Solicitor General of the United States | |
---|---|
United States Department of Justice | |
Style | Mr. or Madam Solicitor General General (in the Supreme Court) |
Reports to | Attorney General |
Seat | Supreme Court Building and Department of Justice Headquarters |
Appointer | The President with Senate advice and consent |
Constituting instrument | 28 U.S.C. § 505 |
Formation | October 1870 |
First holder | Benjamin Bristow |
Deputy | Principal Deputy Solicitor General |
Website | justice.gov/osg |
The solicitor general of the United States (USSG or SG), is the fourth-highest-ranking official within the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), [1] represents the federal government in cases before the Supreme Court of the United States. The solicitor general is appointed by the president and reports directly to the United States attorney general.
The solicitor general's office argues on behalf of the federal government in almost every Supreme Court case in which the United States is a party and also represents in most cases in which the government has filed a brief as amicus curiae . In the United States courts of appeals, the solicitor general's office reviews cases decided against the United States and determines whether the government will seek review in the Supreme Court. The solicitor general's office also reviews cases decided against the United States in the United States district courts and decides whether the government will file an appeal.
Elizabeth Prelogar has served as solicitor general since October 28, 2021.
The solicitor general is assisted by four deputy solicitors general and seventeen assistants to the solicitor general. Three of the deputies are career attorneys in the Department of Justice. The remaining deputy is known as the principal deputy, sometimes called the political deputy and, like the solicitor general, typically leaves at the end of an administration.
The solicitor general or one of the deputies typically presents the most important cases in the Supreme Court. Other cases may be argued by one of the assistants or another government attorney. The solicitor general tends to argue six to nine cases per Supreme Court term, while deputies argue four to five cases and assistants argue two to three cases each. [2]
The solicitor general, who has offices in the Supreme Court Building as well as the Department of Justice headquarters, has been called the "tenth justice" [3] as a result of the close relationship between the justices and the solicitor general (and their respective staffs of clerks and deputies). As the most frequent advocate before the Court, the Office of the Solicitor General generally argues dozens of times each term. Furthermore, when the Office of the Solicitor General endorses a petition for certiorari , review is frequently granted, which is influential given that only 75 to 125 of the over 7,500 petitions submitted each term are granted review by the Court. [4]
The solicitor general is considered an influential and knowledgeable member of the legal community with regard to Supreme Court litigation.[ citation needed ] Six solicitors general have later served on the Supreme Court: William Howard Taft (who served as the 27th president of the United States before becoming chief justice of the United States), Stanley Forman Reed, Robert H. Jackson, Thurgood Marshall, and Elena Kagan. Some who have had other positions in the Office of the Solicitor General have also later been appointed to the Supreme Court. For example, Chief Justice John Roberts was the principal deputy solicitor general during the George H. W. Bush administration and Associate Justice Samuel Alito was an assistant to the solicitor general. The last former solicitor general to be successfully nominated to the court was Justice Elena Kagan. [5] Only one former solicitor general has been nominated to the Supreme Court unsuccessfully, that being Robert Bork; however, no sitting solicitor general has ever been denied such an appointment. Eight other solicitors general have served on the United States Courts of Appeals.[ citation needed ]
Within the Justice Department, the solicitor general exerts significant influence on all appeals brought by the department. The solicitor general is the only U.S. officer who is statutorily required to be "learned in the law". [6] Whenever the DOJ wins at the trial stage and the losing party appeals, the concerned division of the DOJ responds automatically and proceeds to defend the ruling in the appellate process. However, if the DOJ is the losing party at the trial stage, an appeal can only be brought with the permission of the solicitor general. For example, should the tort division lose a jury trial in federal district court, that ruling cannot be appealed by the Appellate Office without the approval of the solicitor general.
When determining whether to grant certiorari in a case where the federal government is not a party, the Court will sometimes request that the solicitor general weigh in, a procedure referred to as a "call for the views of the solicitor general" (CVSG). [7] In response to a CVSG, the solicitor general will file a brief opining on whether the petition should be granted and, usually, which party should prevail. [8]
Although the CVSG is technically an invitation, the solicitor general's office treats it as tantamount to a command. [8] Philip Elman, who served as an attorney in the solicitor general's office and who was the primary author of the federal government's brief in Brown v. Board of Education , wrote, "When the Supreme Court invites you, that's the equivalent of a royal command. An invitation from the Supreme Court just can't be rejected." [9] [10]
The Court typically issues a CVSG where the justices believe that the petition is important, and may be considering granting it, but would like a legal opinion before making that decision. [9] Examples include where there is a federal interest involved in the case; where there is a new issue for which there is no established precedent; or where an issue has evolved, perhaps becoming more complex or affecting other issues. [9]
Although there is usually no deadline by which the solicitor general is required to respond to a CVSG, briefs in response to the CVSG are generally filed at three times of the year: late May, allowing the petition to be considered before the Court breaks for summer recess; August, allowing the petition to go on the "summer list", to be considered at the end of recess; and December, allowing the case to be argued in the remainder of the current Supreme Court term. [8]
The Supreme Court has also occasionally invited a state attorney general to express a view on a petition related to that state. In 2009, for the first time, the invitation was directed instead to a state solicitor general, [11] James Ho of Texas, earning the request the nickname "CVSG-Texas." [12]
Several traditions have developed since the Office of Solicitor General was established in 1870. Most obviously to spectators at oral argument before the Court, the solicitor general and his or her deputies traditionally appear in formal morning coats, [13] although Elena Kagan, the first woman to hold the office on other than an acting basis, elected to forgo the practice. [14]
During oral argument, the members of the Court often address the solicitor general as "General," Some legal commentators such as Michael Herz and Timothy Sandefur have disagreed with this usage, saying that "general" is a postpositive adjective (which modifies the noun "solicitor"), and is not a title itself. [15] [16]
Another tradition is the practice of confession of error. If the government prevailed in the lower court but the solicitor general disagrees with the result, the solicitor general may confess error, after which the Supreme Court will vacate the lower court's ruling and send the case back for reconsideration. [17]
Image | Name | Start | End | President(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benjamin Bristow | October 11, 1870 | November 15, 1872 | Ulysses Grant (1869–1877) | ||
Samuel Phillips | December 11, 1872 | May 1, 1885 | |||
Rutherford Hayes (1877–1881) | |||||
James Garfield (1881) | |||||
Chester Arthur (1881–1885) | |||||
Grover Cleveland (1885–1889) | |||||
John Goode | May 1, 1885 | August 5, 1886 | |||
George Jenks | July 30, 1886 | May 29, 1889 | |||
Orlow Chapman | May 29, 1889 | January 19, 1890 | Benjamin Harrison (1889–1893) | ||
William Taft | February 4, 1890 | March 20, 1892 | |||
Charles Aldrich | March 21, 1892 | May 28, 1893 | |||
Lawrence Maxwell | April 6, 1893 | January 30, 1895 | Grover Cleveland (1893–1897) | ||
Holmes Conrad | February 6, 1895 | July 1, 1897 | |||
John Richards | July 6, 1897 | March 16, 1903 | William McKinley (1897–1901) | ||
Henry Hoyt | February 25, 1903 | March 31, 1909 | Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909) | ||
Lloyd Bowers | April 1, 1909 | September 9, 1910 | William Taft (1909–1913) | ||
Frederick Lehmann | December 12, 1910 | July 15, 1912 | |||
William Bullitt | July 16, 1912 | March 11, 1913 | |||
John Davis | August 30, 1913 | November 26, 1918 | Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921) | ||
Alexander King | November 27, 1918 | May 23, 1920 | |||
William Frierson | June 1, 1920 | June 30, 1921 | |||
James Beck | June 1, 1921 | May 11, 1925 | Warren Harding (1921–1923) | ||
William Mitchell | June 4, 1925 | March 5, 1929 | Calvin Coolidge (1923–1929) | ||
Charles Hughes | May 27, 1929 | April 16, 1930 | Herbert Hoover (1929–1933) | ||
Thomas Thacher | March 22, 1930 | May 4, 1933 | |||
James Biggs | May 5, 1933 | March 24, 1935 | Franklin Roosevelt (1933–1945) | ||
Stanley Reed | March 25, 1935 | January 30, 1938 | |||
Robert Jackson | March 5, 1938 | January 17, 1940 | |||
Francis Biddle | January 22, 1940 | September 4, 1941 | |||
Charles Fahy | November 15, 1941 | September 27, 1945 | |||
Howard McGrath | October 4, 1945 | October 7, 1946 | Harry Truman (1945–1953) | ||
Philip Perlman | July 30, 1947 | August 15, 1952 | |||
Walter Cummings | December 2, 1952 | March 1, 1953 | |||
Simon Sobeloff | February 10, 1954 | July 19, 1956 | Dwight Eisenhower (1953–1961) | ||
Lee Rankin | August 4, 1956 | January 23, 1961 | |||
Archibald Cox | January 24, 1961 | July 31, 1965 | John F. Kennedy (1961–1963) | ||
Thurgood Marshall | August 11, 1965 | August 30, 1967 | Lyndon Johnson (1963–1969) | ||
Erwin Griswold | October 12, 1967 | June 25, 1973 | |||
Robert Bork | June 27, 1973 | January 20, 1977 | Richard Nixon (1969–1974) | ||
Gerald Ford (1974–1977) | |||||
Daniel Friedman Acting | January 20, 1977 | March 4, 1977 | Jimmy Carter (1977–1981) | ||
Wade McCree | March 4, 1977 | January 20, 1981 | |||
Rex Lee | August 6, 1981 | June 1, 1985 | Ronald Reagan (1981–1989) | ||
Charles Fried | June 1, 1985 Acting: June 1, 1985 – October 23, 1985 | January 20, 1989 | |||
William Bryson Acting | January 20, 1989 | May 27, 1989 | George H. W. Bush (1989–1993) | ||
Ken Starr | May 27, 1989 | January 20, 1993 | |||
William Bryson Acting | January 20, 1993 | June 7, 1993 | Bill Clinton (1993–2001) | ||
Drew Days | June 7, 1993 | June 28, 1996 | |||
Walter Dellinger Acting | June 28, 1996 | November 7, 1997 | |||
Seth Waxman | November 7, 1997 | January 20, 2001 | |||
Barbara Underwood Acting | January 20, 2001 | June 13, 2001 | George W. Bush (2001–2009) | ||
Ted Olson | June 13, 2001 | July 13, 2004 | |||
Paul Clement | July 13, 2004 Acting: July 13, 2004 – June 13, 2005 | June 2, 2008 | |||
Gregory Garre | June 2, 2008 Acting: June 2, 2008 – October 2, 2008 | January 20, 2009 | |||
Edwin Kneedler Acting | January 20, 2009 | March 20, 2009 | Barack Obama (2009–2017) | ||
Elena Kagan | March 20, 2009 | May 17, 2010 | |||
Neal Katyal Acting | May 17, 2010 | June 9, 2011 | |||
Don Verrilli | June 9, 2011 | June 25, 2016 | |||
Ian Gershengorn Acting | June 25, 2016 | January 20, 2017 | |||
Noel Francisco Acting | January 20, 2017 | March 10, 2017 | Donald Trump (2017–2021) | ||
Jeff Wall Acting | March 10, 2017 | September 19, 2017 | |||
Noel Francisco | September 19, 2017 | July 3, 2020 | |||
Jeff Wall Acting | July 3, 2020 | January 20, 2021 | |||
Elizabeth Prelogar Acting | January 20, 2021 | August 11, 2021 | Joe Biden (2021–2025) | ||
Brian Fletcher Acting | August 11, 2021 | October 28, 2021 | |||
Elizabeth Prelogar | October 28, 2021 | present |
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)The United States attorney general (AG) is the head of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and is the chief law enforcement officer of the federal government of the United States. The attorney general serves as the principal advisor to the president of the United States on all legal matters. The attorney general is a statutory member of the Cabinet of the United States.
Elena Kagan is an American lawyer who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. She was appointed in 2010 by President Barack Obama and is the fourth woman to serve on the Court.
Neal Kumar Katyal is an American lawyer and legal scholar. He is a partner at the Hogan Lovells law firm and is the Paul and Patricia Saunders Professor of National Security Law at Georgetown University Law Center.
Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case challenging the use of lethal injection as a form of execution in the state of Florida. The Court ruled unanimously that a challenge to the method of execution as violating the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution properly raised a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides a cause of action for civil rights violations, rather than under the habeas corpus provisions. Accordingly, that the prisoner had previously sought habeas relief could not bar the present challenge.
Beth S. Brinkmann is an American lawyer who served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the United States Department of Justice, heading up the appellate staff in the DOJ's Civil Division during the administration of President Barack Obama. She also served as Assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States from 1993 through 2001. Brinkmann has argued 25 cases before the United States Supreme Court both in that role and in her later role as a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of the firm Morrison & Foerster. Currently, Brinkmann is a partner at the Covington & Burling law firm in Washington, D.C.
Ziglar v. Abbasi, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), is a Supreme Court of the United States case in which the Court determined, by a vote of 4–2, that non-U.S. citizens detained in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks cannot recover monetary damages from high level federal officials for the conditions of their confinement. The case was consolidated with Hastey v. Abbasi, and Ashcroft v. Abbasi. It was argued on January 18, 2017.
Ian Heath Gershengorn is an American lawyer and former acting Solicitor General of the United States under President Barack Obama.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services 682 F.3d 1 is a United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decision that affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the terms "marriage" as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" and "spouse" as "a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife." Both courts found DOMA to be unconstitutional, though for different reasons. The trial court held that DOMA violates the Tenth Amendment and Spending Clause. In a companion case, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, the same judge held that DOMA violates the Equal Protection Clause. On May 31, 2012, the First Circuit held the act violates the Equal Protection Clause, while federalism concerns affect the equal protection analysis, DOMA does not violate the Spending Clause or Tenth Amendment.
Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., 563 U.S. 754 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case. The case considered whether a party, in order to "actively [induce] infringement of a patent" under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b), must know that the induced act constitutes patent infringement, or whether deliberate indifference to the existence of a patent can be considered a form of actual knowledge. In an 8–1 decision delivered by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court held that induced infringement requires knowledge of patent infringement, but because the petitioners had knowledge of a patent infringement lawsuit involving the respondent and Sunbeam Products over the same invention, the Federal Circuit's judgement that petitioners induced infringement must be affirmed under the doctrine of willful blindness.
Fisher v. University of Texas, 570 U.S. 297 (2013), also known as Fisher I, is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Texas at Austin. The Supreme Court voided the lower appellate court's ruling in favor of the university and remanded the case, holding that the lower court had not applied the standard of strict scrutiny, articulated in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), to its admissions program. The Court's ruling in Fisher took Grutter and Bakke as given and did not directly revisit the constitutionality of using race as a factor in college admissions.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519 (2012), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court upheld Congress's power to enact most provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), commonly called Obamacare, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA), including a requirement for most Americans to pay a penalty for forgoing health insurance by 2014. The Acts represented a major set of changes to the American health care system that had been the subject of highly contentious debate, largely divided on political party lines.
Curtis E. Gannon is an American lawyer. He is a Deputy Solicitor General, a career position, in the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States. He previously served as the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel of the United States Department of Justice. He was appointed to this position on January 20, 2017, by President Donald Trump.
Jeffrey Bryan Wall is an American attorney and former government official who served as the acting Solicitor General of the United States and the Principal Deputy Solicitor General of the United States during the first presidency of Donald Trump. He is now a partner and head of Supreme Court and Appellate Practice at Sullivan & Cromwell in New York and Washington, DC.
Michael R. Dreeben is a former Deputy Solicitor General who was in charge of the U.S. Department of Justice criminal docket before the United States Supreme Court. He is recognized as an expert in U.S. criminal law.
Eric David Miller is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sharp v. Murphy, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a Supreme Court of the United States case of whether Congress disestablished the Muscogee (Creek) Nation reservation. After holding the case from the 2018 term, the case was decided on July 9, 2020, in a per curiam decision following McGirt v. Oklahoma that, for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, the reservations were never disestablished and remain Indian country.
Franchise Tax Board of California v. Hyatt, 587 U.S. 230 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that unless they consent, states have sovereign immunity from private suits filed against them in the courts of another state. The 5–4 decision overturned precedent set in a 1979 Supreme Court case, Nevada v. Hall. This was the third time that the litigants had presented their case to the Court, as the Court had already ruled on the issue in 2003 and 2016.
Peter v. NantKwest Inc., 589 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case from the October 2019 term.
Brian Fletcher is an American lawyer who serves as the Principal Deputy Solicitor General of the United States. He served as Acting Solicitor General from August 11, 2021, until Elizabeth Prelogar's confirmation on October 21, 2021.
Henry Charles Whitaker is an American legal scholar who has served as the Solicitor General of Florida since 2021. Previously he was the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel at the U.S. Department of Justice in the District of Columbia.