Executive Office for Immigration Review

Last updated
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Seal of the Executive Office for Immigration Review.svg
Seal of the Executive Office for Immigration Review
Agency overview
FormedJanuary 9, 1983
Jurisdiction Federal government of the United States
Headquarters Bailey's Crossroads, Virginia (Falls Church mailing address)
Employees3,161 (2020) [1]
Annual budget$734 million (FY 2021) [2]
Agency executives
  • David Neal [3] , Acting Director
  • Carl C. Risch [4] , Deputy Director
Parent agency United States Department of Justice
Child agency
Website Executive Office for Immigration Review

The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is a sub-agency of the United States Department of Justice whose chief function is to conduct removal proceedings in immigration courts and adjudicate appeals arising from the proceedings. These administrative proceedings determine the removability and admissibility of individuals in the United States. As of January 19,2023, there were sixty-eight immigration courts and three adjudication centers throughout the United States. [5]

Contents

History and jurisdiction

An immigration proceeding conducted in the Department of Labor, 1926. Immigration Court of Labor Dept., 5-10-26 LCCN2016850915.jpg
An immigration proceeding conducted in the Department of Labor, 1926.

EOIR was created in 1983 by the Department of Justice (DOJ) as part of an internal reorganization. [6] Prior to 1983, the functions performed by EOIR were divided among different agencies. The earliest version of a specialized immigration service was the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), created in 1933, in the Department of Labor. [7] Seven years later, in 1940, the INS moved from Labor to its present location in the Department of Justice. Twelve years after moving to DOJ, in 1952, the Immigration and Nationality Act organized all U.S. immigration laws into one statute, and designated "special inquiry officers," the predecessors of immigration judges, to decide questions of deportation. [8]

EOIR adjudicates cases under a patchwork of immigration laws and regulations, including:

In addition to these statutes, other federal statutes, agency regulations, and executive orders, federal courts also play an important role in immigration law. Because litigants have the right to appeal a decision to federal courts of appeal, different areas of the United States effectively have different immigration laws, notwithstanding Supreme Court review. In addition, federal statutes not facially related to immigration also may play a role in admissibility, including those related to public benefits.

Structure

Within the Department of Justice, EOIR is one of a number of offices that answers directly to the Deputy Attorney General. [9] EOIR itself has two members of its leadership team: a director, who is appointed by the Attorney General, [10] and a deputy director who may exercise the full authority of the director. [10] The current director is David L. Neal, [11] and the current deputy director is Charles Adkins-Blanch. [12]

Adjudicative components

Office of the Chief Immigration Judge

The Office of the Chief Immigration Judge (OCIJ) is the authority under which trial-level immigration judges are situated. [13] Like the EOIR director and deputy director, the Chief Immigration Judge is appointed by the attorney general, though he or she is supervised directly by the director of EOIR. [13] The Office of the Chief Immigration Judge oversees nearly 500 immigration judges, 60 immigration courts, and 30 assistant chief immigration judges (ACIJ) based in the various cities where U.S. immigration courts are located. [14] Immigration judges adjudicate hearings under Section 240 of the INA. [15]

Immigration judges, unlike Article III judges, do not have life tenure, and are not appointed by the President nor confirmed by the Senate as required by the Appointments Clause in Article II. Instead, they are civil servants appointed by the attorney general. [15] The director of EOIR may also designate temporary immigration judges, who may serve for a period not longer than six months. [15]

Immigration adjudication does not conform to the separation of functions as prescribed by the Administrative Procedure Act. Instead, the Department of Homeland Security initiates removal proceeding against a litigant; the immigration judge is employed by EOIR. In the removal proceeding, the U.S. Government is represented by an Assistant Chief Counsel, often referred to as a "DHS attorney" or "trial attorney." [16] Unlike criminal adjudications in Article III courts, litigants in removal proceedings do not have a constitutional right to counsel, except in narrow circumstances. [17]

Board of Immigration Appeals

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) is the body to whom litigants may appeal their decisions from immigration judges. Composed of 21 members appointed by the attorney general, BIA decisions are generally decided by panels of three of its members. [18] Unlike courts of appeals in the state and federal systems, the BIA rarely holds oral arguments on appeals. [19] Instead, the BIA conducts a "paper review" of the materials, before issuing a written decision. Though the BIA issues hundreds of decisions each year, it chooses a small number as "precedent decisions," [20] which seek to provide guidance to immigration judges across the countries on the state of immigration law. After the BIA has decided a matter, it may choose to issue a final decision, remand to the immigration judge for further consideration, or refer the matter to the attorney general. The attorney general also may refer the case to him or herself and decide the case regardless of the decision of the BIA. [21]

Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer

The Office for the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) oversees specialized immigration administrative law judges as provided for in the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and the Immigration Act of 1990. [22] Unlike the immigration judges in the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge, who hear the merits of the immigration claims of litigants, the administrative law judges of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer handle matters related to the employment of non-citizens unlawfully residing in the United States; other unfair employment practices; and documentation fraud seeking immigration relief.

Non-adjudicative components

General Counsel

The Office of General Counsel (OGC) is the chief legal counsel of EOIR. [23] The general counsel primarily provides legal guidance regarding precedential Board of Immigration Appeals and federal courts decisions and disseminates that information across EOIR. The Office of General Counsel also represents EOIR in federal court and responds to Freedom of Information Act requests directed at EOIR. The Office of General Counsel is also responsible for maintaining the standard for immigration attorneys nation-wide through its Attorney Discipline Program. [24]

Office of Policy

EOIR's Office of Policy (OP), created in 2017, is responsible for communications, data collection, and regulatory review. [25] Unlike the Office of general counsel, the Office of Policy does not represent EOIR in legal proceedings; it provides training and instructions to effectuate the policy of the director. [26]

Criticism and controversies

The Attorney General's use of precedent decisions has been subject to criticism. [27] Some commentators have argued that the use of the power, instead of settling doctrine, has departed from agency procedures and practices, adjudicated issues not relevant to a particular case, and disrupted the development of circuit law by adopting the minority view. [27] [28]

EOIR has also been criticized for the significant backlog of immigration cases; as of December 2020, there are more than 1.2 million pending cases across the immigration courts. [29] In 2018, the Department of Justice instituted case quotas for immigration judges, requiring each to complete 700 cases per year, a rate requiring each IJ to close more than two cases per day. [30] The president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, stated that the policy was an "unprecedented act which compromises the integrity of the court." [31]

In February 2024 Bloomberg Law News reports the Department of Justice paid 1.2 million dollars to resolve a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment by an Assistant Chief Immigration Judge. [32] This follows findings by the United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General in March 2022, September 2023 and January 2024 of Immigration Judges who violated the Departments zero tolerance policy on sexual harassment and the ethical rules applicable to Immigration Judges.

In January 2021, the San Francisco Chronicle reported that the Executive Office for Immigration Review had failed to prevent or appropriately respond to multiple instances of sexual harassment by judges and supervisors. [33] Tal Kopan, the reporter who broke the story, added later in an interview that more allegations not included in the story indicated that the problem was widespread and not an isolated occurrence. [34]

A November 2019 report by the United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General found that "senior managers" involved in the hiring of Immigration Judges had used a system of "code words" to rate "the attractiveness" of female candidates. [35] The report also found that this conduct "could give rise to claims of sexual harassment or claims of prohibited personnel practices." [36]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Department of Justice</span> U.S. federal executive department

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ), also known as the Justice Department, is a federal executive department of the United States government tasked with the enforcement of federal law and administration of justice in the United States. It is equivalent to the justice or interior ministries of other countries. The department is headed by the U.S. attorney general, who reports directly to the president of the United States and is a member of the president's Cabinet. The current attorney general is Merrick Garland, who has served since March 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States courts of appeals</span> Post-1891 U.S. appellate circuit courts

The United States courts of appeals are the intermediate appellate courts of the United States federal judiciary. They hear appeals of cases from the United States district courts and some U.S. administrative agencies, and their decisions can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. The courts of appeals are divided into 13 "Circuits". Eleven of the circuits are numbered "First" through "Eleventh" and cover geographic areas of the United States and hear appeals from the U.S. district courts within their borders. The District of Columbia Circuit covers only Washington, DC. The Federal Circuit hears appeals from federal courts across the entire United States in cases involving certain specialized areas of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Canada</span> Highest court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Damon Keith</span> American judge (1922–2019)

Damon Jerome Keith was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and a former United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. Keith died in office at age 96.

The court system of Canada is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. In the courts, the judiciary interpret and apply the law of Canada. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Court (Canada)</span> Canadian federal trial court

The Federal Court is a Canadian trial court that hears cases arising under certain areas of federal law. The Federal Court is a superior court with nationwide jurisdiction.

Recusal is the legal process by which a judge, juror, or other adjudicator steps aside from participating in a case due to potential bias, conflict of interest, or appearance of impropriety. This practice is fundamental to ensuring fairness and impartiality in legal proceedings, preserving the integrity of the judiciary, and maintaining public confidence in the legal system. Historical and modern legal frameworks outline specific grounds for recusal, such as personal or financial conflicts of interest, prior involvement in a case, or demonstrated bias. Applicable statutes or canons of ethics may provide standards for recusal in a given proceeding or matter. Providing that the judge or decision-maker must be free from disabling conflicts of interest makes the fairness of the proceedings less likely to be questioned, and more likely that there is due process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of Legal Counsel</span> Office of the United States Department of Justice

The Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) is an office in the United States Department of Justice that supports the attorney general in their role as legal adviser to the president and all executive branch agencies. It drafts legal opinions of the attorney general and provides its own written opinions and other advice in response to requests from the counsel to the president, the various agencies of the executive branch, and other components of the Department of Justice. The office reviews and comments on the constitutionality of pending legislation. The office reviews any executive orders and substantive proclamations for legality if the president proposes them. All proposed orders of the attorney general and regulations that require the attorney general's approval are reviewed. It also performs a variety of special assignments referred by the attorney general or the deputy attorney general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania</span> United States federal district court in Pennsylvania

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania is a district level federal court with jurisdiction over approximately one half of Pennsylvania. The court was created in 1901 by subdividing the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The court is under the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Board of Immigration Appeals</span> United States Department of Justice agency

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) is an administrative appellate body within the Executive Office for Immigration Review of the United States Department of Justice responsible for reviewing decisions of the U.S. immigration courts and certain actions of U.S. Citizenship Immigration Services, U.S Customs and Border Protection, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The BIA was established in 1940 after the Immigration and Naturalization Service was transferred from the United States Department of Labor to the Department of Justice.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that administers the country's naturalization and immigration system. It is a successor to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), which was dissolved by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and replaced by three components within the DHS: USCIS, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Coast Guard Legal Division</span>

The Coast Guard Judge Advocate General oversees the delivery of legal services to the United States Coast Guard, through the Office of the Judge Advocate General in Washington, the Legal Service Command, offices in the Atlantic and Pacific Areas, nine Coast Guard Districts, the Coast Guard Academy, three training centers, and a number of other activities and commands. Legal services are delivered by Coast Guard judge advocates and civilian counsel in ten legal practice areas: criminal law/military justice, operations, international activities, civil advocacy, environmental law, procurement law, internal organizational law, regulations and administrative law, legislative support and legal assistance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerry Edwin Smith</span> American judge

Jerry Edwin Smith is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

In the United States, removal proceedings are administrative proceedings to determine an individual's removability under federal immigration law. Removal proceedings are typically conducted in Immigration Court by an immigration judge (IJ).

Pro se legal representation means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cornelia Pillard</span> American federal judge (born 1961)

Cornelia Thayer Livingston Pillard, known professionally as Nina Pillard, is an American lawyer and jurist serving since 2013 as a U.S. circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Before becoming a judge, Pillard was a law professor at Georgetown University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David J. Barron</span> American judge (born 1967)

David Jeremiah Barron is an American lawyer who serves as the Chief United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and former S. William Green Professor of Public Law at Harvard Law School. He previously served as the Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Office of Legal Counsel at the United States Department of Justice.

Reyes Mata v. Lynch, 576 U.S. 143 (2015), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction to review the orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals to reject motions to reopen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eric D. Miller</span> American judge (born 1975)

Eric David Miller is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

An immigration judge, formerly known as a special inquiry officer, is an employee of the United States Department of Justice. An immigration judge decides cases of aliens in various types of removal proceedings. During the proceedings, an immigration judge may grant any type of immigration relief or benefit to a noncitizen, including to his or her family members.

References

  1. ↑ "FY 2020 Congressional Budget Submission". Executive Office for Immigration Review. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  2. ↑ "Public Law 116-260". congress.gov. United States Congress. Retrieved 14 February 2021.
  3. ↑ Executive Office for Immigration Review (30 May 2017). "Meet the Director". www.justice.gov. United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  4. ↑ Executive Office for Immigration Review (21 August 2017). "Meet the Deputy Director". www.justice.gov. United States Department of Justice.
  5. ↑ "Office of the Chief Immigration Judge". 13 January 2015.
  6. ↑ "48 Fed. Reg. 8038 (Feb. 25, 1983)" (PDF). U.S. Department of Justice. 1983-02-25.
  7. ↑ "Evolution of the U.S Immigration Court System: Pre-1983". U.S. Department of Justice. April 30, 2015. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  8. ↑ F.H.S. (1956). "The Special Inquiry Officer in Deportation Proceedings". Virginia Law Review. 42 (6): 803–830. doi:10.2307/1070271. JSTOR   1070271.
  9. ↑ "Organizational Chart | DOJ | Department of Justice". U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  10. 1 2 "8 CFR § 1003.0 - Executive Office for Immigration Review". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  11. ↑ "Office of the Director". 13 January 2015.
  12. ↑ "Office of the Director". 13 January 2015.
  13. 1 2 "8 CFR § 1003.9 - Office of the Chief Immigration Judge". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  14. ↑ "Office of the Chief Immigration Judge". U.S. Department of Justice. 2020-02-21. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  15. 1 2 3 "8 CFR § 1003.10 - Immigration judges". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
  16. ↑ "Immigration Court Practice Manual (Glossary - 2, p. 235/267 of PDF)". Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review. December 2016.
  17. ↑ Wolf, Leslie (Winter 2014). "After Franco-Gonzalez v. Holder: the Implications of Locating a Right to Counsel under the Rehabilitation Act" (PDF). Review of Law and Social Justice. 23: 329–65.
  18. ↑ "8 CFR § 1003.1 - Organization, jurisdiction, and powers of the Board of Immigration Appeals". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  19. ↑ "Board of Immigration Appeals". www.justice.gov. 2015-01-13. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  20. ↑ "8 CFR § 1003.1(g)(2)". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  21. ↑ "Barr issues 2 rulings limiting ways immigrants can fight deportation". NBC News. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  22. ↑ "Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer". U.S. Department of Justice. 2020-01-09. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  23. ↑ "Office of the General Counsel". www.justice.gov. 2015-01-13. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
  24. ↑ "EOIR: Attorney Discipline Program". U.S. Department of Justice. 2019-06-12.
  25. ↑ "Office of Policy". U.S. Department of Justice. February 21, 2020. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  26. ↑ "Organization of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (84 Fed. Reg. 44,538)" (PDF). Federal Register. August 26, 2019. Retrieved 2020-02-21.
  27. 1 2 Marouf, Fatma (January 2019). "2019". Tulane Law Review. 93 (4): 707, 741–42.
  28. ↑ Shah, Bijal (2017). "The Attorney General's Disruptive Immigration Power". Iowa Law Review. 102: 129, 154.
  29. ↑ "Immigration Court Backlog Tool: Pending Cases and Length of Wait in Immigration Courts". trac.syr.edu. Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse . Retrieved 2021-01-27.
  30. ↑ "Justice Department Rolls Out Quotas For Immigration Judges". NPR.org. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
  31. ↑ "Head of U.S. immigration judges' union denounces Trump quota plan". Reuters. 2018-09-21. Retrieved 2020-03-30.
  32. ↑ news.bloomberglaw.com/litigation/judges-staffer-accepts-1-2-million-to-end-sex-harassment-suit
  33. ↑ "Bad conduct, leering 'jokes' — immigration judges stay on bench". San Francisco Chronicle. 2021-01-22. Retrieved 2021-01-27.
  34. ↑ "New report sheds light into sexual harassment occurring in the immigration court system". KCBS Radio. 2021-01-24. Retrieved 2021-01-27.
  35. ↑ "An Investigation of Alleged Misconduct" (PDF). 2019-11-01. Retrieved 2021-01-27.
  36. ↑ "An Investigation of Alleged Misconduct" (PDF). 2019-11-01. Retrieved 2021-01-27.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.