Joint employment (US Law)

Last updated

Joint employment is the sharing of control and supervision of an employee's activity among two or more business entities.

Contents

At present, no single definition of joint employment exists. Instead, various employment laws define situations in which joint employment may occur with respect to that law.

An example is the Family and Medical Leave Act in the United States. [1] This Act defines joint employment in determining which business entity has the legal responsibility to provide an equivalent job for an employee returning from family or medical leave.

Background

Under the Fair Labor Standard Act of 1938, two or more employers can employ an individual employee at the same time, as the Act does not prevent an employee from having more than one employment relationship at the same time. If all the facts show that the two employers are not acting independently and yet the employee is jointly employed, all the work the employee does during the agreed period is considered as one employment for purposes of the Act. Therefore, both employers are responsible, individually and jointly, to comply with all provisions of the Act (such as overtime) with respect to the entire employment for the particular workweek. In discharging the joint obligation each employer may, of course, take credit toward minimum wage and overtime requirements for all payments made to the employee by the other joint employer or employers. [2]

On July 29, 2021, the U.S. Department of Labor has rescinded and removed the Joint Employer Rule (part 791 of title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations) in its entirety and reserved. [3] [4] [5]

Determination of joint employment

There are few main points to determinate whether a joint employment exists:

It can also look at the employment contract: if it clearly states that they have more than one employer, it is more likely to be a joint-employment contract. However, if the contract of employment is only with one particular employer, even if the contract declares that the employee is required to work for another practice, it is not a joint-employment. Moreover, if the practice exercises control over the employees, even though they do not formally employ them, the practices may still be a joint employer. [8] The more control of both employers, no matter direct or indirect, the greater chance that the courts would generally claim the employee is jointly employed, they would look at the totality of circumstances to determinate whether two entities will be considered as joint employers. In behalf of not causing any legal proceedings, the employers, should set out their responsibilities clearly in the agreement to avoid any uncertainty in the future and contract language is very important. [9] [10] [11] In fact, it's possible for several different businesses to be joint employers of a single employee. The greater the number of joint employers, the more difficult for the employers to overcome some practical problems such as the arrangement of the employee and assume their responsibilities. However, since these issues are legally complex, both employers and employees should ask advice from experienced legal counsel. [12]

Employees jointly employed by two employers must be counted by both employers, whether or not maintained on one of the employer's payroll, in determining employer coverage and employee eligibility. For example, an employer who jointly employs 20 employees from a temporary placement agency and 60 permanent workers is covered by FMLA. An employee who is working for a secondary employer in a given period is considered employed by the secondary employer, and must be counted for coverage and eligibility purposes, as long as the employer has a reasonable expectation that that employee will return to employment with that employer. [13]

Under the joint employment circumstances, only the primary employer has the responsibility to give required notices to the employees such as providing FMLA leave, health benefits, welfare and job restoration. The secondary employer is responsible for accepting the employee returning from FMLA leave in place of the replacement employee if the secondary employer continues to utilize an employee from the temporary placement agency, and the agency chooses to place the employee with the secondary employer. A secondary employer is also responsible for compliance with the prohibited acts provisions with respect to its jointly employed employees, whether or not the secondary employer is covered by FMLA. There are a few factors which determine who is the primary employer such as the authority to employ, assign different tasks for the staffs, provide employment welfare and make payroll. [14]

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rules on joint employment status. A ruling known as the Browning-Ferris ruling was issued in 2015, [15] but this was replaced by a new ruling in February 2020 which stated that in order to be classed as a joint employer,

a business must possess and exercise substantial direct and immediate control over one or more essential terms and conditions of employment of another employer’s employees. [16]

Benefits and drawbacks of joint employment

Benefits

The joint employers may find it easier to hire experts in some niche industries, people with specialist skills, or even replace their regular workforces. Due to the fact that joint employment is more flexible for an employee to work with different practices in a given period, they can decide which job should be prioritised. For instance, there are different deadlines for different projects, under the joint employment circumstances, the employee can adjust the pace of work for different projects, so the work can be completed before the deadlines, as well as building a good relations with other practices. In addition, some employees may also prefer working full-time under a joint contract of employment instead of part-time for different practices, therefore the employers can easier to recruit new employees to address staff shortages. Furthermore, the joint employers share control over the employee such as the work schedule. Some employers can also reduce the cost of labour and employee benefits by a joint employment contract because of the payroll costs split between the employers. [17] [18]

Drawbacks

Unemployment can increase as labor demand reduces due to joint employment; some practices might want to cut payroll cost by choosing a joint contract of employment. One potential risk is there could be confusion about the arrangement of an employee between two employers, so it is difficult to overcome these practical problems. In some circumstances, if two employers have completely different terms and conditions such as work schedule and sick pay, the employees might disagree on them. It is also questionable on who the employee would complain to when they have been treated unfairly. When there is a dispute, even though it was only with one of the employer, the employment tribunal claims against both employers, so it is unfair to another employer. It is necessary to draw up an agreement between the two practices to avoid future dispute and misunderstanding. The joint employers also have to determine their responsibilities as well as manage the process and make decisions in any disciplinary situation. Besides, it is unpredictable what is going to happen when one of the employer decides to end the joint employment relationship due to various reasons such as he is no longer providing the same service, or he wants to sell his business, what will be the new arrangement? Will the other employer change the employee to the normal contract or they will take on full responsibility for the employee? It depends on circumstances. For many medium to large–sized companies, understanding the role of being a joint employer is very important. A lot of large companies such as Walmart, DHL, have been prosecuted for unpaid overtime pay to the joint employer. Employers who do not fully understand joint employer status are at high risk of violation of the law such as overtime pay.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Labor Relations Act of 1935</span> 1935 U.S. federal labor law regulating the rights of workers and unions

The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act, is a foundational statute of United States labor law that guarantees the right of private sector employees to organize into trade unions, engage in collective bargaining, and take collective action such as strikes. Central to the act was a ban on company unions. The act was written by Senator Robert F. Wagner, passed by the 74th United States Congress, and signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Employment is a relationship between two parties regulating the provision of paid labour services. Usually based on a contract, one party, the employer, which might be a corporation, a not-for-profit organization, a co-operative, or any other entity, pays the other, the employee, in return for carrying out assigned work. Employees work in return for wages, which can be paid on the basis of an hourly rate, by piecework or an annual salary, depending on the type of work an employee does, the prevailing conditions of the sector and the bargaining power between the parties. Employees in some sectors may receive gratuities, bonus payments or stock options. In some types of employment, employees may receive benefits in addition to payment. Benefits may include health insurance, housing, disability insurance. Employment is typically governed by employment laws, organisation or legal contracts.

Flextime is a flexible hours schedule that allows workers to alter their workday and decide/adjust their start and finish times. In contrast to traditional work arrangements that require employees to work a standard 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. day, flextime typically involves a "core" period of the day during which employees are required to be at work, and a "bandwidth" period within which all required hours must be worked. The working day outside of the "core" period is "flexible time", in which employees can choose when they work, subject to achieving total daily, weekly or monthly hours within the "bandwidth" period set by employers, and subject to the necessary work being done. The total working time required of employees on flextime schedules is the same as that required under traditional work schedules.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993</span> US labor law

The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) is a United States labor law requiring covered employers to provide employees with job-protected, unpaid leave for qualified medical and family reasons. The FMLA was a major part of President Bill Clinton's first-term domestic agenda, and he signed it into law on February 5, 1993. The FMLA is administered by the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor.

An employment contract or contract of employment is a kind of contract used in labour law to attribute rights and responsibilities between parties to a bargain. The contract is between an "employee" and an "employer". It has arisen out of the old master-servant law, used before the 20th century. Employment contracts relies on the concept of authority, in which the employee agrees to accept the authority of the employer and in exchange, the employer agrees to pay the employee a stated wage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States labor law</span> US laws on fair pay and conditions, unions, democracy, equality and security at work

The rights and duties for employees, labor unions, and employers are set by labor law in the United States. Labor law's basic aim is to remedy the "inequality of bargaining power" between employees and employers, especially employers "organized in the corporate or other forms of ownership association". Over the 20th century, federal law created minimum social and economic rights, and encouraged state laws to go beyond the minimum to favor employees. The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 requires a federal minimum wage, currently $7.25 but higher in 29 states and D.C., and discourages working weeks over 40 hours through time-and-a-half overtime pay. There are no federal laws, and few state laws, requiring paid holidays or paid family leave. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 creates a limited right to 12 weeks of unpaid leave in larger employers. There is no automatic right to an occupational pension beyond federally guaranteed Social Security, but the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 requires standards of prudent management and good governance if employers agree to provide pensions, health plans or other benefits. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 requires employees have a safe system of work.

The National Labor Relations Board, an agency within the United States government, was created in 1935 as part of the National Labor Relations Act. Among the NLRB's chief responsibilities is the holding of elections to permit employees to vote whether they wish to be represented by a particular labor union. Congress amended the Act in 1947 through the Taft–Hartley Act to give workers the ability to decertify an already recognized or certified union as well. This article describes, in a very summary manner, the procedures that the NLRB uses to hold such elections, as well as the circumstances in which a union may obtain the right to represent a group of employees without an election.

An unfair labor practice (ULP) in United States labor law refers to certain actions taken by employers or unions that violate the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 29 U.S.C. § 151–169 and other legislation. Such acts are investigated by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Union busting</span> Efforts to prevent or hinder unionization among workers

Union busting is a range of activities undertaken to disrupt or prevent the formation of trade unions or their attempts to grow their membership in a workplace.

Japanese labour law is the system of labour law operating in Japan.

NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938), is a United States labor law case of the Supreme Court of the United States which held that workers who strike remain employees for the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Court granted the relief sought by the National Labor Relations Board, which sought to have the workers reinstated by the employer. However, the decision is much better known today for its obiter dicta in which the Court said that an employer may hire strikebreakers and is not bound to discharge any of them if or when the strike ends.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</span> United States wage law

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 29 U.S.C. § 203 (FLSA) is a United States labor law that creates the right to a minimum wage, and "time-and-a-half" overtime pay when people work over forty hours a week. It also prohibits employment of minors in "oppressive child labor". It applies to employees engaged in interstate commerce or employed by an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, unless the employer can claim an exemption from coverage. The Act was enacted by the 75th Congress and signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938.

Managerial prerogatives are also referred to as the functions and rights of management, is considered as the discretion of the employer or manager on how to manage its business, not bound by collective bargaining. It is a term that easily leads to widespread misunderstanding. Different circles have different interpretations of this term. When it is used in the trade unions circles, is perceived as a user's support for unilateral management power and can cause protests.When used by the management circle, It is considered as exclusive right and control right without interference. Managerial prerogatives give employers or managers the power to control the direction in which their businesses are heading. Employees basically do not have this power.

Iranian labor law describes the rules of employment in Iran. As a still developing country, Iran is considerably behind by international standards. It has failed to ratify the two basic Conventions of the International Labour Organization on freedom of association and collective bargaining, and one on abolition of child labor. Countries such as the US and India have also failed to ratify many of these Conventions and a mere 14 other Conventions, only 2 since the Islamic Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wage and Hour Division</span> Federal office in the United States

The Wage and Hour Division (WHD) of the United States Department of Labor is the federal office responsible for enforcing federal labor laws. The Division was formed with the enactment of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The Wage and Hour mission is to promote and achieve compliance with labor standards to protect and enhance the welfare of the Nation's workforce. WHD protects over 144 million workers in more than 9.8 million establishments throughout the United States and its territories. The Wage and Hour Division enforces over 13 laws, most notably the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family Medical Leave Act. In FY18, WHD recovered $304,000,000 in back wages for over 240,000 workers and followed up FY19, with a record-breaking $322,000,000 for over 300,000 workers.

Work–life balance in the United States is having enough time for work and enough time to have a personal life in the United States. Related, though broader, terms include lifestyle balance and life balance. The most important thing in work and life is the personal ability to demonstrate and meet the needs of work and personal life in order to achieve goals. People should learn to deal with role engagement management, role conflict management and managing life needs to achieve balance. Balance is about how to properly achieve the desired work and life satisfaction and needs in a conflict situation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whistleblower protection in the United States</span>

A whistleblower is a person who exposes any kind of information or activity that is deemed illegal, unethical, or not correct within an organization that is either private or public. The Whistleblower Protection Act was made into federal law in the United States in 1989.

The elaws Advisors are a set of interactive, online tools developed by the U.S. Department of Labor to help employers and employees learn more about their rights and responsibilities under numerous Federal employment laws. They address some of the nation's most widely applicable employment laws, offering easy-to-understand information on areas such as:

A public access file is a file that needs to be maintained by any United States employer hiring people in H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 temporary nonimmigrant worker statuses. It is intended to include more background information related to the attestations made on the Labor Condition Application used for the Form I-129 and/or visa application that was used to acquire the nonimmigrant worker status. The file may be requested by any member of the public through telephone or email inquiries. Any member of the public requesting access to the documents must be allowed to capture the information through such means as transcription, scanning, or taking photographs, for example. It is distinguished from a private access file that contains more sensitive and confidential employee data that must be shared with the U.S. Department of Labor if they choose to investigate. Regulations governing the public access file can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 20, or more specifically, in 20 CFR 655.760.

The VAT Tribunal case of CGI Group (Europe) Limited v HMRC is a United Kingdom legal case which addressed the VAT treatment of a joint employment arrangement in the context of outsourcing services.

References

  1. ↑ "Garland's Digest on employment discrimination law". Archived from the original on 2011-04-02.
  2. ↑ Law.cornell.edu, (2014). 29 CFR 791.2 - Joint employment. | LII / Legal Information Institute. [online] Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/791.2 [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  3. ↑ "US Department of Labor announces final rule to rescind March 2020 joint employer rule, ensure more workers minimum wage, overtime protections | U.S. Department of Labor".
  4. ↑ "Federal Register :: Request Access".
  5. ↑ "Federal Register :: Request Access".
  6. ↑ DLA Piper, (2014). Joint employer law: is the NLRB edging closer to the abyss? Takeaways from the Bloomberg webinar | Insights | DLA Piper Global Law Firm. [online] Available at: http://www.dlapiper.com/en/us/insights/publications/2014/10/joint-employer-law-nlrb-edging-abyss/ [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  7. ↑ The Emplawyerologist, (2014). Has Wal-Mart Helped to Expand the Scope of Joint Employment?. [online] Available at: http://theemplawyerologist.com/2014/10/02/has-wal-mart-helped-to-expand-the-scope-of-joint-employment/#more-1125 [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  8. ↑ Lawroom.com, (2014). LawRoom: Definition of Joint Employers. [online] Available at: http://www.lawroom.com/Memo_Preview.aspx?txtmemoid=1685#P6_62 [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  9. ↑ Anonymous IOMA's Payroll Manager's Report, Feb 2012, Vol.16(2), pp.1-3
  10. ↑ Dol.gov, (2014). U.S. Department of Labor - Wage and Hour Division (WHD) - Fact Sheet. [online] Available at: http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs35.htm [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  11. ↑ Shibahara, S; Okonogi, T; Yoshida, T; Murai, Y; Kudo, T; Inouye, S; Kondo, S (1990). "A new aminothiazolylcephalosporin having 1-carboxyethoxyimino group, ME1228". The Journal of Antibiotics. 43 (1): 62–9. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.43.62 . PMID   2407708.
  12. ↑ Reid, B. (2014). Who is an Employee, Joint Employee, or Independent Contractor?. [online] The Huffington Post. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brad-reid/who-is-an-employee-joint_b_5744774.html [Accessed 31 Oct. 2014].
  13. ↑ aw.cornell.edu, (2014). 29 CFR 825.106 - Joint employer coverage. | LII / Legal Information Institute. [online] Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/29/825.106 [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  14. ↑ Matthew Stoloff, E. (2014). Joint Employer and Overtime Pay | Law Office of Matthew Stoloff. [online] Stoloff-law.com. Available at: http://stoloff-law.com/blog/joint-employer-and-overtime-pay/. [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  15. ↑ AFL-CIO, The Browning-Ferris NLRB Decision Explained, published 2 September 2015, accessed 6 August 2022
  16. ↑ Staffing Industry Analysists, NLRB RELEASES JOINT-EMPLOYER FINAL RULE; REVERSES OBAMA-ERA DECISION, published 26 February 2020, accessed 7 August 2022
  17. ↑ Bma.org.uk, (2014). Joint employment. [online] Available at: http://bma.org.uk/practical-support-at-work/gp-practices/how-to-employ-shared-staff/joint-employment Archived 2014-10-28 at the Wayback Machine [Accessed 30 Oct. 2014].
  18. ↑ Serota, S. (2001). Employee Benefits Considerations in Joint Ventures. The Tax Lawyer, pp.477--508.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.