List of Mid-South Conference football standings

This is a list of yearly Mid-South Conference football standings.

Mid-South Conference football standings

NAIA Division II (1989–1996)

1989 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T Georgetown (KY) $^ 6 – 0 – 0 7 – 3 – 1 Cumberland (KY) 5 – 1 – 0 7 – 3 – 0 Union (KY) 3 – 3 – 0 4 – 5 – 1 Evansville 3 – 3 – 0 4 – 6 – 0 Campbellsville 2 – 3 – 1 2 – 7 – 1 Kentucky Wesleyan 1 – 4 – 1 3 – 6 – 1 Tennessee Wesleyan 0 – 6 – 0 0 – 10 – 0 $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant	1990 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T Georgetown (KY) $^ 5 – 0 – 0 9 – 1 – 0 Cumberland (KY) 4 – 1 – 0 7 – 2 – 1 Campbellsville 3 – 2 – 0 8 – 2 – 0 Union (KY) 1 – 4 – 0 5 – 5 – 0 Evansville 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0 Tennessee Wesleyan 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0 Lambuth * 0 – 0 – 0 2 – 7 – 0 Cumberland (TN) * 0 – 0 – 0 0 – 8 – 0 $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant * – ineligible for conference title	1991 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T Georgetown (KY) $^ 6 – 0 – 0 13 – 1 – 0 Campbellsville 4 – 2 – 0 9 – 2 – 0 Union (KY) 3 – 3 – 0 6 – 4 – 0 Evansville 3 – 3 – 0 5 – 5 – 0 Cumberland (KY) 3 – 3 – 0 4 – 5 – 0 Lambuth 2 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0 Tusculum 0 – 6 – 0 0 – 10 – 0 $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
1992 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T Union (KY) + 4 – 1 – 0 8 – 2 – 0 Georgetown (KY) +^ 4 – 1 – 0 8 – 3 – 0 Campbellsville + 4 – 1 – 0 7 – 3 – 0 Tusculum 2 – 3 – 0 4 – 6 – 0 Cumberland (KY) 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0 Lambuth 0 – 5 – 0 3 – 7 – 0 + – Conference co-champions ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant	1993 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T Georgetown (KY) $^ 4 – 1 – 0 7 – 4 – 0 Lambuth 3 – 2 – 0 6 – 4 – 0 Tusculum 2 – 3 – 0 5 – 5 – 0 Union (KY) 2 – 3 – 0 5 – 5 – 0 Cumberland (KY) 2 – 3 – 0 2 – 9 – 0 Campbellsville 1 – 4 – 0 2 – 9 – 0 $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant	1994 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T Lambuth $^ 4 – 1 – 0 10 – 3 – 0 Tusculum 3 – 2 – 0 7 – 3 – 0 Union (KY) 3 – 2 – 0 7 – 3 – 0 Georgetown (KY) 3 – 2 – 0 3 – 6 – 0 Cumberland (KY) 1 – 4 – 0 5 – 5 – 0 Campbellsville 1 – 4 – 0 3 – 7 – 0 $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant
1995 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team W   L   T W   L   T Lambuth $^ 7 – 0 – 1 10 – 1 – 1 Union (KY) 6 – 1 – 1 7 – 2 – 1 Georgetown (KY) 6 – 2 – 0 6 – 4 – 0 Cumberland (KY) 5 – 3 – 0 6 – 4 – 0 Cumberland (TN) 4 – 4 – 0 4 – 6 – 0 Tusculum 3 – 5 – 0 3 – 6 – 0 Campbellsville 2 – 6 – 0 3 – 8 – 0 North Greenville 2 – 6 – 0 5 – 6 – 0 Bethel (TN) 0 – 8 – 0 0 – 10 – 0 $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA Division II playoff participant	1996 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Lambuth ^   7 – 0     9 – 2   Cumberland (TN)   6 – 1     8 – 2   Campbellsville   4 – 3     6 – 4   North Greenville   3 – 4     6 – 4   Georgetown (KY)   3 – 4     4 – 5   Union (KY)   3 – 4     4 – 6   Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     2 – 7   Bethel (TN)   1 – 6     2 – 9   + – Conference co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant

NAIA (1997–present)

1997 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Campbellsville +^   5 – 1     7 – 3   Georgetown (KY) +   5 – 1     5 – 4   Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     5 – 4   Cumberland (KY)   3 – 3     5 – 5   Lambuth   2 – 4     4 – 6   Union (KY)   2 – 4     2 – 8   North Greenville   0 – 6     1 – 8   + – Conference co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant	1998 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Georgetown (KY) +^   6 – 1     9 – 3   North Greenville +   6 – 1     7 – 3   Lambuth   5 – 2     7 – 3   Campbellsville   4 – 3     7 – 4   Cumberland (TN)   4 – 3     6 – 5   Belhaven   2 – 5     4 – 6   Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     3 – 7   Union (KY)   0 – 7     0 – 10   + – Conference co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant	1999 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   No. 1 Georgetown (KY) $^   7 – 0     13 – 1   No. 14 Lambuth ^   6 – 1     8 – 4   North Greenville   5 – 2     5 – 6   Belhaven   4 – 3     7 – 4   Campbellsville   2 – 5     2 – 8   Cumberland (KY)   2 – 5     3 – 8   Cumberland (TN)   2 – 5     2 – 8   Union (KY)   0 – 7     0 – 11   $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2000 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   No. 1 Georgetown (KY) $^   8 – 0     14 – 0   No. 11 Lambuth ^   6 – 1     7 – 4   No. 17 Campbellsville   5 – 2     7 – 4   Belhaven   4 – 3     5 – 5   Cumberland (TN)   3 – 5     5 – 5   Union (KY)   2 – 5     3 – 7   Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     2 – 8   North Greenville   0 – 8     0 – 10   $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2001 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   No. 1 Georgetown (KY) $^   7 – 0     14 – 0   No. 10 Campbellsville ^   5 – 2     10 – 3   No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     6 – 3   Belhaven   3 – 4     4 – 6   Lambuth   3 – 4     3 – 6   Union (KY)   2 – 4     2 – 7   Pikeville   2 – 5     3 – 7   Cumberland (KY)   1 – 6     3 – 6   $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2002 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   No. 2 Georgetown (KY) $^   8 – 0     12 – 2   No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   6 – 2     6 – 4   Lambuth   5 – 3     6 – 4   Pikeville   4 – 4     6 – 4   Belhaven   4 – 4     5 – 5   Campbellsville   3 – 5     4 – 6   Cumberland (KY)   3 – 5     4 – 6   Virginia–Wise   2 – 6     3 – 7   Union (KY)   1 – 7     2 – 8   $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2003 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   No. 11 Georgetown (KY) +^   8 – 1     9 – 3   No. 10 Lambuth +^   8 – 1     9 – 3   No. 16 Campbellsville   7 – 2     9 – 2   No. 20 Cumberland (KY)   7 – 2     8 – 2   Pikeville   3 – 6     4 – 6   Union (KY)   3 – 6     4 – 7   Cumberland (TN)   3 – 6     3 – 7   Belhaven   2 – 7     4 – 7   Virginia–Wise   2 – 7     3 – 8   Bethel (TN)   2 – 7     2 – 9   + – Conference co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2004 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   No. 3 Georgetown (KY) $^   10 – 0     12 – 1   No. 23 Pikeville   8 – 2     8 – 3   No. 16 Cumberland (KY)   7 – 3     8 – 3   Lambuth   6 – 4     6 – 4   Campbellsville   5 – 5     6 – 5   Bethel (TN)   5 – 5     5 – 7   Kentucky Wesleyan   4 – 6     4 – 7   Union (KY)   4 – 6     4 – 7   Belhaven   3 – 7     4 – 7   Virginia–Wise   3 – 7     3 – 8   Cumberland (TN)   0 – 10     0 – 10   $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2005 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 5 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     9 – 3   No. 21 Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 2     8 – 3   No. 15 Pikeville ^   3 – 2     7 – 3   Union (KY)   3 – 2     4 – 6   Virginia–Wise   1 – 4     4 – 7   Shorter   0 – 5     2 – 8   West Division No. 23 Bethel (TN) x   5 – 0     7 – 4   Belhaven   3 – 2     5 – 6   Lambuth   3 – 2     5 – 6   Kentucky Wesleyan   2 – 3     3 – 7   Campbellsville   2 – 3     2 – 8   Cumberland (TN)   0 – 5     2 – 8   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2006 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 10 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     9 – 2   No. 24 Virginia–Wise   3 – 2     8 – 3   Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 2     6 – 4   Pikeville   2 – 3     4 – 6   Union (KY)   1 – 4     2 – 8   West Virginia Tech   1 – 4     1 – 10   West Division No. 7 Bethel (TN) x^†   5 – 0     10 – 3   Belhaven   4 – 1     6 – 5   Shorter   3 – 2     6 – 5   Lambuth   1 – 4     4 – 7   Cumberland (TN)   1 – 4     3 – 7   Campbellsville   1 – 4     2 – 8   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant † – Bethel forfeited all ten wins, including games against seven Mid-South teams. Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2007 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 14 Virginia–Wise x   4 – 1     10 – 2   No. 16 Cumberlands (KY) x^   4 – 1     8 – 3   No. 24 Georgetown (KY)   3 – 2     6 – 4   Pikeville   2 – 3     4 – 7   Union (KY)   2 – 3     4 – 7   West Virginia Tech   0 – 5     1 – 10   West Division No. 5 Bethel (TN) x^   5 – 0     11 – 2   Shorter   3 – 2     7 – 4   Belhaven   3 – 2     5 – 6   Cumberland (TN)   2 – 3     3 – 7   Lambuth   2 – 3     3 – 8   Campbellsville   0 – 5     0 – 10   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2008 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 6 Cumberlands (KY) x^   6 – 0     10 – 2   No. 10 Union (KY) ^   5 – 1     9 – 3   No. 19 Virginia–Wise   4 – 2     8 – 3   Georgetown (KY)   3 – 3     5 – 5   Campbellsville   2 – 4     3 – 8   Pikeville   1 – 5     2 – 9   West Virginia Tech   0 – 6     0 – 11   West Division No. 11 Shorter x^   4 – 1     9 – 3   No. 15 Lambuth x^   4 – 1     8 – 4   Cumberland (TN) x   4 – 1     6 – 5   Belhaven   2 – 3     4 – 6   Bethel (TN)   1 – 4     2 – 9   Faulkner   0 – 5     2 – 9   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2009 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 11 Cumberlands (KY) x^   5 – 1     9 – 2   Campbellsville   4 – 2     7 – 4   Georgetown (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 4   Virginia–Wise   4 – 2     5 – 6   Union (KY)   3 – 3     4 – 6   Pikeville   1 – 5     3 – 8   West Virginia Tech   0 – 6     3 – 8   West Division No. 7 Lambuth x^   6 – 0     12 – 1   Belhaven   4 – 2     6 – 5   Bethel (TN)   4 – 2     5 – 6   Shorter   3 – 3     6 – 5   Cumberland (TN)   3 – 3     5 – 6   Kentucky Christian   1 – 5     1 – 9   Faulkner   0 – 6     2 – 9   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2010 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 14 Georgetown (KY) x^   6 – 0     8 – 3   Campbellsville   5 – 1     7 – 5   Lindsey Wilson   4 – 2     5 – 6   Virginia–Wise   3 – 3     3 – 8   Pikeville   2 – 4     2 – 8   West Virginia Tech   1 – 5     2 – 9   Kentucky Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11   West Division No. 19 Cumberlands (KY) x^   5 – 1     7 – 4   No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     8 – 3   Union (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 4   Bethel (TN)   3 – 3     5 – 5   Shorter   2 – 4     5 – 6   Faulkner   2 – 4     3 – 7   Belhaven   1 – 5     4 – 7   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2011 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 4 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     12 – 1   Lindsey Wilson   3 – 2     7 – 3   Campbellsville   3 – 2     7 – 5   Kentucky Christian   2 – 3     4 – 7   Virginia–Wise   1 – 4     5 – 6   Pikeville   1 – 4     4 – 6   West Division No. 14 Bethel (TN) x^   5 – 1     8 – 3   No. 25 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     7 – 3   No. 24 Cumberlands (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 3   Shorter   3 – 3     6 – 4   Belhaven   3 – 3     5 – 6   Faulkner   1 – 5     3 – 7   Union (KY)   1 – 5     2 – 9   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2012 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 8 Georgetown (KY) x^   5 – 0     10 – 1   No. 7 Cumberlands (KY) ^   4 – 1     10 – 2   No. 25 Kentucky Christian   3 – 2     7 – 4   Union (KY)   1 – 4     4 – 7   Pikeville   1 – 4     3 – 8   Virginia–Wise   1 – 4     3 – 8   West Division No. 9 Bethel (TN) x^   6 – 0     9 – 4   No. 19 Cumberland (TN)   4 – 2     8 – 3   Belhaven   4 – 2     6 – 5   Faulkner   4 – 2     6 – 5   Campbellsville   2 – 4     3 – 8   Lindsey Wilson   1 – 5     3 – 8   Bluefield   0 – 6     0 – 11   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2013 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 2 Cumberlands (KY) x^   6 – 0     13 – 1   No. 12 Georgetown (KY) ^   5 – 1     7 – 4   No. 19 Lindsey Wilson   3 – 3     8 – 3   Pikeville   3 – 3     7 – 4   Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     3 – 8   Union (KY)   2 – 4     3 – 8   Bluefield   0 – 6     0 – 11   West Division No. 10 Faulkner x^   4 – 1     9 – 3   Reinhardt x   4 – 1     6 – 4   No. 23 Cumberland (TN)   3 – 2     7 – 4   Campbellsville   3 – 2     4 – 6   Belhaven   1 – 4     3 – 8   Bethel (TN)   0 – 5     2 – 9   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2014 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 7 Lindsey Wilson x^   6 – 0     10 – 3   No. 11 Georgetown (KY) ^   5 – 1     8 – 3   Pikeville   4 – 2     5 – 6   Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     5 – 6   Cumberlands (KY)   2 – 4     3 – 7   Bluefield   1 – 5     3 – 8   Union (KY)   1 – 5     1 – 9   West Division No. 10 Faulkner x^   4 – 1     9 – 3   No. 14 Campbellsville x^   4 – 1     7 – 4   Reinhardt   3 – 2     6 – 4   Cumberland (TN)   2 – 3     6 – 5   Bethel (TN)   2 – 3     5 – 6   Belhaven   0 – 5     2 – 9   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2015 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 25 Georgetown (KY) x   5 – 0     6 – 4   Cumberlands (KY)   4 – 1     7 – 3   Pikeville   3 – 2     4 – 7   Kentucky Christian   2 – 3     2 – 9   Union (KY)   1 – 4     1 – 9   Bluefield   0 – 5     1 – 10   West Division No. 11 Campbellsville x^   5 – 0     8 – 3   No. 10 Reinhardt ^   4 – 1     9 – 2   No. 13 Lindsey Wilson ^   3 – 2     8 – 3   No. 23 Faulkner   2 – 3     7 – 3   Bethel (TN)   1 – 4     4 – 7   Cumberland (TN)   0 – 5     3 – 8   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2016 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   East Division No. 25 Georgetown (KY) x   5 – 1     7 – 4   Pikeville x   5 – 1     6 – 5   Union (KY)   4 – 2     5 – 6   Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 3     4 – 6   Kentucky Christian   3 – 3     3 – 8   Bluefield   1 – 5     1 – 10   Cincinnati Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11   West Division No. 3 Reinhardt x^   5 – 0     13 – 1   No. 8 Lindsey Wilson ^   4 – 1     11 – 2   Faulkner   3 – 2     6 – 4   Cumberland (TN)   2 – 3     5 – 6   Bethel (TN)   1 – 4     7 – 4   Campbellsville   0 – 5     2 – 8   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2017 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Appalachian Division No. 2 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     12 – 1   Bluefield   4 – 2     6 – 5   Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 3     6 – 4   Union (KY)   3 – 3     5 – 5   Pikeville   3 – 3     5 – 6   Point   1 – 5     3 – 8   St. Andrews   1 – 5     2 – 8   Bluegrass Division No. 5 Lindsey Wilson x^   6 – 0     11 – 1   No. 7 Georgetown (KY) ^   5 – 1     9 – 2   No. 20 Campbellsville   4 – 2     8 – 2   Cumberland (TN)   3 – 3     7 – 4   Bethel (TN)   2 – 4     3 – 7   Kentucky Christian   1 – 5     1 – 10   Cincinnati Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11   Sun Division No. 10 Southeastern x^   5 – 0     8 – 2   No. 22 Faulkner   4 – 1     7 – 3   Webber International   3 – 2     5 – 4   Warner   2 – 3     4 – 6   Ave Maria   1 – 4     2 – 8   Edward Waters   0 – 5     0 – 10   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2018 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Appalachian Division No. 11 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 2   No. 12 Cumberlands (KY) ^   5 – 1     10 – 2   Pikeville   4 – 2     6 – 5   Point   2 – 4     3 – 8   Bluefield   1 – 4     4 – 7   St. Andrews   1 – 4     2 – 7   Union (KY)   1 – 5     2 – 8   Bluegrass Division No. 10 Bethel (TN) x^   6 – 0     10 – 1   No. 19 Georgetown (KY)   4 – 2     7 – 3   No. 18 Lindsey Wilson   4 – 2     7 – 3   Cumberland (TN)   3 – 3     5 – 6   Campbellsville   3 – 3     4 – 6   Kentucky Christian   1 – 5     2 – 9   Cincinnati Christian   0 – 6     0 – 11   Sun Division No. 21 Southeastern x   5 – 1     7 – 3   Ave Maria x   5 – 1     6 – 4   Keiser   4 – 2     6 – 4   Webber International   3 – 3     7 – 3   Edward Waters   2 – 4     4 – 7   Faulkner   1 – 5     4 – 6   Warner   1 – 5     1 – 9   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2019 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Appalachian Division No. 13 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 3   St. Andrews   5 – 1     5 – 5   Point   4 – 2     5 – 7   Bluefield   3 – 3     4 – 7   Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     3 – 8   Cincinnati Christian *   1 – 5     2 – 9   Union (KY)   0 – 6     0 – 11   Bluegrass Division No. 4 Lindsey Wilson x^   7 – 0     12 – 1   No. 7 Cumberlands (KY) ^   6 – 1     10 – 2   Pikeville   4 – 3     6 – 5   Georgetown (KY)   4 – 3     5 – 5   Cumberland (TN)   3 – 4     5 – 5   Bethel (TN)   2 – 5     5 – 6   Thomas More   2 – 5     4 – 7   Campbellsville   0 – 7     1 – 9   Sun Division No. 9 Keiser x^   6 – 0     9 – 1   No. 15 Southeastern   5 – 1     8 – 1   Ave Maria   3 – 3     5 – 5   St. Thomas (FL)   2 – 4     4 – 6   Webber International   2 – 4     3 – 6   Warner   2 – 4     3 – 7   Faulkner   1 – 5     3 – 6   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant * – Cincinnati Christian announced its closure mid-season and forfeited its three remaining games. Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2020 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Appalachian Division No. 8 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 1   Faulkner   5 – 1     6 – 2   Kentucky Christian   4 – 2     6 – 2   St. Andrews   2 – 3     3 – 3   Union (KY)   1 – 4     1 – 6   Bluefield   1 – 5     2 – 7   Point   1 – 5     1 – 7   Bluegrass Division No. 1 Lindsey Wilson x^   7 – 0     11 – 0   No. 13 Georgetown (KY) ^   6 – 1     6 – 2   Cumberlands (KY)   4 – 3     4 – 3   Bethel (TN)   3 – 4     3 – 4   Pikeville   3 – 4     3 – 4   Cumberland (TN)   2 – 5     2 – 5   Thomas More   2 – 5     2 – 5   Campbellsville   1 – 6     1 – 6   Sun Division No. 4 Keiser x^   5 – 0     9 – 1   Southeastern   3 – 1     5 – 1   St. Thomas (FL)   3 – 2     4 – 6   Ave Maria   2 – 3     3 – 4   Warner   1 – 3     2 – 4   Webber International   1 – 5     1 – 7   Florida Memorial   0 – 1     1 – 3   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll
2021 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   Appalachian Division No. 6 Reinhardt x^   6 – 0     9 – 3   No. 24 Faulkner   5 – 1     8 – 2   Bluefield   4 – 2     6 – 5   Kentucky Christian   2 – 4     3 – 8   Point   2 – 4     2 – 8   St. Andrews   2 – 4     2 – 9   Union (KY)   0 – 6     1 – 9   Bluegrass Division No. 1 Lindsey Wilson x^   7 – 0     12 – 1   No. 15 Georgetown (KY)   5 – 2     8 – 2   Bethel (TN)   4 – 3     7 – 4   Thomas More   4 – 3     5 – 5   Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 4     6 – 4   Pikeville   2 – 5     4 – 6   Cumberland (TN)   2 – 5     3 – 7   Campbellsville   1 – 6     1 – 8   Sun Division No. 11 Keiser x^   5 – 1     9 – 3   Southeastern x   5 – 1     8 – 3   St. Thomas (FL)   4 – 2     9 – 2   Ave Maria   4 – 2     5 – 6   Warner   1 – 5     3 – 8   Webber International   1 – 5     2 – 8   Florida Memorial   1 – 5     2 – 9   x – Division champion/co-champions ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll	2022 Mid-South Conference football standings v t e Conf Overall Team   W   L     W   L   No. 4 Bethel (TN) $^   8 – 0     11 – 1   No. 8 Lindsey Wilson ^   7 – 1     10 – 2   No. 21 Georgetown (KY)   5 – 3     7 – 3   Pikeville   5 – 3     6 – 4   Thomas More   4 – 4     5 – 6   Cumberlands (KY)   3 – 5     5 – 5   Faulkner   3 – 5     4 – 7   Cumberland (TN)   1 – 7     3 – 7   Campbellsville   0 – 8     2 – 8   $ – Conference champion ^ – NAIA playoff participant Rankings from NAIA Coaches' Poll