Leaders' debate on women's issues during the 1984 Canadian federal election campaign

Last updated

On August 15, 1984, for the first time [1] there was a televised debate on women's issues among the leaders of the three major political parties during the campaign leading up to the Sept. 4 Canadian federal election. During the same election campaign, there had been two previous television debates in July on general campaign issues. [2]

Contents

Format of the debate

The two-hour bilingual debate, organized by the National Action Committee on the Status of Women, took place at the Royal York Hotel in Toronto among Prime Minister John Turner (Liberal party), Conservative party leader Brian Mulroney, and Edward Broadbent of the New Democratic Party. Panelists were Eleanor Wachtel, a Vancouver freelance writer, Kay Sigurjonsson, an NAC founding member and director of the Federation of Women Teachers' Associations of Ontario, Francine Harel-Giasson, a professor at the University of Montreal business school, and Renée Rowan, columnist for Le Devoir , and the moderator of the debate was Caroline Andrew, chairman of the political science department at the University of Ottawa. [3] The debate was jointly broadcast by four TV networks: CBC, Radio-Canada, CTV and Global. [2]

The debate consisted of separate confrontations involving only two leaders at a time, therefore not all candidates were asked to address every issue. [4] The leaders made opening statements in French and closing statements in English. The first 30 minutes were almost entirely in French. [5]

The issues

Inequality

All three leaders expressed commitment to improving the equality of women in social and economic spheres. All three promised action with regard to pensions for women outside the labour force and equal pay for work of equal value, mainly by better enforcement of existing rules. Mulroney promised pensions for homemakers, a plan which Turner criticized and claimed would cost as much as $900 million a year. Broadbent promised $50 million for shelters for battered wives. Turner promised $9.7 million in the following year for women to take training courses. [2]

Turner and Broadbent battled over whether the federal government could or should enforce equal pay for work of equal value in businesses regulated by the provinces. Turner promised mandatory affirmative-action programs in the public and private sector under federal jurisdiction. Mulroney and Broadbent both said they would force companies doing business with the federal government to institute equal pay. [3]

Broadbent asked Mulroney whether he would require banks to set aside specific amounts of money for loans to women for small businesses. [5] Mulroney said he would rely on persuasion. [3]

Day care

A non-partisan group had proposed a day-care plan that would cost $300 million in the first year, a proposal which was accepted by Broadbent. Turner proposed an increase in the maximum deduction for child care from $8000 to $12,000, which "shocked" the lobby group because the party's earlier written reply to their questionnaire had said that such tax deductions are of the greatest value to high income groups, and often remain unclaimed by those eligible. Mulroney promised to study the day-care question. [6] Broadbent criticized the Liberal party for taking refuge in the fact that child care is a provincial jurisdiction, saying that this is the same argument that was used in the 60's about a universal health care insurance system. [1]

The arms race

Peace was considered to be a women's issue. Prime Minister Turner had been continuing the peace initiative started by former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau by writing to world leaders, among them Soviet Communist Party leader Konstantin Chernenko and United Nations Secretary-General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar. [2]

Abortion

Broadbent appeared to go further than the other leaders in advocating freedom of choice. Turner stated that there were two irreconcilable points of view on the abortion issue, and that while the contemporary law didn't satisfy everyone, there was no viable alternative to it. [7] Turner argued that provincial governments should make legal abortions equally available to all women, and was said by an abortion activist to be the first Prime Minister to promise equal access to abortion across the country. Mulroney was not asked to discuss this issue during this debate.

Other issues

Other issues mentioned included pornography. [7]

Trust

The last question in the debate, posed by Kay Sigurjonsson, was "Why should we trust you now?" Turner criticized the Conservative party, citing a poll at a 1982 policy conference as showing 74 percent opposing increased funding for day-care and 75 percent opposed to affirmative action programs. [5] Time ran out before the leaders could finish answering this question. [3] [8]

Reaction to the debate

Chaviva Hosek, president of the NAC, said the debate was "a large step forward in political terms for women's issues". She said that the three leaders were more aware of the issues than they had been previously and that women would not forget their promises. [9] "It was a victory in the sense that two hours of prime time television talking about women's questions is really important," said Caroline Andrew, moderator of the debate. [10]

Outside the room where the debate was being held, about 45 members of REAL Women demonstrated, saying that the NAC does not represent them or the majority of women in Canada. [11]

An article in Maclean's states that Broadbent was widely judged to be the winner of the debate for his handling of the issues, [2] and he was applauded during the debate, [12] was supported by a strong majority of a group of 400 women who gathered at Algonquin College to watch the debate on television, [9] and was said to have come out a clear winner by Doris Anderson, past president of the NAC. [10] However, only Turner and Mulroney were believed to have a reasonable chance of winning the election, and between those two, the article in Maclean's stated that Turner came out ahead, by making more specific promises, some mentioning specific amounts of money. [2] According to Florence Irvine, past president of the Federation of Women Teachers' Associations of Ontario, Mulroney came out on top. The presidents of two major women's groups in Quebec chose Broadbent and Mulroney as winners. [10]

All three leaders were criticized by the media for sounding too much alike and for failing to interest viewers: "neither Turner, Tory leader Brian Mulroney nor New Democratic Party leader Ed Broadbent broke any new ground on women’s issues during the lacklustre debate…They concentrated, instead, on avoiding mistakes." [13] However, the press did give credit to the NAC and the debate for putting women’s issues in the political spotlight. Ronald Anderson of The Globe and Mail claimed the event was significant to the position of the Canadian feminist movement: "The television debate on women's issues this week indicates how far the women's movement has come in its emergence as a political force in Canada." [14]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Turner</span> Prime minister of Canada in 1984

John Napier Wyndham Turner was a Canadian lawyer and politician who served as the 17th prime minister of Canada from June to September 1984. He served as leader of the Liberal Party of Canada and leader of the Official Opposition from 1984 to 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brian Mulroney</span> Prime minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993

Martin Brian Mulroney is a Canadian lawyer, businessman, and politician who served as the 18th prime minister of Canada from 1984 to 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joe Clark</span> Prime minister of Canada from 1979 to 1980

Charles Joseph Clark is a Canadian businessman, writer, and politician who served as the 16th prime minister of Canada from 1979 to 1980.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jean Chrétien</span> Prime minister of Canada from 1993 to 2003

Joseph Jacques Jean Chrétien is a Canadian lawyer and politician who served as the 20th prime minister of Canada from 1993 to 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberal Party of Canada</span> Federal political party

The Liberal Party of Canada is a federal political party in Canada. The party espouses the principles of liberalism, and generally sits at the centre to centre-left of the Canadian political spectrum, with their main rival, the Conservative Party, positioned to their right and the New Democratic Party positioned to their left. The party is described as "big tent", practising "brokerage politics", attracting support from a broad spectrum of voters. The Liberal Party is the longest-serving and oldest active federal political party in the country, and has dominated federal politics of Canada for much of its history, holding power for almost 70 years of the 20th century. As a result, it has sometimes been referred to as Canada's "natural governing party".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ed Broadbent</span> Canadian politician and political scientist

John Edward "Ed" Broadbent is a Canadian social-democratic politician, political scientist, and chair of the Broadbent Institute, a policy think tank. He was leader of the New Democratic Party from 1975 to 1989. In the 2004 federal election, he returned to Parliament for an additional term as the Member of Parliament for Ottawa Centre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allan MacEachen</span> Canadian politician

Allan Joseph MacEachen was a Canadian politician and statesman who served as a senator and several times as a Cabinet minister. He was the first deputy prime minister of Canada and served from 1977 to 1979 and 1980 to 1984.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1993 Canadian federal election</span>

The 1993 Canadian federal election was held on October 25, 1993, to elect members to the House of Commons of the 35th Parliament of Canada. Considered to be a major political realignment, it was one of the most eventful elections in Canada's history. Two new regionalist parties emerged, finishing second and third in seat count. Most notably, the election marked the worst defeat for a governing party at the federal level and among the worst ever suffered by a governing party in the Western democratic world. In a landslide, the Liberal Party, led by Jean Chrétien, won a majority government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 Canadian federal election</span>

The 2004 Canadian federal election was held on June 28, 2004, to elect members to the House of Commons of Canada of the 38th Parliament of Canada. The Liberal government of Prime Minister Paul Martin lost its majority but was able to continue in office as a minority government after the election. This was the first election contested by the newly amalgamated Conservative Party of Canada, after it was formed by the two right-of-centre parties, the Progressive Conservative Party and the Canadian Alliance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1988 Canadian federal election</span>

The 1988 Canadian federal election was held on November 21, 1988, to elect members to the House of Commons of Canada of the 34th Parliament of Canada. It was an election largely fought on a single issue: the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA); the Progressive Conservative Party campaigned in favour of it whereas the Liberal Party and the New Democratic Party (NDP) campaigned against it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meech Lake Accord</span> Series of proposed amendments to the Constitution of Canada

The Meech Lake Accord was a series of proposed amendments to the Constitution of Canada negotiated in 1987 by Prime Minister Brian Mulroney and all 10 Canadian provincial premiers. It was intended to persuade the government of Quebec to symbolically endorse the 1982 constitutional amendments by providing for some decentralization of the Canadian federation.

The Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA), official name as the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the United States of America, was a bilateral trade agreement reached by negotiators for Canada and the United States on October 4, 1987, and signed by the leaders of both countries on January 2, 1988. The agreement phased out a wide range of trade restrictions in stages, over a ten-year period, and resulted in a substantial increase in cross-border trade as an improvement to the last replaced trade deal. With the addition of Mexico in 1994, CUSFTA was superseded by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1984 Canadian federal election</span>

The 1984 Canadian federal election was held on September 4, 1984, to elect members to the House of Commons of the 33rd Parliament of Canada.

The 1980 Quebec independence referendum was the first referendum in Quebec on the place of Quebec within Canada and whether Quebec should pursue a path toward sovereignty. The referendum was called by Quebec's Parti Québécois (PQ) government, which advocated secession from Canada.

The following is a timeline of the Canadian federal election, 2004. More on the election in general is available in the article 2004 Canadian federal election.

Conservatism in Canada is generally considered a movement which is primarily represented by the modern-day Conservative Party of Canada in federal party politics, as well as various centre-right and right-wing parties at the provincial level. Far-right politics have never been a prominent force in Canadian society. The first party which called itself "Conservative" in what would become Canada was elected in the Province of Canada election of 1854.

"You had an option, sir" was a phrase used by Brian Mulroney against John Turner during the English-language leaders debate in the 1984 Canadian federal election. The exchange is considered one of the only "knockout blows" in the history of Canadian political debate.

Dennis Joseph Mills is a Canadian businessman and former politician. He was a Liberal Member of Parliament for the riding of Toronto—Danforth in the east-end of downtown Toronto. From February 2012 until November 2016, Mills was a member of the board of directors of Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp and from April 2013 until the present he has been a director on the board of CGX Energy Inc. Mills is currently the President and CEO of Toronto Partners Inc. and is also founder of Racing Future Inc. where he is currently President and CEO.

Canadian leaders' debates are leaders' debates televised during federal elections in Canada, made up of two debates, one in French and one in English, usually held on back-to-back nights. The first time these debates were held was during the 1968 election. They were until recently produced by a consortium of the main Canadian television networks, namely the CBC/SRC, CTV, Global and TVA, although other channels such as CPAC carry the broadcasts as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lisa Raitt</span> Former Canadian politician

Lisa Sarah MacCormack Raitt is a former Canadian politician who served as a federal Cabinet minister and member of Parliament (MP) from 2008 to 2019. A member of the Conservative Party, Raitt was elected to the House of Commons in the 2008 election, representing Halton. Shortly after her election, Prime Minister Stephen Harper named her minister of natural resources, holding the role until 2010, when she became minister of labour. In 2013, she became minister of transport, remaining in the role until the Conservatives were defeated by the Liberal Party in the 2015 election. Raitt was re-elected in the newly formed riding of Milton. She contested the Conservative leadership in 2017, losing to Andrew Scheer, who made her deputy party leader and deputy opposition leader, a role she would hold until she was defeated in the 2019 election. Since leaving politics, she has been the vice chair of Global Investment Banking at the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC).

References

  1. 1 2 Descôteaux, Bernard (1984-08-16). "Le débat sur la condition féminine – Turner: Mulroney ne mérite pas sa "chance au coureur"". Le Devoir. pp. 1, 8.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nichols, Mark (1984-08-27). "'Why should we trust you now?'". Maclean's 97. In the debate, the New Democrat's Edward Broadbent was widely judged the winner for his handling of the issues.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Cruickshank, John; Regina Hickl-Szabo; Ross Howard; Jeff Sallot (1984-08-16). "Issue of trust left hanging after debate". The Globe and Mail. pp. 1, 4. A Liberal government also would make affirmative-action hiring programs mandatory in the federal public service, Crown corporations and federally incorporated private businesses, Mr. Turner said.
  4. ↑ Warburton, Wendy (1984-08-16). "Debate (continuation of Mulroney to put price on pledges from page 1)". The Ottawa Citizen. p. 4.
  5. 1 2 3 Hepburn, Bob (1984-08-16). "Avoiding mistakes was key goal of leaders (continued from page 1 story)". Toronto Star. p. A10.
  6. ↑ Canadian Press (1984-08-18). "Day-care lobby shocked by Turner's proposal on child-care deduction". The Ottawa Citizen. p. 5.
  7. 1 2 Hurst, Lynda (1984-08-16). "Viewers were the big losers in 2 hours of tortured listening". Toronto Star. p. A11.
  8. ↑ Pierson, Ruth Roach; Marjorie Griffin Cohen (1995). Canadian Women's Issues. James Lorimer & Company. p. 23. ISBN   1-55028-415-0. Kay Sigurjonsson asked, "Why should we trust you now? This electrified the crowd of women who throughout the evening had been strictly controlled because this was a televised event and any gasps, exclamations or other signs of disapproval from the audience were considered inappropriate for the CBC. The question startled the candidates, and each tried to outdo the other in assuring us that they were honest and trustworthy, but Sigurjonsson's point was made.
  9. 1 2 Spencer, Christina; Cathy Campbell (1984-08-16). "Broadbent wins on local 'report cards'". The Ottawa Citizen. p. 3. Results of the first 300 report cards showed 87 percent of the audience thought Broadbent deserved an 'A' rating, while Prime Minister John Turner and Tory leader Brain Mulroney rated a 'C' or worse.
  10. 1 2 3 Smith, Jackie (1984-08-16). "Broadbent a clear winner, Anderson says". Toronto Star. p. A11. New Democratic Party leader Ed Broadbent "came out a clear winner" in the debate on women's issues, says Doris Anderson, past-president of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women. [...] "Brian Mulroney came out on top, Broadbent made some very good points and John Turner's doing his homework," said [Florence] Irvine, past-president of the Federation of Somen Teachers' Associations of Ontario. [...] The presidents of two of Quebec's largest women's groups named Broadbent and Mulroney as the winners of the debate [...] Denyse Rochon – president of the Federation des Femmes du Quebec [...] said Broadbent "knows women's issues better than the other two leaders." Lise Paquette, president of the 35,000-member Association feminine pour l'education et l'action sociale, gave Mulroney top marks.
  11. ↑ "Left out (caption to photograph)". Toronto Star. 1984-08-16. p. A10.
  12. ↑ Poirier, Patricia (1984-08-16). "Broadbent sort gagnant". Le Droit (in French). p. 1. [...]c'est lui [Broadbent] qui a été le plus chaleureusement applaudi au cours des deux heures de débat.
    Le premier ministre libéral John Turner et le leader de l'opposition, Brian Mulroney ont tous deux été hués par les membres de l'auditoire. (Translation: It was he [Broadbent] who was the most warmly applauded during the two hours of debate. Liberal Prime Minister John Turner and the leader of the Opposition, Brian Mulroney, were both booed by the members of the audience.)
  13. ↑ Hepburn, Bob. "Turner says Tories are basically opposed to improving programs affecting women." Toronto Star, August 16, 1984.
  14. ↑ Anderson, Ronald. "Debate on women’s issues reflects their growing clout." The Globe and Mail, August 17, 1984.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.