Judiciary reform in Peru under Alberto Fujimori

Last updated

During the presidency of Alberto Fujimori (1990-2002) the Judiciary branch of Peru faced many reforms that the president enacted as a way to fulfill his campaign against terrorism. The reforms consisted of taking jurisdiction of terrorism cases away from civilian courts, changes in the structure of the court systems, and changes in the training of magistrates. [1] These changes were implemented with popular support, however they also received much criticism from the legal establishment and the international community. [2]

Contents

Background

Before the election of Fujimori, Peru was deeply affected by terrorism and the Judiciary branch of the country was enveloped with corruption and bureaucracy. By the elections of 1990 it was obvious that fighting terrorism with the state of that institution was going to be difficult because of the sluggish pace of the institution and also the low rate of convictions of those accused of terrorism; under a 10% conviction rate. For this reason during his inaugural speech Fujimori promised to reform the Judiciary. [1]

Reforms

During the first two years of his administration there were few changes to the Judiciary. This was a result of the opposition controlling congress and the Judiciary was reluctant to changes. To achieve his goals of reform he performed an “auto-coup” which resulted in the temporary suspension of congress, Judiciary, and also the constitution. At this point, using his presidential power of decree, he started to adopt laws and regulations pertaining to the trials of suspected terrorists and also the structure and functioning of the Judiciary. One of the first things he did was to send suspected terrorist to be tried on military tribunals. He made this move as a result of outrage in the country over judges “granting terrorists more than 200 early releases from prison a year”. [3] Corrupt judges were also known for dramatically reducing the sentences of convicted terrorist. By taking terrorism cases away from them he was able to achieve faster and harsher sentences for terrorist. The military tribunals were done in secret to protect the military judges from threats or bribing. This of course, had the down side of lacking transparency and seeming anti-democratic. However, to this Fujimori responded pointing the approval of this changes and asked people to respect the “popular will”.

To fight corruption in the Judiciary, under the “Emergency Government of National Reconstruction”, he adopted measures of harsh punishments to penalize corrupt Judges and Prosecutors. It is important to note that this decree also targeted judges who were guilty of “political favoritism”, a measure adopted to deal with judges who were known for favoring opposition leaders. [3] Another major aspect of his reform was Law 26623. This controversial law, which was approved by congress in a cloudy manner, created the Council of Judicial Coordination. [1] This body had full power to reorganize the judiciary in coordination with other organizations of the state. The aim of this law was to achieve more coordination amongst the different establishments within the Judiciary. The law also handed control over the Academy of the Magistrates to the new council. This was extremely controversial since this academy was responsible for the training of Judges, so legal experts saw it as a move by the executive to control and politicize the Judiciary.

Support and Criticisms

Fujimori was elected thanks to anti-establishment feelings. Right before the auto-coup the Peruvian congress, which had been stalling the reforms offered by the newly elected president, had an anemic approval rating of 17% compared to Fujimori’s 42% at that same time. [4] For this reason his assault against the establishment was widely supported, resulting in a jump in post-coup approval rating to 81%. [5] One poll showed that the reorganization of the Judiciary enjoyed 95% approval and only 2% disapproval. [3] Months after the coup, thanks to some of the policies adopted post-coup, Abimael Guzman, the leader of Shining Path, was captured and successfully tried. This increased support for his policies even more. Released cables from the US embassy show the concerns of US diplomats in Peru who stated: “the Guzman arrest- [has] muted opposition criticism of his efforts to reconfigure Peru’s suspended institutions and enhance his executive authority”. [2] Fujimori and his policies were widely popular in Peru up till the bitter end when he fled the country early in his third term because of the corruption and kidnapping charges that were brought against him.

Once the auto-coup took place, Fujimori started governing by mainly using decrees. This was criticized for being undemocratic, and his coup and manner of reforms received international condemnation. His reforms in the Judiciary were seen as an effort to increase presidential influence over that branch of government. International legal experts also claim that the changes “deprive the accused of a fair trial”. [1] Human rights organizations strongly condemned his administration and many called for the release of suspected terrorist, who they claimed were being wrongly accused and held. [1]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of Peru</span> Political system of Peru

The politics of the Republic of Peru takes place in a framework of a unitary semi-presidential representative democratic republic, whereby the President of Peru is both head of state and head of government, and of a pluriform multi-party system. Executive power is exercised by the President and the Government. Legislative power is vested in both the Government and the Congress. The Judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature. The Economist Intelligence Unit rated Peru a "hybrid regime" in 2022. Traditionally weak political parties saw their support collapse further in Peru since 2000, paving the way for the rise of personalist leaderships. The political parties in the congress of Peru are, according to political scientist Lucía Dammert, "agglomerations of individual and group interests more than solid and representative parties".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alberto Fujimori</span> President of Peru from 1990 to 2000

Alberto Kenya Fujimori Inomoto is a Peruvian former politician, professor and engineer who served as President of Peru from 28 July 1990 until 22 November 2000, though de facto leadership was reportedly held by Vladimiro Montesinos, the then head of the National Intelligence Service. Frequently described as a dictator, he remains a controversial figure in Peruvian politics. He is currently in prison, serving a 25-year sentence for human rights abuses during his presidency.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vladimiro Montesinos</span> Former Head of Peruvian Intelligence Service

Vladimiro Lenin Ilich Montesinos Torres is a Peruvian former intelligence officer who was the long-standing head of Peru's National Intelligence Service (SIN) and was reportedly the de facto leader of Peru while President Alberto Fujimori served as a figurehead leader. Montesinos had strong connections with the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for over 25 years and was said to have received $10 million from the agency for his government's anti-terrorist activities, with international bank accounts possessed by Montesinos reportedly holding at least $270 million. The United States reportedly supported the candidacy of Fujimori during 1990 Peruvian general election due to his links to Montesinos and ignored human rights abuses performed under Montesinos during the 1990s. In 2000, the infamous "Vladi-videos" came to light when they were broadcast on the news. They were secret videos recorded by Montesinos that showed him bribing elected congressmen into leaving the opposition and joining the pro-Fujimori group of the Congress. The ensuing scandal caused Montesinos to flee the country and prompted Fujimori's resignation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">President of Peru</span> Chief Executive of the Republic of Peru

The president of Peru, officially called the Constitutional President of the Republic of Peru, is the head of state and head of government of Peru. The president is the head of the executive branch and is the Supreme Head of the Armed Forces and National Police of Peru. The office of president corresponds to the highest magistracy in the country, making the president the highest-ranking public official in Peru.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Valentín Paniagua</span> Peruvian lawyer and politician

Valentín Toribio Demetrio Agustin Paniagua Corazao was a Peruvian lawyer and politician who briefly served as President of Peru from 2000 to 2001. Elected President of Congress on 16 November 2000, he ascended to the presidency as incumbent Alberto Fujimori and both his Vice Presidents resigned by 22 November 2000.

The judicial system of Ukraine is outlined in the 1996 Constitution of Ukraine. Before this there was no notion of judicial review nor any Supreme court since 1991's Ukrainian independence when it started being slowly restructured.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrios Altos massacre</span> Massacre perpetrated by the Grupo Colina

The Barrios Altos massacre occurred on 3 November 1991 in the Barrios Altos neighborhood of Lima, Peru. Members of Grupo Colina, a death squad comprising Peruvian Armed Forces personnel, were later identified as the assailants who killed fifteen individuals, including an eight-year-old child, and injured four others. The victims were reportedly partygoers associated with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist group Shining Path. Nevertheless, judicial authorities found that they were not terrorists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Congress of the Republic of Peru</span> Legislative branch of the Peruvian government

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1992 Peruvian self-coup</span> Constitutional crisis after the dissolution of the Peruvian legislature and judiciary

A self-coup, sometimes known as the Fujimorazo, was performed in Peru in 1992 after President Alberto Fujimori dissolved the Congress as well as the judiciary and assumed full legislative and judicial powers. With the collaboration of the military, the Fujimori government subsequently began to implement objectives of the Green Plan following the coup.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Martha Chávez</span> Peruvian politician

Martha Gladys Chávez Cossío de Ocampo is a Peruvian Fujimorist politician and lawyer. A historical and a prominent figure of Fujimorism, she has served in Congress for six-non consecutive terms from 1995 to 2006 and from 2011 to 2016, and since 2020 to finish the 2016–2021 that was interrupted by the dissolution of Congress. In the 2006 elections, she ran for the presidency, running on the Fujimorist Alliance for the Future ticket, but she lost, placing fourth in the election.

Anti-terrorism legislation are laws with the purpose of fighting terrorism. They usually, if not always, follow specific bombings or assassinations. Anti-terrorism legislation usually includes specific amendments allowing the state to bypass its own legislation when fighting terrorism-related crimes, under alleged grounds of necessity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alberto Fujimori's arrest and trial</span>

Former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori was arrested, tried, and convicted for a number of crimes related to corruption and human rights abuses that occurred during his government. Fujimori was president from 1990 to 2000. His presidency ended when he fled the country in the midst of a scandal involving corruption and human rights violations.

Decree Law 25418 is a highly controversial Peruvian law decreed in April 1992 by then-President Alberto Fujimori. The decree essentially provided the legal trappings for the coup d'état of April 5, 1992.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fujimorism</span> Political ideology in Peru

Fujimorism denotes the policies and the political ideology of former President of Peru Alberto Fujimori as well as the personality cult built around him, his policies and his family, especially Keiko Fujimori. The ideology is defined by authoritarianism, its support for neoliberal economics, opposition to communism, and socially and culturally conservative stances such as opposition to LGBT rights and school curriculums including gender equality or sex education. Opponents of Fujimorism are known as anti-Fujimorists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Saudi Arabia</span> Saudi system of Islamic law courts

The judiciary of Saudi Arabia is a branch of the government of Saudi Arabia that interprets and applies the laws of Saudi Arabia. The legal system is based on the Islamic code of Sharia, with its judges and lawyers forming part of the country's religious leadership or ulama. There are also non-Sharia government tribunals which handle disputes relating to specific royal decrees. Final appeal from both Sharia courts and government tribunals is to the King of Saudi Arabia and all courts and tribunals follow Sharia rules of evidence and procedure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Martín Vizcarra</span> President of Peru from 2018 to 2020

Martín Alberto Vizcarra Cornejo is a Peruvian engineer and politician who served as President of Peru from 2018 to 2020. Vizcarra previously served as Governor of the Department of Moquegua (2011–2014), First Vice President of Peru (2016–2018), Minister of Transport and Communications of Peru (2016–2017), and Ambassador of Peru to Canada (2017–2018), with the latter three during the presidency of Pedro Pablo Kuczynski.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Peruvian constitutional referendum</span>

A constitutional referendum was held in Peru on 9 December 2018 alongside the second round of gubernatorial elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peruvian political crisis (2017–present)</span> Political tension between the Executive and Legislative branches in Peru

Since 2016, Peru has been plagued with political instability and a growing crisis, initially between the President, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski and Congress, led de facto by Keiko Fujimori. The crisis emerged in late 2016 and early 2017 as the polarization of Peruvian politics increased, as well as a growing schism between the executive and legislative branches of government. Fujimori and her Fujimorist supporters would use their control of Congress to obstruct the executive branch of successive governments, resulting with a period of political instability in Peru.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019–2020 Peruvian constitutional crisis</span> Political conflict in Peru

The 2019–2020 Peruvian constitutional crisis began when President Martín Vizcarra dissolved the Congress of Peru on 30 September 2019 considering a de facto denial of the vote of confidence. The majority of lawmakers, opponents and Fujimorists viewed Vizcarra's actions as a "coup" or "self-coup" while some compared the event to the 1992 Peruvian self-coup. Congress responded by declaring Vizcarra's presidency suspended and appointed Vice President Mercedes Aráoz as interim president. During the evening hours, the heads of the Peruvian Armed Forces shared a photograph beside Vizcarra in the Government Palace amidst the crisis, putting forward their support for him.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic policy of the Alberto Fujimori administration</span>

Alberto Fujimori served as President of Peru from 28 July 1990 to 17 November 2000. A controversial figure, Fujimori has been credited with the creation of Fujimorism, defeating the Shining Path insurgency in Peru and restoring its macroeconomic stability. However, he was criticized for his authoritarian way of ruling the country and was accused of human rights violations. Even amid his prosecution in 2008 for crimes against humanity relating to his presidency, two-thirds of Peruvians polled voiced approval for his leadership in that period.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Peru: Judicial Reforms". Oxford Analytica Daily Brief Service. 24 June 1996. p. 1. ProQuest   192422243.
  2. 1 2 "Alberto Fujimoris Reforms in Peru".
  3. 1 2 3 "The Coup against the Courts: Terrorist and Judicial Housecleaning". United States Embassy in Peru. Retrieved 27 April 2013.
  4. Smith, Peter (1995). Latin America in Comparative Perspective. p. 234.
  5. Carrion, Julio (2006). The Fujimori Legacy: The Rise of Electoral Authoritarianism in Peru. p. 129.