Modes of religiosity

Last updated

The theory of divergent modes of religiosity (DMR) is intended to explain how religions are created, transmitted, and changed. DMR theory was first developed by anthropologist Harvey Whitehouse following his ethnographic fieldwork in Papua New Guinea. [1] [2] [3] The theory proposes that religions tend to coalesce around two divergent modes, termed imagistic and doctrinal, which are distinguished primarily by their ritual practices. The imagistic mode is characterized by infrequently performed, high arousal rituals (e.g. initiation rites) and is associated with small scale, exclusive religious groups. In contrast the doctrinal mode is characterized by frequently performed, low arousal rituals (e.g. daily recitations of sacred texts) and is associated with larger inclusive communities, as found in the major world religions.

Contents

The theory posits that these differing ritual patterns promote the transmission of religious traditions by exploiting core memory processes. Imagistic rituals arouse strong emotion and generate vivid, flashbulb like, episodic memories, while doctrinal rituals repetitive nature means that rather than individual events the experiences over time are stored in procedural and semantic memories. Later formulations of the theory also emphasised the different forms of group cohesion that are generated by the two modes, with imagistic rituals promoting intense, relational bonds with the other ritual participants and doctrinal rituals promoting more diffuse, categorical bonds with larger communities who share the same identity markers. [4]

DMR theory was tested empirically against data on 645 rituals from the HRAF global ethnographic database and the anticipated clustering of rituals around imagistic and doctrinal modes was confirmed. [5] Ethnographic and historical examinations of the theory have been broadly positive and archaeologists have drawn upon DMR to explain the transition from small-scale societies to larger, more complex civilizations. [6] [7] [8] Similarly, historians and biologists have utilized DMR theory to help explain why some religions separate into sects and how reformations may occur. [9] [10] [11] However, the theory has been challenged by some scholars on theoretical grounds [12] [13] and faced criticisms from some ethnographers and historians for suggesting too strong of a division between imagistic and doctrinal modes. [14] [15]

Although the DMR theory developed out of research on religious groups, more recent research has found evidence that the ritual dynamics described apply outside of the religious domain, including amongst football fans and armed militias, [16] and that it may therefore serve as a more general theory of ritual and social cohesion. [4] [17]

Imagistic mode

The imagistic mode of religiosity involves collective rituals that are infrequent and highly emotional. Examples of these types of rituals include various initiation rites and rites of passage. [18] The often dysphoric and highly emotional nature of these types of rituals activate the episodic memory system, resulting in detailed autobiographical memories. These dysphoric rituals can produce an extreme form of cohesion with the group, known as identity fusion. [19] DMR posits that fusion with other group members will also motivate the individual to act out extreme forms of altruism, especially when the group is threatened. [20] Therefore, the imagistic mode of religiosity prevails when a group’s survival depends on extremely high levels of cohesion. [21]

Doctrinal mode

The doctrinal mode of religiosity refers to collective rituals that are frequent, usually routinized, and generate relatively little affect. Examples of this type of collective ritual would include Holy Communion and call to prayer. Due to the repetitive nature of these types of rituals, semantic memory systems are thought to be activated and function similarly to organizing other general schemas and scripts of general knowledge. In contrast to the imagistic mode, these routinized rituals tend to produce less intense group identification, which serves to promote trust and cooperation but not extreme self-sacrifice. DMR posits that the historical transition from small-scale societies to the invention of agriculture brought about the need for large-scale cooperation and collective identity. [22]

Related Research Articles

Çatalhöyük Archaeological site in Turkey

Çatalhöyük was a very large Neolithic and Chalcolithic proto-city settlement in southern Anatolia, which existed from approximately 7500 BC to 6400 BC, and flourished around 7000 BC. In July 2012, it was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Morality Differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper (right) and those that are improper (wrong)

Morality is the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper (right) and those that are improper (wrong). Morality can be a body of standards or principles derived from a code of conduct from a particular philosophy, religion or culture, or it can derive from a standard that a person believes should be universal. Morality may also be specifically synonymous with "goodness" or "rightness".

Civil religion, also referred to as a civic religion, is the implicit religious values of a nation, as expressed through public rituals, symbols, and ceremonies on sacred days and at sacred places. It is distinct from churches, although church officials and ceremonies are sometimes incorporated into the practice of civil religion. Countries described as having a civil religion include France, South Korea, the former Soviet Union, and the United States. As a concept, it originated in French political thought and became a major topic for U.S. sociologists since its use by Robert Bellah in 1960.

Psychology of religion Application of psychological methods to the contents of religious traditions

Psychology of religion consists of the application of psychological methods and interpretive frameworks to the diverse contents of religious traditions as well as to both religious and irreligious individuals. The extraordinary range of methods and frameworks can be helpfully summed up regarding the classic distinction between the natural-scientific and human-scientific approaches. The first cluster proceeds by means of objective, quantitative, and preferably experimental procedures for testing hypotheses regarding the causal connections among the objects of one's study. In contrast, the human-scientific approach accesses the human world of experience using qualitative, phenomenological, and interpretive methods, with the goal of discerning meaningful rather than causal connections among the phenomena one seeks to understand.

A religious symbol is an iconic representation intended to represent a specific religion, or a specific concept within a given religion.

The study of religiosity and intelligence explores the link between religiosity and intelligence or educational level. Religiosity and intelligence are both complex topics that include diverse variables, and the interactions among those variables are not always well understood. For instance, intelligence is often defined differently by different researchers; also, all scores from intelligence tests are only estimates of intelligence, because one cannot achieve concrete measurements of intelligence due to the concept’s abstract nature. Religiosity is also complex, in that it involves wide variations of interactions of religious beliefs, practices, behaviors, and affiliations, across a diverse array of cultures.

Community archaeology is archaeology by the people for the people. The field is also known as public archaeology. There is debate about whether the terms are interchangeable; some believe that community archaeology is but one form of public archaeology, which can include many other modes of practice, in addition to what is described here. The design, goals, involved communities, and methods in community archaeology projects vary greatly, but there are two general aspects found in all community archaeology projects. First, community archaeology involves communities "in the planning and carrying out of research projects that are of direct interest to them". Second, community archaeologists generally believe they are making an altruistic difference. Many scholars on the subject have argued that community collaboration does not have a pre-set method to follow. Although not found in every project, there are a number of recurring purposes and goals in community archaeology. Similarities are also found in different countries and regions—due to commonalities in archaeological communities, laws, institutions, and types of communities. It has also been suggested that public archaeology can be defined in a broad sense as the production and consumption of archaeological "commodities".

Steven Mithen, is a Professor of Archaeology at the University of Reading. He has written a number of books, including The Singing Neanderthals and The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science.

Cultural materialism is an anthropological research orientation first introduced by Marvin Harris in his 1968 book The Rise of Anthropological Theory, as a theoretical paradigm and research strategy. It is said to be the most enduring achievement of that work. Harris subsequently developed a full elaboration and defense of the paradigm in his 1979 book Cultural Materialism. To Harris social change is dependent of three factors: a society's infrastructure, structure, and superstructure.

Cognitive science of religion is the study of religious thought and behavior from the perspective of cognitive science, and often engages with evolutionary science, which it assumes is its foundation. The field employs methods and theories from a wide range of disciplines, including cognitive psychology, evolutionary psychology, cognitive anthropology, artificial intelligence, developmental psychology, and archaeology. Scholars in this field seek to explain how human minds acquire, generate, and transmit religious thoughts, practices, and schemas by means of ordinary cognitive capacities.

Harvey Whitehouse is chair of social anthropology and professorial fellow of Magdalen College at the University of Oxford.

The evolutionary psychology of religion is the study of religious belief using evolutionary psychology principles. It is one approach to the psychology of religion. As with all other organs and organ functions, the brain's functional structure is argued to have a genetic basis, and is therefore subject to the effects of natural selection and evolution. Evolutionary psychologists seek to understand cognitive processes, religion in this case, by understanding the survival and reproductive functions they might serve.

Evolutionary origin of religions Emergence of religious behavior discussed in terms of natural evolution

The evolutionary origin of religions and religious behavior is a field of study related to evolutionary psychology, the origin of language and mythology, and cross-cultural comparison of the anthropology of religion. Some subjects of interest include Neolithic religion, evidence for spirituality or cultic behavior in the Upper Paleolithic, and similarities in great ape behavior.

The Society for the Scientific Study of Religion was formed to advance research in the social scientific perspective on religious institutions and experiences. The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion is published by the society to provide a forum for empirical papers in the topic area.

Jeffrey Kaplan is an American academic who has written and edited a number of books on racism, religious violence, terrorism and the far right. He is an associate professor of religion at the University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh and a member of the board of academic advisors of the university's Institute for the Study of Religion, Violence and Memory.

Pagan studies is the multidisciplinary academic field devoted to the study of contemporary Paganism, a broad assortment of modern religious movements, which are typically influenced by or claiming to be derived from the various pagan beliefs of premodern Europe. Pagan studies embrace a variety of different scholarly approaches to studying such religions, drawing from history, sociology, anthropology, archaeology, folkloristics, theology and other religious studies.

Mervin Feldman Verbit is an American sociologist whose work focuses on sociology of religion, American Jews and the American Jewish community. He is currently the chair of the Sociology Department at Touro College.

Kathleen Flake

Kathleen Flake is a historian, writer, and attorney and is currently the Richard Lyman Bushman Chair of Mormon studies at the University of Virginia.

Identity fusion, a psychological construct rooted in social psychology and cognitive anthropology, is a form of alignment with groups in which members experience a visceral sense of oneness with the group. The construct relies on a distinction between the personal self and the social self. As the name suggests, identity fusion involves the union of the personal and social selves. When fusion occurs, both the personal and social selves remain salient and influential but the boundaries between them become highly permeable. In addition, the theory proposes that fused persons come to regard other group members as "family" and develop strong relational ties to them as well as ties to the collective. Therefore, fused persons are not just bound to the collective; they are tied to the individual members of the collective.

Cognitive science of new religious movements is the study of new religious movements from the perspective of cognitive science. The field employs methods and theories from a variety of disciplines, including cognitive science of religion, sociology of religion, scientific study of religion, anthropology, and artificial life. Scholars in the field seek to explain the origin and evolution of new religious movements in terms of ordinary universal cognitive processes.

References

  1. ↑ Whitehouse, Harvey (1995). Inside the cult: religious innovation and transmission in Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN   978-0198279815.
  2. ↑ Whitehouse, H. (2000). Arguments and icons: divergent modes of religiosity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0198234159.
  3. ↑ Whitehouse, H. (2004). Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Walnut Creek, CA.: Alta Mira Press. ISBN   978-0759106154.
  4. 1 2 Whitehouse, H.; Lanman, J.A. (2014). "The Ties That Bind Us: Ritual, Fusion, and Identification". Current Anthropology. 55 (6): 674–695. doi:10.1086/678698. S2CID   45622337.
  5. ↑ Atkinson, Q.D.; Whitehouse, H. (2011). "The cultural morphospace of ritual form". Evolution and Human Behavior. 32 (1): 50–62. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.09.002. ISSN   1090-5138.
  6. ↑ Whitehouse, H.; Hodder, I. (2010). "Modes of religiosity at Çatalhöyük". In Hodder, I. (ed.). Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 122–145.
  7. ↑ Mithen, S. (2004). "From Ohalo to Çatalhöyük: The development of religiosity during the early prehistory of Western Asia, 20,000–7000 BC". In Whitehouse, H.; Martin, L.H. (eds.). Theorizing Religions Past: Historical and Archaeological Perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA.: AltaMira Press. pp. 17–43.
  8. ↑ Johnson, K. (2004). "Primary emergence of the doctrinal mode of religiosity in prehistoric southwestern Iran.". In Whitehouse, H.; Martin, L.H. (eds.). Theorizing Religions Past: Historical and Archaeological Perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. pp. 45–66.
  9. ↑ Gragg, D. (2004). "Old and New in Roman Religion: A Cognitive Account.". In Whitehouse, H.; Martin, L.H. (eds.). Theorizing Religions Past: historical and archaeological perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  10. ↑ Hinde, R. (2005). "Modes Theory: Some Theoretical Considerations.". In Whitehouse, H.; McCauley, R.N. (eds.). Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religiosity. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  11. ↑ Pyysiainen, I. (2004). "Corrupt Doctrine and Doctrinal Revival: On the Nature and Limits of the Modes Theory.". In Whitehouse, H.; Martin, L.H. (eds.). Theorizing Religions Past: historical and archaeological perspectives. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
  12. ↑ McCauley, Robert N.; Lawson, E. Thomas (2002-08-15). Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   9780521016292.
  13. ↑ Schjoedt, Uffe; Sørensen, Jesper; Nielbo, Kristoffer Laigaard; Xygalatas, Dimitris; Mitkidis, Panagiotis; Bulbulia, Joseph (2013-02-01). "Cognitive resource depletion in religious interactions" (PDF). Religion, Brain & Behavior. 3 (1): 39–55. doi:10.1080/2153599X.2012.736714. ISSN   2153-599X. S2CID   40315884.
  14. ↑ Whitehouse, Harvey; Laidlaw, James (2004-01-01). Ritual and memory: toward a comparative anthropology of religion. AltaMira Press. ISBN   9780759106161.
  15. ↑ Whitehouse, Harvey; McCauley, Robert N. (2005-06-02). Mind and Religion: Psychological and Cognitive Foundations of Religion. Rowman Altamira. ISBN   9780759114838.
  16. ↑ Whitehouse, Harvey; McQuinn, Brian; Buhrmester, Michael; Swann, William B. (2014-12-16). "Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (50): 17783–17785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416284111 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   4273349 . PMID   25385591.
  17. ↑ Jones, Dan (23 Jan 2013). "Social evolution: The ritual animal". Nature. Retrieved 3 April 2017.
  18. ↑ Whitehouse, H. (2004). "Rites of Terror: emotion, metaphor, and memory in Melanesian initiation cults.". In Corrigan, J. (ed.). Religion and Emotion: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 703–715.
  19. ↑ Swann, W.B.; Jensen, J.; Gomez, A.; Whitehouse, H.; Bastian, B. (2012). "When Group Membership Gets Personal: A theory of identity fusion". Psychological Review. 119 (3): 441–456. doi:10.1037/a0028589. PMID   22642548.
  20. ↑ Whitehouse, H.; McQuinn, B.; Burhmester, M.; Swann, W.B. (2014). "Brothers in Arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like Family". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (50): 17783–17785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416284111 . PMC   4273349 . PMID   25385591.
  21. ↑ Whitehouse, H.; Jong, J.; Buhrmester, M.D.; Gómez, Á.; Bastian, B.; Kavanagh, C.M.; Newson, M.; Matthews, M.; Lanman, J.A.; McKay, R.; Gavrilets, S. (2017). "The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences". Scientific Reports. 7: 44292. doi:10.1038/srep44292. PMC   5349572 . PMID   28290499.
  22. ↑ Whitehouse, H.; Francois, P.; Turchin, P. (2015). The Role of Ritual in the Evolution of Social Complexity: Five predictions and a drum roll (PDF). Cliodynamics. Vol. 6. pp. 199–210. doi: 10.21237/C7clio6229624 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.