Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP

Last updated

Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided March 20, 2019
Full case nameObduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
Docket no. 17-1307
Citations586 U.S. ___ ( more )
Holding
A business engaged in only nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a "debt collector" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, except for the limited purpose of Section 1692f(6).
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas  · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch  · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinions
MajorityBreyer, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceSotomayor
Laws applied
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP, 586 U.S. ___(2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a business engaged in only nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a "debt collector" under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, except for the limited purpose of Section 1692f(6). [1] [2]

Contents

Background

the law firm McCarthy & Holthus LLP was hired to carry out a nonjudicial foreclosure on a Colorado home owned by Dennis Obduskey. McCarthy sent Obduskey correspondence related to the foreclosure. Obduskey responded with a letter invoking a federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) provision, 15 U. S. C. §1692g(b), which provides that if a consumer disputes the amount of a debt, a "debt collector" must "cease collection" until it "obtains verification of the debt" and mails a copy to the debtor. Instead, McCarthy initiated a nonjudicial foreclosure action. Obduskey sued, alleging that McCarthy failed to comply with the FDCPA's verification procedure. The district court dismissed on the ground that McCarthy was not a "debt collector" within the meaning of the FDCPA, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed. [1]

Opinion of the Court

Subsequent developments

References

  1. 1 2 Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP,No. 17-1307 , 586 U.S. ___(2019).
  2. D'Onfro, Danielle (March 22, 2019). "Opinion analysis: An extremely narrow Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ruling". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved July 12, 2025.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .