John of Mirecourt

Last updated

John of Mirecourt, [1] also known as Monachus Albus, [2] was a Cistercian scholastic philosopher of the fourteenth century, from Mirecourt, Lorraine. He was a follower of William of Ockham; he was censured by Pope Clement VI. [3]

Contents

Life and Writings

Very little is known of the life of John of Mirecourt, but it seems that he was born at Mirecourt in Lorraine between 1310-1315. [4] He lectured at the Cistercian College of St. Bernard in Paris, and rose to the height of his philosophical and theological fame around the year 1345. [5] He is credited with writing a commentary on Peter Lombard's Sentences, and two subsequent apologies which were responses to various criticisms of his commentary. [6] He wrote two versions of his commentary; the first of which was attacked by a Benedictine called Johannes Normanus. [7] Mirecourt replied by issuing a Declaratio in which he explained the meanings behind his propositions. [8] Nevertheless, acting upon the recommendation of the faculty of theology at the University of Paris, Robert of Bardis, the University chancellor, condemned 41 propositions that were drawn from Mirecourt's writings on the Sentences. [9] Mirecourt responded to this condemnation by writing a second apology to no avail: he was censured in Paris by Pope Clement VI in 1347. [10] After this censure, nothing further is known of him, including any approximation as to the date of his death. [11] There is some speculation that scholarly jealousy and academic politics made up a portion of the motivation behind Mirecourt's censure; and as Mirecourt was not radical in all of his philosophical views, it is not unsubstantiated that his censure was in part the result of some ill-will from various of the nominalist factions. [12]

Philosophical thought

Knowledge and Intuition


Mirecourt reasoned that there are two kinds of certain knowledge: (1) 'the principle of non-contradiction,' and (2) 'the immediate intuition of one's existence'. [13] The most undoubtedly of all things that can be known fall to this first kind of knowledge, as well as all analytic judgements that are reducible to it. [14] Mirecourt distinguishes between two kinds of evidence of these kinds of knowledge: (1) special and (2) natural. [15] Special evidence comes from the principle of non-contradiction, and natural evidence is that which is gained empirically. [16] Mirecourt thought natural evidence to be weaker than special evidence because he understood God to be both absolutely powerful and the producer of miracles (as taken to be some occurrence outside of what is otherwise empirically observable). [17]

It is speculated that Mirecourt was censured due to his rigid views regarding the reliance of everything upon the will of God. [18] Mirecourt held the view that anything physical or moral is wholly depended on the entirely free will of God. [19] This was a controversial view because it held God responsible for willing not only all that is good, but also all that is not good. This stood in rather severe contradistinction to the commonly accepted view of Mirecourt's contemporaries which were centered on the premise of an all-good God. [20] Mirecourt stated that some temptations cannot be overcome without a miracle from God. Such temptations included resisting the urge to have sexual relations with another man's wife. If this miracle is not given, Mirecourt argued that the action is then to be called neither adultery, nor a sin. [21]

Mirecourt is most well known for his theories on the infinite. [22] He was chiefly concerned with species and perfections. [23] God possessed the highest degree of perfection on his scale; and all creatures were infinitely distant from him. [24] Mirecourt held that it is impossible to measure perfections because of the infinite distance they have from God. Thus, all that can be known is that any species either exceeds, or is exceeded by, some other species in a scale of perfections. [25]

Nominalism

Mirecourt is generally thought to be a nominalist, and is often thought of as being a follower of William Ockham. Mirecourt rejected the idea of an imperfect intuitive cognition, however, which is a considerable departure from Ockham. [26] The two, though, are generally in accord, especially with respect to their epistemological views. [27]

Epistemology

Both Mirecourt and Ockham describe abstractive and intuitive cognition in very similar ways: both men think of knowledge as starting with intuitive cognition. [28] Both men also distinguish between judgement and simple apprehension. [29] In addition, both assert a need for close connections between a cognition and its object. [30]

Influences

Mirecourt was chiefly influenced by the philosophy of Nicholas of Autrecourt, William Ockham, and to a minimal degree, Gregory of Rimini, and perhaps even Thomas Bradwardine. [31] Nearly all of the major figures of Mirecourt's day accepted the basic tenets of nominalism, to some degree, and Mirecourt was no different in this respect. He was particularly influenced by the radical nominalist views of Nicholaus of Autrecourt, who was forced to burn his writings in 1347. [32]

Related Research Articles

Metaphilosophy Philosophy of philosophy

Metaphilosophy, sometimes called the philosophy of philosophy, is "the investigation of the nature of philosophy". Its subject matter includes the aims of philosophy, the boundaries of philosophy, and its methods. Thus, while philosophy characteristically inquires into the nature of being, the reality of objects, the possibility of knowledge, the nature of truth, and so on, metaphilosophy is the self-reflective inquiry into the nature, aims, and methods of the activity that makes these kinds of inquiries, by asking what is philosophy itself, what sorts of questions it should ask, how it might pose and answer them, and what it can achieve in doing so. It is considered by some to be a subject prior and preparatory to philosophy, while others see it as inherently a part of philosophy, or automatically a part of philosophy while others adopt some combination of these views.

Nominalism Philosophical view with two varieties

In metaphysics, nominalism is the view that universals and abstract objects do not actually exist other than being merely names or labels. There are at least two main versions of nominalism. One version denies the existence of universals—things that can be instantiated or exemplified by many particular things. The other version specifically denies the existence of abstract objects—objects that do not exist in space and time.

William of Ockham English Franciscan friar and theologian (c.1287 – 10 April 1347)

William of Ockham was an English Franciscan friar, scholastic philosopher, and theologian, who is believed to have been born in Ockham, a small village in Surrey. He is considered to be one of the major figures of medieval thought and was at the centre of the major intellectual and political controversies of the 14th century. He is commonly known for Occam's razor, the methodological principle that bears his name, and also produced significant works on logic, physics, and theology. William is remembered in the Church of England with a commemoration on 10 April.

Scholasticism Medieval school of philosophy

Scholasticism was a medieval school of philosophy that employed a critical method of philosophical analysis predicated upon a Latin Catholic theistic curriculum which dominated teaching in the medieval universities in Europe from about 1100 to 1700. It originated within the Christian monastic schools that were the basis of the earliest European universities. The rise of scholasticism was closely associated with these schools that flourished in Italy, France, Spain and England.

Robert Kilwardby 13th-century Archbishop of Canterbury, writer, and cardinal

Robert Kilwardby was an Archbishop of Canterbury in England and a cardinal. Kilwardby was the first member of a mendicant order to attain a high ecclesiastical office in the English Church.

20th-century philosophy Philosophy-related events during the 20th century

20th-century philosophy saw the development of a number of new philosophical schools—including logical positivism, analytic philosophy, phenomenology, existentialism, and poststructuralism. In terms of the eras of philosophy, it is usually labelled as contemporary philosophy.

Albert of Saxony was a German philosopher and mathematician known for his contributions to logic and physics. He was bishop of Halberstadt from 1366 until his death.

Condemnations of 1210–1277 13th-century anti-heresy condemnations issued at University of Paris

The Condemnations at the medieval University of Paris were enacted to restrict certain teachings as being heretical. These included a number of medieval theological teachings, but most importantly the physical treatises of Aristotle. The investigations of these teachings were conducted by the Bishops of Paris. The Condemnations of 1277 are traditionally linked to an investigation requested by Pope John XXI, although whether he actually supported drawing up a list of condemnations is unclear.

John of Dumbleton was a member of the Dumbleton village community in Gloucestershire, a southwestern county in England. Although obscure, he is considered a significant English fourteenth-century philosopher for his contributions to logic, natural philosophy, and physics. Dumbleton’s masterwork is his Summa Logicae et Philosophiae Naturalis, likely to have been composed just before the time of his death.

Philosophy of language Discipline of philosophy that deals with language and meaning

In analytic philosophy, philosophy of language investigates the nature of language, the relations between language, language users, and the world. Investigations may include inquiry into the nature of meaning, intentionality, reference, the constitution of sentences, concepts, learning, and thought.

Lullism

Lullism or llullism is a term for the later philosophical and theological currents related to the philosophy of Ramon Llull. It also refers to the project of editing and disseminating Llull's works. The earliest centers of Lullism were in fourteenth-century France, Mallorca, and Italy.

Adam of Wodeham, OFM (1298–1358) was a philosopher and theologian. Currently, Wodeham is best known for having been a secretary of William Ockham and for his interpretations of John Duns Scotus. Despite this associational fame, Wodeham was an influential thinker who made valuable philosophical contributions during his life.

Philosophy Study of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct

Philosophy is the study of general and fundamental questions, such as those about existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind, and language. Such questions are often posed as problems to be studied or resolved. Some sources claim the term was coined by Pythagoras ; others dispute this story, arguing that Pythagoreans merely claimed use of a preexisting term. Philosophical methods include questioning, critical discussion, rational argument, and systematic presentation.

Western philosophy Philosophy of the Western world

Western philosophy encompasses the philosophical thought and work of the Western world. Historically, the term refers to the philosophical thinking of Western culture, beginning with the ancient Greek philosophy of the pre-Socratics. The word philosophy itself originated from the Ancient Greek philosophía (φιλοσοφία), literally, "the love of wisdom" Ancient Greek: φιλεῖν phileîn, "to love" and σοφία sophía, "wisdom").

Francis of Marchia was an Italian Franciscan theologian and philosopher. He was an ally of William of Ockham and Michael of Cesena, and opponent of Pope John XXII, in the struggles of the Franciscan Spirituals, leading to his expulsion from the order in 1329. He was commenting on the Sentences of Peter Lombard around 1320, but no longer closely bound to Lombard; for example he incidentally theorises on projectile motion, views now thought to be taken from Richard Rufus of Cornwall. He was nicknamed Doctor Succinctus.

John of Reading was an English Franciscan theologian and scholastic philosopher. He was an early opponent of William of Ockham, and a follower of Duns Scotus. He wrote a commentary on the Sentences around 1320, at the University of Oxford. He argued for the unity of science.

Formal distinction

In scholastic metaphysics, a formal distinction is a distinction intermediate between what is merely conceptual, and what is fully real or mind-independent. It was made by some realist philosophers of the Scholastic period in the thirteenth century, and particularly by Duns Scotus.

Medieval philosophy Philosophy during the medieval period

Medieval philosophy is the philosophy that existed through the Middle Ages, the period roughly extending from the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century to the Renaissance in the 15th century. Medieval philosophy, understood as a project of independent philosophical inquiry, began in Baghdad, in the middle of the 8th century, and in France, in the itinerant court of Charlemagne, in the last quarter of the 8th century. It is defined partly by the process of rediscovering the ancient culture developed in Greece and Rome during the Classical period, and partly by the need to address theological problems and to integrate sacred doctrine with secular learning.

Didier Njirayamanda Kaphagawani or Didier Kaphagawani was a Malawian philosopher. He is known for his ideas on African philosophy. This included ideas on African epistemology and African understandings of personhood.

Richard Anthony Fumerton is a Canadian American philosopher and professor of philosophy at the University of Iowa with research interests in epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of mind and value theory. He has been cited as an influential expert on the position of "metaepistemological scepticism". He received his B.A. in philosophy from the University of Toronto in 1971 and his M.A. and PhD from Brown University in 1973 and 1974, respectively. He has been the F. Wendell Miller Professor of Philosophy at the University of Iowa since 2003.

References

Notes

  1. ↑ Jean de Mirecourt, Jean de Méricour, Johannes de Mercuria.
  2. ↑ Pasnau, Robert (2010). The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy . Cambridge University Press. pp.  909.
  3. ↑ Chapter Vii Archived 2008-07-20 at the Wayback Machine
  4. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 14.
  5. ↑ Pasnau, Robert (2010). The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. p. 909.
  6. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 22.
  7. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 377.
  8. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 377.
  9. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 18.
  10. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 377.
  11. ↑ Courtenay (1989). "nquiry and Inquisition: Academic Freedom in Medieval Universities". 2 (58): 168–181. JSTOR   3168722.Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 33.
  13. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 377–379.
  14. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 377–379.
  15. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 377–379.
  16. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. pp. 377–379.
  17. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 378.
  18. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 379.
  19. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 379.
  20. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 380.
  21. ↑ Beuchot, Mauricio (2003). A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages. Blackwell Publishing. p. 380.
  22. ↑ Murdoch, John (1978). Subtilitates Anglicanae in Fourteenth-Century Paris: John of Mirecourt and Peter Ceffons. New York Academy of Sciences. pp. 51–61.
  23. ↑ Murdoch, John (1978). Subtilitates Anglicanae in Fourteenth-Century Paris: John of Mirecourt and Peter Ceffons. New York Academy of Sciences. p. 60.
  24. ↑ Murdoch, John (1978). Subtilitates Anglicanae in Fourteenth-Century Paris: John of Mirecourt and Peter Ceffons. New York Academy of Sciences. p. 60.
  25. ↑ Murdoch, John (1978). Subtilitates Anglicanae in Fourteenth-Century Paris: John of Mirecourt and Peter Ceffons. New York: New York Academy of Sciences. p. 60.
  26. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 90.
  27. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. pp. 90–91.
  28. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 90.
  29. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 90.
  30. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 90.
  31. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. pp. 14–90.
  32. ↑ Van Neste, Roy (1971). The Epistemology of John of Mirecourt in Relation to Fourteenth Century Thought. University of Wisconsin. p. 18.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.