Northern California Innocence Project

Last updated
Northern California Innocence Project
Formation2001 ; 16 Years Ago
FounderKathleen "Cookie" Ridolfi; Linda Starr
Founded atSanta Clara School of Law at Santa Clara University
TypeNon-Profit Organization
PurposeExoneration Justice Reform
Headquarters500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053
Region
United States of America
AffiliationsThe Innocence Network
Website ncip.org

The Northern California Innocence Project (NCIP) is a legal based organization at the Santa Clara University School of Law in Santa Clara, California. The organization revisits previous convictions of individuals who are believed to be innocent of their crimes. They are a non-profit clinical program of Santa Clara University School of Law, which looks to promote a more fair, effective and compassionate criminal justice system. The NCIP attempts to protect the rights of all parties involved so that they too may have an adequate trial. NCIP is a member of the national Innocence Project network of similar organizations. The NCIP was created in 2001 by Kathleen "Cookie" Ridolfi and Linda Starr, during this time new legislation in California (CA Penal Code Section 1405) had permitted convicted inmates to seek DNA testing to prove their innocence.

Contents

Founding

The Northern California Innocence Project was established after a landmark amendment that was adopted by the California District Court. CA Penal Code Section 1405 provides currently incarcerated convicted person should seek DNA testing to reveal exculpatory evidence. Kathleen "Cookie" Ridolfi and Linda Starr worked as trial and appellate attorneys for the criminal justice system. After numerous years of practice, they realized they had an opportunity to improve the errors within the system and free wrongly convicted individuals. In 2001, they co-founded the NCIP. The project was founded through the assistance of volunteers and members of another legal clinic associated through the Santa Clara university School of Law. The current executive director of the Northern Innocence Project is Linda Starr.

The project receives 65% of their funding from donated goods and services, 10% from individual contributions, 9% from government grants, 7% from the Santa Clara University School of Law, 8% from private foundations, and 1% from endowment interests. [1] This organization also receives more than $3,000,000 in pro-bono services from members in the field. [1]

Mission

The Northern California Innocence Project looks to primarily protect the rights of the innocent as well as make a more fair, effective and compassionate justice system. They primarily look to exonerate people whose case allows DNA evidence to be available and be retested in the light of an exoneration. The NCIP promotes for more research and advocacy in wrongful convictions. The NCIP foresees a criminal justice system that correctly divides the innocent from the guilty along with treating all with their inalienable rights and compassion.

Programs

Exonerate

The NCIP provides a four-step process on the exoneration process for their services.

Stage 1 Screening the Request

The first step after the innate sends in a request is a filtering stage by the intake attorney. The intake attorney will do one of the following.

60% of requests that come to the NCIP end up getting rejected

Stage 2 Preliminary Investigation

Next the staff will complete a very in-depth investigation suing the information gathered from the first stage. The staff will locate information gathered by previous lawyers and law enforcement who started this case. Also, prior lawyers, investigators, law enforcement personnel, laboratories, and witnesses will be contacted in this preliminary investigation. In this stage, the staff will also try to figure out the legal reason on what the inmate lost their initial case. After an extensive period of information gathering the intake attorney takes the case to the NCIP's Director to do one of the following things: [2]

Stage 3 Full Investigation

The attorney that gets assigned the case will begin organizing and structuring their argument. They will work with the law students in the legal clinic to develop and enact a strategy for their investigation. At any point in this stage, the director can close the case. [2] If the case is allowed to proceed, then the investigative team will start their investigation using forensic sciences.

Stage 4 Negotiation and Litigation

When investigations are complete and the team is able find enough evidence to argue for innocence. The legal team tries to assist the inmate through litigation, negotiation, and collaboration. If this negotiation and collaboration does not work, then the team will move on to litigation. [2] The legal team working on the case will begin with a petition for writ of habeas corpus. This asks the court to overturn the initial decision. These petitions are often based on the claims of new evidence; such as DNA test results, new witnesses, confessions from the true perpetrators, etc.

Educate

NCIP Law Clinic

This is part of the Santa Clara Law Clinic program that provides law students a platform to work towards investigating and helping litigants with possible wrongful convictions. The program also allows law students to work on promoting reforms on resolving issues within the US criminal justice system. [3] Students are afforded hands on experience through interviewing prisoners, witnesses, crime lab personnel, law enforcement, defense attorneys, and prosecutors. Students will also be able to draft legal documents, attend and participate at court proceedings.

Training and Symposia

The NCIP seeks to improve the current criminal justice system through training and symposia. The goal is to reduce the amount of wrongful convictions. The NCIP trains members of the criminal justice field on evidence based practices that reduce wrongful convictions. [4]

Speaking Engagements

NCIP tries to educate anyone and everyone along with the criminal justice community. The NCIP establishes a network of exonerees and staff members to go to community centers to speak about the criminal justice system and the NCIP. [5]

Reform

Senate Bill (SB) 336 made it so that more wrongfully convicted individuals are able to receive transitional aid after their release from prison. Assembly Bill (AB) 454 placed an exemption on wrongfully convicted people from paying the state income tax based on their compensation from the state. SB 1134 creates a more concrete standard of using new evidence to prove actual innocence. [6] SB 1389 was signed on September 30, 2016, and it requires that all interrogations of murder suspects to be recorded electronically. [6] SB 635 increases the compensation for the exonerated to $140 per a day for those who were wrongly incarcerated. AB 672 requires the California Department of Corrections to help freed individuals obtain identification cards and other transitional services after their emancipation from prison. [6] SB 980 makes it so physical and biological evidence is more accessible to an inmate. SB 1058 makes it so a false testimony innocence claim includes outdated expert testimony.

Freed Clients

Jimmie Dick was wrongly imprisoned for 30 years, Frankie Carillo Jr. was wrongfully imprisoned for 20 years, John Stoll was wrongfully imprisoned for 20 years, Peter Rose was wrongfully imprisoned for approximately 10 years, Johnny Williams was wrongfully imprisoned for 14 years, Albert Johnson was wrongfully imprisoned for 14 years [7]

Glenn Payne was charged with kidnapping and sexual assault in December 1990. On the clothes of the child, authorities found that there was a strand a hair. The expert laboratory analyst said under oath that there were very slim chances that the hair came from anyone beside Payne based on testing from microscopic hair comparison. There was no other physical evidence that could connect Payne and the victim. Payne was convicted and sentenced to 27 years in prison. Payne was released on parole in 2005, which ended in 2008. In 2013, The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released a report stating that microscopic hair comparison could not determine if two strands of hair were a match. With the new information, Payne did not have any means to have his conviction turned over legally. This was because remediation was only restricted to those incarcerated or on parole. However, in January 2017 a new law permitted to seek relief even after they were released from prison or parole. The original conviction was overturned on January 25, 2018 [8] Payne served for 15 years.

Francisco "Franky" Carrillo, Jr was sentenced to life in prison in 1992. Carrillo was charged with murder in a drive by shooting a teenager in Lynwood, California. The conviction rested with the eyewitness testimony of 6 people. The conviction was overturned in 2011. The witnesses confessed that they did not have a clear view of the crime, but were coerced by Los Angeles Police Officers to say so. The true perpetrators eventually confessed to their crime. Carrillo sued the Sheriff's Department for violation of civil rights. The Los Angeles County paid $10 million to settle the lawsuit. [9]

See also

Related Research Articles

Innocence Project, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit legal organization that is committed to exonerating individuals who have been wrongly convicted, through the use of DNA testing and working to reform the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice. The group cites various studies estimating that in the United States between 2.3% and 10% of all prisoners are innocent. The Innocence Project was founded in 1992 by Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld who gained national attention in the mid-1990s as part of the "Dream Team" of lawyers who formed part of the defense in the O. J. Simpson murder case.

A miscarriage of justice occurs when a grossly unfair outcome occurs in a criminal or civil proceeding, such as the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Miscarriages are also known as wrongful convictions. Innocent people have sometimes ended up in prison for years before their conviction has eventually been overturned. They may be exonerated if new evidence comes to light or it is determined that the police or prosecutor committed some kind of misconduct at the original trial. In some jurisdictions this leads to the payment of compensation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Innocence Canada</span>

Innocence Canada, is a Canadian, non-profit legal organization. Based in Toronto, Innocence Canada identifies, advocates for, and helps exonerate individuals who have been convicted of a serious crime which they did not commit and to preventing future wrongful convictions through education and justice system reform.

Darryl Hunt was an African-American man from Winston-Salem, North Carolina, who, in 1984, was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment for the rape and the murder of Deborah Sykes, a young white newspaper copy editor. After being convicted in that case, Hunt was tried in 1987 for the 1983 murder of Arthur Wilson, a 57-year-old black man of Winston-Salem. Both convictions were overturned on appeal in 1989. Hunt was tried again in the Wilson case in 1990; he was acquitted by an all-white jury. He was tried again on the Sykes charges in 1991; he was convicted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Neufeld</span> American attorney

Peter J. Neufeld is an American lawyer, cofounder, with Barry Scheck, of the Innocence Project, and a founding partner in the civil rights law firm Neufeld Scheck & Brustin. Starting from his earliest years as an attorney representing clients at New York's Legal Aid Society, and teaching trial advocacy at Fordham School of Law from 1988 to 1991, he has focused on civil rights and the intersection of science and criminal justice.

Exoneration occurs when the conviction for a crime is reversed, either through demonstration of innocence, a flaw in the conviction, or otherwise. Attempts to exonerate convicts are particularly controversial in death penalty cases, especially where new evidence is put forth after the execution has taken place. The transitive verb, "to exonerate" can also mean to informally absolve one from blame.

Jeffrey Mark Deskovic is an American man from upstate New York known for having been wrongly convicted in 1990 at the age of seventeen of raping, beating, and strangling Angela Correa, a 15-year-old high school classmate at Peekskill High School.

The Innocence Network is an affiliation of organizations dedicated to providing pro bono legal and investigative services to individuals seeking to prove innocence of crimes for which they have been convicted and working to redress the causes of wrongful convictions. Most organizations involved are in the United States, covering all 50 states; however, the network includes organizations in Canada, Australia, and the UK.

Arthur Paul Carmona served more than two years in prison after being wrongfully convicted of two armed robberies on the basis of eyewitness testimony. His case took on prominence in the ongoing debate in the legal community over the reliability of eyewitness identification. After his release, he had become an activist for the wrongfully accused.

In United States federal criminal law, the Innocence Protection Act is the first federal death penalty reform to be enacted. The Act seeks to ensure the fair administration of the death penalty and minimize the risk of executing innocent people. The Innocence Protection Act of 2001, introduced in the Senate as S. 486 and the House of Representatives as H.R. 912, was included as Title IV of the omnibus Justice for All Act of 2004, signed into law on October 30, 2004 by President George W. Bush as public law no. 108-405.

Earl Washington Jr. is a former Virginia death-row inmate, who was fully exonerated of murder charges against him in 2000. He had been wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death in 1984 for the 1982 rape and murder of Rebecca Lyn Williams in Culpeper, Virginia. Washington has an IQ estimated at 69, which classifies him as intellectually disabled. He was coerced into confessing to the crime when arrested on an unrelated charge a year later. He narrowly escaped being executed in 1985 and 1994.

Centurion is a non-profit organization located in Princeton, New Jersey, with a mission to exonerate innocent individuals who have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to life sentences or death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clarence Elkins</span> American wrongfully convicted for murder and rape

Clarence Arnold Elkins Sr. is an American man who was wrongfully convicted of the 1998 rape and murder of his mother-in-law, Judith Johnson, and the rape and assault of his wife's niece, Brooke Sutton. He was convicted solely on the basis of the testimony of his wife's six-year-old niece who testified that Elkins was the perpetrator.

In law, post conviction refers to the legal process which takes place after a trial results in conviction of the defendant. After conviction, a court will proceed with sentencing the guilty party. In the American criminal justice system, once a defendant has received a guilty verdict, he or she can then challenge a conviction or sentence. This takes place through different legal actions, known as filing an appeal or a federal habeas corpus proceeding. The goal of these proceedings is exoneration, or proving a convicted person innocent. If lacking representation, the defendant may consult or hire an attorney to exercise his or her legal rights.

The Illinois Innocence Project, a member of the national Innocence Project network, is a non-profit legal organization that works to exonerate wrongfully convicted people and reform the criminal justice system to prevent future injustice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Innocence Project</span> American legal non-profit founded 1999

The California Innocence Project is a non-profit based at California Western School of Law in San Diego, California, United States, which provides pro bono legal services to individuals who maintain their factual innocence of crime(s) for which they have been convicted. It is an independent chapter of the Innocence Project. Its mission is to exonerate wrongly convicted inmates through the use of DNA and other evidences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anthony Charles Graves</span>

Anthony Charles Graves is the 138th exonerated death row inmate in America. With no record of violence, he was arrested at 26 years old, wrongfully convicted, and incarcerated for 18 years before finally being exonerated and released. He was awarded $1.4 million for the time he spent imprisoned, and the prosecutor who put him in prison was ultimately disbarred for concealing exculpatory evidence and using false testimony in the case.

The Nebraska Innocence Project was a member organization Nebraska-based chapter of a U.S non-profit organization called the Innocence Project, located in Omaha, Nebraska. In 2019, the Nebraska Innocence Project folded into the Midwest Innocence Project. The Midwest Innocence Project's mission is to educate about, advocate for, and obtain and support the exoneration and release of wrongfully convicted people in Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Arkansas. The Nebraska chapter was founded in 2005 by a group of volunteers who were inspired by the work of Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld, founders of the Innocence Project in 1992. The Midwest Innocence Project (MIP) was founded in 2001 through the UMKC School of Law and is also part of the national Innocence Network.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Semanchik</span> American wrongful conviction advocate

Michael "Mike" Semanchik is Managing Attorney at the California Innocence Project (CIP). As part of his work with CIP, he has been involved in many cases involving the exoneration of previously-convicted prisoners, working closely with the organization's director, Justin Brooks, and also preparing petitions for many of CIP's clients. After working at CIP while still a law student at California Western School of Law, following graduation in 2010 he became an investigator and then a staff attorney there.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alissa Bjerkhoel</span> American wrongful conviction advocate

Alissa Leanne Bjerkhoel is an American litigation coordinator at the California Innocence Project (CIP), a law school clinic that investigates cases of factual innocence while training law students. Bjerkhoel was born in Truckee, California, and later graduated from California Western School of Law (CWSL) after previously obtaining a B.A. degree She has been an attorney with CIP since 2008. Bjerkhoel has served as counsel for CIP on numerous criminal cases, and achieved the legal exoneration of a number of convicted prisoners. Bjerkhoel serves as CIP's in-house DNA expert and also serves as a panel attorney with the nonprofit law firms Appellate Defenders, Inc. (ADI) and Sixth District Appellate Program (SDAP). She is a member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Bjerkhoel has won a number of awards.

References

  1. 1 2 "FAQ - Northern California Innocence Project". Northern California Innocence Project. Retrieved 2018-10-31.
  2. 1 2 3 "Exonerate - Northern California Innocence Project". Northern California Innocence Project. Retrieved 2018-10-31.
  3. ↑ "Educate - Northern California Innocence Project". Northern California Innocence Project. Retrieved 2018-12-03.
  4. ↑ "Training & Symposia - Northern California Innocence Project". Northern California Innocence Project. Retrieved 2018-12-03.
  5. ↑ "Get Involved - Northern California Innocence Project". Northern California Innocence Project. Retrieved 2018-12-03.
  6. 1 2 3 "Current Legislative Agenda". Northern California Innocence Project. Retrieved December 3, 2018.
  7. ↑ "Northern California Innocence Project". Mighty Cause. 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  8. ↑ Possley, Maurice (February 21, 2018). "Glenn Payne". The National Registry of Exonerations. Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  9. ↑ Sewell, Abby (July 19, 2016). "L.A. County to pay $10 million to man whose murder conviction was overturned". LA Times. Retrieved December 4, 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.