Roberts Court

Last updated

Supreme Court of the United States
Roberts Court
 Current
Official roberts CJ.jpg
September 29, 2005 –
18 years, 355 days
Seat Supreme Court Building
Washington, D.C.
No. of positions 9
Roberts Court decisions
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg

The Roberts Court is the time since 2005 during which the Supreme Court of the United States has been led by John Roberts as Chief Justice. Roberts succeeded William Rehnquist as Chief Justice after Rehnquist's death.

Contents

It has been considered to be the most conservative court since the Vinson Court (1946–1953). This is due to the retirement of the relatively moderate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and the confirmation of the more conservative Justice Samuel Alito. [1] The ideological balance of the court shifted further to the right in the following years through the replacement of swing-vote Anthony Kennedy with Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 and the replacement of liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg with Amy Coney Barrett in 2020.

Membership

Roberts was originally nominated by President George W. Bush as an associate justice to succeed Sandra Day O'Connor, who had announced her retirement, effective with the confirmation of her successor. However, before the Senate could act upon the nomination, Chief Justice William Rehnquist died. President Bush quickly withdrew the initial nomination and resubmitted it as a nomination for Chief Justice; this second Roberts nomination was confirmed by the Senate on September 29, 2005, by a 78–22 vote. Roberts took the constitutional oath of office, administered by senior Associate Justice John Paul Stevens (who was the acting chief justice during the vacancy) at the White House after his confirmation the same day. On October 3, Roberts took the judicial oath provided for by the Judiciary Act of 1789, prior to the first oral arguments of the 2005 term. The Roberts Court commenced with Roberts as Chief Justice and the remaining eight associate justices from the Rehnquist Court: Stevens, O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer. President Bush's second nominee to replace O'Connor, Harriet Miers, withdrew before a vote; Bush's third nominee to replace O'Connor was Samuel Alito, who was confirmed in January 2006.

In 2009, President Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to replace Souter; she was confirmed. In 2010, Obama nominated Elena Kagan to replace Stevens; she, too, was confirmed. In February 2016, Justice Scalia died; in the following month, Obama nominated Merrick Garland, but Garland's nomination was never considered by the Senate, and it expired when the 114th Congress ended and the 115th Congress began on January 3, 2017. On January 31, 2017, President Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to replace Scalia. Democrats in the Senate filibustered the Gorsuch nomination, which led to the Republicans exercising the "nuclear option". After that, Gorsuch was confirmed in April 2017. In 2018, Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to replace Kennedy; [2] he was confirmed. In September 2020, Justice Ginsburg died; Trump nominated Amy Coney Barrett to succeed Ginsburg and she was confirmed on October 26, 2020, days before the 2020 election. [3]

In 2022, Breyer announced his retirement effective at the end of the Supreme Court term, assuming his successor was confirmed, in a letter to President Joe Biden. [4] Biden nominated Ketanji Brown Jackson to succeed Breyer, [5] and she was confirmed by the Senate. [6] Breyer remained on the Court until it went into its summer recess on June 30, at which point Jackson was sworn in, [7] becoming the first black woman and the first former federal public defender to serve on the Supreme Court. [8] [9]

Timeline

Roberts Court

Note: The blue vertical line denotes "now" (September 2024).

Bar key:
  Ford appointee  Reagan appointee  G. H. W. Bush appointee  Clinton appointee  G. W. Bush appointee  Obama appointee  Trump appointee  Biden appointee

Other branches

Presidents during this court have been George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden. Congresses included the 109th through the current 118th United States Congresses.

Rulings of the Court

The Roberts Court (since June 30, 2022): Front row (left to right): Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Elena Kagan. Back row (left to right): Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Supreme Court of the United States - Roberts Court 2022.jpg
The Roberts Court (since June 30, 2022): Front row (left to right): Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Elena Kagan. Back row (left to right): Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The Roberts Court has issued major rulings on incorporation of the Bill of Rights, gun control, affirmative action, campaign finance regulation, election law, abortion, capital punishment, LGBT rights, unlawful search and seizure, and criminal sentencing. Major decisions of the Roberts Court include: [10] [11]

Judicial philosophy

The Roberts Court has been described as conservative and by many as "dominated by an ambitious conservative wing." [14] [15] Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett generally have taken more conservative positions, while Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson have generally taken more liberal positions. Among former justices, Scalia and Kennedy had been more conservative, while Souter, Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer had been more liberal. These two blocs of voters have lined up together in several major cases, though Justice Kennedy occasionally sided with the liberal bloc. Roberts has also served as a swing vote, often advocating for narrow rulings and compromise among the two blocs of justices. [11] [16] Though the Court sometimes does divide along partisan lines, attorney and SCOTUSblog founder Tom Goldstein has noted that more cases are decided 9–0 and that the individual justices hold a wide array of views. [17]

The judicial philosophy of Roberts on the Supreme Court has been assessed by leading court commentators including Jeffrey Rosen [18] and Marcia Coyle. [19] Although Roberts is identified as having a conservative judicial philosophy, his vote in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012) upholding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has caused reflection in the press concerning the comparative standing of his conservative judicial philosophy compared to other sitting justices of conservative orientation; he is seen as having a more moderate conservative orientation, particularly when his vote to uphold the ACA is compared to Rehnquist's vote in Bush v. Gore . [20] Some commentators have also noted that Roberts uses his vote in high-profile cases to achieve a facially-neutral result that sets up for larger conservative rulings in the future. [21] The Five Four Podcast went so far as to deem this maneuver the "Roberts Two-Step." [22]

Regarding Roberts' contemporaneous peers on the bench, his judicial philosophy is seen as more moderate and conciliatory than that of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [18] [20] Roberts has not indicated any particularly enhanced reading of originalism or framer's intentions as has been plainly evident in Scalia's speeches and writings. [19] Roberts' strongest inclination on the Court has been to attempt to re-establish the centrist aesthetics of the Court as being party neutral, in contrast to his predecessor Rehnquist who had devoted significant effort to promote a 'states-rights' orientation for the Court. Roberts' voting pattern is most closely aligned with Brett Kavanaugh's. [23] [24] [25]

After Ginsburg was replaced by Barrett, several commentators wrote that Roberts was no longer the leading justice. As the five other conservative justices could outvote the rest, he supposedly could no longer preside over a moderately conservative course while respecting precedent. [26] [27] Some said this view was confirmed by the court's 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization , which overturned the landmark rulings Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey of 1973 and 1992, respectively. [28] [29] The conservative bloc is sometimes further split into a wing more hesitant to overrule precedent (Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett), and a wing more willing to overrule precedent (Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch). [30] [31] [32] Roberts wrote the majority opinion in West Virginia v. EPA which officially established the major questions doctrine and restricted the ability of the EPA to regulate power plant emissions using generation shifting under the Clean Air Act. That opinion drew ire from critics who argued that Roberts and the conservative bloc manufactured a doctrine to thwart climate reforms. [33]

Criticism

Since 2023, criticism of the Court by Democrats has risen, who have increasingly viewed the Court as being illegitimate. [34] [35] [36] The Court's legitimacy has also been questioned by its liberal bloc of justices, [37] [38] [39] as well as the general public. [40] Aaron Regunberg in The New Republic criticized the Supreme Court for playing Calvinball, a game with no rules except for those made up as they go. [41]

Democratic backsliding

In a July 2022 research paper entitled "The Supreme Court's Role in the Degradation of U.S. Democracy," the Campaign Legal Center, founded by Republican Trevor Potter, asserted that the Roberts Court "has turned on our democracy" and was on an "anti-democratic crusade" that had "accelerated and become increasingly extreme with the arrival" of Trump's three appointees. [42] [43]

Public opinion

The Roberts Court is considered to be the most unpopular Court since Gallup started tracking public approval of the Supreme Court in 1973. [44] Public perception of the Court was at a net negative before the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022, and dropped further following the ruling. [45] [46] An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll indicated that allegations of Clarence Thomas having broken the Court's code of conduct repeatedly eroded trust in the Court further, with public confidence dropping from 59% in 2018 to 37% in 2023. [47] A 2024 survey by Marquette Law School found the court to have a 40% approval rating. [48]

List of Roberts Court opinions

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United States</span> Highest court of jurisdiction in the US

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party." The court holds the power of judicial review, the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution. It is also able to strike down presidential directives for violating either the Constitution or statutory law.

Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), was a case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. The court ruled in an 8–0 decision that Pennsylvania's Nonpublic Elementary and Secondary Education Act from 1968 was unconstitutional and in an 8–1 decision that Rhode Island's 1969 Salary Supplement Act was unconstitutional, violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The act allowed the Superintendent of Public Schools to reimburse private schools for the salaries of teachers who taught in these private elementary schools from public textbooks and with public instructional materials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Alito</span> US Supreme Court justice since 2006

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. is an American jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated to the high court by President George W. Bush on October 31, 2005, and has served on it since January 31, 2006. After Antonin Scalia, Alito is the second Italian American justice to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States is the only court specifically established by the Constitution of the United States, implemented in 1789; under the Judiciary Act of 1789, the Court was to be composed of six members—though the number of justices has been nine for most of its history, this number is set by Congress, not the Constitution. The court convened for the first time on February 2, 1790.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neil Gorsuch</span> US Supreme Court justice since 2017 (born 1967)

Neil McGill Gorsuch is an American jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President Donald Trump on January 31, 2017, and has served since April 10, 2017.

With the advice and consent of the United States Senate, the president of the United States appoints the members of the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the highest court of the federal judiciary of the United States. Following his victory in the 2016 presidential election, Republican Donald Trump took office as president on January 20, 2017, and faced an immediate vacancy on the Supreme Court due to the February 2016 death of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2016 term, which began October 3, 2016 and concluded October 1, 2017.

Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v. AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members. Under the Taft–Hartley Act of 1947, which applies to the private sector, union security agreements can be allowed by state law. The Supreme Court ruled that such union fees in the public sector violate the First Amendment right to free speech, overruling the 1977 decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education that had previously allowed such fees.

Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U.S. 148 (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), a statute defining certain "aggravated felonies" for immigration purposes, is unconstitutionally vague. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) classifies some categories of crimes as "aggravated felonies", and immigrants convicted of those crimes, including those legally present in the United States, are almost certain to be deported. Those categories include "crimes of violence", which are defined by the "elements clause" and the "residual clause". The Court struck down the "residual clause", which classified every felony that, "by its nature, involves a substantial risk" of "physical force against the person or property" as an aggravated felony.

June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a Louisiana state law placing hospital-admission requirements on abortion clinics doctors was unconstitutional. The law mirrored a Texas state law that the Court found unconstitutional in 2016 in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (WWH).

Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down ten per curiam opinions during its 2019 term, which began October 7, 2019 and concluded October 4, 2020.

Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., 591 U.S. ___ (2020), also known as AOSI II, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that compelled speech required as a condition for funding on foreign non-governmental affiliates of U.S. non-government organizations does not violate First Amendment rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down fourteen per curiam opinions during its 2020 term, which began October 5, 2020 and concluded October 3, 2021.

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), abbreviated NYSRPA v. Bruen and also known as NYSRPA II or Bruen to distinguish it from the 2020 case, is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court related to the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case concerned the constitutionality of the 1911 Sullivan Act, a New York State law requiring applicants for a pistol concealed carry license to show "proper cause", or a special need distinguishable from that of the general public, in their application.

Niz-Chavez v. Garland, 593 U.S. 155 (2021), was an immigration decision by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision authored by Neil Gorsuch, the Court ruled against the federal government, holding that deportation hearing notices need to be in a single document. Although a highly technical case, the decision received attention for being predicated on the single-letter word a.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eight per curiam opinions during its 2021 term, which began October 4, 2021 and concluded October 2, 2022.

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, 598 U.S. 651 (2023), also known as Sackett II, was a United States Supreme Court case related to the scope of the Clean Water Act.

Moore v. United States, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case related to the ability of the federal government to tax unrealized gains as income. The Supreme Court upheld the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (MRT).

References

  1. Liptak, Adam (July 24, 2010). "Court Under Roberts Is Most Conservative in Decades". The New York Times . Retrieved August 5, 2010.
  2. "Trump gets chance to reshape top court". BBC News. June 27, 2018. Retrieved June 27, 2018.
  3. Vazquez, Maegan; Liptak, Kevin (September 26, 2020). "Trump nominates Amy Coney Barrett as Supreme Court justice". CNN. Retrieved October 2, 2020.
  4. Shear, Michael D. (January 27, 2022). "Biden plans to name Breyer's successor by the end of February". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved June 24, 2022.
  5. Macaya, Melissa; Wagner, Meg; Sangal, Aditi; Vogt, Adrienne; Kurtz, Jason (February 25, 2022). "Feb. 25 coverage of Biden's SCOTUS nomination Ketanji Brown". CNN. Retrieved June 24, 2022.
  6. Wagner, John; Alfaro, Mariana (April 7, 2022). "Post Politics Now: Biden gets history-making nominee Jackson on the Supreme Court". Washington Post. Retrieved June 24, 2022.
  7. Chowdhury, Maureen; Vogtm, Adrienne; Sangal, Aditi; Hammond, Elise; Macaya, Melissa (June 30, 2022). "Live updates: Ketanji Brown Jackson to be sworn in as Supreme Court Justice as court issues final opinions". CNN. Retrieved June 30, 2022.
  8. Maureen Chowdhury; Ji Min Lee; Meg Wagner; Melissa Macaya (April 7, 2022). "Jackson won't be sworn in until Justice Stephen Breyer retires". CNN. Retrieved June 24, 2022.
  9. Booker, Brakkton. "What Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson means for the country". POLITICO. Retrieved June 24, 2022.
  10. Chiusano, Scott (September 29, 2015). "Landmark decisions during John Roberts' decade as Chief Justice". New York Daily News. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  11. 1 2 Wolf, Richard (September 29, 2015). "Chief Justice John Roberts' Supreme Court at 10, defying labels". USA Today. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  12. Liptak, Adam (May 18, 2015). "Supreme Court Ruling Altered Civil Suits, to Detriment of Individuals". The New York Times. Retrieved March 3, 2016.
  13. "One Really Good Thing in the Supreme Court's Travel-Ban Ruling: Korematsu Is Gone". The New Yorker . June 26, 2018.
  14. "The Chief Stands Alone: Roberts, Roe and a Divided Supreme Court". news.bloomberglaw.com. Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  15. Godfrey, Elaine (June 28, 2023). "The Court Is Conservative—But Not MAGA". The Atlantic. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  16. Fairfield, Hannah (June 26, 2014). "A More Nuanced Breakdown of the Supreme Court". The New York Times. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  17. Goldstein, Tom (June 30, 2010). "Everything you read about the Supreme Court is wrong (except here, maybe)". SCOTUSblog . Retrieved July 7, 2010.
  18. 1 2 Rosen, Jeffrey (July 13, 2012). "Big Chief". The New Republic.
  19. 1 2 Coyle, Marcia (2013). The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution.
  20. 1 2 Scalia, Antonin; Garner, Bryan A. (2008). Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges. St. Paul: Thomson West. ISBN   978-0-314-18471-9.
  21. Hasen, Richard L. (April 2, 2014). "Die Another Day". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  22. "Shelby County v. Holder". Five Four Pod (Podcast). Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  23. Bravin, Jess (July 7, 2023). "John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh Are Now the Supreme Court's Swing Votes". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  24. Schonfeld, Zach (July 8, 2023). "How John Roberts exhibited his power in the Supreme Court's biggest decisions". The Hill. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  25. Feldman, Adam (June 30, 2023). "Another One Bites the Dust: End of 2022/2023 Supreme Court Term Statistics" . Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  26. Kirchgaessner, Stephanie (October 11, 2021). "John Roberts is no longer the leader of his own court. Who, then, controls it?". The Guardian . Archived from the original on June 28, 2022.
  27. Huq, Aziz (September 15, 2021). "The Roberts Court is Dying. Here's What Comes Next". Politico . Archived from the original on July 24, 2022.
  28. Liptak, Adam (June 24, 2022). "June 24, 2022: The Day Chief Justice Roberts Lost His Court". New York Times . Archived from the original on July 14, 2022.
  29. Biskupic, Joan (June 26, 2022). "Chief Justice John Roberts lost the Supreme Court and the defining case of his generation". CNN . Archived from the original on July 19, 2022.
  30. Johnson, John (June 18, 2021). "Supreme Court's Interesting New Math: 3-3-3". Newser.
  31. "America's Supreme Court is less one-sided than liberals feared". The Economist. June 24, 2021.
  32. Blackman, Josh (June 18, 2021). "We don't have a 6–3 Conservative Court. We have a 3-3-3 Court". Reason.
  33. Emerson, Blake (June 30, 2022). "The Real Target of the Supreme Court's EPA Decision". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved March 1, 2023.
  34. Leonhardt, David (May 22, 2023). "Supreme Court Criticism". The New York Times . Retrieved July 5, 2023.
  35. Smith, David (May 21, 2023). "Democrats fight to expand a 'broken and illegitimate' supreme court". The Guardian. Retrieved July 5, 2023.
  36. Marcotte, Amanda (July 3, 2023). "Fraud justice: Decision based on a fake case showcases the Supreme Court's illegitimacy". Salon. Retrieved July 5, 2023.
  37. Gresko, Jessica (October 26, 2022). "Supreme Court justices spar over court legitimacy comments". AP News. Retrieved November 23, 2023.
  38. "Justices join debate on Supreme Court's legitimacy after abortion ruling". NBC News. September 18, 2022. Retrieved November 23, 2023.
  39. Kanu, Hassan (July 10, 2023). "Even some justices are raising questions about the U.S. Supreme Court's legitimacy". Reuters. Retrieved November 23, 2023.
  40. Greenhouse, Steven (October 5, 2023). "The US supreme court is facing a crisis of legitimacy". the Guardian. Retrieved November 23, 2023.
  41. Regunberg, Aaron (July 12, 2022). "How the Calvinball Supreme Court Upended the Bar Exam". The New Republic . Retrieved July 1, 2024.
  42. Tokaji, Dan (July 13, 2022). "CLC on "The Supreme Court's Role in the Degradation of U.S. Democracy"". Election Law Blog.
  43. "The Supreme Court's Role in the Degradation of U.S. Democracy" (PDF). Campaign Legal Center. July 13, 2022. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court's relationship to democracy has shifted dramatically in recent years. Under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court has spent the last two decades systematically dismantling federal voting rights protections and campaign finance laws while enabling states to restrict the franchise and distort electoral outcomes with remarkable zeal. The pace of this upheaval has accelerated since 2017 with the additions of Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
  44. "A historically unpopular Supreme Court made a historically unpopular decision". CBS News . June 26, 2022. Retrieved April 25, 2023. Quinnipiac isn't the only pollster to show a major degradation in the court's standing. The percentage of Americans (25%) who have great or quite a lot of confidence in the court is at the lowest level ever recorded by Gallup since 1973.
  45. Jones, Jeffrey M. (June 23, 2022). "Confidence in U.S. Supreme Court Sinks to Historic Low". Gallup. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  46. Todd, Chuck; Murray, Mark; Kamisar, Ben; Bowman, Bridget; Marquez, Alexandra (August 22, 2022). "Public's opinion of Supreme Court plummets after abortion decision". NBC News. Retrieved April 27, 2023.
  47. Sam Levine (April 24, 2022). "Majority of Americans oppose bans of medication abortion drugs, poll finds". The Guardian. Retrieved May 8, 2023.
  48. Franklin, Charles (February 20, 2024). "New Marquette Law School national survey finds approval of U.S. Supreme Court at 40%, public split on removal of Trump from ballot". law.marquette.edu. Retrieved April 29, 2024.

Further reading