Anthony Kennedy

Last updated

Anthony Kennedy
Anthony Kennedy official SCOTUS portrait.jpg
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
In office
February 18, 1988 July 31, 2018
Nominated by Ronald Reagan
Preceded by Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Succeeded by Brett Kavanaugh
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In office
May 30, 1975 February 18, 1988
Nominated by Gerald Ford
Preceded by Charles Merton Merrill
Succeeded by Pamela Ann Rymer
Personal details
Anthony McLeod Kennedy

(1936-07-23) July 23, 1936 (age 83)
Sacramento, California, U.S.
Mary Davis(m. 1963)
Education Stanford University (BA)
Harvard University (LLB)
Signature Anthony Kennedy signature.svg
Military service
AllegianceFlag of the United States (Pantone).svg United States
Branch/serviceFlag of the United States Army.svg  United States Army
Years of service1961–1962
Unit California Army National Guard

Anthony McLeod Kennedy (born July 23, 1936) is an American lawyer and jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1988 until his retirement in 2018. He was nominated to the court in 1987 by President Ronald Reagan, and sworn in on February 18, 1988. After the retirement of Sandra Day O'Connor in 2006, he was the swing vote on many of the Roberts Court's 5–4 decisions.


Born in Sacramento, California, Kennedy took over his father's legal practice in Sacramento after graduating from Harvard Law School. In 1975, President Gerald Ford appointed Kennedy to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. In November 1987, after two failed attempts at nominating a successor to Associate Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., President Reagan nominated Kennedy to the Supreme Court. Kennedy won unanimous confirmation from the United States Senate in February 1988. Following the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016, Kennedy became the Senior Associate Justice of the Court; he remained the Senior Associate Justice until his July 2018 retirement. Kennedy retired during the administration of President Donald Trump and was succeeded by his former law clerk, Brett Kavanaugh.

Kennedy authored the majority opinion in several important cases, including Boumediene v. Bush , Citizens United v. FEC , and four gay rights cases ( Romer v. Evans , Lawrence v. Texas , United States v. Windsor , and Obergefell v. Hodges ). He also co-authored the plurality opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey .

Early life and education

Kennedy was born and raised in an Irish Catholic family in Sacramento, California. [1] He was the son of Anthony J. Kennedy, an attorney with a reputation for influence in the California State Legislature, and Gladys (née McLeod), who participated in many local civic activities. [2] As a boy, Kennedy came into contact with prominent politicians of the day, such as California Governor and future Chief Justice of the United States Earl Warren. As a young man, Kennedy served as a page in the California State Senate. Kennedy attended C. K. McClatchy High School, where he was an honors student and graduated in 1954. [3] [4]

Following in his mother's footsteps, Kennedy enrolled at Stanford University where he developed an interest with constitutional law. After spending his senior year at the London School of Economics, Kennedy graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Stanford in 1958 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in political science. [5] Kennedy then attended Harvard Law School; he graduated with a Bachelor of Laws, cum laude , in 1961. [6]

Early career

Kennedy was in private practice in San Francisco from 1961 to 1963. In 1963, following his father's death, he took over his father's Sacramento practice, which he operated until 1975. [3] From 1965 to 1988, he was a Professor of Constitutional Law at McGeorge School of Law, at the University of the Pacific. [5]

During Kennedy's time as a California law professor and attorney, he helped California Governor Ronald Reagan draft a state tax proposal. [3]

Kennedy has served in numerous positions during his career, including the California Army National Guard in 1961 and the board of the Federal Judicial Center from 1987 to 1988. He also served on two committees of the Judicial Conference of the United States: the Advisory Panel on Financial Disclosure Reports and Judicial Activities (subsequently renamed the Advisory Committee on Codes of Conduct) from 1979 to 1987, and the Committee on Pacific Territories from 1979 to 1990, which he chaired from 1982 to 1990. [7]

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

On March 3, 1975, upon Reagan's recommendation, [3] President Gerald Ford nominated Kennedy to the seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that had been vacated by Charles Merton Merrill. Kennedy was unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 20 and received his commission on March 24, 1975. [8]

Supreme Court of the United States

President Reagan and Kennedy meeting in the Oval Office on November 11, 1987 C43610-23 Ronald Reagan and Anthony Kennedy.jpeg
President Reagan and Kennedy meeting in the Oval Office on November 11, 1987

Nomination and confirmation

On November 11, 1987, President Reagan nominated Kennedy to the Supreme Court seat vacated by Lewis F. Powell Jr., who had announced his retirement in late June. [9] Kennedy's nomination followed Reagan's failure to appoint Robert Bork, who was nominated in July but rejected by the Senate on October 23, [10] or Douglas Ginsburg, [11] [12] who withdrew his name from consideration on November 7 after admitting to marijuana use. [13] Kennedy was then subjected to an unprecedentedly thorough investigation of his background, [14] which he easily passed.

In a Ninth Circuit dissent that Kennedy wrote before joining the Supreme Court, he criticized police for bribing a child into showing them where the child's mother hid drugs. Considering such conduct offensive and destructive of the family, Kennedy wrote that "indifference to personal liberty is but the precursor of the state's hostility to it." [15] Kennedy wrote an article the year before, however, about judicial restraint, and the following excerpt from it was read aloud[ by whom? ] at his confirmation hearing:

One can conclude that certain essential, or fundamental, rights should exist in any just society. It does not follow that each of those essential rights is one that we as judges can enforce under the written Constitution. The Due Process Clause is not a guarantee of every right that should inhere in an ideal system. Many argue that a just society grants a right to engage in homosexual conduct. If that view is accepted, the Bowers decision in effect says the State of Georgia has the right to make a wrong decision—wrong in the sense that it violates some people's views of rights in a just society. We can extend that slightly to say that Georgia's right to be wrong in matters not specifically controlled by the Constitution is a necessary component of its own political processes. Its citizens have the political liberty to direct the governmental process to make decisions that might be wrong in the ideal sense, subject to correction in the ordinary political process. [16]

Kennedy said about Griswold v. Connecticut , a privacy case about the use of contraceptives, "I really think I would like to draw the line and not talk about the Griswold case so far as its reasoning or its result." [17] He also discussed "a zone of liberty, a zone of protection, a line that's drawn where the individual can tell the Government, 'Beyond this line you may not go.'" [18] [19]

His hearings before the Senate judiciary committee began on December 14, [20] [21] and lasted just three consecutive days. [22] When the Senate voted on Kennedy's nomination, he received bipartisan support. Maureen Hoch of PBS wrote that he "virtually sailed through the confirmation process and was widely viewed by conservatives and liberals alike as balanced and fair". [23] The U.S. Senate confirmed him on February 3, 1988, by a vote of 97 to 0. [19] Absent from the vote were three Democrats: Paul Simon and Al Gore were campaigning and Joe Biden was ill. [24] Attorney General Edwin Meese presented Kennedy's commission to the Court in a swearing-in ceremony on February 18, 1988. [25]

Tenure and analysis

Although appointed by a Republican president, Kennedy was not easily pigeonholed ideologically; he had a reputation for looking at cases individually instead of deciding them on the basis of a rigid ideology. [3] In fact, an article for Vanity Fair quoted several former Supreme Court clerks as indicating that they believe Kennedy was often swayed by the opinions of his clerks, including his ruling on Roe v Wade. [26] One clerk derisively stated that "the premise is that he can't think by himself, and that he can be manipulated by someone in his second year of law school". This notion also lead the Federalist Society to target Kennedy with more conservative clerks, believing this would make Kennedy more conservative. Conservative pundit George Will and Georgetown University Law Center professor Randy Barnett have described Kennedy's jurisprudence as "libertarian", [27] although other legal scholars have disagreed. [28] [29]

Kennedy issued conservative rulings during most of his tenure, having voted with William Rehnquist as often as any other justice from 1992 to the end of the Rehnquist Court in 2005. [30] In his first term on the court, Kennedy voted with Rehnquist 92 percent of the time—more than any other justice. [31] However, Kennedy was also known for siding with the Court's liberal justices on high-profile social issues like same-sex marriage and abortion. [32] Kennedy was known as a swing vote on the Court, [33] [34] [35] [36] and this reputation became more pronounced after the 2005 retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor (who had previously been known as the court's swing vote). [37] Kennedy was more conservative than former Justice O'Connor was on issues of race, religion, and abortion, and intensely disliked being labeled a "swing vote" in public. [38] However, interviews with former clerks indicate that, behind the scenes, he relished his role as the deciding vote, to the point that some of them expressed a belief that he would pretend to waver on votes when he had, in fact, already made up his mind. [39]

On the Roberts Court, Kennedy often decided the outcome of cases. In the 2008–2009 term, he was in the majority 92 percent of the time. In the 23 decisions in which the justices split 5-to-4, Kennedy was in the majority in all but five. Of those 23 decisions, 16 were strictly along ideological lines, and Kennedy joined the conservative wing of the court 11 times; the liberals, five. [40] In the 2010–2011 term, 16 cases were decided by a 5–4 vote; Kennedy joined the majority in 14 of the decisions. [33]

Following the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016, Kennedy became the Senior Associate Justice of the Court and the last appointed by President Reagan; he remained the Senior Associate Justice until his retirement. [41] Kennedy retired from the Supreme Court and made the transition to senior status effective July 31, 2018. [42]

Conservative criticism

According to legal reporter Jan Crawford, Kennedy attracted the ire of conservatives when he did not vote with his more conservative colleagues. [43] In 2005, Tom DeLay criticized Kennedy for his reliance on international law and for conducting his own Internet research, calling him a judicial activist. [44] According to legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin, some conservatives viewed Kennedy's pro-gay-rights and pro-choice rulings as betrayals. [45] According to Greenburg, the "bitter" quality of some movement conservatives' views on Kennedy stems from his eventual rethinking of positions on abortion, religion, and the death penalty (which Kennedy believes should not be applied to juveniles or the mentally challenged). [43]

A short 2008 law review article by retired lawyer Douglas M. Parker in The Green Bag [46] charged that much of the criticism of Kennedy was based upon "pop psychology" rather than careful analysis of his opinions. Kennedy himself responds to concerns about judicial activism this way: "An activist court is a court that makes a decision you don't like." [47]


According to legal writer Jeffrey Toobin, starting in 2003, Kennedy became a leading proponent of the use of foreign and international law as an aid to interpreting the United States Constitution. [45] Toobin sees this consideration of foreign law as the biggest factor behind Kennedy's occasional breaking with his most conservative colleagues. [45] The use of foreign law in Supreme Court opinions dates back to at least 1829, though according to Toobin, its use in interpreting the Constitution on "basic questions of individual liberties" began only in the late 1990s. [45]

Defending his use of international law, in 2005 Kennedy told The New Yorker staff writer Jeffrey Toobin, "Why should world opinion care that the American Administration wants to bring freedom to oppressed peoples? Is that not because there's some underlying common mutual interest, some underlying common shared idea, some underlying common shared aspiration, underlying unified concept of what human dignity means? I think that's what we're trying to tell the rest of the world, anyway." [48]

A 2008 profile of Kennedy in the Los Angeles Times focused on his internationalist perspective. According to David Savage, Kennedy had become a strong proponent of interpreting the guarantees of liberty and equality in line with modern human rights law: "lawyers and judges have come to believe the basic principles of human rights are common to the peoples of world." [49]



In Hodgson v. Minnesota , 497 U.S. 417 (1990), Kennedy voted to uphold a restriction on abortion for minors that required both parents to be notified about the procedure.

Kennedy joined O'Connor's plurality opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which reaffirmed in principle (though without many details) the Roe v. Wade decision recognizing the right to abortion under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The plurality opinion, signed jointly by three justices appointed by Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, ignited a firestorm of criticism from conservatives. Kennedy had stated at least as early as 1989 that, in order to uphold precedent, he might not vote to overturn Roe. [50] According to court insiders, Kennedy had reportedly considered overturning Roe, but in the end decided to uphold restrictions while affirming the Roe precedent. [51]

In later abortion decisions, it became apparent that Kennedy thought Casey had narrowed Roe and allowed more restrictions. Owing to the Court's altered composition under President Clinton, Kennedy was no longer the fifth vote to strike down abortion restrictions. Hence, O'Connor became the justice who defined the meaning of Casey in subsequent cases, while Kennedy was relegated to dissents in which he sought to explain what he thought Casey meant. For example, Kennedy dissented in the 2000 decision in Stenberg v. Carhart , which struck down laws criminalizing partial-birth abortion. [52]

After the judicial appointments made by President George W. Bush, Kennedy again became the needed fifth vote to strike down abortion restrictions. Since Kennedy's conception of abortion rights was narrower than O'Connor's, the Court became slightly more supportive of abortion restrictions after 2006. Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Gonzales v. Carhart , 550 U.S. 124 (2007), which held that a federal law criminalizing partial-birth abortion did not violate Casey because it did not impose an "undue burden" upon the exercise of abortion rights. The decision did not expressly overrule Stenberg, although many commentators saw it as having that effect. [53] [54]

Capital punishment

With the Court's majority in Atkins v. Virginia and Roper v. Simmons , Kennedy agreed that the execution of the mentally ill and those under 18 at the time of the crime was unconstitutional. In Kansas v. Marsh , however, he declined to join the dissent, which questioned the overall "soundness" of the existing capital punishment system.

In 2008, Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Kennedy v. Louisiana . The opinion, joined by the court's four more liberal justices, held, "[t]he Eighth Amendment bars Louisiana from imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child where the crime did not result, and was not intended to result, in the victim's death." The opinion went on to state, "The court concludes that there is a distinction between intentional first-degree murder, on the one hand, and non-homicide crimes against individuals, even including child rape, on the other. The latter crimes may be devastating in their harm, as here, but in terms of moral depravity and of the injury to the person and to the public, they cannot compare to murder in their severity and irrevocability." The opinion concluded that in cases of crimes against individuals, "the death penalty should not be expanded to instances where the victim's life was not taken." [55]


Kennedy wrote the majority decision in Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (2009), which involved an Alaskan mining company that planned to extract new gold from a mine that had been closed for decades using a technique known as "froth-flotation". This technique would produce approximately 4.5 million tons of "slurry", a thick waste product laced with toxic elements such as lead and mercury. The company intended to dispose of the waste in a nearby lake, which would eventually decrease the depth of the lake by fifty feet and flood the surrounding land with contaminated water. While federal law forbids "[t]he use of any river, lake, stream or ocean as a waste treatment system", Kennedy's decision stated that pollutants are exempt from this law so long as they have "the effect of ... changing the bottom elevation of water". Justice Ginsburg's dissent stated that such a reading of federal law "strains credulity" because it allows "[w]hole categories of regulated industries" to "gain immunity from a variety of pollution-control standards".

Gay rights and homosexuality

Kennedy's concept of liberty has included protections for sexual orientation. As early as 1980, then-Judge Kennedy speculated that some homosexual behavior is constitutionally protected. [56] He wrote the Court's opinion in the 1996 case Romer v. Evans , invalidating a provision in the Colorado Constitution denying homosexuals the right to bring local discrimination claims. In 2003, he wrote the Court's opinion in Lawrence v. Texas , which invalidated criminal laws against homosexual sodomy on the basis of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution, overturning the Court's previous ruling in 1986's Bowers v. Hardwick . In both cases, he sided with the more liberal members of the Court. The decision in Lawrence also controversially cited foreign laws, specifically ones enacted by the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and a decision of the European Court of Human Rights, in partly justifying the result. [57]

In the 2000 case of Boy Scouts of America v. Dale , Kennedy voted, with four other justices, to uphold the Boy Scouts of America's organizational right to ban homosexuals from being scoutmasters.

On October 19, 2009, Kennedy temporarily blocked Washington state officials from releasing the names of people who signed petitions calling for a referendum ballot measure that would repeal a gay rights domestic partnership law, but joined the subsequent majority decision in Doe v. Reed , which stated the Washington law permitting signature release was constitutional, but remanded the matter to the lower court to determine whether the release of this particular petition's signatures was constitutional.

In the 2010 case Christian Legal Society v. Martinez , the Court held that a public law college's policy requiring that all student organizations allow any student to join was constitutional. The Christian Legal Society wanted an exemption from the policy because the organization barred students based on religion and sexual orientation. Hastings College of Law refused to grant the exemption. The Court found that Hastings' policy was reasonable and viewpoint neutral. Kennedy wrote a concurrence joining the majority.

On August 4, 2010, Dahlia Lithwick wrote about Judge Vaughn R. Walker's ruling that overturned California's Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage, Walker "is not Anthony Kennedy. But when the chips are down, he certainly knows how to write like him. I count—in his opinion today—seven citations to Justice Kennedy's 1996 opinion in Romer v. Evans ... and eight citations to his 2003 decision in Lawrence v. Texas ... In a stunning decision this afternoon ... Walker trod heavily on the path Kennedy has blazed on gay rights." [58] The next day, Lithwick said on ABC's Good Morning America , "Walker's ruling that California's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional was aimed at one man: Justice Anthony Kennedy." [59]

On June 26, 2013, Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act was held unconstitutional in United States v. Windsor . In the majority opinion on this case, Kennedy wrote, "The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity. By seeking to displace this protection and treating those persons as living in marriages less respected than others, the federal statute is in violation of the Fifth Amendment." [60]

Two years later, Kennedy authored the majority ruling in the decision of Obergefell v. Hodges , which holds that same-sex couples must be allowed to marry nationwide. [61] [62] The closing paragraph of Kennedy's ruling has been used by many couples in their marriage vows: [63]

No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were.

Gun control

On June 26, 2008, Kennedy joined the majority in District of Columbia v. Heller , which struck down the ban on handguns in the District of Columbia. At issue was whether Washington, D.C.'s ban violated the right to "keep and bear arms" by preventing individuals from having guns in their homes. Kennedy sided with the conservatives on the Court, holding that the Second Amendment recognized an individual's right to keep and bear arms. (The decision came the day after the Court's ruling in Kennedy v. Louisiana , a capital punishment decision written by Kennedy, in which he sided with the liberal justices.) Two years later, in McDonald v. Chicago , Kennedy joined the majority opinion holding that the Second Amendment's protections for the right to keep and bear arms are incorporated against the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [64]

Habeas corpus

On June 12, 2008, Kennedy wrote the 5–4 majority opinion in Boumediene v. Bush . The case challenged the legality of Lakhdar Boumediene's detention at the Guantanamo Bay military base as well as the constitutionality of the Military Commissions Act (MCA) of 2006. Kennedy was joined by the four more liberal judges in finding that the constitutionally guaranteed right of habeas corpus applies to persons held in Guantanamo Bay and to persons designated as enemy combatants on that territory. They also found that the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 failed to provide an adequate substitute for habeas corpus and that the MCA was an unconstitutional suspension of that right. [65] [66] [67] [68]

The Court also concluded that the detainees are not required to exhaust review procedures in the court of appeals before seeking habeas relief in the district court. In the ruling, Kennedy called the Combatant Status Review Tribunals "inadequate". [65] [66] [67] [68] He explained, "to hold that the political branches may switch the constitution on or off at will would lead to a regime in which they, not this court, 'say what the law is.'" [69] The decision struck down section seven (7) of the MCA but left intact the Detainee Treatment Act. In a concurring opinion, Justice Souter stressed the fact that the prisoners involved had been imprisoned for as many as six years. [70]

Religious liberty

On issues of religion, Kennedy held to a less separationist reading of the Establishment Clause than did his colleague, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor,[ citation needed ] favoring a "Coercion Test" that he detailed in County of Allegheny v. ACLU . [71] Kennedy authored the majority opinion in Town of Greece v. Galloway , 572 U.S. _____ (2014), concluding, "The town of Greece does not violate the First Amendment by opening its meetings with prayer that comports with our tradition, and does not coerce participation by nonadherents." [72]

Super PACs

Justice Kennedy's majority opinion [73] in Citizens United found that the BCRA §203 prohibition of all independent expenditures by corporations and unions violated the First Amendment's protection of free speech. The majority wrote, "If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech." [74]

Justice Kennedy's opinion for the majority also noted that because the First Amendment does not distinguish between media and other corporations, these restrictions would allow Congress to suppress political speech in newspapers, books, television, and blogs. [75] The Court overruled Austin, which had held that a state law that prohibited corporations from using treasury money to support or oppose candidates in elections did not violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court also overruled that portion of McConnell that upheld BCRA's restriction of corporate spending on "electioneering communications". The Court's ruling effectively freed corporations and unions to spend money both on "electioneering communications" and to directly advocate for the election or defeat of candidates (although not to contribute directly to candidates or political parties). [76]

On October 25, 2011, Richard L. Hasen wrote that in the 2012 election super PACs "will likely replace political parties as a conduit for large, often secret contributions, allowing an end run around the $2,500 individual contribution limit and the bar on corporate and labor contributions to federal candidates". According to Hasen, the rise of super PACs dates to a sentence in Kennedy's opinion in Citizens United : "We now conclude that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption." [77] Kennedy also wrote in his opinion that he was not concerned if higher expenditures by people or corporations were viewed as leading to corruption, stating, "... the appearance of influence or access will not cause the electorate to lose faith in this democracy." [78]

Other issues

On the issue of the limits of free speech, Kennedy joined a majority to protect flag burning in the controversial case of Texas v. Johnson (1989). [79] In his concurrence, Kennedy wrote, "It is poignant but fundamental that the flag protects those who hold it in contempt." He took a very broad view of constitutional protection for speech under the First Amendment,[ citation needed ] invalidating a congressional law prohibiting "virtual" child pornography in the 2002 decision, Ashcroft v. ACLU . [80]

Kennedy has joined with Court majorities in decisions favoring states' rights and invalidating federal and state affirmative action programs. He ruled with the majority on Equal Protection grounds in the controversial 2000 Bush v. Gore case that halted continuing recounts in the 2000 presidential election and ended the legal challenge to the election of President George Bush. Although the decision was published without an author, Kennedy wrote the decision. [81] . Behind the scenes, colleagues criticized his professionalism in this case, feeling that he inflated the numbers of his majority opinion by deciding, without consulting the dissenting justices, to implicate some of the dissenters as having joined his opinion in part. [82]

In the 2005 Gonzales v. Raich case, he joined the liberal members of the Court (along with conservative Justice Scalia) in permitting the federal government to prohibit the use of medical marijuana, even in states where it is legal. [83] Several weeks later, in the controversial case of Kelo v. City of New London (2005), he joined the four more liberal justices in supporting the local government's power to take private property for economic development through the use of eminent domain. [84]

In Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Ayers (2003), Kennedy wrote a partial dissent in which he argued that railroad workers who had contracted asbestosis from their employment should not be entitled to recovery for the emotional pain and suffering from their increased risk of cancer. [85]

In Baze v. Rees , Kennedy played a deciding role in the outcome of lethal injection. Some correspondents believed he would play a larger role, believing more than two judges would dissent. [86]

A December 2011 article in the Huffington Post noted that Kennedy dissented on an interpretation of the Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses, where a lab tech who created a forensic report on a case is required to testify at trial if called. His dissent, joined by Roberts, Breyer, and Alito, claimed that the rule would place a burden on understaffed labs. However, in Williams v. Illinois, Kennedy sided with Scalia's interpretation of the amendment. [87]

Public speaking and teaching

Kennedy called for reform of overcrowded American prisons in a speech before the American Bar Association. He has spent his summers in Salzburg, Austria, where he teaches international and American law at the University of Salzburg for the McGeorge School of Law international program and has attended the large yearly international judges' conference held there. [88]

In January 2015, Kennedy recorded a short interview for Historic Mount Vernon about the vital role George Washington had played in the drafting and early interpretation of the Constitution. [89]

Personal life

On June 23, 1963, Kennedy married Mary Jeanne Davis from Sacramento, California. The Kennedys have three children: Justin, Gregory, and Kristin. [90] Mary Kennedy and the three Kennedy children are all graduates of Stanford. [90] Mary Kennedy was a third grade teacher at the Golden Empire Elementary School in Sacramento. [91] After working for Goldman Sachs, Justin Kennedy worked for Deutsche Bank from 1997 to 2009; he became its global head of real estate capital markets. [92] [93] [94]

As of 2018, out of the 114 justices who have served on the Supreme Court, Kennedy is one of 14 Roman Catholics (including six current justices). [95]

See also

Related Research Articles

Supreme Court of the United States Highest court in the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States of America. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal and state court cases that involve a point of federal law, and original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party". The Court holds the power of judicial review, the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution. It is also able to strike down presidential directives for violating either the Constitution or statutory law. However, it may act only within the context of a case in an area of law over which it has jurisdiction. The Court may decide cases having political overtones, but it has ruled that it does not have power to decide non-justiciable political questions.

Sandra Day OConnor Former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

Sandra Day O'Connor is an American attorney, politician, and jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1981 until her retirement in 2006. She was the first woman to serve on the Court.

Byron White Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, American football player

Byron Raymond "Whizzer" White was an American lawyer and professional football player who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1962 to 1993. Born and raised in Colorado, he played college football, basketball, and baseball for the University of Colorado, finishing as the runner up for the Heisman Trophy in 1937. He was selected in the first round of the 1938 NFL Draft by the Pittsburgh Pirates and led the National Football League in rushing yards in his rookie season. White was admitted to Yale Law School in 1939 and played for the Detroit Lions in the 1940 and 1941 seasons. During World War II, he served as an intelligence officer with the United States Navy in the Pacific. After the war, he graduated from Yale and clerked for Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson.

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. It struck down many U.S. state and federal abortion laws, and prompted an ongoing national debate in the United States about whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role of religious and moral views in the political sphere should be. Roe v. Wade reshaped American politics, dividing much of the United States into abortion rights and anti-abortion movements, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.

Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with sexual orientation and state laws. It was the first Supreme Court case to address gay rights since Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), when the Court had held that laws criminalizing sodomy were constitutional.

Antonin Scalia American judge

Antonin Gregory Scalia was an American lawyer, jurist, government official, and academic who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1986 until his death in 2016. He was described as the intellectual anchor for the originalist and textualist position in the Court's conservative wing. For catalyzing an originalist and textualist movement in American law, he has been described as one of the most influential jurists of the twentieth century, and one of the most important justices in the Supreme Court's history. Scalia was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2018, and the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University was named in his honor.

David Souter American judge

David Hackett Souter is a retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He served from October 1990 until his retirement in June 2009. Appointed by President George H. W. Bush to fill the seat vacated by William J. Brennan Jr., Souter sat on both the Rehnquist and Roberts Courts.

John Paul Stevens American Supreme Court judge

John Paul Stevens was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1975 until his voluntary retirement in 2010. At the time of his retirement, he was the second-oldest-serving justice in the history of the court and the third-longest-serving justice. His long tenure saw him write for the court on most issues of American law, including civil liberties, death penalty, government action and intellectual property. In cases involving presidents of the United States, he wrote for the court that they were to be held accountable under American law. A registered Republican when appointed who throughout his life identified as a conservative, Stevens was considered to have been on the liberal side of the court at the time of his retirement.

Warren E. Burger 15th chief justice of the United States

Warren Earl Burger was the 15th chief justice of the United States, serving from 1969 to 1986. Born in Saint Paul, Minnesota, Burger graduated from the St. Paul College of Law in 1931. He helped secure the Minnesota delegation's support for Dwight D. Eisenhower at the 1952 Republican National Convention. After Eisenhower won the 1952 presidential election, he appointed Burger to the position of Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Division. In 1956, Eisenhower appointed Burger to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Burger served on this court until 1969 and became known as a critic of the Warren Court.

Lewis F. Powell Jr. Former Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

Lewis Franklin Powell Jr. was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1971 to 1987. Powell compiled a generally conservative and business-aligned record on the Court.

Samuel Alito Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. is an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President George W. Bush and has served since January 31, 2006.

John Roberts American judge

John Glover Roberts Jr. is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as Chief Justice of the United States. Roberts has authored the majority opinion in several landmark cases, including Shelby County v. Holder, National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, King v. Burwell, and Department of Commerce v. New York. He has been described as having a conservative judicial philosophy in his jurisprudence but has shown a willingness to work with the Supreme Court's liberal bloc, and since the retirement of Anthony Kennedy in 2018 has come to be regarded as a key swing vote on the Court.

Roberts Court period of the Supreme Court of the United States from 2005-present

The Roberts Court is the time since 2005 during which the Supreme Court of the United States has been led by Chief Justice John Roberts. It is generally considered more conservative than the preceding Rehnquist Court, as a result of the retirement of moderate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and the subsequent confirmation of the more conservative Justice Samuel Alito in her place.

<i>Gonzales v. Carhart</i> United States Supreme Court case

Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. The case reached the high court after U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales appealed a ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in favor of LeRoy Carhart that struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. Also before the Supreme Court was the consolidated appeal of Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which had struck down the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.

Rehnquist Court

The Rehnquist Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1986 to 2005, when William Rehnquist served as Chief Justice of the United States. Rehnquist succeeded Warren Burger as Chief Justice after the latter's retirement, and Rehnquist served as Chief Justice until his death in 2005, at which point John Roberts was nominated and confirmed as Rehnquist's replacement. The Rehnquist Court is generally considered to be more conservative than the preceding Burger Court and Warren Court. According to Jeffrey Rosen, Rehnquist combined an amiable nature with great organizational skill, and he "led a Court that put the brakes on some of the excesses of the Earl Warren era while keeping pace with the sentiments of a majority of the country." Biographer John Jenkins argued that Rehnquist politicized the Supreme Court and moved the court and the country to the right. Through its rulings, the Rehnquist Court often promoted a policy of New Federalism in which more power was given to the states at the expense of the federal government. The Rehnquist Court was also notable for its stability, as the same nine justices served together from 1994 to 2005, the longest such stretch in Supreme Court history.

William Rehnquist Chief Justice of the United States

William Hubbs Rehnquist was an American lawyer and jurist who served on the Supreme Court of the United States for 33 years, first as an Associate Justice from 1972 to 1986 and then as Chief Justice from 1986 until his death in 2005. Considered a conservative, Rehnquist favored a conception of federalism that emphasized the Tenth Amendment's reservation of powers to the states. Under this view of federalism, the court, for the first time since the 1930s, struck down an act of Congress as exceeding its power under the Commerce Clause.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court concerning campaign finance. The Court held that the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofit corporations, labor unions, and other associations.

Clarence Thomas Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

Clarence Thomas is an American judge who serves as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Following the retirement of Anthony Kennedy, Thomas became the most senior member of the Supreme Court. Thomas succeeded Thurgood Marshall and is the second African American to serve on the Court. Among the current members of the Court he is the longest-serving justice, with a tenure of 28 years, 249 days as of June 28, 2020.

June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo is a current court case within the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with the constitutionality of a Louisiana state law related to abortion practices. The state law, mirroring one that had passed in Texas, requires doctors performing abortions to have admission privileges at a state-authorized hospital within 30 miles (48 km) of the abortion clinic. As in Texas, this law would have limited abortions to one single doctor in the state, as other doctors had not yet gained admission privileges or are outside the given range. The Texas law was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (WWH) in 2016, on the basis that limiting clinic availability was an undue burden on women seeking legal abortions, a constitutional right as determined by the landmark Roe v. Wade case.

Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., No. 18-483, 587 U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 1780 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the constitutionality of a 2016 anti-abortion law passed in the state of Indiana. Indiana's law sought to ban abortions performed solely on the basis of the fetus' gender, race, ethnicity, or disabilities. Lower courts had blocked enforcement of the law for violating a woman's right to abortion under privacy concerns within the Fourteenth Amendment, as previously found in the landmark cases Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The lower courts also blocked enforcement of another portion of the law that required the disposal of aborted fetuses through burial or cremation. The per curiam decision by the Supreme Court overturned the injunction on the fetal disposal portion of the law, but otherwise did not challenge or confirm the lower courts' ruling on the non-discrimination clauses, leaving these in place.


  1. William E. Watson and Eugene J. Halus, Jr (2014). Irish Americans: The History and Culture of a People. ABC-CLIO. p. 114. ISBN   9781610694674.
  2. "Anthony M. Kennedy". Oyez. Retrieved June 20, 2010.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Christopher L. Tomlins (2005). The United States Supreme Court . Houghton Mifflin. ISBN   0618329692 . Retrieved October 21, 2008.
  4. "Anthony M. Kennedy Biography and Interview". American Academy of Achievement.
  5. 1 2 "LII: US Supreme Court: Justice Kennedy". Archived from the original on February 21, 2009. Retrieved January 10, 2009.
  6. "Biographies of Current Justices of the Supreme Court". Supreme Court of the United States . Retrieved January 25, 2012.
  7. "Hon.Anthony M.Kennedy". World Justice Project. Retrieved December 12, 2019.
  8. Jacobs, Ben. "Who is Anthony Kennedy? Supreme court wildcard was critical 'swing vote'". Guardian News & Media Limited. Retrieved December 12, 2019.
  9. "Powell to leave Supreme Court". Milwaukee Journal. Associated Press. June 26, 1987. p. 1A.
  10. "Bork loses by 58–42 Senate vote". Eugene Register-Guard. Oregon. Associated Press. October 24, 1987. p. 1A.
  11. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Pages 53–60.
  12. Greenhouse, Linda. (November 30, 1987). "Nursing the Wounds From the Bork Fight". The New York Times.
  13. "Ginsburg withdraws as court nominee". Eugene Register-Guard. Oregon. wire service reports. November 8, 1987. p. 1A.
  14. "Reagan, on 3rd Try, Picks Californian for High Court: 'Bit Wiser' After Two Defeats". Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. November 11, 1987. Retrieved June 27, 2018.
  15. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Page 55.
  16. Kennedy, Anthony (July 24 – August 1, 1986). "Unenumerated Rights and the Dictates of Judicial Restraint" (PDF). Address to the Canadian Institute for Advanced Legal Studies, Stanford University. Palo Alto, California. p. 13. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2008. (Also quoted at p. 443 of Kennedy's 1987 confirmation transcript).
  17. Kennedy Confirmation Hearing, page 164. Archived June 11, 2010, at the Wayback Machine (1987).
  18. "The Questions Begin: 'Who Is Anthony Kennedy?'", The New York Times (December 15, 1987).
  19. 1 2 Greenhouse, Linda. Becoming Justice Blackmun. Times Books. 2005. Page 189.
  20. "Kennedy hearings to begin". Lewiston Daily Sun. Maine. (Christian Science Monitor). December 14, 1987. p. 3.
  21. "No promises made, Kennedy says". Milwaukee Sentinel. Associated Press. December 15, 1987. p. 3, part 1.
  22. "Panel finishes confirmation hearings for Kennedy". Eugene Register-Guard. Oregon. December 17, 1987. p. 7A.
  23. Hoch, Maureen (March 9, 2007). "Justice Anthony Kennedy: In 1988, President Reagan needed a rock-solid Supreme Court Justice nominee after two previous nomination attempts failed". PBS. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  24. "Senate confirms Kennedy". Milwaukee Journal. Associated Press. February 3, 1988. p. 3A.
  25. "Kennedy sworn, court at full strength". The Galveston Daily News. Galveston, Texas. AP. February 19, 1988. Archived from the original on February 26, 2019 via Open Access logo PLoS transparent.svg
  27. 'This Week,' ABC, July 1, 2012 and Barnett, Randy (July 10, 2003) Kennedy's Libertarian Revolution Archived June 4, 2010, at the Wayback Machine , National Review . Retrieved April 9, 2010
  28. Shapiro, Ilya, Book Review: A Faint-Hearted Libertarian At Best: The Sweet Mystery Of Justice Anthony Kennedy Archived July 21, 2010, at the Wayback Machine , 33 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 333 (Winter 2010).
  29. Calabresi, Massimo "What Will Justice Kennedy Do?" article at Time Magazine June 2012
  30. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Page 162.
  31. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Page 85.
  32. "Kennedy's departure puts abortion, gay rights in play at high court". Reuters. June 28, 2018 via
  33. 1 2 Bravin, Jess, Court Conservatives Prevail June 28, 2011. Retrieved June 18, 2013.
  34. Jeffrey Toobin, The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2010) p. 198
  35. Steffen W. Schmidt et al. American Government & Politics Today (2008) p. 547
  36. Jeffrey Rosen, "Courting Controversy", Time June 28, 2007
  37. "Justice Kennedy to retire; Trump can cement court's conservative majority". NBC News.
  38. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Page 177.
  40. Liptak, Adam (July 1, 2009). "Roberts Court Shifts Right, Tipped by Kennedy". The New York Times. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
  41. Toobin, Jeffrey (October 3, 2016). "The Supreme Court After Scalia". The New Yorker. Retrieved September 22, 2017.
  42. "Justice Kennedy, the pivotal swing vote on the Supreme Court, announces his retirement". Washington Post.
  43. 1 2 Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Pages 86, 162.
  44. "DeLay slams Supreme Court Justice Kennedy: Lashes out at other judges, calling them 'judicial activists'". MSNBC. Associated Press. April 20, 2005. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
  45. 1 2 3 4 Toobin, Jeffrey (September 12, 2005). "Swing Shift: How Anthony Kennedy's passion for foreign law could change the Supreme Court". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on April 30, 2011. Retrieved May 4, 2011.
  46. Justice Kennedy: The Swing Justice and his Critics, 11 Green Bag 317 (2008)
  47. Matt Sedensky, "Justice questions way court nominees are grilled". Archived from the original on June 5, 2010. Retrieved June 5, 2010.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link), Associated Press, May 14, 2010. Retrieved May 14, 2010.
  48. Jeffrey Toobin (September 12, 2005). "Swing Shift". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on July 19, 2010. Retrieved June 20, 2010.
  49. Savage, David G. (June 14, 2008). "A justice's international view". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  50. Greenburg, Jan Crawford (2007). Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court . New York: Penguin Press. p.  80. ISBN   978-1-59420-101-1.
  51. Savage, David G. (1993). Turning Right: The Making of the Rehnquist Supreme Court. New York: Wiley. pp.  268–269, 288, 466–471. ISBN   0-471-59553-5.
  52. Colucci, Frank J. (2009). Justice Kennedy's jurisprudence: the full and necessary meaning of liberty. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press. p. 58. ISBN   978-0-7006-1662-6.
  53. "05-380 – Gonzales v. Carhart ( April 18, 2007)" (PDF). Retrieved May 4, 2011.
  54. Colucci, Frank J. (2009). Justice Kennedy's jurisprudence: the full and necessary meaning of liberty. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press. p. 38. ISBN   978-0-7006-1662-6.
  55. "Opinion of the court, authored by Kennedy – Part IV-A paragraph 7". Retrieved May 4, 2011.
  56. Michael Klarman, The Supreme Court, 2012 Term – Comment: Windsor and Brown: Marriage Equality and Racial Equality, 127 Harvard Law Review 127, 138 (2013) citing Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1980) (Finding the Navy could discharge sailors at Naval Air Station Alameda for engaging in homosexual acts).
  57. Colucci, Justice Kennedy's jurisprudence ch. 4
  58. Dahlia Lithwick (August 4, 2010). "A Brilliant Ruling". Slate. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  59. "Proposition 8 Ruling Takes Aim at Justice Kenedy". ABC News. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  60. "Supreme Court of the United States" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 27, 2014. Retrieved June 26, 2013.
  61. Staff (June 26, 2015). "Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States . Retrieved June 26, 2015.
  62. Liptak, Adam (June 26, 2015). "Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules, 5–4". The New York Times . Retrieved June 26, 2015.
  63. Gresko, Jessica (August 26, 2015). "Gay and straight couples alike say 'I do' with Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy's words". US News & World Report . Retrieved August 26, 2015.
  64. Rose, Veronica. "SUMMARY OF THE RECENT MCDONALD V. CHICAGO GUN CASE". Retrieved December 11, 2019.
  65. 1 2 Mark Sherman (June 12, 2008). "High Court: Gitmo detainees have rights in court". Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 22, 2008. Retrieved June 12, 2008. The court said not only that the detainees have rights under the Constitution, but that the system the administration has put in place to classify them as enemy combatants and review those decisions is inadequate.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  66. 1 2 Mark Sherman (June 12, 2008). "Terror suspects can challenge detention: U.S. Supreme Court". The Globe and Mail. Canada. Archived from the original on June 14, 2008. Retrieved June 12, 2008.
  67. 1 2 Mark Sherman (June 12, 2008). "High Court sides with Guantanamo detainees again". Monterey Herald . Retrieved June 12, 2008.[ dead link ]
  68. 1 2 James Oliphant (June 12, 2008). "Court backs Gitmo detainees". The Baltimore Sun . Archived from the original on June 14, 2008. Retrieved June 12, 2008.CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
  69. "Stuck with Guantánamo". The Economist. June 19, 2008. Retrieved May 4, 2011.
  70. "Boumediene et al. v. Bush—No. 06–1195" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. June 12, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 27, 2008. Retrieved June 15, 2008.
  71. County of Allegheny v. ACLU , 492 U.S. 573, 655–667 (1989) (Kennedy, J., dissenting and concurring in part). Found at Cornell Law School website and Both. Retrieved February 28, 2012.
  72. Mears, Bill. "Justices allow public prayers at New York town's council meetings". CNN. Retrieved December 11, 2019.
  73. Syllabus : Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Supreme Court of the United States.
  74. Toobin, Jeffrey (May 21, 2012). "Money Unlimited: How Chief Justice John Roberts orchestrated the Citizens United decision". The New Yorker . Retrieved October 16, 2012.
  75. Liptak, Adam (January 21, 2010). "Justices, 5–4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit". The New York Times.
  76. Dunbar, John. "THE 'CITIZENS UNITED' DECISION AND WHY IT MATTERS". The Center for Public Integrity. Retrieved December 11, 2019.
  77. Richard L. Hasen (October 25, 2011). "Super-Soft Money". Slate. Retrieved April 6, 2012.
  78. E.J. Dionne (October 11, 2010). "Shadowy Players in a New Class War". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 12, 2014.
  79. Eisler, Kim Isaac (1993). A Justice for All: William J. Brennan, Jr., and the decisions that transformed America. Page 277. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN   0-671-76787-9
  80. "Ashcroft, Attorney General v. American Civil Liberties Union et al". FindLaw. June 29, 2004. Archived from the original on May 15, 2011. Retrieved May 4, 2011.
  83. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Page 17.
  84. Greenburg, Jan Crawford. Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court. 2007. Penguin Books. Page 18.
  85. "Norfolk & Western R. Co. V. Ayers". Cornell University Law School. Archived from the original on July 15, 2007. Retrieved May 4, 2011.
  86. Andrew Cohen. "At The Supreme Court It's Kennedy's World". CBS News. Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  87. Sacks, Mike (December 6, 2011). "Justice Anthony Kennedy Confronts Sixth Amendment Case, Hints At Change Of Heart, Cites Hamlet". The Huffington Post. Retrieved April 11, 2012.
  88. "Anthony Kennedy". University of the Pacific. Retrieved October 29, 2013.
  89. "Justice Kennedy on George Washington". George Washington's Mount Vernon. Archived from the original on January 24, 2015. Retrieved January 21, 2015.
  90. 1 2 Burton, Danielle (October 1, 2007). "10 Things You Didn't Know About Anthony Kennedy". US News . Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  91. "Weddings; Victoria Reese, Gregory Kennedy". The New York Times. September 10, 1995. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  92. Protess, Ben; Silver-Greenberg, Jessica; Drucker, Jesse (July 19, 2017). "Big German Bank, Key to Trump's Finances, Faces New Scrutiny". The New York Times. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  93. Haberman, Maggie; Liptak, Adam (June 28, 2018). "Inside the White House's Quiet Campaign to Create a Supreme Court Opening". The New York Times. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  94. Locke, Benjamin (June 29, 2018). "A shocking report just revealed disturbing secret relationship between Trump and Justice Kennedy's son". Washington Press. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  95. "Religious affiliation of Supreme Court justices" Justice Sherman Minton converted to Catholicism after his retirement.

Further reading

Legal offices
Preceded by
Charles Merton Merrill
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Succeeded by
Pamela Ann Rymer
Preceded by
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
Succeeded by
Brett Kavanaugh
U.S. order of precedence (ceremonial)
Preceded by
Sandra Day O'Connor
as Senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court
Order of Precedence of the United States
as Senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court
Succeeded by
David Souter
as Senior Associate Justice of the Supreme Court