This article needs to be updated. The reason given is: It is missing the special counsel response to the US Supreme Court decision Trump v. United States (2024). Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(July 2024)
Smith moved quickly to advance his investigations, assembling a team of at least twenty DOJ prosecutors, and called witnesses for grand jury testimony, issued subpoenas to election officials in multiple states and asked a federal judge to hold Trump in contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena.
On June 8, 2023, a grand jury in the Southern Florida U.S. District Courtindicted Trump on 37 felony counts,[1] including charges of willful retention of national security material, obstruction of justice and conspiracy, relating to his removal and retention of presidential materials from the White House after his presidency ended.[2] Thirty-one of the counts fell under the Espionage Act.[3]
Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges in both indictments.[7][8] Trials were scheduled[9][10] but never held.
On July 15, 2024, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents prosecution against Donald Trump, siding with the former president's argument that special counsel Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed.[11]
On November 25, 2024, Smith announced that he was seeking to drop all charges against Donald Trump in the aftermath of Trump's victory in the 2024 United States presidential election.[12] The Justice Department, by policy, does not prosecute sitting presidents of the United States.[13]
Smith submitted his final report to the Justice Department on January 7, 2025 and resigned three days later.[14][15] The part of the report about election obstruction was made public on January 14. The part about the mishandling of government records was not released at the same time because it was related to an ongoing criminal case.[16]
Origin
The order appointing Jack Smith as special counsel, dated November 18, 2022
On U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland's confirmation as attorney general, the DOJ opened multiple investigations into events during the closing weeks of the Trump presidency.
One investigation involved the people and events surrounding the January 6 attack on the Capitol.[17] In early 2022, the public became aware that the Justice Department was investigating the Trump fake electors plot.[18] In September 2022, subpoenas were issued, focusing on fundraising in the lead-up to the attack on the Capitol.[19]
On November 15 2022, Trump formally announced his 2024 presidential campaign.[23] Three days following Trump's announcement, Garland appointed Smith as special counsel to head the investigations.[24] A report published in July 2023 said he had spent $5.4million to date on the investigations.[25] The grand jury is due to expire on September 15, 2023, but can be extended.[26]
Investigation of mishandling of documents
Developments
2022
December
Smith asked Beryl Howell, chief judge of the DC District Court, to hold Trump in contempt for failure to fully comply with an August 2022 DOJ subpoena, as prosecutors suspected Trump may have withheld some documents subject to the subpoena; Howell declined to hold Trump in contempt, asking both parties to continue working toward a resolution.[27][28]
On December 12, 2022, Jennifer Rodgers, a legal analyst for CNN, noted that DOJ (which had not yet charged Trump with a crime) would find it difficult to finish any hypothetical case before the 2024 presidential election. She said DOJ might prioritize charging Trump in the documents case given that a conviction might be reached more quickly than in the January 6 case.[29]
Contractors hired by Trump in late 2022 found additional documents marked classified, and Trump attorneys gave them to the special counsel in December 2022.[30][31]
2023
January
Document boxes in Mar-a-Lago bathroom
Smith hired Raymond Hulser, former chief of public integrity at DOJ, and David Harbach, who'd previously led cases against a U.S. senator and a governor.[32]
A laptop and thumb drive belonging to a former Oval Office aide, Chamberlain Harris, were handed over. Harris had scanned some documents, consisting of Trump's travel schedules, onto her two devices, evidently unaware they were classified.[30][31]
The special counsel subpoenaed an empty manila folder marked "Classified Evening Briefing" that had been found by the contractors in Trump's Mar-a-Lago bedroom. The folder had been reported to the special counsel but wasn't handed over until it was subpoenaed.[30][31] One of Trump's lawyers claimed in February that Trump had been using the empty folder to shield an annoying light at his bedside.[33]
Trump attorneys Evan Corcoran and Christina Bobb testified before a grand jury. Corcoran had reportedly drafted a June 2022 letter, signed by Bobb, attesting that, in response to a subpoena, a diligent search was conducted and no classified documents remained at Mar-a-Lago; however, thousands of documents, over a hundred of which had classified markings, were subsequently found in the August 2022 FBI search.[34][35][36][37]
Trump attorney Alina Habba also appeared before a grand jury. Habba did not represent Trump regarding the documents matter, but she had spoken about it on television.[38][39]
On January 12, CNN reported that the investigators sought to learn who was paying the legal bills of subpoena recipients.[40]
On January 26, Senate Intelligence Committee chair Mark Warner said the committee wanted to see the classified documents immediately (the ones found in Trump's and Biden's possession) and did not want to "wait until a special prosecutor blesses the intelligence committee's oversight".[41]
On January 30, the two people who had been hired to search four locations in October 2022 for classified documents —Trump's Bedminster golf club, Trump Tower in New York, an office location in Florida and a storage unit in Florida — testified before a federal grand jury.[42]
February
In early February, the government offered to brief certain members of Congress—the leaders of the House and Senate, and the leaders of the intelligence committees—on the status of the classified documents investigation.[43] It was also reported that more documents with classified markings had been found during a search of Mar-a-Lago "weeks" earlier, in the presence of Trump's legal team.[44]
On February 16, former Trump national security advisor Robert O'Brien appeared before a grand jury. After being subpoenaed in both the documents investigation and the election investigation, he had tried to assert executive privilege to withhold some information. It was not immediately known before which grand jury he testified.[45][46]
In February, Smith asked federal judge Beryl Howell in a sealed motion for approval to invoke the crime-fraud exception to pierce attorney-client privilege and compel Corcoran to produce documents and answer certain questions before the grand jury.[47] The special counsel argued that Trump may have acted criminally by intentionally misleading his attorneys about his retention of classified materials.[48] On March 17, Judge Howell ruled that DOJ had justified the crime-fraud exception, and she ordered Corcoran to testify again.[49] Trump attorneys sought to block Corcoran's further testimony, but the DC Circuit Court of Appeals denied their appeal,[50] and Corcoran testified on March 24.[51] Subsequently, he recused himself—at least temporarily—from the Mar-a-Lago case, though he continued to represent Trump in the January 6 case. Under the witness advocate rule, lawyers who may be called as key witnesses are generally not supposed to represent clients at trial.[52]
March
CNN reported on March 16 that the special counsel had subpoenaed at least two dozen people at Mar-a-Lago, from resort staff to members of Trump's inner circle.[53]
In mid-March, Trump aide Margo Martin appeared before the grand jury. She was asked about a supposed classified document about a potential military attack on Iran, as investigators had obtained an audio recording of Trump saying he possessed it.[54][55][56][57] Subpoenas were subsequently issued to Trump and to another person who attended the recorded meeting. The subpoenas sought the supposed Iran document and all materials related to it, including any materials related to Milley, maps or invasion plans. Trump's legal team produced some subpoenaed materials but were unable to find the purported Iran document.[58]
April
The Washington Post reported on April 2 that investigators had obtained emails and texts of Molly Michael, a Trump White House and Mar-a-Lago aide, that provided a detailed account of movements at the resort during critical times. Investigators had come to suspect Trump had gone through boxes of documents after being subpoenaed, apparently to identify documents he sought to withhold. The Post also reported investigators were asking witnesses if Trump had shown any classified materials, including maps, to political donors.[59][60]
ABC News reported on April 3 that multiple members of Trump's current and former Secret Service details had been subpoenaed for testimony in the documents case.[61][62]
On April 13, former acting director of national intelligence Richard Grenell testified before a Smith grand jury regarding Trump's retention of classified materials. As Trump's acting DNI, Grenell declassified documents that Trump believed would delegitimize the Russia investigation. He remained in Trump's post-presidency circle of associates and had publicly defended Trump's documents retention.[63]
On April 26, four Trump attorneys wrote Republican House Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Turner that the Justice Department "should be ordered to stand down" from its classified documents investigation, and legislation enacted to transfer the inquiry to the US intelligence community, asserting it was a civil case rather than a criminal case.[64][65]
May
CNN reported on May 3 that in recent weeks new subpoenas had been issued to top Trump Organization employees, regarding the handling of Mar-a-Lago security footage after it had been subpoenaed in summer 2022, and conversations employees had about the footage. Matthew Calamari Sr. and his son Matthew Calamari Jr. were among several witnesses who testified before the grand jury investigating the mishandling of documents on May 4. Calamari Sr. is the longtime chief operating officer of the Trump Organization, primarily overseeing security operations for the company, while his son is a director of security. The footage reportedly captured Trump valet Walt Nauta and another Mar-a-Lago employee moving boxes out of a storage room, which Nauta told the FBI was at Trump's direction. Investigators had previously asked about a text message from Nauta to Calamari Sr. and subsequent conversations about the surveillance footage.[66]
The New York Times reported on May 4 that the special counsel had gained the cooperation of an inside witness to help investigators determine how the materials were handled. Investigators came to believe Nauta had not given a full and accurate account of his activities, and indicated he might be charged, whereupon his attorneys ceased cooperating. Investigators asked witnesses about gaps in the surveillance footage, and had subpoenaed the vendor that provides the surveillance equipment for the Trump Organization. A subpoena had also been issued for records relating to Trump's dealings with LIV Golf, a Saudi-backed professional golf venture. The Times reported investigators were seeking to determine whether Trump paid for attorneys for witnesses based on their degree of loyalty to him.[67]
In a May 16 letter to Trump, acting national archivist Debra Steidel Wall said NARA had sixteen presidential records showing Trump and his top advisors had been informed of "whether, why, and how you should declassify certain classified records." Wall wrote that Trump had tried to prevent the special counsel from accessing the sixteen records by asserting a claim of "constitutionally based privilege," which she rejected, advising Trump the records would be provided to investigators on May 24 unless a court intervened.[68]
On May 17, Timothy Parlatore announced he was quitting Trump's legal team. He contended Boris Epshteyn hindered his access to Trump such that Parlatore could not provide adequate defense. Several other Trump attorneys had attempted to intervene with Trump to advise him Epshteyn was giving him rosy legal assessments in the face of dire circumstances. Parlatore also claimed Epshteyn tried to prevent the legal team from conducting searches for documents at Trump's other properties after the Mar-a-Lago search by the FBI. A Trump spokesperson said Parlatore's "statements regarding current members of the legal team are unfounded and categorically false." Epshteyn remained a top Trump advisor and coordinator of his myriad legal matters since Epshteyn's alleged involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. He had been interviewed by Smith investigators in April 2023.[69][70][71]
On May 19, prosecutors formally notified Trump's legal team that the former president was a target of the investigation in the documents case. Justice Department policy allows sending a target letter to afford a target an opportunity to testify to a grand jury before an indictment might be handed down.[72][73][74][75]
The Guardian reported on May 22 that the Smith grand jury had about 50 pages of Corcoran's contemporaneous notes, following a DOJ subpoena to Trump for classified documents, indicating that Corcoran had explained to Trump that he could not retain these documents. The notes also contained details of how the documents had been stored and moved.[76]
The New York Times reported on May 22 that the special counsel had subpoenaed the Trump Organization for records related to any business dealings it might have had with seven countries since the beginning of the Trump presidency. Investigators were seeking to determine if Trump's removal of presidential documents was related to any foreign business deals. The countries were China, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Oman.[77]
The Wall Street Journal reported on May 23 that the special counsel was wrapping up the documents investigation, suggesting an indictment might be near. Hours later, Trump attorneys wrote Merrick Garland requesting a meeting at his earliest convenience to "discuss the ongoing injustice that is being perpetrated by your Special Counsel and his prosecutors."[78][79]
On May 25, The Washington Post reported that before being subpoenaed Trump and his aides conducted a "dress rehearsal" for moving sensitive documents. Two Trump employees moved boxes into a storage room the day before the FBI executed the search warrant. Investigators also developed evidence Trump had kept classified documents in his office such that they were visible, and sometimes showed them to others.[80]
The New York Times reported on May 31 that former Trump White House staffers had been subpoenaed for information about the firing of Christopher Krebs. Krebs had been the Trump administration's top cybersecurity official, and he had concluded the 2020 election was secure.[81] He was fired on November 17, 2020, two weeks after the election.
June
Three Trump attorneys met with Smith and others at the Justice Department in Washington on June 5 to argue that Trump should not be indicted in the documents case. Garland and his deputy Lisa Monaco were not present. NBC News previously reported that the grand jury examining the documents matter was expected to reconvene that week.[82][83] A previously unreported Miami, Florida grand jury which had begun hearing evidence in May was also set to hear testimony in the documents case that week. The purpose of that grand jury was not immediately clear, though that federal judicial district encompasses Mar-a-Lago.[84][85][86] Former Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich testified before that grand jury on June 7.[74]
The New York Times reported on June 6 that Mark Meadows, a figure in both distinct lines of the special counsel investigation, had at some time testified before a grand jury, but it was not clear if he was questioned about one or both of the matters Smith was investigating.[87] Meadows' attorney George Terwilliger on June 7 denied his client had accepted a plea deal but would not discuss whether Meadows received limited immunity for his testimony.[88]
CNN reported on June 8 that a career White House official, who was in charge of advising the Trump and Obama administrations on the declassification process, told prosecutors that Trump knew the process and followed it at times while in office.[89]
According to a transcript obtained by CNN of the July 2021 recording of Trump discussing an Iran document, Trump acknowledged the document remained classified, stating, "As president, I could have declassified, but now I can't." Trump added, "Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this."[90]
On June 23, in the documents case, the special counsel filed a motion requesting the trial date be moved from August to December to allow defense attorneys more time to obtain security clearances.[91]
CNN reported on June 29 that the "representative of his political action committee" referenced in the June 2023 indictment was Susie Wiles. Investigators had questioned her extensively about any classified documents Trump may have shown her, including a map.[92]
September
ABC News reported that longtime Trump aide Molly Michael told investigators that Trump repeatedly wrote her "to-do" lists on the backs of documents marked classified. Michael found the documents in her Mar-a-Lago office the day after the August 2022 FBI search and transferred them to the FBI that day. Sources told ABC News that after Trump became aware the FBI wanted to interview Michael, he told her, "You don't know anything about the boxes" and asked her to help spread a message that no more boxes existed, though she knew many more boxes remained in the storage room after Trump had relinquished 15 boxes to NARA. Photographs of the boxes Michael provided to Trump were included in his indictment.[93][94]
October
ABC News reported Trump had in April 2021 discussed sensitive information about American nuclear submarine capabilities with Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt, who then shared the information with at least 45 others. The matter was investigated by the special counsel. Trump's alleged disclosures to Pratt included the number of warheads American submarines carry and how closely they can approach Russian submarines undetected.[95][96]
Classified document about Iran
A key piece of evidence was a July 2021 audio recording, six months after Trump left the White House, in which he said he had a classified document about a potential military attack on Iran.
Days earlier, on July 15, 2021, Susan Glasser reported in The New Yorker that Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of StaffMark Milley had discouraged military action against Iran, had also feared that Trump might stage a coup to remain in power, and had directed his deputies to ignore any illegal orders from Trump. Mark Meadows was holding a narrative contrary to Glasser's, namely that Milley had urged attacking Iran more than once and that Trump had rejected those recommendations. Trump was infuriated by Glasser's story, and he gave an interview to writers involved with Meadows's forthcoming memoir. Trump's aide Margo Martin recorded the discussion at his home in Bedminster, New Jersey. (Martin commonly did this to ensure writers quoted Trump correctly. Special counsel investigators obtained several if not all of the recordings made during Trump's book interviews.)
During the interview, Trump referred to a war proposal against Iran that had been drafted for him to consider in the closing days of his presidency. Of the document, he said: "It is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this." He added: "As president, I could have declassified, but now I can't." Media outlets were told the document was written early in the Trump presidency when Joseph Dunford and Jim Mattis headed the Pentagon. In the 2021 recorded interview, however, Trump asserted it was written by Milley ("this was him", Trump said multiple times), whom Trump had appointed but then had a falling-out with. Meadows similarly attributed the document to Milley in his memoir.[97][54][55][56][57]
In a June 19, 2023, interview with Fox News anchor Bret Baier, Trump denied he had been handling a classified document during the 2021 interview, and rather claimed that they were "newspaper stories, magazine stories and articles."[98] He added: "I don't think I've ever seen a document from Milley."[99]
CNN aired a two-minute audio of the interview on June 26.[100]
Investigation of attempts to overturn 2020 election
Days after Trump was indicted on charges related to mishandling of presidential documents, The Washington Post reported the special counsel investigation was "barreling forward on multiple tracks" related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election, including by the use of fake electors and fundraising pitches falsely claiming election fraud.[101]
Mike Pence
On April 27, 2023, former Vice President Mike Pence testified before the grand jury.[102]
Legal challenge
In early 2023, Pence was subpoenaed for documents and testimony, following months of negotiations between his legal team and prosecutors.[103][104][105]
On March 3, both Pence and Trump filed separate legal challenges.
Pence challenged his subpoena with a separation of powers argument.[106] He argued that, as a vice president who was performing his job as president of the Senate when the election was certified, he was temporarily a member of the legislative branch, so the Speech or Debate Clause of the Constitution protects him from being "questioned" about his activity that day.[107][108] A week earlier, influential conservative jurist J. Michael Luttig, who had advised Pence to not bow to Trump's 2020 election pressure, wrote in The New York Times saying Pence's objection would not succeed.[109][110]
Trump attorneys asked a judge to block Pence's testimony based on executive privilege.[106][111]
Both Pence and Trump were expected to make these arguments in court on March 23.[112] Their outcomes:
On March 28, Judge James Boasberg ruled that Pence need not testify about his own actions on January 6 but must testify about his conversations with Trump.[113] Pence decided not to appeal.[114] On June 9, Boasberg said he planned to release the ruling.[115]
On April 26, a three-judge panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously denied Trump's appeal. Trump had sought to block Pence's testimony; he had filed the sealed request on April 10,[116] and he had asked on April 14 to expedite it.[117][118]
Pence testified before the grand jury the day after Trump's request was denied.[102]
Developments
2022
November
Within days of his appointment, Smith began issuing grand jury subpoenas to local officials in Arizona, Michigan and Wisconsin, three key battleground states in the 2020 election, demanding they provide all communications they had with Trump, his campaign, and aides and associates.[119]
December
By December, local officials in Georgia, New Mexico, Nevada and Pennsylvania had also been subpoenaed.[120]Georgia Secretary of StateBrad Raffensperger was issued a grand jury subpoena in December. During a January 2021 recorded phone call, Trump had pressured Raffensperger to "find" sufficient votes needed to secure his victory in the state.[121]
Smith's grand jury investigated fundraising and disbursements by Trump's Save America PAC, which had been created days after the November 2020 election. In late 2022, subpoenas were sent to Rudy Giuliani about payments he received from the PAC, and to other witnesses close to Trump.[122] By February 2023, numerous Save America PAC vendors had been subpoenaed to determine how they had been paid and whether they delivered genuine services or concealed who had actually been paid.[39]
On December 11, 2022, former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara noted that Smith had been hiring people who had "left their former positions, both in government and private practice", suggesting a major legal action in the works.[29]
2023
January
Smith subpoenaed former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows for documents and testimony.[123]
In January, Smith's office obtained a search warrant for Trump's Twitter account, covering a period from October 2020 through January 2021.[124] Twitter resisted a nondisclosure order preventing it from alerting Trump, and Judge Beryl Howell held the company in contempt. Though Twitter complied with the warrant and order on February 9, producing 32 direct messages along with other material,[124] Howell fined the company $350,000 for having missed the deadline for compliance. The incident became publicly known in August 2023[125][126][127] with more details published in September. Smith obtained 32 direct messages from Trump's account; all accounts and usernames associated with Trump's account; all devices that were used to login to the account; and searches and advertising information associated with the account.[124][128]
On January 26, former Department of Homeland Security official Ken Cuccinelli testified before the grand jury.[129]
February
DOJ subpoenaed at least three Republican Arizona state legislators, and at least one former legislator. Naming 18 individuals, DOJ demanded their communications with Trump or his campaign members.[130]
The Washington Post reported in February that soon after the election, the Trump campaign paid researchers from Berkeley Research Group to examine a wide range of indicators that might suggest the election had been stolen. Trump, Meadows and others were briefed on the findings in December 2020. The analysis found no significant irregularities beyond those commonly found in all elections, and nothing that might have changed the election outcome. The findings were never publicly disclosed, though the Justice Department obtained the analysis by subpoena.[131][132][133] The Post reported in April that the Trump campaign had hired a second firm, Simpatico Software Systems, days after the election to examine fraud allegations. The company delivered a report late in 2020, finding no evidence of fraud. The company's founder was subpoenaed for testimony in early 2023.[131][134]
March
Concurrent with her crime-fraud exception ruling, Howell also rejected Trump's claim of executive privilege and ordered grand jury testimony from former Trump officials Mark Meadows; director of national intelligenceJohn Ratcliffe; national security advisor Robert O'Brien; senior advisor Stephen Miller; deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino; DHS official Ken Cuccinelli; and Trump personal aides John McEntee and Nick Luna. Trump's April 3 emergency motion to block the testimony was denied by a three-judge panel of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals overnight.[135][136] Prosecutors interviewed Jocelyn Benson, the Michigan Secretary of State, about the impact of election misinformation.[137]
April
The Washington Post reported on April 12 that in recent weeks the special counsel had subpoenaed a wide range of documents, including emails and texts, from numerous Trump associates and Republican operatives to compare what they had said privately about election fraud claims with what post-election Trump fundraising emails had said. The emails raised over $200 million in donations. Investigators were examining whether wire fraud had been committed by using false claims to swindle people out of money.[138][139]
John Ratcliffe testified before a Smith grand jury regarding the aftermath of the 2020 election on April 13.[140]
On April 25, Fox News whistleblower Abby Grossberg released a recording of Senator Ted Cruz planning obstruction during the vote certification.[141] Grossberg had previously released recordings in which Trump lawyers Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, speaking off-air with Fox host Maria Bartiromo, contradicted what they had said on-air about the election.[142]
In April, an FBI agent and a prosecutor from the special counsel's office interviewed a former employee of Pennsylvania Republican donor Bill Bachenberg. This regarded Bachenberg's alleged attempt to access voting equipment in Pennsylvania coordinated with Sidney Powell. Bachenberg had helped organize Pennsylvania's fake electors and had been subpoenaed in 2022.[26]
May
In late May, former Trump senior strategist Steve Bannon was subpoenaed for documents and testimony related to January 6 and Trump's efforts to remain in office.[143]
On May 31, the Georgia secretary of state's office was subpoenaed for "any and all security video or security footage, or any other video of any kind" of the State Farm Arena polling place in Atlanta near the day of the 2020 election day.[144]
June
Investigators interviewed Giuliani in late June. The interview was pursuant to a proffer agreement in which a subject of a criminal investigation agrees to provide certain information that would not be used against them in any future prosecution; a proffer can precede a formal cooperation deal. The New York Times reported Giuliani was asked about the fake electors scheme, the roles of John Eastman and Sidney Powell, as well as those at the Willard Hotel "command center" in the days leading up to the certification of the election, including Giuliani, Eastman, Steve Bannon and Trump attorney Boris Epshteyn.[145][146] (Weeks later, when Trump received a target letter and Giuliani did not, Giuliani's political adviser, Ted Goodman, insisted to the press that Giuliani had not "flipped".)[147]
CNN reported on June 29 that Mike Roman had entered into a proffer agreement with the special counsel investigation. Roman was a Trump 2020 campaign director of election day operations who was involved in the fake electors scheme.[148][149]
The grand jury investigating the attack on the Capitol heard testimony from:
June 13: Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald[151]
June 13: Republican National Committeeman Jim DeGraffenreid[151]
June 22: Gary Michael Brown, Trump's deputy director of Election Day operations in 2020. Brown has been accused of involvement with the fake electors scheme.[152]
CNN reported on June 23 that at least two fake electors had testified before the grand jury "in recent weeks" in exchange for limited immunity.[153]
NBC reported on June 26 that "five or six" Secret Service agents had testified before the grand jury. (Separately, in the documents case, "about 24" Secret Service agents had testified.)[154]
Trump inner circle aides Jared Kushner and Hope Hicks. They were asked about whether Trump had been told and had acknowledged he had lost the election. The New York Times reported that Kushner testified that it was his impression that Trump truly believed the election had been stolen from him.[155][156]
July
Axios reported on July 5 that Smith had recently subpoenaed the Arizona secretary of state's office.[157]Rusty Bowers, the Republican former Arizona speaker of the house, said on CNN that day he had been interviewed by the FBI a few months earlier but declined to discuss any subpoena. Bowers, who supported Trump in the 2020 election, had previously testified to the January 6 committee that Trump and Giuliani had called him after the election asking him to involve the legislature regarding what Giuliani said was proof of election fraud, with the objective of replacing Biden electors with Trump electors. Bowers declined to comply. He had told the committee that Giuliani never produced proof of fraud and had told Bowers, "we've got lots of theories, we just don't have the evidence."[158][159]The Washington Post reported Trump had also called Republican Arizona governor Doug Ducey to pressure him to overturn the state's election results, and repeatedly asked Pence to call the governor.[160]
CNN reported on July 6 that investigators had recently renewed interest in a December 18, 2020 Oval Office strategy meeting among Trump, Michael Flynn, Giuliani, Meadows, Powell, White House counsel Pat Cipollone, and others. The heated meeting included discussions of a Flynn proposal to seize voting machines, declare martial law and hold a new election under military authority, and a proposal to appoint Powell as a special counsel to investigate allegations of election fraud. Some witnesses to the meeting had been asked about it months earlier, while several others, such as Giuliani, had been questioned more recently.[161][162][163]
On July 18, CNN reported that former Arizona Governor Doug Ducey, whom Trump had pressured to overturn the 2020 election, had been contacted by the special counsel's office.[169]
On July 20, Trump adviser Will Russell testified to the grand jury for at least the third time. Previously, he was asked about fundraising; this time, he was asked about Trump's state of mind.[170] There was a dispute over executive privilege.[171]
CNN reported on July 20 that a former Trump lawyer was planning to speak.[171]
Bernie Kerik's lawyer, Tim Parlatore, announced on July 24 that he had shared thousands of documents that had been subpoenaed from Kerik. Kerik had worked with Giuliani regarding claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election.[172]
On July 27, the grand jury convened, and two of Trump's lawyers, John Lauro and Todd Blanche, met with Jack Smith. Blanche has also represented Trump in two other cases in which he has been indicted: the documents case and the hush-money case.[173] Trump's team sought to delay the expected indictment[174] but received no guidance on that point.[175]
August
On August 1, Trump was indicted.
On August 7, federal prosecutors interviewed former New York City police commissioner Bernie Kerik,[176] and the Washington Post reported that more subpoenas had been issued "in recent days...about the elector scheme in multiple states".[177]
On August 10, the government asked the court for the trial to begin on January 2, 2024.[178]
On August 28, the judge set trial for March 4, 2024.[10]
September
CNN reported on September 5 that Sidney Powell's non-profit, Defending the Republic, had hired forensics firms that accessed voting equipment in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Arizona, and that Smith was investigating how funds were raised for this.[26]
The New York Times reported on September 8 that in October 2022 investigators met with Enrique Tarrio in Miami to tell him they believed he had communicated with Trump through at least three intermediaries prior to January 6. During a jailhouse phone interview days after his conviction for seditious conspiracy, Tarrio told the Times he was offered leniency if he confirmed their beliefs. Tarrio said he told them they were wrong and declined to name to the Times any of the individuals investigators had mentioned, though he specifically said the longtime Trump political adviser Roger Stone was not among them.[179]
October
In October, the special counsel withdrew subpoenas for the Save America PAC and the Trump campaign, according to the New York Times and CNN. The subpoenas had sought information about their fundraising practices.[180]
ABC News reported on October 24 that the special counsel had granted Mark Meadows immunity to testify before the grand jury under oath, one of at least three meetings with prosecutors in 2023. Meadows' attorney said the report was "largely inaccurate." The Guardian later reported prosecutors had sought the Meadows testimony by subpoena in March, but Trump tried and failed to block it based in part on executive privilege grounds. Meadows then apparently invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to testify; judge Beryl Howell approved a special counsel request to order Meadows to testify under limited immunity such that his testimony could not be used against him in any future prosecution. Meadows said he had repeatedly told Trump during the weeks after the election that the allegations of significant voting fraud they were hearing were baseless and that as of his testimony he had seen no evidence of it. The Meadows testimony contradicted assertions in his 2021 memoir that the election was "stolen" and "rigged" with help from "allies in the liberal media." He said Trump was being dishonest when he first claimed to have won hours after polls closed on election day.[181][182][183]
December
On December 11, Smith's office ordered transcripts from Eastman's disbarment trial. (Eastman had not been charged in this federal case, though he had been charged in Georgia.)[184]
The FBI seized the phone of Republican congressman Scott Perry in August 2022. Perry sought to prevent investigators from examining the contents of his phone, citing immunity from criminal investigation under the speech and debate clause of the Constitution. After a protracted legal battle, on December 19, 2023 DC Circuit Court of Appeals chief judge Jeb Boasberg ruled that 396 messages on the phone were protected, while investigators could examine 1,659 others.[185]
Indictment of Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos de Oliveira, updated July 27, 2023
Trump was indicted by a federal grand jury on June 8, 2023, on charges stemming from the Smith special counsel investigation. The 37-felony-count indictment was filed in the District Court for the Southern District of Florida, based in Miami.[186] Charges included illegal retention of government secrets, obstruction of justice, making false statements, and conspiracy to obstruct. Trump's arraignment, as well a brief arrest and booking, took place on June 13 at the federal courthouse in Miami.[187][188]
Trump aide Walt Nauta, his White House valet,[189] was also indicted on June 8, 2023.[190] As conditions for his release, Trump was barred from speaking with Nauta and discussing the case with witnesses.[191][192] Nauta was arraigned on July 6.[193]
In a superseding indictment unsealed on July 27, Trump was indicted on an additional count of willful retention of documents, bringing his total counts on that charge to 32. Trump, Nauta, and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira were also charged with obstruction of justice related to their request to Trump information technology employee Yuscil Taveras to delete surveillance video footage to prevent it from being viewed by investigators. De Oliveira had worked at Mar-a-Lago for more than two decades, starting as a valet earning $12,000 in 2010 (equivalent to $17,000in 2023), and had been promoted to becoming the club's property manager in 2022.[194] The footage had recently been subpoenaed by a Smith grand jury. The superseding indictment alleged De Oliveira told Taveras "that 'the boss' wanted the server deleted," and Taveras replied "that he would not know how to do that, and that he did not believe that he would have the rights to do that."
Like Nauta and several others associated with Trump, Taveras had been provided legal representation by Stan Woodward, whose legal fees were paid or by Trump's Save America PAC.[195] After Taveras received a target letter following the initial indictment of Trump and Nauta, and was told that Woodward might have a conflict of interest, in July 2023 he dropped Woodward and retained a different attorney who was independent of Trump, retracted his previous false grand jury testimony given while represented by Woodward, and implicated the three other men in an alleged conspiracy to delete surveillance video at the Florida property that implicated Trump.[195][196][197][198][199] The new indictment alleged that–despite Trump's denial one month earlier–he had shown a top secret war plan document related to Iran to individuals lacking security clearances at his Bedminster home in 2021.[200]The New York Times reported prosecutors had the document in their possession.[201]
2020 election case
Indictment of Donald J. Trump filed on 1 Aug 2023 [45 pages]
At a hearing on August 28, prosecutor Molly Gaston complained that Trump was posting to social media about the case and argued that a swifter trial would be appropriate.[203] Prosecutor Tom Windom argued that the defense would not need extra time to prepare for classified evidence because, while several classified documents had been produced in discovery, the government did not expect to present any classified documents at trial.[204] The judge set the trial for March 4, 2024.[205]
Reactions
On December 11, 2022, former U.S. attorney Preet Bharara predicted that the DOJ would bring charges in the election case in January.[29]
On July 11, 2023, Ty Cobb, who had served as a White House attorney during the Trump administration, said "I think they [DOJ] are ready to go" with a federal indictment related to January 6, though Cobb said they must be facing "some difficult decisions" regarding what kind of charges to bring.[206]
On July 20, 2023, four days after the special counsel's office notified Donald Trump he was a target in the election investigation, Trump posted audio of himself saying: "If you f**k around with us, if you do something bad to us, we are going to do things to you that have never been done before." (The audio was recorded in 2020 regarding Iran. It was spliced into a video showing Trump's 2024 campaign logo.)[207]
By August, House Republicans were seeking to use their power of the purse to halt investigations and prosecutions of Trump. Some proposed leveraging the looming September 30 deadline to fund the government for the coming year in order to trigger a federal shutdown, though none of the federal or state actions against Trump would be affected by a shutdown.[208]
Republican chairman of the House Judiciary CommitteeJim Jordan announced on September 7, 2023, that he was opening an investigation into the special counsel's office related to allegations of prosecutorial abuse. Jordan alleged that Jay Bratt, one of Smith's senior prosecutors, "improperly pressured" Stan Woodward "by implying that the Administration would look more favorably" on his candidacy for a judgeship if his client, Walt Nauta, chose to cooperate with special counsel investigators.[209] In November 2024, the Office of Professional Responsibility opened an investigation concerning Jordan's allegations.[210]
In September 2023, war crimes prosecutor Alex Whiting joined Smith's team.[211]
Second Trump presidency
Following Trump's election on November 5, 2024, the election obstruction case was still active, and the special counsel had an active appeal of the dismissal of the documents case.[212]
On November 8, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton made a Freedom of Information Act Request to the Department of Justice asking for records of the special counsel investigation. He asked for every communication the special counsel's office had ever sent to "any New York State governmental office", "the Fulton County District Attorney's office", "any Congressional office", "any governmental or law enforcement officer in the State of Texas", along with all documentation of the special counsel's "final reasoning to request that a trial against President-elect Trump to start in January of 2024" and "all mobile numbers" of the special counsel's staff.[213][214]
On November 24, Senator Eric Schmitt said Justice Department staff who worked on the cases "should be fired immediately."[215]
On November 25, Smith motioned to have the election obstruction case dismissed.[216] He wrote:
"After careful consideration, the [Justice] Department has determined that OLC's [the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel's] prior opinions concerning the Constitution's prohibition on federal indictment and prosecution of a sitting President apply to this situation and that as a result this prosecution must be dismissed before the defendant is inaugurated. That prohibition is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government's proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind."[217]
Former U.S. attorney Barbara McQuade noted that Smith chose to "explain his reasons for dismissing the case, rather than allowing Trump's future AG to mischaracterize them". She said this might be "an effort to keep the cases alive in the long term" so that another prosecutor can pick them up in 2029.[218]
Smith was expected to submit court filings on December 2 explaining how he would wind down the cases.[219][220] He resigned in January 2025 before Trump's inauguration,[14] amid the general understanding that Trump, upon taking office, would have fired his entire team anyway. Trump had said he would use the Justice Department to investigate his 2020 election loss.[221]
Final report
The special counsel prepared a two-volume final report: the first volume about the election obstruction case, and the second volume about the classified documents case.[222]
Trump's lawyers were allowed to review Smith's final report from January 3–6, 2025 in a room where they could not use their electronic devices. They objected to the report's release.[223] On January 6, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira (who could still face criminal charges in the classified documents case)[224] asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to stop its release to avoid influencing their case,[225] and the next day, Judge Aileen Cannon blocked the report's release until three days after the 11th Circuit decided.[225] Later in the evening on January 7, the special counsel provided both volumes to the attorney general,[226] and the next day, the Department of Justice said it would release the first volume publicly and may provide a redacted version of the second volume for a limited review by select members of Congress.[227] On January 9, the 11th Circuit allowed the release of the first volume,[224][228] and on January 13, Cannon said she would likewise allow it, given that her own authority was limited to the classified documents case.[229] On January 14, the 137-page first volume was released.[230]
The Robert Mueller special counsel investigation was an investigation into 45th U.S. president Donald Trump regarding Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections and was conducted by special prosecutor Robert Mueller from May 2017 to March 2019. It was also called the Russia investigation, Mueller probe, and Mueller investigation. The investigation focused on three points:
Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
Trump associates and their connection to Russian officials and espionage
Possible obstruction of justice by Trump and his associates
This is a timeline of events in the first half of 2019 related to investigations into the many suspicious links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies relating to the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. It follows the timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, both before and after July 2016, until November 8, 2016, the transition, the first and second halves of 2017, the first and second halves of 2018, and followed by the second half of 2019, 2020, and 2021.
The Special Counsel investigation was a United States law enforcement and counterintelligence investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in United States politics and any possible involvement by members of the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. It was primarily focused on the 2016 presidential election.
Hugo Lowell is a Senior Political Correspondent for The Guardian in Washington, D.C. He covers former President Donald Trump and the US Department of Justice, and has broken several high-profile stories. He frequently appears on MSNBC.
This is a timeline of events from 2020 to 2022 related to investigations into the many suspicious links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies relating to the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. It follows the timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, both before and after July 2016, until November 8, 2016, election day, the transition, the first and second halves of 2017, the first and second halves of 2018, and the first and second halves of 2019.
The United States Department of Justice under the Trump administration acquired by a February 2018 subpoena the Apple iCloud metadata of two Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee, several others associated with the committee, and some of their family members. The subpoena covered 73 phone numbers and 36 email addresses since the inception of the accounts. Seizing communications information of members of Congress is extraordinarily rare. The department also subpoenaed and obtained 2017 and 2018 phone log and email metadata from news reporters for CNN, The Washington Post and The New York Times. Apple also received and complied with February 2018 subpoenas for the iCloud accounts of White House counsel Don McGahn and his wife. Microsoft received a subpoena relating to a personal email account of a congressional staff member in 2017.
The United States House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol was a select committee of the U.S. House of Representatives established to investigate the U.S. Capitol attack.
This is a timeline of major events in second half of 2019 related to the investigations into the myriad links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies that are suspected of being inappropriate, relating to the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. It follows the timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections before and after July 2016 up until election day November 8, and the transition, the first and second halves of 2017, the first and second halves of 2018, and the first half of 2019, but precedes that of 2020 and 2021.
The Trump fake electors plot was a scheme to submit illegitimate certificates of ascertainment to falsely claim U.S. president Donald Trump had won the Electoral College vote in certain states, following Trump's loss in the 2020 United States presidential election. After the results of the 2020 election determined Trump had lost, the scheme was devised by him, his associates, and Republican Party officials in seven states, and it formed a part of Trump and his associates' attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election.
The United States Justice Department investigation into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election began in early 2021 with investigations and prosecutions of hundreds of individuals who participated in the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol. By early 2022, the investigation had expanded to examine Donald Trump's inner circle, with the Justice Department impaneling several federal grand juries to investigate the attempts to overturn the election. Later in 2022, a special counsel was appointed.
On August8, 2022, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago, the residence of former U.S. president Donald Trump in Palm Beach, Florida.
Plasmic Echo was the codename for a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) criminal investigation into former President Donald Trump's handling of classified and national defense-related government documents beginning in 2022, looking for possible violations of the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice.
John Luman Smith is an American attorney who has served in the United States Department of Justice as an assistant U.S. attorney, acting U.S. attorney, and head of the department's Public Integrity Section. He was also the chief prosecutor at the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, an international tribunal at The Hague tasked with investigating and prosecuting war crimes in the Kosovo War. He served as a Special Counsel for the Department of Justice from November 18, 2022 until his resignation on January 10, 2025.
Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, was a lawsuit filed on August 22, 2022, by former U.S. president Donald Trump in the Southern District of Florida. He sought the appointment of a special master to review materials seized on August 8, 2022, during the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, a part of the investigation into Donald Trump's handling of government documents.
On January 9, 2023, CBS News reported that attorneys for U.S. President Joe Biden discovered classified government documents in his former office at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C., and in his personal residence in Wilmington, Delaware, dating to his time in the United States Senate and his vice presidency in the Obama administration. The number of documents was later revealed to be between 25 and 30. By June 2023, classified documents from Biden's Senate tenure were discovered in materials donated to the University of Delaware.
Matthew Evan Corcoran is an American former federal prosecutor who became a white-collar crime defense attorney, gaining national prominence due to his role in the FBI investigation into Donald Trump's handling of government documents as Trump's attorney.
In February 2021, Fulton County, Georgia, district attorney Fani Willis launched a criminal investigation into alleged efforts by then-president Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the certified 2020 election victory of Democratic candidate Joe Biden and award the state's electoral college votes to Trump. A special grand jury recommended indictments in January 2023, followed by a grand jury that indicted Trump and 18 allies in August 2023. The charges include conspiracy, racketeering and other felonies.
United States of America v. Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira is a federal criminal case against Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States; Walt Nauta, his personal aide and valet; and Mar-a-Lago maintenance chief Carlos De Oliveira. The grand jury indictment brought 40 felony counts against Trump related to his alleged mishandling of classified documents after his first presidency, to which he pleaded not guilty. The case marks the first federal indictment of a former U.S. president.
United States of America v. Donald J. Trump was a federal criminal case against Donald Trump, former president of the United States from 2017 to 2021 and president-elect, regarding his alleged participation in attempts to overturn the 2020 U.S. presidential election, including his involvement in the January6 Capitol attack.
Taylor Budowich is an American political consultant who has worked in conservative politics, including as executive director of the Tea Party Express and MAGA Inc. and in communications roles for Donald Trump’s political operations. He has been involved in various campaigns and policy initiatives, working on education policy, political advocacy, and communications strategy.
↑ Kyle Cheney; Josh Gerstein (June 9, 2023). "Trump indictment unsealed". Politico. Archived from the original on June 9, 2023. Retrieved June 9, 2023.
↑ Alan Feuer; Maggie Haberman; Ben Protess (June 6, 2023). "Grand Jury in Florida Hints at Unknown Complexities in Trump Documents Inquiry". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023. Among those who have appeared before the Washington grand jury in the past few months or have been subpoenaed by it, people familiar with the investigation said, are more than 20 members of Mr. Trump's Secret Service security detail.
↑ Adrienne Vogt; Aditi Sangal; Elise Hammond; Maureen Chowdhury; Melissa Macaya; Meg Wagner (June 21, 2022). "Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers says Giuliani 'never' provided evidence of voter fraud claims". CNN. Archived from the original on July 6, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2023. The Arizona House speaker also told the committee that during another conversation with him, Giuliani said, 'we've got lots of theories, we just don't have the evidence.'
↑ "#90 in United States v. Donald Trump (11th Cir., 24-12311) – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Retrieved January 8, 2025. Volume One relates to the Special Counsel's investigation and prosecution of President Donald Trump relating to the 2020 presidential election (Election Case). Volume Two relates to the Special Counsel's investigation and prosecution of defendants Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, as well as President Trump, relating to mishandling of classified documents (Classified Documents Case).
↑ "#90 in United States v. Donald Trump (11th Cir., 24-12311) – CourtListener.com". CourtListener. January 8, 2025. Retrieved January 8, 2025. On the evening of January 7, both volumes of the report were transmitted by the Special Counsel to the Attorney General. Consistent with Justice Department practice, the Attorney General did not review the report before its transmission.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
![Indictment of Donald J. Trump filed on 1 Aug 2023 [45 pages] USA v Trump-Jan6 Indictment.pdf](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/69/USA_v_Trump-Jan6_Indictment.pdf/page1-220px-USA_v_Trump-Jan6_Indictment.pdf.jpg)
