McBride v Minister of Police

Last updated

McBride v Minister of Police
Constitutional court of South Africa.jpeg
Court Constitutional Court of South Africa
Full case nameMcBride v Minister of Police and Another
Decided6 September 2016 (2016-09-06)
Docket nos.CCT 255/15
Citation(s) [2016] ZACC 30; 2016 (2) SACR 585 (CC); 2016 (11) BCLR 1398 (CC)
Case history
Appealed fromMcBride v Minister of Police and Another [2015] ZAGPPHC 830 in the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division
Court membership
Judges sitting Mogoeng CJ, Cameron J, Froneman J, Jafta J, Khampepe J, Madlanga J, Mhlantla J, Nkabinde J, Zondo J and Bosielo AJ
Case opinions
It is unconstitutional for statute to grant the Minister of Police the power to suspend, discipline, or remove the Executive Director of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate. Such a power is inconsistent with the directorate's independence as guaranteed by section 206(6) of the Constitution.
Decision byBosielo AJ (unanimous)
Keywords
  • Independent Police Investigative Directorate, independence thereof
  • Independent Police Investigative Directorate Act, 2011
  • Minister of Police
  • section 206(6) of the Constitution

McBride v Minister of Police and Another is a 2016 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which concerns the independence of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID). In a unanimous decision written by Ronnie Bosielo, the court confirmed that certain legislative provisions were unconstitutional insofar as they permitted the Minister of Police unilaterally to suspend, discipline, or remove IPID's Executive Director, thereby making the directorate vulnerable to political influence. The court also set aside Police Minister Nathi Nhleko's decision to suspend Robert McBride from his position at the head of IPID.

Contents

Background

In March 2014, Robert McBride was appointed as the executive director of the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID), a statutory body established to investigate alleged misconduct by members of the South African Police Service. However, he was placed on precautionary suspension in March 2015 in connection with a controversial IPID investigation into the alleged unlawful rendition of four Zimbabweans by senior members of the Hawks. His suspension was effectuated by the Minister of Police, Nathi Nhleko, in terms of section 6 of the IPID Act, 2011. Using the same provisions, the Minister instituted disciplinary charges against Nhleko in May 2015.

High Court action

McBride approached the High Court of South Africa with a challenge to the constitutionality of the provisions that had been used to institute the suspension and disciplinary inquiry. On that basis, he sought to have the Minister's decisions set aside. His constitutional challenge was grounded in section 206(6) of the Constitution, which provided for IPID's establishment as an "independent police complaints body"; he argued that insofar as the IPID Act allowed the Minister of Police to suspend, discipline, and remove IPID's Executive Director, it did not contain sufficient safeguards for the independence of the executive director and of IPID itself.

On 4 December 2015 in the Pretoria High Court, Judge Fayeeza Kathree-Setiloane delivered judgment in favour of McBride. Relying heavily on the Constitutional Court's decisions on the independence of the Hawks in Glenister v President and Helen Suzman v President; Glenister v President, she agreed that IPID's independence required that the Executive Director – and his security of tenure in office – should be "sufficiently insulated from undue political interference". She therefore held that "it is imperative... that the suspension and removal from office of the Executive Director be subject to parliamentary oversight through a veto power."

Thus the High Court declared that provisions of the IPID Act, along with other enabling provisions elsewhere, were unconstitutional and unlawful "to the extent that they purport to authorise the Minister of Police to suspend, take any disciplinary steps pursuant to suspension, or to remove from office the Executive Director". Minister Nhleko's decisions to suspend McBride and pursue disciplinary charges against him were also set aside. The orders were referred to the Constitutional Court for confirmation, [1] and argument was heard on 17 May 2016. [2]

Judgment

On 6 September 2016, Acting Justice Ronnie Bosielo delivered judgment on behalf of a unanimous court. He confirmed the High Court's finding of constitutional invalidity and affirmed its reasoning, agreeing that the relevant provisions undermined IPID's constitutionally guaranteed independence. [3] [4] The Constitutional Court also rejected Minister Nhleko's bid, argued by Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, [2] to preserve his decisions in respect of McBride's own employment. However, because both parties were amenable, the court suspended the order setting aside the Minister's decision; he was given 30 days to arrange for the disciplinary process to restart with the necessary parliamentary oversight.

Aftermath

In May 2020, President Cyril Ramaphosa assented to the IPID Amendment Act, 2019, which provided for parliamentary oversight of the suspension, discipline, and removal of IPID's Executive Director, thereby addressing the constitutional defects identified in the original legislation. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert McBride (police officer)</span> South African Umkhonto we Sizwe member and police chief

Robert McBride is the former chief of the metropolitan police for Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality. During the apartheid era he was a member of Umkhonto we Sizwe, the paramilitary wing of the African National Congress, and was convicted of terrorism after he bombed Magoos Bar, a busy Durban night club, in an attack that killed three people. However, this conviction was "for all purposes...deemed not to have taken place" under the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Prosecuting Authority</span> South African government agency

The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is the agency of the South African Government responsible for state prosecutions. Under Section 179 of the South African Constitution and the National Prosecuting Authority Act of 1998, which established the NPA in 1998, the NPA has the power to institute criminal proceedings on behalf of the state and to carry out any necessary functions incidental to institution of criminal proceedings. The NPA is accountable to Parliament, and final responsibility over it lies with the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scorpions (South Africa)</span> Specialised unit of the National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa

The Directorate of Special Operations (DSO), commonly known as the Scorpions, was a specialised unit of the National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa formed by President Thabo Mbeki, tasked with investigating and prosecuting high-level and priority crimes including organised crime and corruption. An independent and multidisciplinary unit with a unique methodology which combined investigation, forensic intelligence, and prosecution, the Scorpions were known as an elite unit, and were involved in several extremely high-profile investigations, especially into the Arms Deal and into high-ranking African National Congress (ANC) politicians including Jackie Selebi, Jacob Zuma, and Tony Yengeni.

Nkosinathi Phiwayinkosi Thamsanqa Nhleko is a South African politician and former trade unionist from KwaZulu-Natal. He was the Minister of Police and Minister of Public Works in the second cabinet of President Jacob Zuma. After he was sacked from the cabinet in 2018, he served as a backbencher in the National Assembly until the 2019 general election.

The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID), formerly the Independent Complaints Directorate (ICD), is a department of the South African government responsible for investigating complaints against the South African Police Service and municipal police services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dikgang Moseneke</span> South African judge

Dikgang Ernest Moseneke OLG is a South African jurist and former Deputy Chief Justice of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nkandla homestead</span> Building in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

The private residence of former South African President Jacob Zuma is situated about 24 km (15 mi) south of the rural town of Nkandla in KwaZulu-Natal and is commonly referred to as the Nkandla homestead. During Zuma's presidency, the homestead was the subject of a major public controversy, sometimes referred to as Nkandlagate, concerning what were ostensibly security upgrades to Zuma's compound, at a cost of over R246 million. The use of public funds to make these improvements received significant media coverage and political opposition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hawks (South Africa)</span> National intelligence agency of South Africa

The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (DPCI), commonly known as the Hawks, is the branch of the South African Police Service which investigates organised crime, economic crime, corruption, and other serious crime referred to it by the President or another division of the police. The unit was established in 2008 by President Jacob Zuma to replace the disbanded Scorpions.

Art. 23 1/15, Art. 23 2/15 and Art. 23 1/16 are three related cases decided by the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office concerning the removal from office of Patrick Corcoran, a member of the Boards of Appeal, who had been previously suspended by the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation. According to Article 23(1) EPC, members of the Boards of Appeal may only be removed from office by the Administrative Council on a proposal from the Enlarged Board of Appeal. Two cases were successively initiated by the Administrative Council, but the Enlarged Board eventually dismissed both of them. In the third case initiated by the Administrative Council, the Enlarged Board decided not to propose the removal from office of Corcoran.

<i>Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly</i> 2016 South African legal case

Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others; Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others [2016] ZACC 11 is an important judgment of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which finds that President Jacob Zuma breached the South African Constitution by failing to implement the recommendations in the Public Protector's Nkandla report.

Nomgcobo Jibawas the Deputy National Director of Public Prosecutions in South Africa.

Hlaudi Motsoeneng is the leader of African Content Movement (ACM) who served as the acting Chief operating officer of the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) from 2011 to 2013. Motsoeneng was removed from his position as Chief operating officer after it had been found that he lied about his qualifications. After being removed as acting Chief operating officer it was announced that Motsoeneng would move back to his previous position as Group Executive Editor of Provinces and Corporate Affairs of the SABC. In December 2016, the Western Cape High Court ruled that Motsoeneng's appointment as Group Executive was illegal and that he was "not entitled to occupy any position at the SABC". In June 2022 the state capture commission proposed criminal investigations into possible contraventions of the Public Finance Management Act when group CEO Lulama Mokhobo and COO Motsoeneng concluded an SABC agreement with the Gupta owned TNA newspaper. In July 2022 the High Court dismissed Motsoeneng's bid to appeal the repayment, with interest, of R11.5 million obtained unlawfully when the SABC concluded a deal with MultiChoice.

Makhotso Magdeline "Maggie" Sotyu is a South African politician who is currently serving as Deputy Minister of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries since May 2019. She has been a deputy minister since 2010, formerly as Deputy Minister of Arts and Culture and Deputy Minister of Police, and has represented the African National Congress in the National Assembly since June 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Step-aside rule</span> Policy of the African National Congress

The step-aside rule is an internal policy of the African National Congress (ANC), the ruling party of South Africa, which requires members charged with corruption or other serious crimes voluntarily to "step aside" from participation in party and government activities, or face suspension. Since its adoption in 2017 at the ANC's 54th National Conference, it has led to the suspension of several ANC members, most prominently ANC Secretary-General Ace Magashule. In 2022, it was applied to prohibit affected members from standing in internal leadership elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francois Beukman</span> South African attorney and former politician

Francois Beukman is a South African attorney and former politician who served as a Member of the National Assembly of South Africa from 1999 to 2009 and again from 2014 to 2019.

Lebotsang Orphan "Ronnie" Bosielo was a South African judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal. Formerly a judge of the High Court of South Africa, he served in the appellate court from October 2009 until his death in May 2018. He was an acting judge in the Constitutional Court in 2012 and 2016, and he was thrice nominated unsuccessfully for permanent appointment to the apex court.

<i>Masetlha v President</i> South African legal case

Masetlha v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another is an important decision in the Constitutional Court of South Africa which held that procedural fairness was not a ground for the review of executive action. Upholding President Thabo Mbeki's decision to dismiss Billy Masetlha as the head of the National Intelligence Agency, a majority of the court held that, unlike legality and rationality, procedural fairness was not a requirement for the lawful exercise of the President's powers of appointment and dismissal, the exercise of which constituted executive rather than administrative action. The matter was heard on 10 May 2007 and decided on 3 October 2007, with Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke writing for the majority.

<i>Corruption Watch v President</i> South African legal case

Corruption Watch NPC and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others; Nxasana v Corruption Watch NPC and Others is a 2018 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on prosecutorial independence. In a judgment written by Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, the court affirmed unanimously that section 179(4) of the Constitution provided for the independence of the National Prosecuting Authority. It therefore held that sections of the National Prosecuting Authority Act, 1998 were unconstitutional insofar as they granted the President discretion over certain aspects of senior prosecutors' terms of employment, thereby compromising prosecutorial independence.

<i>Glenister v President</i> (2008) South African legal case

Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others, often known as Glenister I, is a 2008 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on the separation of powers and the scope of judicial review. The Constitutional Court unanimously dismissed an application by businessman Hugh Glenister, who challenged Cabinet's decision to introduce draft legislation that would disband the Scorpions.

<i>Glenister v President</i> (2011) South African legal case

Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others, often known as Glenister II, is a 2011 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, in which the court held that the state is constitutionally obligated to establish and maintain an independent agency to combat corruption. It ruled that the Hawks were not sufficiently independent to fulfil this obligation and that the statutory provisions that created the Hawks were therefore, and to that extent, constitutionally invalid. The case was part of a series of litigation that sought to challenge the disbanding of the Scorpions.

References

  1. "McBride seeks confirmation from top court on independence". Business Day. 7 January 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2024.
  2. 1 2 "Nhleko tries to convince Constitutional Court to uphold McBride suspension". Business Day. 17 May 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2024.
  3. "Concourt rules in favour of Robert McBride". The Mail & Guardian. 6 September 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2024.
  4. Vos, Pierre de (7 September 2016). "Will IPID go after the Hawks for its abuse of power?". Daily Maverick. Retrieved 3 February 2024.
  5. "New law sees criminal capacity of child increased from 10 years to 12 years". Sunday Times. 5 June 2020. Retrieved 3 February 2024.