Trump travel ban

Last updated

The Trump travel ban was a series of executive actions taken by U.S. President Donald Trump that restricted entry into the United States by certain foreign nationals, beginning with Executive Order 13769, issued on January 27, 2017. [1] [2]

Contents

It was labeled as a "Muslim ban" by Trump's aides, [3] [4] as well as his critics, [5] [6] and became widely known as such since the ban mostly impacted countries with predominantly Muslim populations. [7] In addition to the restrictions on entry by foreign nationals, North Korea was the only country targeted with a reverse travel ban, prohibiting American citizens from traveling to North Korea.

On January 20, 2021, newly inaugurated president Joe Biden issued a proclamation revoking the Trump travel bans, with the exception of the reverse travel ban prohibiting American citizens from traveling to North Korea.

Comments during 2016 presidential campaign

On December 2, 2015, a terrorist attack, consisting of a mass shooting and an attempted bombing, occurred at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California, United States. On December 7, 2015, as a candidate for President, Donald Trump, called for "a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on." [8] [9] His comments were condemned by several of his competitors for the Republican nomination, including Chris Christie, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and Lindsey Graham, as well as by several Republican state party chairmen, civil rights activist Ibrahim Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and Democratic candidates for president Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley. [8] [9]

Executive actions

Court challenges

List of countries under travel ban

The countries affected by the travel ban: [14] [15] All travel restrictions listed below were ended by President Biden on January 20, 2021. [10]

Waivers

Presidential Proclamation 9645 provided for 'waivers' as exceptions to people affected from the countries who need visas. The waivers were supposed to be granted at the discretion of the consular officers who review the applications of those facing a lot of undue hardship that requires them to be with their loved ones in the United States. For example, if a family member in the United States is dying, a person from the country with a travel ban on it would be granted a waiver to see their family member one last time. However, only 2% of the people who applied for the waiver were granted one. From 33,176 applicants through April 30, 2018, 579 applicants had been granted the waiver. [14]

Reverse travel ban to North Korea

In 2017, following the death of Otto Warmbier, the Trump administration issued a reverse travel ban prohibiting American citizens from traveling to North Korea. President Biden's revocation of the Trump travel ban did not include a reversal of the travel ban to North Korea. [18] The reverse travel ban was issued for one year, but has been renewed on an annual basis since August 2018. Unless extended again, the ban remains in effect until August 31, 2025. [19] [20]

Public opinion

Area polledSegment polledPolling groupDateSupportOpposeUnsureSample sizePolling methodSource
Flag of the United States.svg United States All adults YouGov (for HuffPost )May 25–26, 201745%43%13%1,000online [21]
Flag of the United States.svg United States All adults Gallup March 9–29, 201740%46%14%1,526telephone [22]
Flag of the United States.svg United States Registered voters Quinnipiac University March 16–21, 201742%52%6%1,056telephone [23]
Flag of California.svg California All adults Public Policy Institute of California March 6–14, 201737%58%5%1,487telephone [24]
Flag of the United States.svg United States All adults Pew Research Center February 28 – March 12, 201747%52%1%3,844telephone and online [25]
Flag of the United States.svg United States Registered voters Quinnipiac University March 2–6, 201742%51%7%1,323telephone [26]
Flag of the United States.svg United States Registered voters Morning Consult/Politico February 2–4, 201755%38%7%2,070online interviews [27]
Flag of the United States.svg United States All adults CBS News February 1–2, 201745%51%4%1,019telephone [28]
Flag of the United States.svg United States All adults Investor's Business Daily January 27 – February 2, 201751%48%1%885telephone [29]
Flag of the United States.svg United States Registered voters Ipsos (for Reuters)January 30–31, 201749%41%10%1,201online [30]
Flag of the United States.svg United States Likely voters Rasmussen Reports January 25–26, 201757%32%11%1,000telephone and online [31]
Flag of Utah.svg Utah Registered voters University of Utah January 9–16, 201740%55%5%605N/A [32]
Flag of the United States.svg United States All adults Quinnipiac University January 5–9, 201748%42%10%899telephone [33]

  majority support  plurality support  majority oppose  plurality oppose

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State Sponsors of Terrorism (U.S. list)</span> U.S. designation applied to certain countries

"State Sponsors of Terrorism" is a designation applied to countries that are alleged to have "repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism" per the United States Department of State. Inclusion on the list enables the United States government to impose four main types of unilateral sanctions: a restriction of foreign aid, a ban on weapons sales, heightened control over the export of dual-use equipment, and other miscellaneous economic sanctions. The State Department is required to maintain the list under section 1754(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, and section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Border control</span> Measures taken to regulate the movement of goods and people across borders

Border control comprises measures taken by governments to monitor and regulate the movement of people, animals, and goods across land, air, and maritime borders. While border control is typically associated with international borders, it also encompasses controls imposed on internal borders within a single state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement</span> 2004 treaty on refugee management

The Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement is a treaty, entered into force on 29 December 2004, between the governments of Canada and the United States to better manage the flow of refugee claimants at the shared land border.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Derrick Watson</span> American judge (born 1966)

Derrick Kahala Watson is an American lawyer who serves as the chief United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii.

The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is an association of federal agencies and nonprofit organizations which work hand in hand to identify and admit qualified refugees for resettlement into the United States. Under Section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, individuals wishing to resettle in the United States are processed through this program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First 100 days of the first Donald Trump presidency</span>

The first 100 days of the first Donald Trump presidency began on January 20, 2017, the day Donald Trump was inaugurated as the 45th president of the United States. The first 100 days of a presidential term took on symbolic significance during Franklin D. Roosevelt's first term in office, and the period is considered a benchmark to measure the early success of a president. The 100th day of his presidency ended on April 30, 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration policy of Donald Trump</span> Policies regarding immigration of the Trump administration

Immigration policy, including illegal immigration to the United States, was a signature issue of former U.S. president Donald Trump's presidential campaign, and his proposed reforms and remarks about this issue generated much publicity. Trump has repeatedly said that illegal immigrants are criminals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive Order 13769</span> United States Executive Order limiting refugees from Muslim-majority countries

Executive Order 13769, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, labeled the "Muslim ban" by Donald Trump and his supporters and critics alike, and commonly known as such, or commonly referred to as the Muslim travel ban, Trump travel ban, the Trump Muslim travel ban, or the Trump Muslim Immigration Ban, was an executive order by President Trump. Except for the extent to which it was blocked by various courts, it was in effect from January 27, 2017, until March 6, 2017, when it was superseded by Executive Order 13780, a second order sharing the title "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protests against Executive Order 13769</span> Protest in the United States

In late January and early February 2017, during protests against Executive Order 13769, commonly referred to as the “Muslim ban,” thousands of people gathered at various airports in the United States and around the world to protest the attempt by the Trump administration to prevent the prohibition refugees and visitors from seven countries considered by the administration to be unsafe. According to various sources, more than two thousand people were at the protest at John F. Kennedy International Airport in Queens, New York City with other protests appearing at significant international airports and other important sites around the United States. Protests continued daily and internationally through February 6. Protests also continued after a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against parts of the travel ban.

A Muslim immigration ban is a ban, either absolute or from specific nations, on the immigration of Muslims to a specific nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal challenges to the Trump travel ban</span> Legal disputes

Executive Order 13769 was signed by U.S. President Donald Trump on January 27, 2017, and quickly became the subject of legal challenges in the federal courts of the United States. The order sought to restrict travel from seven Muslim majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. The plaintiffs challenging the order argued that it contravened the United States Constitution, federal statutes, or both. On March 16, 2017, Executive Order 13769 was superseded by Executive Order 13780, which took legal objections into account and removed Iraq from affected countries. Then on September 24, 2017, Executive Order 13780 was superseded by Presidential Proclamation 9645 which is aimed at more permanently establishing travel restrictions on those countries except Sudan, while adding North Korea and Venezuela which had not previously been included.

Many organizations reacted to the enactment of Executive Order 13769, titled "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States," which was an executive order issued by United States President Donald Trump. Domestically, the order was criticized by Democratic and Republican members of Congress, universities, business leaders, major corporations, Catholic bishops, and Jewish organizations. Some 1,000 U.S. diplomats signed a dissent cable opposing the order, setting a record. Public opinion was divided, with initial national polls yielding inconsistent results. Protests against the order erupted in airports and cities.

<i>Washington v. Trump</i> Lawsuit challenging Executive Order 13769

State of Washington and State of Minnesota v. Trump, 847 F.3d 1151, was a lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of Executive Order 13769, issued by U.S. president Donald Trump.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive Order 13780</span> 2017 executive order by U.S. President Trump placing travel restrictions on several countries

Executive Order 13780, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, was an executive order signed by United States President Donald Trump on March 6, 2017. It placed a 90-day restriction on entry to the U.S. by nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and barred entry for all refugees who did not possess either a visa or valid travel documents for 120 days. This executive order—sometimes called "Travel Ban 2.0"—revoked and replaced Executive Order 13769 issued on January 27, 2017.

<i>International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump</i>

International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 883 F. 3d 233, was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, upholding an injunction against enforcement of Proclamation No. 9645, titled "Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats", a presidential proclamation signed by President Donald Trump on September 24, 2017. The proclamation indefinitely suspends the entry into the U.S. of some or all immigrant and non-immigrant travelers from eight countries. It is a successor to Executive Order 13769, entitled "Protection of the Nation from Terrorist Entry into the United States," which were also enjoined by the District Court of Maryland and the Fourth Circuit in a case decided in 2017 by the same name of International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554.

Trump v. Hawaii, No. 17-965, 585 U.S. 667 (2018), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case involving Presidential Proclamation 9645 signed by President Donald Trump, which restricted travel into the United States by people from several nations, or by refugees without valid travel documents. Hawaii and several other states and groups challenged the Proclamation and two predecessor executive orders also issued by Trump on statutory and constitutional grounds. Citing a variety of statements by Trump and administration officials, they argued that the proclamation and its predecessor orders were motivated by anti-Muslim animus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Travel during the COVID-19 pandemic</span> Restrictions by countries intended to stop spread of disease

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries and territories imposed quarantines, entry bans, or other travel restrictions for citizens of or recent travelers to the most affected areas. Some countries and territories imposed global restrictions that apply to all foreign countries and territories, or prevented their own citizens from travelling overseas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021</span> 2021 United States legislative bill

The U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021 was a legislative bill that was proposed by President Joe Biden on his first day in office. It was formally introduced in the House by Representative Linda Sánchez. It died with the ending of the 117th Congress.

Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to The United States was the second presidential proclamation signed by President Joe Biden on January 20, 2021. The proclamation revoked Executive Order 13769, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, which had been signed by U.S. President Donald Trump on January 27, 2017, and Proclamations 9645, 9723, and 9983.

References

  1. Almasy, Steve; Simon, Darran (March 30, 2017). "A timeline of President Trump's travel bans". CNN. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  2. Bier, David (December 14, 2017). "Trump's Muslim Ban is Working. Muslim Immigration Slumps". Newsweek. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
  3. "Trump asked for a 'Muslim ban,' Giuliani says — and ordered a commission to do it 'legally'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 29, 2017. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  4. "Federal judges have refused to reinstate the US travel ban, asserting their authority over Trump". QZ. Archived from the original on July 29, 2023. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  5. Livingston, Abby (February 7, 2017). "At homeland security hearing, McCaul calls Trump's travel ban rollout "problematic"". The Texas Tribune. Archived from the original on April 8, 2022. Retrieved November 15, 2021.
  6. Dennis, Brady; Markon, Jerry (January 29, 2017). "Amid protests and confusion, Trump defends executive order: 'This is not a Muslim ban'". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286. Archived from the original on March 10, 2021. Retrieved November 15, 2021.
  7. "Trump's travel ban really was a Muslim ban, data suggests". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on October 14, 2019. Retrieved July 29, 2023.
  8. 1 2 Johnson, Jenna (December 7, 2015). "Trump calls for 'total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved December 12, 2018.
  9. 1 2 Taylor, Jessica (December 7, 2015). "Trump Calls For 'Total And Complete Shutdown Of Muslims Entering' U.S." NPR. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved December 12, 2018.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Urban Justice Center (January 31, 2018). "The Evolution of the Muslim Ban - an Explainer" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 28, 2022. Retrieved December 28, 2022.
  11. 1 2 3 IRAP. "Darweesh v. Trump: Fighting back against Trump's first Executive Order banning nationals from certain Muslim-majority countries | International Refugee Assistance Project". refugeerights.org. Retrieved December 28, 2022.
  12. 1 2 3 IRAP. "IRAP v. Trump: Continuing the fight against Trump's Executive Orders banning nationals from certain Muslim-majority countries | International Refugee Assistance Project". refugeerights.org. Retrieved December 28, 2022.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Timeline of the Muslim Ban". ACLU of Washington. May 23, 2017. Archived from the original on January 3, 2023. Retrieved December 28, 2022.
  14. 1 2 Gladstone, Rick; Sugiyama, Satoshi (July 1, 2018). "Trump's Travel Ban: How It Works and Who Is Affected". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved November 9, 2019.
  15. "US travel ban: Trump puts restrictions on six more countries". BBC News. January 31, 2020. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved January 31, 2020.
  16. Williams, Pete (September 25, 2017). "Trump restricts visas from eight countries as travel order expires". NBC News. Archived from the original on May 16, 2021. Retrieved February 12, 2020.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats". whitehouse.gov . September 24, 2017. Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved January 20, 2021 via National Archives.
  18. Matthew Lee (September 21, 2021). "Biden administration extends Trump-era ban on US passport use for North Korea travel". USA Today. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved August 2, 2023.
  19. United States Passports Invalid for Travel To, In, or Through the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). August 8, 2024.
  20. "US Extends Travel Ban on N. Korea for Another Year". Korean Broadcasting System. August 8, 2024.
  21. "Public Narrowly Agrees With Court's Decision Not To Reinstate Travel Ban" (PDF). HuffPost. May 30, 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 14, 2019. Retrieved May 30, 2017.
  22. Frank Newport (April 7, 2017). "Trump Family Leave, Infrastructure Proposals Widely Popular". Gallup. Archived from the original on April 8, 2017. Retrieved April 7, 2017.
  23. "American Voters Want To Save Big Bird, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Most Oppose Spending Cuts In Trump Budget". Quinnipiac University. March 24, 2017. Archived from the original on March 24, 2017. Retrieved March 24, 2017.
  24. "Californians and Their Government-March 2017" (PDF). Public Policy Institute of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 25, 2017. Retrieved March 24, 2017.
  25. "Wave 24.5 Mode Study- Final Topline" (PDF). March 31, 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 1, 2017. Retrieved March 31, 2017.
  26. "U.S. Voters Say Sessions Lied And Should Resign, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Support For Immigrant 'path To Citizenship' At New High". Quinnipiac University. March 8, 2017. Archived from the original on March 9, 2017. Retrieved March 8, 2017.
  27. "Trump's Approval Rating Slides Despite Support for Travel Ban". Morning Consult. February 8, 2017. Archived from the original on February 9, 2017. Retrieved February 9, 2017.
  28. "CBS News Poll: Country Divides on Travel Ban, Record Low Approval for President Trump". Scribd. February 3, 2017. Archived from the original on February 9, 2017. Retrieved February 9, 2017.
  29. "51% Back Trump's Temporary Ban On Refugees — IBD/TIPP Poll". Investor's Business Daily . February 6, 2017. Archived from the original on February 6, 2017. Retrieved February 6, 2017.
  30. "Exclusive: Trump's travel ban polarizes America – Reuters/Ipsos poll". Reuters. January 31, 2017. Archived from the original on January 31, 2017. Retrieved January 31, 2017.
  31. "Most Support Temporary Ban ..." Rasmussen Reports. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved January 30, 2017.
  32. "Utahns oppose Trump's plan to curtail refugee immigration". The Salt Lake Tribune . January 26, 2017. Archived from the original on January 27, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2017.
  33. "American Voters Want Second Opinion on Obamacare, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; Voters Support Immigrants, but Also Back Muslim List". Quinnipiac University. Archived from the original on January 23, 2017. Retrieved January 27, 2017.