This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page . (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
This is a summary of state trade secret law in the United States and its territories. Although many U.S. states have adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), each state is responsible for defining what constitutes a trade secret. This list draws on both statutory law and the case law interpreting it.
State | Statutory Provision | Elements | Key Cases |
---|---|---|---|
Alabama | Ala. Code. § 8-27-2(1) | There are six elements that need to be met: a. Is used or intended for use in a trade or business; b. Is included or embodied in a formula, pattern, compilation, computer software, drawing, device, method, technique, or process; c. Is not publicly known and is not generally known in the trade or business of the person asserting that it is a trade secret; d. Cannot be readily ascertained or derived from publicly available information; e. Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy; and f. Has significant economic value. | Ex parte Miltope Corp., 823 So. 2d 640, 644–46 (Ala. 2001); Ex parte W.L. Halsey Grocery Co., 897 So. 2d 1028, 1034 (Ala. 2004); Movie Gallery US v. Greenshields, 648 F. Supp. 2d 1252, 1264 (M.D. Ala. 2009); Public Systems, Inc. v. Towry, 587 So. 2d 969, 972 (Ala. 1991) |
Alaska | Alaska Stat. Ann. § 45.50.940(3) | (3) "trade secret" means information that (A) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (B) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | State Dept. of Nat. Resources v. Arctic Slope Reg'l Corp., 834 P.2d 134, 139 (Alaska 1991) (the data obtained by the oil companies from the KIC well constituted a trade secret because the value of the data depended on its secrecy and the companies clearly attempted to maintain its secrecy) |
Arizona | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 44-401 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, that both: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy | Enter. Leasing Co. v. Ehmke (the trade secret must not be known naturally by individuals within the area of business); W. L. Gore & Assocs. v. GI Dynamics, Inc. (not a trade secret if the information has been disclosed in a public domain such as a patent application) |
Arkansas | A.C.A. § 4-75-601(4) | Information qualifies as a trade secret if it is a compilation or process which derives economic value from being generally unknown and is subject to reasonable confidentiality efforts. | Weigh Sys. South v. Mark's Scales & Equipment (2002) (whether information is a trade secret depends on: the extent to which information is known outside the business and within the business, measures to guard secrecy, economic value of the information, effort in developing information, and ease at which information could be duplicated); Vigoro Indus. v. Crisp (1996); Coenco, Inc. v. Coenco Sales, Inc. (1991) (information that is readily ascertainable to the public does not qualify for trade secret designation, even if there were efforts to keep potentially valuable confidential); Allen v. Johar, Inc. (1992) (customer lists generally constitute trade secrets) |
California | Cal. Civ. Code § 3426.1 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1993) (plaintiff's database was a trade secret as it had potential economic value since it allowed a competitor to direct its sales efforts to those potential customers already using the MAI computer system; MAI also took reasonable steps to insure the secrecy of the information requiring employees to sign confidentiality agreements) |
Colorado | C.R.S. § 7-74-102 | "Trade secret" means the whole or any portion or phase of any scientific or technical information, design, process, procedure, formula, improvement, confidential business or financial information, listing of names, addresses, or telephone numbers, or other information relating to any business or profession which is secret and of value. To be a "trade secret" the owner thereof must have taken measures to prevent the secret from becoming available to persons other than those selected by the owner to have access thereto for limited purposes. | Rumnock v. Anschultz, 2016 CO 77 (plaintiff's documents did not meet the confidentiality requirement for trade secret status because there was no evidence of any efforts to keep the documents confidential); Gognat v. Ellsworth, 259 P.3d 497 (the term "trade secret" refers to one complete asset, meaning that individual pieces of a compilation are not separate trade secrets) |
Connecticut | Con. Gen. Stat. § 35–51(d) | A trade secret is a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, process, drawing, cost data, or customer list that "(1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy." | Smith v. Snyder, 839 A.2d 589, 463 (Conn. 2004) |
Delaware | Del. Code Ann. § 2001(4) | "Trade secret" shall mean information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, that: a. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and b. Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. HRD Corp., 909 F.Supp.2d 340 (2012); AlixPartners, LLP v. Benichou, 250 A.3d 775 (2019) |
Florida | Fla. Stat. Ann. § 688.002 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. Barker Boatworks, LLC, 898 F. 3d 1279, 1299 (11th Cir. 2018) |
Georgia | Ga. Code Ann. § 10-1-761(4) | (1) technical or nontechnical data, a formula, a pattern, a compilation, a program, a device, a method, a technique, a drawing, a process, financial data, financial plans, product plans, or a list of actual or potential customers or suppliers (2) not commonly known by or available to the public (3) Derives economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use (4) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy | Penalty Kick Mgt. Ltd. v. Coca-Cola Co., 318 F.3d 1284, 1291 (11th Cir. 2003);Camp Creek Hosp. Inns, Inc. v. Sheraton Fran. Corp., 139 F.3d 1396, 1411 (11th Cir. 1998) |
Hawaii | Haw. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 482B-2 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program device, method, technique, or process that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | |
Idaho | Idaho Code § 48-801 | Information is a "trade secret" if it (a). derives economic value from (b.) not being generally known by others that could make economic use of it and (c.) not being readily and properly ascertainable by others that could make economic use of it, as well as (d.) being subject to reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy. | Basic Am. v. Shatila, 133 Idaho 726 (Idaho 1999) |
Illinois | 765 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 1065/2 | (d) "Trade secret" means information, including but not limited to, technical or non-technical data, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, drawing, process, financial data, or list of actual or potential customers or suppliers, that: (1) is sufficiently secret to derive economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy or confidentiality. | |
Indiana | Ind. Code § 24-2-3-2 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | |
Iowa | Iowa Code Ann. § 550 | "Trade secret" means information, including but not limited to a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that is both of the following elements: a. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by a person able to obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. b. Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | |
Kansas | K.S.A. § 60-3320(4) | i) economic value; ii) not generally known; iii) not readily ascertainable by proper means; iv) by others who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, iv) subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances | Fireworks Spectacular, Inc. v. Premier Pyrotechnics, Inc., 147 F. Supp. 2d 1057 (D. Kan. 2001); DSMC, Inc. v. Convera Corp., 479 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2007) |
Kentucky | Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 365.880 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, data, device, method, technique, or process, that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Alph C. Kaufman, Inc. v. Cornerstone Indus. Corp., 540 S.W.3d 803 (Ky. Ct. App. 2017); Insight Kentucky Partners II, L.P. v. Preferred Auto. Servs., Inc., 514 S.W.3d 537 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016) |
Louisiana | La. Stat. Ann. § 1431(4) | (a) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (b) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Innovative Manpower Sols., LLC v. Ironman Staffing, LLC, 929 F. Supp. 2d 597, (W.D. La. 2013); Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Guidry, W.D.La.2010, 724 F.Supp.2d 612.; CheckPoint Fluidic Systems Intern., Ltd. v. Guccione, E.D.La.2012, 888 F.Supp.2d 780. |
Maine | Me. Stat. tit. 10, § 1542 | Trade secret. "Trade secret" means information, including, but not limited to, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, that: A. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and B. Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Blue Sky W., LLC v. Maine Revenue Servs., 2019 ME 137 (Me. 2019); Spottiswoode v. Levine, 1999 ME 79 (Me. 1999) |
Maryland | Md. Code Ann., Com. Law § 11-1201 | Information, which includes "a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process" must meet a two-element test: "(1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and "(2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy." | AirFacts, Inc. v. de Amezaga, 909 F.3d 84 (4th Cir. 2018); Brightview Grp., LP v. Teeters, 441 F. Supp. 3d 115 (D. Md. 2020); RaceRedi Motorsports, LLC v. Dart Mach., Ltd., 640 F. Supp. 2d 660 (D. Md. 2009) |
Massachusetts | Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 93, § 42 | "Trade secret", specified or specifiable information, whether or not fixed in tangible form or embodied in any tangible thing, including but not limited to a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, process, business strategy, customer list, invention, or scientific, technical, financial or customer data that (i) at the time of the alleged misappropriation, provided economic advantage, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, others who might obtain economic advantage from its acquisition, disclosure or use; and (ii) at the time of the alleged misappropriation was the subject of efforts that were reasonable under the circumstances, which may include reasonable notice, to protect against it being acquired, disclosed or used without the consent of the person properly asserting rights therein or such person's predecessor in interest. | |
Michigan | Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1902 | (d) "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that is both of the following: (i) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. (ii) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy." | Prudential Defense Solutions, Inc. v. Graham, 498 F.Supp.3d 928 (E.D. Mich. 2020) |
Minnesota | Minn. Stat. § 325c | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (i) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (ii) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Prairie Field Servs., LLC v. Welsh, 497 F.Supp 3d 381 (D. Minn. 2020) ("The DTSA and MUTSA define a ‘trade secret’ as ‘information’ that ‘(1) is not generally known or readily ascertainable, (2) has value as a result of its secrecy, and (3) is the subject of reasonable efforts under the circumstances to protect its secrecy.") |
Mississippi | Miss. Code Ann. § 75-26-3(d)(i–ii) | (d) "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, that: (i) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (ii) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | |
Missouri | Mo. Ann. Stat. § 417.450 | "Trade secret", information, including but not limited to, technical or nontechnical data, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Central Trust and Inv. Co. v. Signalpoint Asset Management, LLC; Whelan Sec. Co. v. Kennebrew; Western Blue Print Co., LLC v. Roberts |
Montana | Mont. Code Ann. § 30-14-402 | Montana's Uniform Trade Secrets Act defines a "trade secret" as information or computer software, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (a) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other person who can obtain economic value for its disclosure or use; and (b) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Great Falls Trib. v. Mont. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 82 P.3d 786 (Mont. 2003); Mont. Silversmiths, Inc. v. Taylor Brands, LLC, 850 F.Supp.2d 1172 (D. Mont. 2012) |
Nebraska | Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann § 87-502(4) | Nebraska's Trade Secrets Act defines a trade secret as information, including, but not limited to, a drawing, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, code, or process that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being known to, and not being ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | First Express Servs. Group v. Easter, 286 Neb. 912 (2013) |
Nevada | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 600A.030 | "Trade secret": (a) Means information, including, without limitation, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, product, system, process, design, prototype, procedure, computer programming instruction or code that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by the public or any other persons who can obtain commercial or economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. (b) Does not include any information that a manufacturer is required to report pursuant to NRS 439B.635 or 439B.640, information that a pharmaceutical sales representative is required to report pursuant to NRS 439B.660, information that a pharmacy benefit manager is required to report pursuant to NRS 439B.645 or information that a wholesaler is required to report pursuant to NRS 439B.642, to the extent that such information is required to be disclosed by those sections. | Finkel v. Cashman Professional, Inc., 128 Nev. 68, 74 (Nev. 2012) |
New Hampshire | N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 350-B:1 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Beane v. Beane, 856 F. Supp. 2d 280 (D.N.H. 2012); Mortg. Specialists, Inc. v. Davey, 153 N.H. 764, 904 A.2d 652 (2006) |
New Jersey | N.J. Stat. Ann. § 56:15-2 | "Trade secret" means information, held by one or more people, without regard to form, including a formula, pattern, business data compilation, program, device, method, technique, design, diagram, drawing, invention, plan, procedure, prototype or process, that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Lasch v. Koperweis, No. A-4352-17T1, 2019 WL 2317166, at *4 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 31, 2019) Intech Powercore Corp. v. Albert Handtmann Elteka GmbH & Co. KG, No. CV 14–05508, 2021 WL 1138124, at *6 (D.N.J. March 24, 2021) |
New Mexico | N.M. Stat. Ann. § 57-3A-2 | "trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, that: (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Rapid Temps, Inc. v. Lamon, 2008, 144 N.M. 804, 192 P.3d 799; Insure New Mexico, LLC v. McGonigle, 2000, 128 N.M. 611, P.2d 1053 |
New York | New York does not have any statutes pertaining to trade secrets. New York is only one of two states that have not adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Instead, New York trade secret protection is governed by the common law. [1] | A trade secret is any “formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one’s business, and which gives [the employer] an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.” [2] "New York courts typically consider the following factors in determining whether there is a trade secret: (1) the extent to which the information is known outside of the business; (2) the extent to which it is known by employees and others involved in the business; (3) the extent of measures taken by the business to guard the secrecy of the information; (4) the value of the information to the business and its competitors; (5) the amount of effort or money expended by the business in developing the information; (6) the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly acquired or duplicated by others." [3] | Ashland Mgmt. v. Janien, 82 N.Y.2d 395, 407 (N.Y. 1993) |
North Carolina | N.C. Gen. Stat. § 66–152(3) | "Trade secret" means business or technical information, including but not limited to a formula, pattern, program, device, compilation of information, method, technique, or process that: a. Derives independent actual or potential commercial value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable through independent development or reverse engineering by persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and b. Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Spirax Sarco, Inc. v. SSI Eng’g, Inc., 122 F.Supp.3d 406 (E.D. N.C. 2015); RLM Commc’ns, Inc. v. Tuschen, 66 F.Supp.3d 681 (E.D. N.C. 2014); Philips Elecs. N. Am. Corp. v. Hope, 631 F.Supp.2d 705 (M.D. N.C. 2009) |
North Dakota | N.D.C.C. 47–25.1-01 | A "Trade secret" is information such as a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: 1. Derives actual or potential independent economic value from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and 2. Is subject to reasonable efforts under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | |
Ohio | Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 1333.61(D) | (D) "Trade secret" means information, including the whole or any portion or phase of any scientific or technical information, design, process, procedure, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or improvement, or any business information or plans, financial information, or listing of names, addresses, or telephone numbers, that satisfies both of the following: (1) It derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. (2) It is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Sheil v. Horton, 117 N.E.3d 194, 205 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018); Salemi v. Cleveland Metroparks, 49 N.E.3d 1296, 1302 (Ohio 2016); State ex. rel. The Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of Ins., 687 N.E.2d 661, 672 (Ohio 1997) |
Oklahoma | 78 Okl. St. Ann § 86 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, that: a. derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and b. is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Sw. Stainless, L.P. v. Sappington, 582 F.Supp.3d 1176 (10th Cir. 2009); Micro Consulting, Inc. v. Zubeldia, 813 F.Supp. 1514 (W.D. Okla. 1990); ProLine Products, L.L.C. v. McBride, 324 P.3d 430 (Civ. App. Okla. 2014) |
Oregon | O.R.S § 646.461 | 1) Independent economic value from not being generally known to the public; 2) subject of reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy | Western Medical Consultants, Inc. v. Johnson (1996); Smith v. Healy (2010), IKON Office Solutions, Inc. v. American Office Products, Inc. (2001); Dial Temporary Help Service, Inc. v. Shrock (1996); Hart Enterprises, Inc. v. Chia (1992) |
Pennsylvania | 12 Pa. C.S. Ann. § 5302 | "Trade secret." —Information, including a formula, drawing, pattern, compilation including a customer list, program, device, method, technique or process that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | |
Rhode Island | R.I. Gen. Laws § 6-41-1 | (4) "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (i) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (ii) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | |
South Carolina | S.C. Code Ann. § 39-8-20 | 5) "Trade secret" means: (a) information including, but not limited to, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, product, system, or process, design, prototype, procedure, or code that: (i) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by the public or any other person who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and (ii) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. (b) A trade secret may consist of a simple fact, item, or procedure, or a series or sequence of items or procedures which, although individually could be perceived as relatively minor or simple, collectively can make a substantial difference in the efficiency of a process or the production of a product, or may be the basis of a marketing or commercial strategy. The collective effect of the items and procedures must be considered in any analysis of whether a trade secret exists and not the general knowledge of each individual item or procedure. | Wilson v. Gandis; Hartsock v. Goodyear Dunlop Tires N. Am.; Laffitte v. Bridgestone Corp.; Atwood Agency. v. Black |
South Dakota | S.D. Codified Laws § 37-29-1(4) | A trade secret is information (1) embodied in a "formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or proces"; (2) that "derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use"; and (3) "Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy." | Aqreva, LLC v. Bailly, 950 N.W.2d 774 (S.D. 2020); Weins v. Sporleder, 569 N.W.2d 16 (S.D. 1997); Centrol, Inc. v. Morrow, 489 N.W.2d 890 (S.D. 1992) |
Tennessee | Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-1702 | Information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process to which all of the following apply: 1. The information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. 2. The information is the subject of efforts to maintain its secrecy that are reasonable under the circumstances. | Boesch v. Holeman, 621 S.W.3d 60 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020) |
Texas | Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 134A.002 | All forms and types of information, whether tangible or intangible and whether or how stored, compiled, or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in writing if (1) the owner of the trade secret has taken reasonable measures under the circumstances to keep the information secret (2) the information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, another person who can obtain economic value from the disclosure or use of the information. | Snowhite Textile & Furnishings, Inc. v. Innvision Hosp., Inc., No. 05-18-01447-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 9811 (Tex. App.—Dallas December 14, 2020, no pet. h.); Educ. Mgmt. Servs., LLC v. Tracey, 102 F. Supp. 3d 906 (W.D. Tex. 2015) |
Utah | Utah Code Ann. § 13-24-2 | "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: (a) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorp; InnoSys, Inc. v. Mercer; Cordell v. Berger; CDC Restoration & Constr., LC v. Tradesmen Contrs. |
Vermont | 9 V.S.A. § 4601 | There are two elements that must be met for "information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process" to be a trade secret: (a) it must "derive independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use;" and (b) is must be "the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy." | Dicks v. Jensen, 172 Vt. 43 (Vt. 2001); Omega Optical, Inc. v. Chroma Tech. Corp., 174 Vt. 10 (Vt. 2002) |
Virginia | Va. Code Ann. § 59.1–336 | "Trade secret" means information, including but not limited to, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, that: 1. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use, and 2. Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Secure Servs. Tech., Inc. v. Time & Space Processing Inc., 722 F. Supp. 1354 (E.D. Va. 1989); Advanced Computer Servs. of Michigan, Inc. v. MAI Sys. Corp., 845 F. Supp. 356 (E.D. Va. 1994); Physicians Interactive v. Lathian Sys., Inc., No. CA 03-1193-A, 2003 WL 23018270 (E.D. Va. 2003) |
Washington | Wash. Rev. Code § 19.108.010(4) | (4) "Trade secret" means information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that: (a) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (b) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, LLP v. Office of Attorney Gen., 179 Wash. App. 711, 328 P.3d 905 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014); Progressive Animal Welfare Soc'y v. Univ. of Wash., 125 Wn.2d 243, 263, 884 P.2d 592 (Wash. 1994); Ed Nowogroski Ins., Inc. v. Rucker, 137 Wn.2d 427, 438, 971 P.2d 936 (Wash. 1999); NW Monitoring LLC v. Hollander, 534 F. Supp. 3d 1329 (W.D. Wash. 2021) |
West Virginia | W. Va. Code, § 47-22-1 | "Trade secret" means information, including, but not limited to, a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process, that: (1) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (2) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | Servo Corp. of America v. General Elec. Co., 393 F.2d 551 (C.A.Va. 1968); McGough v. Nalco Co., 496 F.Supp.2d 729 (N.D.W.Va.,2007); IVS Hydro, Inc. v. Robinson, 93 Fed.Appx. 521, 2004 WL 626828 |
Wisconsin | Wis. Stat. Ann. § 134.90 | information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process to which all of the following apply: 1. The information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. 2. The information is the subject of efforts to maintain its secrecy that are reasonable under the circumstances. | Nalco Chem. Co. v. Hydro Techs., Inc., 984 F.2d 801, (7th Cir. 1993), as amended on denial of reh'g (March 18, 1993); Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. v. LaGrant, 483 F. Supp. 3d 625, (E.D. Wis. 2020) |
Wyoming | Wyo. Stat. Ann. §40-24-101 | A trade secret is information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program device, method, technique or process that: (A) Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and (B) Is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. | PPEX, LLC v. Buttonwood Inc., Case No. 21-CV-53-F, 2021 WL 7210417 (D. Wyo. September 7, 2021) |
Washington, D.C. | D.C. Code Ann. § 36-401(4) | Catalyst & Chem. Servs., Inc. v. Glob. Ground Support, 350 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8–9 (D.D.C. 2004) | |
Puerto Rico | 10 L.P.R.A. § 4132 | Industrial or trade secrets are deemed to be any information: (a) That has a present or a potential independent financial value or that provides a business advantage, insofar as such information is not common knowledge or readily accessible through proper means by persons who could make a monetary profit from the use or disclosure of such information, and (b) for which reasonable security measures have been taken, as circumstances dictate, to maintain its confidentiality. Any information generated by, used in or resulting from any failed attempts to develop a trade secret shall also be deemed to be a part thereof. | TLS Mgmt. & Mktg. Servs., LLC v. Rodríguez-Toledo, 966 F.3d 46 (1st Cir. 2020); Phillips Med. Sys. P.R. v. GIS Partners Corp., 203 F. Supp. 3d 221 (D.P.R. 2016) |
Trade secrets or confidential commercial information are a type of intellectual property (IP) that includes formulas, practices, processes, designs, instruments, patterns, or compilations of information that have inherent economic value because they are not generally known or readily ascertainable by others, and which their owner takes reasonable measures to keep secret. Intellectual property law gives the owner of a trade secret the right to restrict others from disclosing it.
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York is the intermediate appellate court in New York State. The state is geographically divided into four judicial departments of the Appellate Division. The full title of each is, using the "Fourth Department" as an example, the "Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department".
Student rights are those rights, such as civil, constitutional, contractual and consumer rights, which regulate student rights and freedoms and allow students to make use of their educational investment. These include such things as the right to free speech and association, to due process, equality, autonomy, safety and privacy, and accountability in contracts and advertising, which regulate the treatment of students by teachers and administrators. There is very little scholarship about student rights throughout the world. In general most countries have some kind of student rights enshrined in their laws and proceduralized by their court precedents. Some countries, like Romania, in the European Union, have comprehensive student bills of rights, which outline both rights and how they are to be proceduralized. Most countries, however, like the United States and Canada, do not have a cohesive bill of rights and students must use the courts to determine how rights precedents in one area apply in their own jurisdictions.
The Nonintercourse Act is the collective name given to six statutes passed by the United States Congress in 1790, 1793, 1796, 1799, 1802, and 1834 to set boundaries of American Indian reservations. The various acts were also intended to regulate commerce between White Americans and citizens of Indigenous nations. The most notable provisions of the act regulate the inalienability of aboriginal title in the United States, a continuing source of litigation for almost 200 years. The prohibition on purchases of Indian lands without the approval of the federal government has its origins in the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Confederation Congress Proclamation of 1783.
The People v. Ronald Onofre, 51 N.Y.2d 476, 415 N.E.2d 936, 434 N.Y.S.2d 947 (1980), was an appeal against New York's sodomy laws, decided in the New York Court of Appeals.
International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918), also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case, is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law: a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing, such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars, but it has its supporters.
Muntaqim v. Coombe, 449 F.3d 371, was a legal challenge to New York State’s law disenfranchising individuals convicted of felonies while in prison and on parole. The plaintiff, Jalil Abdul Muntaqim who was serving a life sentence at the time, argued that the law had a disproportionate impact on African Americans and therefore violated Section 2 of the federal Voting Rights Act as a denial of the right to vote on account of race.
The United States Patents Quarterly (U.S.P.Q.) is a United States legal reporter published by the Bloomberg Industry Group in Washington, D.C. The U.S.P.Q. covers intellectual property cases including patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, from 1913 to the present. The publisher stopped the sequence of volume numbers and restarted with a second series, cited as U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA), in 1987.
José Alberto Cabranes is an American lawyer who serves as a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and a former presiding judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ("FISCR"). Formerly a practicing lawyer, government official, and law teacher, he was the first Puerto Rican appointed to a federal judgeship in the continental United States (1979).
Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 982 F.2d 693 is a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that addressed to what extent non-literal elements of software are protected by copyright law. The court used and recommended a three-step process called the Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test. The case was an appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in which the district court found that defendant Altai's OSCAR 3.4 computer program had infringed plaintiff Computer Associates' copyrighted computer program entitled CA-SCHEDULER. The district court also found that Altai's OSCAR 3.5 program was not substantially similar to a portion of CA-SCHEDULER 7.0 called SYSTEM ADAPTER, and thus denied relief as to OSCAR 3.5. Finally, the district court concluded that Computer Associates' state law trade secret misappropriation claim against Altai was preempted by the federal Copyright Act. The appeal was heard by Judges Frank Altimari, John Daniel Mahoney, and John M. Walker, Jr. The majority opinion was written by Judge Walker. Judge Altimari concurred in part and dissented in part. The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling as to copyright infringement, but vacated and remanded its holding on trade secret preemption.
In United States law, the Aguilar–Spinelli test was a judicial guideline set down by the U.S. Supreme Court for evaluating the validity of a search warrant or a warrantless arrest based on information provided by a confidential informant or an anonymous tip. The Supreme Court abandoned the Aguilar–Spinelli test in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983), in favor of a rule that evaluates the reliability of the information under the "totality of the circumstances." However, Alaska, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, Vermont, Oregon, and Washington have retained the Aguilar–Spinelli test, based on their own state constitutions.
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, is a biannual peer-reviewed law journal edited by law students at University of Minnesota Law School. It was established in 1981 to examine the social impact of law on disadvantaged people.
Dennis G. Jacobs is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Denise Louise Cote is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York, 397 U.S. 664 (1970), was a case before the United States Supreme Court. The Court held that grants of tax exemption to religious organizations do not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. It was the first case to articulate the "excessive entanglement doctrine" that one year later became the third prong of the Lemon test.
Sergey Aleynikov is a former Goldman Sachs computer programmer. Between 2009 and 2016, he was prosecuted by NY Federal and State jurisdictions for the same conduct of allegedly copying proprietary computer source code from his employer, Goldman Sachs, before joining a competing firm. His first prosecution in federal court in New York ultimately resulted in acquittal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The outcome of his second prosecution and trial in New York state court was a split verdict dismissed by court, which acquitted him on all counts. One count in that order of dismissal was later overturned by New York Court of Appeals, which took a very broad interpretation of the statute, and on recommendation of prosecutors he was sentenced to time served without punishment. The same New York Court of Appeals denied his petition to appeal on double jeopardy grounds. His story inspired Michael Lewis's bestseller Flash Boys.
Data General Corp. v. Digital Computer Controls, Inc. was a 1971 case in which the Delaware Court of Chancery determined that widespread, confidential disclosure of trade secrets does not necessarily compromise their secrecy. Data General Corporation distributed design documentation with its Nova 1200 minicomputer, notifying owners of the confidentiality of these design drawings through contractual agreements and explicit text on the drawings. After acquiring drawings with a Nova 1200 purchase, Digital Computer Controls designed its own nearly identical minicomputer. Digital Computer Controls maintained that its use of the documentation was proper because Data General Corporation inadequately maintained the secrecy of the design drawings by distributing them to many customers. The court found that Data General Corporation had sufficiently protected the secrecy of the drawings and that Digital Computer Controls was thus in violation of trade secret law for improperly using confidential information.
The United States was the first jurisdiction to acknowledge the common law doctrine of aboriginal title. Native American tribes and nations establish aboriginal title by actual, continuous, and exclusive use and occupancy for a "long time." Individuals may also establish aboriginal title, if their ancestors held title as individuals. Unlike other jurisdictions, the content of aboriginal title is not limited to historical or traditional land uses. Aboriginal title may not be alienated, except to the federal government or with the approval of Congress. Aboriginal title is distinct from the lands Native Americans own in fee simple and occupy under federal trust.
County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, 470 U.S. 226 (1985), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning aboriginal title in the United States. The case, sometimes referred to as Oneida II, was "the first Indian land claim case won on the basis of the Nonintercourse Act."
Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha, 640 F.3d 497, was a case in which United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which had granted American Buddha's motion to dismiss Penguin Group (USA) Inc. ("Penguin")'s copyright infringement action for lack of personal jurisdiction. The appellate court remanded the case for further proceedings.