Nina Crummy

Last updated

Nina Crummy is a British archaeologist and artefact (small finds) specialist, especially of Roman material culture.

Contents

Career

Crummy completed an undergraduate degree at Keele University [1] and works as an independent archaeological finds specialist. [2] She was formerly Archaeological Archive Manager at the Museum of London, [3] where she helped develop the Museum's standards for the deposition of archaeological finds. [4] She consolidated the Museum of London's archaeological archive collection, based at Lever Street, the precursor to the London Archaeological Archive & Research Centre (LAARC). [5] [6] She has had a long-standing relationship with the University of Reading, as a visiting research fellow to the Department of Archaeology [7] and as a small finds consultant on the Silchester Town Life Project. [8] [9] She has previously been elected as a fellow to the Society of Antiquaries of London. [10] [11]

She has written numerous archaeological reports and publications on the subject of small finds, ranging from site assemblages to individual artefacts. [12] [13] She is notable for her work on the small finds from Roman Colchester (Camulodunum) [14] and Roman Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum). [15] Major contributions to artefact studies include those on Roman toilet instruments [16] and the manufacture of Roman bone artefacts. [17] [18] [19] Her book, The Roman Small Finds from Excavations in Colchester 1971-9, [20] has been described as the 'bible of the Roman finds world in Britain' by archaeologist and finds specialist Hillary Cool. [21]

Crummy's Functional Categories for Small Finds

Crummy's publication The Roman Small Finds from Excavations in Colchester 1971-9 [22] was one of the first to analyse and present archaeological artefacts (small finds) within 'functional' as opposed to 'material' categories. [23] Although this system of categorisation has been questioned, for simplifying objects' multiple functionality, it remains highly influential especially within Romano-British archaeology. [24] [25]

The subjects of the functional categories are: Category 1: Objects of personal adornment or dress; Category 2: Toilet, surgical or pharmaceutical instruments; Category 3: Objects used in the manufacture or working of textiles; Category 4: Household utensils and furniture; Category 5: Objects used for recreational purposes; Category 6: Objects employed in weighing and measuring; Category 7: Objects used for or associated with written communications; Category 8: Objects associated with transport. Category 9: Buildings and services; Category 10: Tools; Category 11: Fasteners and fittings; Category 12: Objects associated with agriculture, horticulture and animal husbandry. Category 13: Military equipment. Finds such as weapons, fittings from armour, tools with military associations, and phallic amulets possibly used by the army; Category 14: Objects associated with religious beliefs and practices; Category 15: Objects and waste material associated with metal working; Category 16: Objects and waste material associated with antler, horn, bone, and tooth working; Category 17: Objects and waste material associated with the manufacture of pottery vessels or pipeclay objects; Category 18: Objects the function or identification of which is unknown or uncertain.

Selected publications

Edited Publications

Co-authored Publications

References

  1. ↑ "University of Reading Staff List (2008-9)" (PDF). University of Reading.
  2. ↑ "The Silchester Core Project Team". University of Reading: Silchester Archaeology.
  3. ↑ Devonshire, Amanda; Wood, Barbara, eds. (1996). Women in Industry and Technology: From Prehistory to the Present Day. Museum of London. p. 316.
  4. ↑ "Museum of London Archaeological Archive: Standards Preface" (PDF).
  5. ↑ Shepherd, John (2011). "The London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre: Past, Present and Future" (PDF). The Archaeologist (20): 45. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2023-11-05. Retrieved 2020-06-10.
  6. ↑ Swain, Hedley (2007). An Introduction to Museum Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. p. 133.
  7. ↑ "University of Reading Staff List (2008-9)" (PDF). University of Reading.
  8. ↑ "The 'Town Life' Project 1997-2002: Abandonment". University of Reading: Silchester Archaeology.
  9. ↑ "The Silchester Core Project Team". University of Reading: Silchester Archaeology.
  10. ↑ "University of Reading Staff List (2008-9)" (PDF). University of Reading.
  11. ↑ "Salon 130". Salon: Society of Antiquaries of London Online Newsletter (130). 14 February 2020.
  12. ↑ "ADS Library". Archaeological Data Service.
  13. ↑ "Bibliography of Nina Crummy". Archéophile.
  14. ↑ "Colchester Archaeological Trust Report Titles". Colchester Archaeological Trust Online Report Library.
  15. ↑ "Silchester Town Life Project Publications (since 1997)". University of Reading: Silchester Archaeology.
  16. ↑ Hella Eckardt; Nina Crummy (2008). Styling the body in Later Iron Age and Roman Britain: A Contextual Approach to Toilet Instruments. M. Mergoil.
  17. ↑ Crummy, Nina (1979). "A Chronology of Romano-British Bone Pins" . Britannia. 10: 157–163. doi:10.2307/526051. JSTOR   526051. S2CID   163005062.
  18. ↑ Crummy, Nina (1981). "Bone-working at Colchester" . Britannia. 12: 277–285. doi:10.2307/526252. JSTOR   526252. S2CID   163363605.
  19. ↑ Nina Crummy (2017). "Working skeletal materials in south-eastern Roman Britain". In Bird, David (ed.). Agriculture and Industry in South-Eastern Roman Britain. Oxbow Books.
  20. ↑ Crummy, Nina (1983). The Roman Small Finds from Excavations in Colchester 1971-9 (PDF). Colchester Archaeological Trust.
  21. ↑ Cool, Hilary. "A Basic Bibliography for Studying Romano-British Small Finds" (PDF). Barbican Research Associates.
  22. ↑ Crummy, Nina (1983). The Roman Small Finds from Excavations in Colchester 1971-9 (PDF). Colchester Archaeological Trust.
  23. ↑ Ellen Swift (2016). "The development of artefact studies". In Millett, Martin; Revell, Louise; Moore, Alison (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Roman Britain. Oxford University Press. p. 80.
  24. ↑ Allison, Penelope (2013). People and Spaces in Roman Military Bases. Cambridge University Press. pp. 42–43.
  25. ↑ Martin Millett (2017). "Discussion. Reflections on the representational use of artefact evidence". In Van Oyden, Astrid; Pitts, Martin (eds.). Materialising Roman Histories. Oxbow Books. p. 69.