Judith Barzilay | |
---|---|
Senior Judge of the United States Court of International Trade | |
Assumed office June 2, 2011 | |
Judge of the United States Court of International Trade | |
In office March 11,1998 –June 2,2011 | |
Appointed by | Bill Clinton |
Preceded by | Dominick L. DiCarlo |
Succeeded by | Mark A. Barnett |
Personal details | |
Born | Judith Morgenstern [1] January 3,1944 Russell,Kansas |
Education | Wichita State University (BA) School of Communication and Information (Rutgers University) (MLS) Rutgers School of Law–Newark (JD) |
Judith Morgenstern Barzilay (born January 3,1944 in Russell,Kansas) [2] is a Senior United States Judge of the United States Court of International Trade.
Barzilay received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1965 from Wichita State University. [3] She received a Master of Library Science degree in 1971 from Rutgers University School of Library and Information Science. She received a Juris Doctor in 1981 from Rutgers University School of Law–Newark. [2]
Barzilay worked as a high school teacher from 1965 to 1967 and again from 1968 to 1969 in Wichita,Kansas,Lawrenceville,New Jersey and Hamilton Township,Mercer County,New Jersey. [3] She worked as a librarian from 1971 to 1978 in Selden,New York,Woodbridge,New Jersey,Somerville,New Jersey and East Brunswick,New Jersey. She served as a law clerk to Judge Robert Tarleton of the New Jersey Superior Court from 1981 to 1982. [4] She worked in private practice in Wayne,New Jersey from 1982 to 1983. She worked as a trial attorney in the International Trade Field Office of the United States Department of Justice in New York City from 1983 to 1986. She worked in private practice in New York City from 1986 to 1988. She served at Sony Electronics Inc. as a senior attorney from 1988 to 1989,Vice President of Import-Export Operations from 1989 to 1995 and Vice President of Government Affairs from 1996 to 1998. She was a member of the Treasury Advisory Committee on Commercial Operations of the United States Customs Service from 1995 to 1998. [2]
On January 27,1998,President Bill Clinton nominated Barzilay to serve as a United States Judge of the United States Court of International Trade,to the seat vacated by Judge Dominick L. DiCarlo. She was confirmed by the Senate on March 11,1998 and received her commission the same day. She took senior status on June 2,2011. [2] She is currently inactive.[ when? ]
In addition to hearing disputes before the United States Court of International Trade,Judge Barzilay frequently sat on other federal courts by designation of the Chief Justice of the United States. In particular,Judge Barzilay sat by designation on the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third,Fifth,Sixth,Ninth,and Eleventh Circuits,as well as the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Judge Barzilay is perhaps most well known for her decision in Toy Biz,Inc. v. United States. In that opinion,Judge Barzilay addressed whether certain X-Men action figures were toys,rather than dolls,for customs classification purposes because the action figures represented "nonhuman creatures," [5] [6] lowering the tariff rate from 12 percent to 6.8 percent. The decision generated significant media attention,disappointed legions of X-Men fans, [7] and yielded further discussion in academic circles. [8]
Apart from the Toy Biz decision,Judge Barzilay issued several opinions during her tenure addressing issues of first impression. Those opinions include Michael Simon Design,Inc. v. United States,which concerned a challenge to the President's modification of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule; [9] U.S. Steel Corp. v. United States,which concerned a challenge to the United States Department of Commerce's change in the use of zeroing in investigations; [10] United States v. Nitek Electronics,Inc.,which concerned whether the United States Government must exhaust its administrative remedies before imposing penalties on importers; [11] and JBF RAK LLC v. United States,which concerned the United States Department of Commerce's use of its targeted dumping methodology in the context of administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. [12] The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ultimately affirmed each of these opinions.
While serving an active judge of the United States Court of International Trade,Barzilay issued approximately 209 opinions. She authored dozens of other opinions while sitting by designation.[ citation needed ]
Augustus Noble Hand was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and later was a United States Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. His most notable rulings restricted the reach of obscenity statutes in the areas of literature and contraceptives. He was the older first cousin of famed judge Learned Hand,who served on both courts with his cousin during most of Augustus Hand's tenure.
The Nonintercourse Act is the collective name given to six statutes passed by the United States Congress in 1790,1793,1796,1799,1802,and 1834 to set Amerindian boundaries of reservations. The various acts were also intended to regulate commerce between settlers and the natives. The most notable provisions of the act regulate the inalienability of aboriginal title in the United States,a continuing source of litigation for almost 200 years. The prohibition on purchases of Indian lands without the approval of the federal government has its origins in the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Confederation Congress Proclamation of 1783.
International News Service v. Associated Press,248 U.S. 215 (1918),also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case,is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law:a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing,such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars,but it has its supporters.
Marilyn Hall Patel is a former United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Toy Biz v. United States was a 2003 decision in the United States Court of International Trade that determined that for purposes of tariffs,Toy Biz's action figures were toys,not dolls,because they represented "nonhuman creatures". This decision effectively halved the tariff rate,from 12 percent tax to 6.8 percent.
Richard George Kopf is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Jed Saul Rakoff is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Richard Miles Berman is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Robert David Sack is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Loretta A. Preska is an American lawyer who serves as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Born in Albany,Preska received law degrees from Fordham University School of Law and New York University School of Law. She practiced law in New York City from 1973 to 1992 at the law firms of Cahill Gordon &Reindel and Hertzog,Calamari &Gleason. President George H. W. Bush appointed her to the district bench in 1992. She served as chief judge of the court for a seven-year term from 2009 to 2016,and took senior status in 2017. President George W. Bush nominated Preska to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2008,but the Senate did not act on the nomination.
Jerry Edwin Smith is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Long Term Capital Holdings v. United States,330 F. Supp. 2d 122,was a court case argued before the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut that concerned a tax shelter used by Long-Term Capital Management,a failed hedge fund.
Denise Louise Cote is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Kevin Thomas Duffy was an American lawyer and United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Ellen Judith Huvelle is an inactive Senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. She has overseen several significant cases. In a case decided in May 2001,Huvelle "upheld federal regulations that restrict the sale of consumers' names,Social Security numbers,dates of birth,addresses and phone numbers." Later that year,Huvelle heard requests by family members of Vince Foster seeking access to pictures of his body taken after his death. In November 2005,she accepted the guilty plea in the high-profile prosecution of lobbyist Michael Scanlon. Huvelle assumed senior status on June 3,2014.
Charles Proctor Sifton was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York from 1977 to 2009 and its Chief Judge from 1995 to 2000.
Meyer v. Grant,486 U.S. 414 (1988),was an important decision by the United States Supreme Court on paid petition circulation. Colorado was one of several states with a process for citizens to propose initiatives for the ballot,which if passed became law. One of the requirements was to get the signatures of a significant number of registered Colorado electors. Colorado prohibited initiative sponsors from paying for the circulation of these petitions. The state argued this was necessary to "protect[...] the integrity of the initiative."
Mark Allen Barnett is the Chief Judge of the United States Court of International Trade.
Barclays Capital Inc. v. Theflyonthewall.com,Inc.,650 F.3d 876,was a case decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where the Second Circuit,reversing the decision of the US District Court below it,found that the claims of three major financial investment firms against an internet subscription stock news service (theflyonthewall.com) for "Hot-news" Misappropriation under state common law doctrine could not stand,as they were pre-empted by several sections of the Federal Copyright Act.
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA,Inc. v. Sandoz,Inc.,574 U.S. 318 (2015),is a patent case of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the Copaxone patent. The Court held that,when reviewing a district court’s resolution of subsidiary factual matters made in the course of its construction of a patent claim,the Federal Circuit must apply a "clear error," not a de novo,standard of review.