Blue Dog Coalition | |
|---|---|
| | |
| Co-Chairs | |
| Founded | February 14, 1995 |
| Ideology |
|
| Political position |
|
| National affiliation | Democratic Party |
| Colors | Blue |
| Seats in the House Democratic Caucus | 10 / 214 |
| Seats in the House | 10 / 435 |
| Website | |
| bluedogs-gluesenkampperez | |
^ A: The Blue Dog Coalition is now described as both socially conservative [5] and socially liberal. [6] | |
The Blue Dog Coalition, or Blue Dog Caucus, [7] commonly known as the Blue Dogs or Blue Dog Democrats, is a caucus of moderate [8] [9] and conservative [10] [11] [12] members from the Democratic Party in the United States House of Representatives. The caucus was founded as a group of conservative Democrats in 1995 in response to defeats in the 1994 elections. Historically, the Blue Dog Coalition has been conservative, both fiscally and socially. At its peak in 2009, the Blue Dog Coalition numbered 54 members, accounting for 21% of the entire Democratic caucus at the time. [13]
In the late 2010s and early 2020s, the coalition's focus shifted towards ideological centrism and constituency-based politics; [14] [15] [16] however, the coalition maintained an emphasis on fiscal responsibility. [17] The Blue Dog Coalition remains the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House. [13]
| Congress | Democratic seats | ± |
|---|---|---|
| 104th (1994) | 29 / 204 | |
| 105th (1996) | 28 / 207 | |
| 106th (1998) | 34 / 211 | |
| 107th (2000) | 35 / 212 | |
| 108th (2002) | 38 / 205 | |
| 109th (2004) | 38 / 202 | |
| 110th (2006) | 56 / 233 | |
| 111th (2008) | 65 / 257 | |
| 112th (2010) | 28 / 193 | |
| 113th (2012) | 19 / 201 | |
| 114th (2014) | 15 / 188 | |
| 115th (2016) | 18 / 193 | |
| 116th (2018) | 27 / 235 | |
| 117th (2020) | 19 / 222 | |
| 118th (2022) | 11 / 213 | |
| 119th (2024) | 10 / 215 |
| Part of a series on |
| Liberalism in the United States |
|---|
| |
The Blue Dog Coalition was formed in 1995 [20] [21] during the 104th Congress to give members from the Democratic Party representing conservative-leaning districts a unified voice after the Democrats' loss of Congress in the 1994 Republican Revolution. [22]
The term "Blue Dog Democrat" is credited to Texas Democratic Representative Pete Geren (who later joined the George W. Bush administration). Geren opined that the members had been "choked blue" by "extreme" Democrats on the left. [23] It is related to the political term "Yellow Dog Democrat", a reference to Southern Democrats said to be "so loyal they would even vote for a yellow dog before they would vote for any Republican". The term also refers to the "Blue Dog" paintings of Cajun artist George Rodrigue of Lafayette, Louisiana as the original members of the coalition would regularly meet in the offices of Louisiana representatives Billy Tauzin and Jimmy Hayes, both of whom later joined the Republican Party – both also had Rodrigue's paintings on their walls. [24] [25] An additional explanation for the term cited by members is "when dogs are not let into the house, they stay outside in the cold and turn blue", a reference to the Blue Dogs' belief they had been left out of a party that they believed had shifted to the political left. [26] At one time, first-term Blue Dogs were nicknamed 'Blue Pups'. [24] Starting in the twenty-first century, the caucus began shifting its ideology and began adopting more socially liberal stances in order to align more closely with mainstream Democratic Party political values. [14]
Many Blue Dogs voted for George W. Bush's Bush tax cuts. [27] In 2007, 15 Blue Dogs in safe seats rebelled, and refused to contribute party dues to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. An additional 16 Blue Dogs did not pay any money to the DCCC, but were exempt from party-mandated contributions because they were top GOP targets for defeat in 2008. One reason for the party-dues boycott was contained in remarks made by Rep. Lynn Woolsey of California, encouraging leaders of anti-war groups to field primary challenges to any Democrat who did not vote to end the war in Iraq. Woolsey later stated that she was misunderstood, but the Blue Dogs continued the boycott. Donations to party congressional committees are an important source of funding for the party committees, permitting millions of dollars to be funneled back into close races. [28]
In the summer of 2009, The Economist said the following regarding the Blue Dog Coalition: "The debate over health care ... may be the pinnacle of the group's power so far." The Economist quoted Charlie Stenholm, a founding Blue Dog, as stating that "This is the first year for the new kennel in which their votes are really going to make a difference". [29] In July 2009, Blue Dog members, who were committee members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, successfully delayed the House vote on the Health Insurance Reform Bill (HR3200) until after the summer recess. [30] [31] It was during this recess that the term 'Obamacare' was first derisively adopted by Republicans on Capitol Hill. [32] Blue Dog opposition to a potential "public option" within Obamacare, together with the contentious town hall meetings faced by House members during the 2009 summer recess, gave the healthcare bill's Republican opponents the opportunity to further escalate their attacks on Obamacare. The Blue Dog's refusal to include the pre-recess bill's public option, subsequently forced that central feature to be dropped from ACA's final text. [33] On Nov. 7, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Affordable Health Care for America Act 220 - 215 [34] - a bill that would "provide health coverage to almost every American.” [35] While, a majority of the Blue Dogs actually voted for that final healthcare bill, by a 28 to 24 margin, they did so with that central public option removed from the ACA's final passage. [36]
The Washington Post stated that the Blue Dogs, with over 50 members, were the most influential voting bloc in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2010. [37]
The Blue Dog Coalition suffered serious losses in the 2010 midterm elections, losing over half of its seats to Republican challengers. Its members, who were roughly one quarter of the Democratic Party's caucus in the 111th Congress, accounted for half of the party's midterm election losses. [38] Including retirements, Blue Dog numbers in the House were reduced from 59 members in 2009 to 26 members in 2011. [39] Two of the coalition's four leaders (Stephanie Herseth Sandlin and Baron Hill) failed to secure re-election. [40] [41]
The caucus shrank even more in the 2012 House of Representatives elections, decreasing in size from 27 to 14 members. Speculation ensued that the centrist New Democrat Coalition would fill the power vacuum created by the Blue Dog Coalition's decline. [42] Opposition to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and climate change legislation are believed to have contributed to the defeat of two conservative Democrats in the 2012 House elections in Pennsylvania by more liberal opponents. [43]
In the 2016 elections, future Blue Dogs accounted for over half of the Democrats' gains in the House. [44] In 2018, for the first time since 2006, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee partnered with the Blue Dog PAC (the Blue Dog Coalition's political organization) to recruit candidates in competitive districts across the country. [45] After the 2018 House of Representatives elections, the caucus grew from 18 members to 24. [39] All incumbents were re-elected and Rep. Kyrsten Sinema was elected to the U.S. Senate from Arizona. [46] The caucus also added 11 new members who defeated Republican incumbents in the 2018 election in districts that had voted for Donald Trump in 2016. [47]
The Democratic Party lost seats in the 2020 and 2022 House of Representatives elections, including the Blue Dog Coalition. As of April 2024, during the 118th Congress, the coalition had 10 members. [48]
At the start of the 118th Congress in January 2023, six of the 15 members of the Coalition departed following a failed attempt to rename the group to the "Common Sense Coalition". [49] Freshman representative Don Davis, who was expected to join the Blue Dogs, also chose not to do so. [18] After this split, the group reorganized and began an effort to stabilize, rebuild, and maintain influence on policy proposals in the closely divided 118th Congress. [50] The effort included a recruitment drive which prompted Mary Peltola (AK-AL), Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez (WA-03), and Wiley Nickel (NC-13) to join, bringing the number of members back up to 10. [51] Under the leadership of Peltola, Perez, and Representative Jared Golden, the caucus shifted its focus towards ideological centrism and pragmatic, constituency-based (especially rural and working-class) politics. [15]
Prior to the 2026 House of Representatives elections, the Blue Dog PAC endorsed five candidates: Jasmeet Bains for CA-22, Jamie Ager for NC-11, Bobby Pulido for TX-15, Johnny Garcia for TX-35, and Rebecca Cooke for WI-03. [52] [53] [54] [55]
The Blue Dog Coalition's positions are socially liberal to socially conservative [4] and fiscally conservative. [14] [17] The grouping has been described as conservative, [1] progressive conservative, [56] or moderate-conservative. [57] Historically, it adhered to social conservatism. [14] [58] Although its members have evolved on social issues over time, [39] the group has never taken a position on social issues as a caucus. [14] Scholars and journalists positioned the group as center-right, [4] centrist, [59] or center-left. [60] Historically, the grouping was considered exclusively center-right. [12]
The Blue Dog Coalition is the most conservative grouping of Democrats in the House. It "advocates for fiscal responsibility, a strong national defense and bipartisan consensus rather than conflict with Republicans". It opposes legislation that its members perceive to be too far to the right or to the left on the political spectrum. [17] In the 2010s, the Blue Dogs became more demographically diverse and less conservative. [14]
The Blue Dog Coalition is often involved in searching for a compromise between liberal and conservative positions, including classically liberal policies. Most of its members represent competitive swing districts, and are thus inclined to appeal to swing voters. [61]
In the early years of the caucus, the Blue Dogs were viewed by some as the political successors to Southern Democratic groups such as the Boll Weevils or conservative coalition. [62] [63] The Boll Weevils may, in turn, be considered the descendants of the Dixiecrats and the "states' rights" Democrats of the 1940s through the 1960s, and even the Bourbon Democrats of the late 19th century. [64]
In 2014, there was no mention of social issues in the official Blue Dog materials. [65] By January 2019, McClatchy reported a transformation of the Blue Dogs from a coalition of 'southern white men' to 'a multi-regional, multicultural group.' At that time, the coalition included two African-American members, one Vietnamese-American, one Mexican-American, and only five members from Southern states. [39]
As of April 2024, the coalition included 10 members. At that point, the coalition's membership was smaller than it had ever been since its formation. [18] [61]
The co-chairs of the Blue Dog Coalition for the 119th Congress are U.S. representatives Lou Correa, Vicente Gonzalez, and Marie Gluesenkamp Pérez.
| Start | End | Chair for Administration | Chair for Communications | Chair for Policy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 1995 | April 1995 | Gary Condit (CA) | John Tanner (TN) | Nathan Deal (GA) |
| April 1995 | January 1999 | Collin Peterson (MN) | ||
| January 1999 | January 2001 | Bud Cramer (AL) | Chris John (LA) | Charlie Stenholm (TX) |
| January 2001 | January 2003 | Chris John (LA) | Jim Turner (TX) | Allen Boyd (FL) |
| January 2003 | January 2005 | Jim Turner (TX) | Baron Hill (IN) | Charlie Stenholm (TX) |
| January 2005 | January 2007 | Jim Matheson (UT) | Dennis Cardoza (CA) | Jim Cooper (TN) |
| January 2007 | January 2009 | Allen Boyd (FL) | Mike Ross (AR) | Dennis Moore (KS) |
| January 2009 | October 2009 | Stephanie Herseth (SD) | Charlie Melancon (LA) | Baron Hill (IN) |
| October 2009 | January 2011 | Jim Matheson (UT) | ||
| January 2011 | January 2013 | Heath Shuler (NC) | Mike Ross (AR) | John Barrow (GA) |
| January 2013 | January 2015 | John Barrow (GA) | Kurt Schrader (OR) | Jim Cooper (TN) |
| January 2015 | January 2017 | Kurt Schrader (OR) | Jim Costa (CA) | |
| January 2017 | January 2019 | Jim Costa (CA) | Henry Cuellar (TX) | Dan Lipinski (IL) |
| January 2019 | January 2021 | Stephanie Murphy (FL) | Lou Correa (CA) | Tom O'Halleran (AZ) |
| January 2021 | January 2023 | Tom O'Halleran (AZ) | Ed Case (HI) | |
| January 2023 | May 2023 | Jared Golden (ME) | Jim Costa (CA) | |
| May 2023 | January 2025 | Jared Golden (ME) | Marie Pérez (WA) | Mary Peltola (AK) |
| January 2025 | present | Marie Pérez (WA) | Vicente Gonzalez (TX) | Lou Correa (CA) |
| State | District | CPVI [66] | Member | Also a member of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | CA-4 | D+17 | Mike Thompson | |
| CA-13 | R+1 | Adam Gray | New Democrat Coalition | |
| CA-21 | D+4 | Jim Costa | New Democrat Coalition | |
| CA-46 | D+11 | Lou Correa | New Democrat Coalition | |
| Georgia | GA-02 | D+4 | Sanford Bishop | |
| Maine | ME-02 | R+4 | Jared Golden | |
| New Jersey | NJ-05 | D+2 | Josh Gottheimer | New Democrat Coalition |
| Texas | TX-28 | R+2 | Henry Cuellar | New Democrat Coalition |
| TX-34 | EVEN | Vicente Gonzalez | New Democrat Coalition | |
| Washington | WA-03 | R+2 | Marie Gluesenkamp Perez |
In the 116th U.S. Congress that took power after the 2018 midterms, 44% of the 233 Democratic members of the House of Representatives participated in the ideologically moderate New Democratic Coalition, 41% of the members aligned with the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and 11% belonged to the ideologically conservative Blue Dog Coalition.
All three were on the conservative end of the Democratic party, with all three serving as part of the conservative Blue Dog Coalition of mostly rural Democrats (Blue Dog Coalition 2023).
Some of them, like Charlie Stenholm (D-Texas), a leader of the conservative Blue Dog Democrats, considered that having a socialist in the caucus may meet with fierce opposition from their constituents.
While the liberal Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC)—only 9 of whose "progressive" members endorsed Sanders in 2020, compared to 32 for Biden before Bernie withdrew—grew by 24 percent from 78 to 97 members in the House (plus Bernie alone in the Senate), the militantly centrist New Democrat Coalition shot up from 59 members to 103 or by 75 percent, with the conservative Blue Dog Democrats making a comeback from 15 to 27 members or by 80 percent.
Stephanie Murphy (Fla.), the co-chair of the conservative Blue Dog Coalition, who is the House's fifth largest recipient of donations from the pharmaceutical and health products…
Oregon's Schrader, a former leader of the conservative Blue Dog coalition, angered Democrats in the state after his vote against a provision that would allow Medicare to negotiate the price of prescription drugs.
Schrader, the chair of the House Democrats' conservative Blue Dog Coalition, is infamous for being one of the three Big Pharma Democrats who worked to block legislation that would lower prices for prescription drugs.
Blue Dog Democrats promote fiscally conservative policies and support strong defense.
The Blue Dog Coalition is a caucus of U.S. Democratic representatives who identify as fiscally conservative, centrist Democrats.
The Blue Dog Coalition was--and still is--a caucus of moderate, fiscally conservative House Democrats who represent swing districts.
Democratic co-sponsors of her bill include Reps. Jared Golden of Maine and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, the co-chairs of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition.
Murphy, who is a co-chair of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition, said any policies need to be reevaluated over time.
Spanberger, a former CIA operative, is a member of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition.
The Blue Dog Coalition, a group of 24 centrist House Democrats, is poised to be important players as the drama to end the partial government shutdown unfolds.
While in Congress, he was a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, a group of centrist Democrats viewed widely as the party's most conservative House members.
This should not be a surprise, because Cuellar is considered one of the most conservative Democrats and he is part of the Blue Dog caucus, representing the center-right in the Democratic Party whose members are mostly elected in Republican-leaning districts.
On the other hand, Golden is a member of the center-right Blue Dog caucus, and he refused to endorse Harris over Trump.
Democratic opposition to the rule was largely concentrated among the right-leaning Blue Dog Coalition, though Walz was not associated with that caucus during his time in Congress.
Peterson, a moderate founder of the Blue Dog Coalition of right-leaning Democrats, faces two primary challengers but the GOP contest has drawn more attention.
And Schiff, a former member of the center-right Blue Dog caucus, is the most conservative member of the group of contenders for the sought-after seat.
"We appreciate that Speaker Pelosi took the time to meet with the Blue Dogs to discuss a path forward to lower the cost of prescription drugs," Rep. Stephanie Murphy (Fla.), co-chair of the center-right Blue Dog Democrats, said after a meeting with Pelosi Tuesday on the proposal, NPR noted.
For the first time since 2006, the Blue Dog Coalition, the right-leaning Democratic group that prides itself on promoting socially conservative, business-friendly lawmakers, has worked with the DCCC to select the party's candidates for the 2018 midterms.
Harder's win and subsequent cruise to victory over Republican Ted Howze in 2020 upset the conventional wisdom about Valley politics, which dictates that, in order to win, Democrats must become "Blue Dogs" who follow the lead of former Congressman Gary Condit, one of the founders of the Democratic Blue Dog Coalition in 1995. Gray was formerly married to Condit's daughter, Cadee Condit Gray. They are now divorced. Blue Dog Democrats lean to the right.
Democratic moderates (called "center-left," but more accurately center-right) were riding high as a political camp. The Blue Dog Coalition sported record membership numbers in 2009 and 2010.
In 1995, conservative members of the House formed the Blue Dog Coalition to give a greater voice to center-right Democrats to achieve that.
He was first elected to Congress in 1979, aligning himself with the Boll Weevils before co-founding the House Blue Dog Coalition, a group of center-right, fiscally conservative Democrats.
The socially conservative factions, such as the Blue Dog Coalition, and the socially liberal faction, like the Congressional Progressive Caucus, disagree on matters of social and fiscal policy.
"Blue dog" is a reference to the Blue Dog Coalition, also known as the Blue Dogs or Blue Dog Democrats, a caucus of moderate congressional Democrats who generally hold socially liberal but fiscally conservative views.
The Blue Dog Caucus, which originated in 1995 after the Republicans took control of the House, had been a growing problem for Speaker Pelosi, before they had their ranks cut in half in the 2010 midterms.
In contrast to the halting mobilization of Insurgent Republicans and southern Democrats, the Blue Dogs' adoption of ... ideological bonafides, the Coalition worked to establish a Blue Dog brand and associate it with support for centrist policies.
Four years ago, they were the most influential voting bloc on Capitol Hill, more than 50 House Democrats pulling their liberal colleagues to a more centrist, fiscally conservative vision on issues such as health care and Wall Street reforms.
A leader of the moderate-conservative House Democratic Blue Dog Caucus fought back against Pelosi and progressives, noting that if progressives were to block the infrastructure bill, all public faith would be lost in Biden's legislative agenda (Lillis, Marcos, & Wong 2021).
In contrast to the halting mobilization of Insurgent Republicans and southern Democrats, the Blue Dogs' adoption of ... ideological bonafides, the Coalition worked to establish a Blue Dog brand and associate it with support for centrist policies.
Not that the members weren't traditional values types. Most were. And they surely ran for office on those issues as well. But there is not one word in the official Blue Dog materials about social issues.