro quo sexual harassment and behavior that creates a hostile work environment. It has been noted that a number of the early sexual harassment cases were brought by African American women and girls.

The Alliance Against Sexual Coercion (AASC) was an American organization that aimed to address sexual coercion and sexual harassment faced by working women. The organization was established in June 1976 by Freada Kapor Klein, Lynn Wehrli, and Elizabeth Cohn-Stuntz. They argued that sexual harassment toward women increases difficulties for women in the workplace by reinforcing the idea that women are inferior to men.

Nadine Taub was an American lawyer who laid the essential groundwork for women's rights in the workplace, including defending and winning the first sexual harassment case in the US in 1977. Taub played a pivotal, but largely unrecognized, role in the development of sexual harassment law in the United States. As part of a group of young female lawyers in the 1970s, including Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Nancy Stearns and others, Taub made legal history by winning cases which argued that the Constitution protected women's rights.

References

  1. 1 2 Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., 130F.3d1287 ( 8th Cir. 1997).
  2. ↑ Bingham, Clara (2003). Class action : the landmark case that changed sexual harassment law. Laura Leedy Gansler (1st Anchor books ed.). New York: Anchor Books. ISBN   0-385-49613-3. OCLC   53969370.
  3. ↑ Baker, Carrie. The Women's Movement Against Sexual Harassment. Cambridge University Press. p. 67.
  4. 1 2 Gutek, Barbara A.; Morasch, Bruce (January 1982). "Sex-Ratios, Sex-Role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work". Journal of Social Issues. 38 (4): 55–74. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01910.x.
  5. 1 2 3 Hart, Melissa (2003). "Litigation Narratives: Why Jensen v es: Why Jensnn v. Eveleth Didn't Change Sexual Harassment Law, but Still Has a Story Worth Telling". Archived from the original on May 7, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.
  6. ↑ "Minnesota Department of Human Rights". Archived from the original on January 16, 2013. Retrieved July 3, 2006. Archived 2013-01-16 at the Wayback Machine
  7. ↑ Oglebay Norton Archived June 19, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  8. ↑ Sinclair, H. Colleen (August 21, 2007). "Searching for the Psychology in The Handbook of Women, Psychology and the Law: The Handbook of Women, Psychology and the Law Edited by Andrea Barnes, San Francisco, California, Jossey-Bass, 2005. 448 pp. $60.00 (Hardcover) ISBN: 0787970603". Sex Roles. 57 (5–6): 467–469. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9260-y. ISSN   0360-0025. S2CID   141996512.
  9. ↑ Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Co., 824F. Supp.847 ( D. Minn. 1993).
  10. 1 2 Selmi, Michael (2005). "Sex Discrimination in the Nineties, Seventies Style: Case Studies in the Preservation of Male Workplace Norms". Archived from the original on April 12, 2023. Retrieved May 7, 2023.

Notes

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.