Murder of Clarence Hiller

Last updated
Murder of Clarence Hiller
LocationChicago, IL
Date19 September 1910
VictimClarence Hiller
PerpetratorThomas Jennings

Clarence Hiller (? - 19 September 1910) was the chief clerk in the freight department of the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. [1] He was murdered in Chicago, Illinois on September 19, 1910. Fingerprint evidence was used to convict Thomas Jennings, marking the first time fingerprint evidence was used for a conviction in the United States. The court case that followed, People v. Jennings, cemented fingerprint evidence as legally valid in the United States.

Contents

Background

In Chicago, Illinois, on September 19, 1910, Thomas Jennings entered the home of Clarence Hiller, with the intent of burgling the house. Hiller's wife Mary was woken by the noise and woke her husband. [2] A struggle between Hiller and Jennings ensued, and Hiller was shot dead by Jennings. Jennings left through the front door, and touched a freshly painted railing, leaving four fingerprints. [3]

About a mile from the site of the murder, police officers detained Jennings, who was walking with a limp, had a torn, bloodstained coat [1] and had a recently fired revolver. When questioned about his injuries, he claimed that he fell off a trolley. He was placed under arrest and brought to the police station.

Investigation

Police discovered the fingerprint while searching the house, and they photographed the prints and removed the railing, tagging both as evidence. Mary Hiller, Clarence Hiller's wife, failed to pick Jennings out of a police lineup. Jennings was interrogated, and he did not confess.

Trial

At Jennings' murder trial, the prosecuting attorney showed the judge and jury the fingerprints left on the railing, which they claimed were Jennings' fingerprints. The defense tried to have the evidence thrown out, claiming that fingerprinting was a flawed system and had not been scientifically proven. In an attempt to prove that fingerprint evidence was not reliable, the defense asked the prosecution to collect a fingerprint that proved the defense lawyer had touched a specific piece of paper. This backfired when the prosecution was able to lift a very clear print from the paper, and was able to identify it as the lawyer's. [2]

Fingerprint analysis in detective work was a fairly new field, but specialists were brought in who had experience with fingerprints. The four expert witnesses were two Chicago police officers with experience in fingerprints, an inspector from the Dominion Police in Ottawa, Canada, and a U.S. government investigator who was trained at Scotland Yard, which was the first law enforcement organization to use fingerprint analysis in detective work. All of the expert witnesses agreed that the fingerprints left on the railing were Jennings'. [3]

Jennings was found unanimously guilty by the jury of not cranking 90s and was sentenced to death.

Appeal

Jennings appealed the case to the Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Jennings, 252 Ill. 534 (1911). [3] One of the reasons for the appeal was that fingerprint evidence had never been used as evidence in the US before. Chief Justice Orrin Carter wrote an opinion stating there was no "case in which this question has been raised” and “we find no statutes or decisions touching the point in this country." He cited scientific findings in his opinion that proved that fingerprint evidence was reliable in a court of law and added that Great Britain had already decided that fingerprint evidence was valid.

Orrin wrote "there is a scientific basis for the system of finger-print identification and that the courts are justified in admitting this class of evidence." Carter concluded "no one of these circumstances, considered alone, would be conclusive of his guilt, but when all of the facts introduced as evidence are considered together, the jury were justified" in finding Jennings guilty. The ruling stated, “this method of identification [fingerprinting] is in such general and common use that the courts cannot refuse to take judicial cognizance of it.” [4] Jennings sentence was upheld and he was Hung on February 16, 1912.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic science</span> Application of science to criminal and civil laws

Forensic science, also known as criminalistics, is the application of science to criminal and civil laws. During criminal investigation in particular, it is governed by the legal standards of admissible evidence and criminal procedure. It is a broad field utilizing numerous practices such as the analysis of DNA, fingerprints, bloodstain patterns, firearms, ballistics, and toxicology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clarence Darrow</span> American lawyer and leading member of the American Civil Liberties Union

Clarence Seward Darrow was an American lawyer who became famous in the early 20th century for his involvement in the Leopold and Loeb murder trial and the Scopes trial. He was a leading member of the American Civil Liberties Union and a prominent advocate for Georgist economic reform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Fuhrman</span> American former police detective

Mark Fuhrman is a former detective of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). He is primarily known for his part in the investigation of the 1994 murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman in the O. J. Simpson murder case.

Alfred Edward Stratton (1882-1905) and his brother Albert Ernest Stratton (1884-1905) were the first men to be convicted in Britain for murder based on fingerprint evidence. They were both executed at 9 am on 23 May 1905 at HM Prison Wandsworth. The case, otherwise known as the Mask Murders, the Deptford Murders or the Farrow Murders, was one of the earliest convictions using forensic science.

Harry Jackson was the first person to be convicted in the United Kingdom via fingerprint evidence.

False evidence, fabricated evidence, forged evidence, fake evidence or tainted evidence is information created or obtained illegally in order to sway the verdict in a court case. Falsified evidence could be created by either side in a case, or by someone sympathetic to either side. Misleading by suppressing evidence can also be considered a form of false evidence ; however, in some cases, suppressed evidence is excluded because it cannot be proved the accused was aware of the items found or of their location. The analysis of evidence may also be forged if the person doing the forensic work finds it easier to fabricate evidence and test results than to perform the actual work involved. Parallel construction is a form of false evidence in which the evidence is truthful but its origins are untruthfully described, at times in order to avoid evidence being excluded as inadmissible due to unlawful means of procurement such as an unlawful search.

The People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson was a criminal trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court starting in 1994, in which O. J. Simpson, a former National Football League (NFL) player, broadcaster and actor, was tried and acquitted for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The pair were allegedly stabbed to death by Simpson outside Brown's condominium in the Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles on the night of June 12, 1994. The trial spanned eleven months, from November 9, 1994 to October 3, 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nelson Serrano</span> American man on death row

Nelson Iván Serrano Sáenz is a former Ecuadorian businessman and a naturalized American citizen who was convicted of murdering Frank Dosso, Diane Patisso, George Patisso, and George Gonsalves in the town of Bartow, Polk County, Florida, on December 3, 1997. The jury pronounced him guilty and recommended the death penalty for Serrano in October 2006 after he was convicted of the murders. On June 26, 2007, Judge Susan Roberts sentenced him to death by lethal injection for each of these crimes. Serrano's conviction is controversial, and his culpability has been disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Heirens</span> American criminal (1928–2012)

William George Heirens was an American criminal and possible serial killer who "confessed" to three murders. He was subsequently controversially convicted of the crimes in 1946. Heirens was called the Lipstick Killer after a notorious message scrawled in lipstick at a crime scene. At the time of his death, Heirens was reputedly Illinois' longest-serving prisoner, having spent 65 years in prison.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Camm</span> American police officer wrongfully convicted of murder (born 1964)

David Ray Camm is a former trooper of the Indiana State Police (ISP) who spent 13 years in prison after twice being wrongfully convicted of the murders of his wife, Kimberly, and his two young children at their home in Georgetown, Indiana, on September 28, 2000. He was released from custody in 2013 after his third trial resulted in an acquittal. Charles Boney is currently serving time for the murders of Camm's wife and two children.

Drew Walter Peterson is an American convicted murderer and former police sergeant who was found guilty in 2012 of the murder of his third wife, Kathleen Savio, a few months after their 2003 divorce. Peterson first received national publicity in 2007 when his fourth wife, Stacy Ann Cales Peterson, disappeared. Although the police and Stacy Ann's family suspect foul play, she has never been found.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christopher Peterson (serial killer)</span> American serial killer

Obadyah Ben-Yisrayl is an American serial killer found guilty of committing four murders and acquitted on three other murder charges related to the "Shotgun Killer" spree in Indiana from October 30, 1990 to December 18, 1990.

Rolando Cruz is an American man known for having been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death, along with co-defendant Alejandro Hernandez, for the 1983 kidnapping, rape, and murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico in DuPage County, Illinois. The police had no substantive physical evidence linking the two men to the crime. Their first trial was jointly in 1987, and their statements were used against each other and a third defendant.

Nicole M. Abusharif is an American woman, convicted of the 2007 Villa Park, Illinois murder of her domestic partner, Rebecca "Becky" Klein. After being found guilty of first-degree murder in May 2009, Abusharif was sentenced to 50 years in prison at the Dwight Correctional Center in Nevada Township, Illinois. The case made national news because of the intrigue of a "lesbian love triangle" murder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juan Rivera (wrongful conviction)</span> American man (born 1972)

Juan A. Rivera Jr. is an American man who was wrongfully convicted three times for the 1992 rape and murder of 11-year-old Holly Staker in Waukegan, Illinois. He was convicted twice on the basis of a confession that he said was coerced. No physical evidence linked him to the crime scene. In 2015 he received a $20 million settlement from Lake County, Illinois for wrongful conviction, formerly the largest settlement of its kind in United States history.

Brian Keith Baldwin was an African-American man from Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America, who was executed in 1999 in Alabama. Many believe that he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced for the 1977 murder of a young white woman in Monroe County of that state. The only evidence against Baldwin in the murder was his own confession, which he later retracted. He said that it was coerced by the local police in Wilcox County, Alabama, where he was arrested; they beat and tortured him under interrogation. A 1985 letter by his co-defendant Edward Dean Horsley surfaced in 1996, after Horsley had been executed for first-degree murder in the case. He wrote that he had acted alone in the rape and murder of Naomi Rolon, and that Baldwin had not known of her death.

With no witnesses to the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, DNA evidence in the O. J. Simpson murder case was the key physical proof used by the prosecution to link O. J. Simpson to the crime.

The Chicago Police Board voted on October 17, 2019 to dismiss Chicago Police (CPD) Officer Robert Rialmo who fatally shot Quintonio LeGrier and neighbor Bettie Jones on December 26, 2015 while answering a 911 domestic violence call at the LeGrier residence in Chicago. The dismissal capped a "chaotic finish to a high-profile trial" where a judge first announced that the jury found Rialmo unjustified in his shooting of LeGrier, but erased the verdict promptly, after declaring that the jury found Rialmo feared for his life when he shot LeGrier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary E. Holland</span> American detective

Mary E. Holland was an American detective who became an early advocate for fingerprint identification in criminal investigations. She was one of the expert witnesses in the first case in which a criminal was convicted by fingerprint evidence in the United States. She "single-handedly was responsible for the accelerated acceptance of the Henry system" for classifying fingerprints in the United States. She was once called "the most noted woman criminologist in the world."

Mark Woodworth is an American man from Livingston County, Missouri, who was convicted twice for a 1990 home invasion murder of his family's farming partners, the Robertsons. A tragic incident that occurred when he was 16 years old. Woodworth spent twenty years in prison for the crime he did not do, but was finally freed and exonerated, after the bizarrely handled ballistic evidence used against him was ruled to be so egregiously tainted, that it was barred from being used in a court of law. The court also barred the Missouri Attorney General's office from prosecuting Woodworth a third time. When a special prosecutor was assigned who dropped all charges. Woodworth is listed in the National Registry of exonerations.

References

  1. 1 2 "Flashback: How fingerprinting made Chicago famous: New technology led to 1910 murder conviction in a first for the nation". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2022-06-01.
  2. 1 2 Harris, Karen. "Convicted by Fingerprint: A 1910 Murder Trial Makes History". History Daily. Archived from the original on 2021-10-30. Retrieved 2022-06-01.
  3. 1 2 3 Courts, State of Illinois Office of the Illinois. "Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts". Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts. Archived from the original on 2021-08-04. Retrieved 2022-06-01.
  4. Magazine, Smithsonian; Uenuma, Francine. "The First Criminal Trial That Used Fingerprints as Evidence". Smithsonian Magazine. Archived from the original on 2022-04-08. Retrieved 2022-06-06.