Since 2018, Weiss had been investigating Hunter Biden as U.S. attorney. In 2023, Republicans asked Garland to appoint a special counsel, some specifically demanding Weiss, a Republican appointed to his role by President Donald Trump. Garland ultimately appointed Weiss, giving him additional authority. However, congressional Republicans then expressed criticism, some stating Weiss was untrustworthy.[1][2][3]
A plea agreement negotiated in July 2023 fell through after a U.S. district judge declined to approve it, due to disagreement between the defense and prosecution about the extent of the prosecutorial immunity offered. In September 2023, Hunter Biden was indicted on gun-related charges arising from his purchase of a handgun in 2018, when he had an addiction to cocaine. In December 2023, the special counsel indicted Biden on nine additional counts, all tax-related charges.[4] Biden's gun trial began on June 3, 2024, and he was found guilty of all counts on June 11, making him the first child of a sitting U.S. president to be convicted in a criminal trial.[5][6][7][8] Hunter Biden was scheduled to face an additional trial related to the tax charges starting on September 5, 2024.[9] On this day, however, he would instead change his plea to guilty.[10][11]
On December 1, 2024, President Biden granted Hunter Biden a full and unconditional pardon for all offenses charged by Special Counsel Weiss and for any other crimes he may be alleged to have committed from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024. He said he made this decision due to what he claimed was the "selective" and "political" nature of the charges against his son, which he deemed an extraordinary affront to justice, necessitating his rare interference in the justice system.[12] David Weiss later issued a statement saying "There was none and never has been any evidence of vindictive or selective prosecution in this case.”[13]
Investigation
Trump administration
In December 2020, Hunter Biden disclosed his tax affairs were under Justice Department (DOJ) criminal investigation. Begun in late 2018, the investigation initially examined possible money laundering, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigators were unable to find sufficient evidence to justify a prosecution.
On December 8, 2020, prosecutors in Delaware served two subpoenas, at least one regarding Biden's taxes.[14] Trump administration attorney general William Barr said in December 2020 that he did not see the need for a special counsel, distancing himself from statements of then-president Donald Trump, who had pressed him to use the DOJ to attack the Biden family during his 2020 presidential campaign.[15]
The investigation was led by David Weiss, a Republican, and Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for the State of Delaware.
Biden administration
Weiss was asked to remain in his position in the Biden administration to continue the investigation.[16] Garland, the Biden administration's attorney general, said that Weiss had full independence amid claims by House Republicans of DOJ interference.[17] According to Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler—two Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblowers who testified to Congress—Weiss sought special counsel status, but his request was denied. Both Weiss and Garland denied these claims. Garland said that Weiss had "full authority" to bring cases.[18][19] In a July 10, 2023 letter to senator Lindsey Graham, Weiss wrote he had discussed with DOJ officials being given "special attorney" status that would allow him to file charges in any federal judicial district; that he was assured he would be granted such authority if it became necessary; and that he had "never been denied the authority to bring charges in any jurisdiction".[20] Garland said had Weiss requested special counsel status, his request would have been approved. He added that Weiss would have more power as a U.S. attorney than as special counsel.[21][22] According to a transcript obtained by news organizations, FBI agent Thomas Sobocinski, who since 2021 oversaw the investigation into Hunter Biden (as special agent in charge of the FBI's Baltimore field office), disputed Shapley and Ziegler's claims of political interference. In testimony to the House Judiciary Committee, Sobocinski contradicted Shapley's claim that Weiss had said in an October 2022 meeting that he was "not the deciding person on whether charges are filed"; Sobocinski, who attended the meeting, said Weiss never said such a thing, and "If he would have said that, I would have remembered it."[23][24] CBS News later obtained what Shapley said were his contemporaneous notes of the meeting in which Shapley wrote, "Weiss stated – He is not the deciding person".[25]
In October 2022, federal agents concluded that there was sufficient evidence to charge Biden with violations of law relating to his tax filings and the October 2018 gun purchase.[26] Specifically, by April 2023, prosecutors were considering bringing four charges: two misdemeanor counts for failure to file taxes, a single felony count of tax evasion, and a charge related to a gun purchase.[27]
Plea agreement negotiations, collapse, and subsequent plea
On June 20, 2023, Hunter Biden and prosecutors entered a plea agreement, agreeing to probation for filing his taxes late and entering into a diversion program on the gun charge in return for broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity for a range of matters being investigated by the Justice Department. According to the New York Times, judge Maryellen Noreika seemed skeptical about the deal and questioned why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When questioned, prosecutor Leo Wise acknowledged that there was no precedent for the kind of deal proposed.[28]
Hunter Biden's attorney said the agreement with prosecutors "resolved" the investigation, though Weiss prosecutors said the investigation was "ongoing". Prosecutors later explained that the "ongoing" aspect of the investigation referred to possible charges of failing to register as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).[29][30] Republicans asserted Biden received a "sweetheart deal" as the son of the president.[31][32] Legal experts said charges are rarely brought under circumstances such as Biden's.[33][34][35][36]
On July 26, Judge Maryellen Noreika declined to accept the deal, pending clarification of its terms by the parties.[37] House Republicans and conservative groups had sought to block the deal the previous day.[38] Biden attorneys asserted that the collapsed plea deal still gives him an immunity from prosecution on the felony gun charge. Prosecutors said that the agreement was never made valid.[39]
Special counsel and firearm indictment
On August 11, 2023, Garland appointed Weiss as special counsel.[22] The same day, Weiss filed a document stating negotiations had broken down.[22]
On September 14, 2023, Hunter Biden was indicted on three gun charges returned by a federal grand jury in Wilmington, Delaware. Two counts allege that Biden lied on his Form 4473 when he purchased a .38 caliberColt Cobra handgun in Delaware in 2018, by certifying on the form that he was not an unlawful user of, or addicted to, a controlled substance; the other count alleges possession of a firearm as a prohibited person (under federal law, addicts of controlled substances may not own firearms,[40][41][42] which was found to be unconstitutional by SCOTUS in Robinson v. California).[original research?] The three counts are felonies with a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison.[43] Biden purchased the gun during a period when he was struggling with cocaine addiction; he possessed the gun for about 11 days, from October 12 to October 23, 2018,[41][40] until Hallie Biden tossed the gun in a dumpster.[40] Hunter Biden never used the gun to commit a crime.[42] He has said that he has been sober since 2019.[40][42] The indictment charges Biden with violating the following laws:
18 U.S.C. §922(a)(6): It shall be unlawful…for any person in connection with the acquisition or attempted acquisition of any firearm or ammunition from a licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer, or licensed collector, knowingly to make any false or fictitious oral or written statement or to furnish or exhibit any false, fictitious, or misrepresented identification, intended or likely to deceive such importer, manufacturer, dealer, or collector with respect to any fact material to the lawfulness of the sale or other disposition of such firearm or ammunition under the provisions of this chapter;[44][45]
18 U.S.C. §922(g)(3): It shall be unlawful for any person…who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802))…to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.[44][45]
18 U.S.C. §924(a)(1)(A): …whoever knowingly makes any false statement or representation with respect to the information required by this chapter to be kept in the records of a person licensed under this chapter or in applying for any license or exemption or relief from disability under the provisions of this chapter…shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than five years, or both.[44][46]
ATF Form 4473, October 2016 revision
Question 11.e. on the form asked, "Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?"[47]
At his initial appearance and arraignment in Wilmington on October 3, 2023, Biden pleaded not guilty on all gun charges. His lawyers have said the statute he was charged under is unconstitutional.[48]
In November 2023, Hunter Biden's attorneys filed a motion for authorization to issue subpoenas for documents from Donald Trump, former Attorney General Bill Barr and other Department of Justice officials. Biden's attorneys contend that the documents that could be obtained by the subpoenas could support their theory that the charges are the result of a "selective or vindictive prosecution arising from an unrelenting pressure campaign beginning in the last administration."[49] Weiss opposed this request, denying that the prosecution is vindictive or selective, and arguing that these claims can only be raised during trial.[49]
In January 2024, prosecutors argued to maintain the gun charge, revealing that cocaine residue was found in Biden's gun pouch;[50] at the time of this report, it was again noted that possessing a gun while using illegal drugs is against the law.[51]
A final pre-trial hearing for Biden's firearm charges was held on May 24, 2024.[7][52] At the same time, it was stated that Biden's trial for these charges was set to begin June 3, 2024.[7][52] During the final hearing, Judge Maryellen Noreika ruled that prosecutors could not refer to his upcoming California tax trial, child support proceedings in Arkansas, his discharge from the Navy, or include a statement which Biden made at a July 2023 hearing where his plea deal collapsed.[52] However, the prosecution will be able to bring up Biden's drug use, portions of his memoir Beautiful Things, and a summary of data from his phone and iPad.[52]
The trial began in the District Court for the District of Delaware courthouse on June 3, 2024.[6][5][7] A jury of six men and six women was selected that day.[53][54] On June 4, opening statements were heard.[55] After opening statements concluded, FBI special agent Erika Jensen took the stand to testify as the prosecution's first witness.[55] Jensen During her testimony, Jensen noted passages from Hunter Biden's memoir where Biden acknowledged his addiction and crack smoking, with the jury also hearing passages from the memoir's audiobook.[55] Jensen also verified bank statements which were made from Hunter Biden's Wells Fargo account, indicating he made ATM withdraws in California and Washington D.C. in April 2019.[55] Between September and November 2018, Biden also made $151,640.45 in cash withdrawals.[55] Biden was also confirmed to have been in at a detox center in Southern California known as "The View" 40 days before he purchased the Colt Cobra revolver, even though he claimed on the ATF form which was used during the gun purchase that he was not using illegal drugs at the time of the purchase.[55] Hunter's laptop and iPad were also introduced as evidence, revealing, among other things, messages Hunter exchanged and a photo of what appeared to be cocaine.[55]
On June 5, Hunter Biden's ex-wife Kathleen Buhle, ex-girlfriend Zoe Kestan, and Gordon Cleveland, the gun retailer who sold Biden the Colt Cobra which was the subject of the trial, all testified.[56] Buhle testified that she did not become aware of Biden being a drug user until 2015.[56] Buhle testified she never saw Biden use drugs but learned about his drug use while in therapy and further stated that she would search his car before their daughters used it as he would leave drugs and drug paraphernalia in it.[56] Kestan, who at one point lived with Biden, testified that she saw Biden use crack when they first met in 2017 when she was a part-time stripper and that he was a drug addict throughout much of their relationship. She that she saw Biden smoking crack cocaine "every 20 minutes or so" in a Malibu home that he had rented in 2018. Kestan left Malibu around September 22 and 23 to head back to the East Coast.[56] Cleveland testified that Biden asked for a Colt revolver, even though he showed Biden some Rugers guns, and that he also saw Biden fill out the ATF form in question.[56] The gun was also introduced as evidence.[56] Cleveland stated that Biden purchased a box of hollow bullets, which Cleveland told Biden were better for self-defense.[56]
On June 6, Hunter's former lover and sister-in-law Hallie Biden testified. In her testimony, Hallie stated how she became a drug user after Hunter introduced her to drugs, but quit using them a couple of months before Hunter bought the gun.[57] She noted how she found crack and the gun in Hunter's truck and also tossed the gun in their trash can after putting it in a leather bag. It was also noted that Hunter did tell Delaware State Police that he bought the gun for target practice. Hallie also noted how she tried to track Hunter down in the days after he purchased the gun, and that he replied by claiming that he was waiting to meet a dealer and smoking crack on a car. A text from October 13, 2018, showed how Biden purchased drugs from a dealer who he described as "Mookie."[57][58]
Also on June 6, former Delaware State Police Lt. Millard Greer testified how he located the gun from the man who removed the from the trash can. It was acknowledged how Hallie discovered that the gun was missing. Delaware State Police officer Joshua Marley, who reported the gun, testified as well.[57] Edward Banner, the man who found the gun in the trash can while it was still in the leather pouch, would also testify.[59] On June 7, 2024, FBI forensic chemist James Brewer testified that cocaine residue was found the in leather pouch where the gun was kept; the defense previously argued in opening statements that it was unknown if the residue belonged to either Hunter or Hallie. The same day, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent Joshua Romig testified that Hunter Biden was using coded messages which were known for drugs and also how a photo on Hunter's electronic devices from April 2018 showed cocaine. In addition, Romig stated that several pictures from Hunter's devices showed what appeared to be a crack pipe with burnt marks.[60]
On June 7, the defense called its first witness, Jason Turner, who ran a background check and made sales for the store where the gun was purchased. Turner testified how he approved the background check which was required to sell Hunter the gun, noting the Hunter verified his address. Turner also noted how Hunter used his passport and vehicle registration as identification. Though he could show the form related to the passport, Hunter's lawyer Abbe Lowell was denied the option of also showing the second form related to the vehicle registration, as it was previously acknowledged to have been doctored during a pretrial hearing. Naomi Biden, Hunter Biden's daughter, also testified in her father's defense. Naomi testified how she visited her father when he was in rehabilitation in California during the summer of 2018. Naomi also stated that “I knew he was struggling with addiction,” though she never saw him use drugs, and stated that "things got bad after Hunter's brother Beau died in 2015. However, the prosecution was able to point out that Hunter Biden indicated in an October 2018 text message that he was avoiding his daughter when he went to New York to visit her. At one point during his time in New York, Hunter met in his hotel room with someone named "Frankie" and also gave this person the access key to his Wells Fargo account.[60]
On June 10, the prosecution and defense met with Judge Noreika before the jury's arrival to discuss finalizing jury instructions. During this time, Lowell indicated that Hunter Biden wouldn't testify. Following the conclusion of lawyer deliberations, the defense would rest their case without calling any further witnesses. In their rebuttal case, the prosecution would have Erika Jensen give further testimony. Following Jensen's testimony and defense cross-examination, Judge Noreika would begin reading the instructions to the jury. Noreika stated that she would read up to the part related to closing arguments. During closing arguments, the prosecution stated that evidence against Hunter Biden was "overwhelming" and ugly," noting how even his ex-girlfriend Zoe Kestan testified that she saw him use crack a little over two weeks before he purchased the gun. In the defense's closing argument, the prosecution's evidence was claimed to be "speculation or conjecture," with the defense placing more blame on the gun store.[61]
Following a rebuttal from the prosecution, jury instructions were completed. The jury then beginning deliberations. The jury concluded the first day of deliberations without a verdict being announced.[61] On the second day, the jury reached a verdict, finding Biden guilty of all charges.[62]
Tax indictment
On December 7, 2023, the special counsel indicted Biden on nine tax-related charges, including three felony and six misdemeanor offenses, alleging that Biden failed to pay $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019. Biden faced up to 17 years in prison if convicted.[63] On January 11, 2024, Biden pleaded not guilty to all tax evasion charges in a Los Angeles federal courthouse.[64]
Originally scheduled to start on June 20, 2024, the trial for these charges was postponed in May 2024 so it would begin on September 5, 2024.[65] The postponement came after an attorney for Hunter Biden claimed that the firearm charges trial made it so his defense didn't have time to prepare for the initial June 20 start date.[65] A pre-trial hearing which involved Biden's lawyers was held on August 21, 2024.[66]
Guilty plea
On September 5, 2024, Biden's defense lawyer Abbe Lowell revealed that Biden would instead plead to guilty to the charges he faced, a reversal from his initial not guilty plea.[67] It was not immediately made clear that Judge Mark C. Scarsi would accept this plea proposal, regarded as an Alford plea.[68] Under this plea agreement, Biden would've accepted a sentence and that there was enough evidence to convict him, but also maintain his innocence.[69][70]
Later in the day, it was reported that this plea offer would not be accepted by the prosecution.[71] Judge Scarsi would not accept the plea or call off the trial, but did not make a final ruling and instead opted to make a decision about the plea offer at a later time.[69][70][72] However, Scarsi would accept a guilty plea by the end of the day, with Biden pleading guilty to all nine charges.[73] During his plea hearing, Biden responded "Yes" after Scarsi asked him "Do you agree you committed every element of the charges in the indictment?"[73]
January 2024 Contempt of Congress recommendation and deposition agreement
On January 10, 2024, Biden and attorney Abbe Lowell made a surprise appearance at a House Oversight Committee meeting which had been convened to discuss possibly holding Biden in Contempt of Congress. Nancy Mace declared Biden "too afraid to show up for a deposition" with him present. Jared Moskowitz invited the committee to "take a vote", asking, "Who wants to hear from Hunter right now, today?"[74] The same day, the House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight Committee each voted to recommend a full House vote to hold Biden in contempt of Congress.[75] The House Judiciary Committee approved the recommendation to hold Biden in contempt by 23 to 14, followed by the House Oversight Committee with a vote of 25–21.[76] The Republican chairs released a report in which they said that Biden was in contempt.[76] On January 12, the House of Representatives agreed to hold a full vote on holding Biden in contempt the following week. The holding of contempt would have referred the matter to the Justice Department, which would have then decided whether to charge Biden with contempt.[77] On January 16, Republicans called off the full vote to allow more negotiations, and Biden agreed on January 18 to provide a closed-door deposition to the House Oversight Committee on February 28.[78] Biden would give a private deposition on the scheduled date.[79] Transcripts from his deposition would be made public on February 29, 2024.[80][81]
Indictment of ex-FBI informant
Weiss indicted Alexander Smirnov, a former FBI informant, on February 15, 2024. The indictment alleged Smirnov had fabricated his account of Burisma executives telling him that the company had hired Hunter Biden as a means of protecting the company through Joe Biden, and that both Bidens had been paid $5 million bribes to accomplish that. Smirnov's allegations played a key role in Biden corruption allegations made by the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee investigation of the Bidens that led to impeachment proceedings against the president.[82]
Responses and analysis
In an October 2022 interview with Jake Tapper following The Washington Post's reporting, Joe Biden said he had "great confidence" in his son.[83] Democrats have suggested that the investigation is irrelevant to swing voters.[84]
Senior House Republicans suggested the Weiss appointment was an effort to obstruct their investigation into the Biden family. House SpeakerKevin McCarthy suggested Weiss could not be trusted because he negotiated what Republicans called a "sweetheart deal" that was later rejected by a judge. Oversight Committee chairman James Comer said the appointment was "part of the Justice Department's efforts to attempt a Biden family coverup", while the spokesman for House Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Jordan said it was "just a new way to whitewash the Biden family's corruption".[85]
The gun charges brought against Hunter Biden are unusual as a standalone basis for a prosecution; most charges of lying on the background-check form or illegal weapon possession are brought against defendants charged with more serious underlying crimes.[42] Biden's defense attorney is Abbe Lowell. Upon his client's indictment in September 2023, Lowell said his client was being charged due to pressure from Republicans, saying: "Hunter Biden possessing an unloaded gun for 11 days was not a threat to public safety, but a prosecutor, with all the power imaginable, bending to political pressure presents a grave threat to our system of justice."[41] In a letter to the Republican chairs of the House committees scrutinizing Biden, Lowell wrote: "Mr. Biden was and will be charged for conduct no one else would be charged for because, as the President's son, he has been subject to your relentless efforts to inject partisan Republican politics into the process."[86] However, a report by the United States Sentencing Commission showed prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(3) constitute a significant percentage of federal firearm offenses.[87]
Notes
↑ Biden was found guilty in violation of 18 USC, Sections 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(2), 18 USC, Section 924(a)(1)(A), and 18 USC, Sections 922(g)(3) and 924(a)(2).
Related Research Articles
In the United States, a special counsel is a lawyer appointed to investigate, and potentially prosecute, a particular case of suspected wrongdoing for which a conflict of interest exists for the usual prosecuting authority. Other jurisdictions have similar systems. For example, the investigation of an allegation against a sitting president or attorney general might be handled by a special prosecutor rather than by an ordinary prosecutor who would otherwise be in the position of investigating his or her own superior. Special prosecutors also have handled investigations into those connected to the government but not in a position of direct authority over the Justice Department's prosecutors, such as cabinet secretaries or election campaigns.
Patrick J. Fitzgerald is an American lawyer and former partner at the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
Edward Robert Vrdolyak, also known as "Fast Eddie", is a former American politician and lawyer. He was a longtime Chicago alderman and the head of the Cook County Democratic Party until 1987 when he ran unsuccessfully for Mayor of Chicago on the Illinois Solidarity Party ticket. He subsequently ran again in 1989 on the Republican Party ticket. He was a prominent opponent of Harold Washington and the de facto leader of the so-called "Vrdolyak 29" that opposed and blocked many of Washington's measures.
John Henry Durham is an American lawyer who served as the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut from 2018 to 2021. By April 2019, the Trump administration assigned him to investigate the origins of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections, and in October 2020 he was appointed special counsel for the Department of Justice on that matter.
Robert Hunter Biden is an American attorney and businessman. He is the second son of U.S. President Joe Biden and his first wife, Neilia Hunter Biden. Biden was a founding board member of BHR Partners, a Chinese investment company, in 2013, and later served on the board of Burisma Holdings, one of the largest private natural gas producers in Ukraine, from 2014 until his term expired in April 2019. He has worked as a lobbyist and legal representative for lobbying firms, a hedge fund principal, and a venture capital and private equity fund investor.
Richard William Gates III is an American former political consultant and lobbyist who pleaded guilty to conspiracy against the United States for making false statements in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. He is a longtime business associate of Paul Manafort and served as deputy to Manafort when the latter was campaign manager of the Donald Trump presidential campaign in 2016, and after under Kellyanne Conway.
The two criminal trials of Paul Manafort were the first cases brought to trial by the special counsel's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Manafort served as campaign chair for the Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign from June 20 to August 19, 2016. In July 2017, the FBI conducted a raid of Manafort's home, authorized by search warrant under charges of interference in the 2016 election. Manafort and his business assistant Rick Gates were both indicted and arrested in October 2017 for charges of conspiracy against the United States, making false statements, money laundering, and failing to register as foreign agents for Ukraine. Gates entered a plea bargain in February 2018.
The Special Counsel investigation was a United States law enforcement and counterintelligence investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in United States politics and any possible involvement by members of the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. It was primarily focused on the 2016 presidential election.
David Michael Pascoe is an American lawyer serving as the First Circuit Solicitor in the state of South Carolina since 2005. The First Circuit comprises Dorchester, Calhoun, and Orangeburg counties. In 2016, Pascoe won a Supreme Court case against the South Carolina Attorney General where the Attorney General attempted to remove Pascoe as the special prosecutor in a corruption probe involving the General Assembly. Pascoe oversaw the investigation and secured convictions on five powerful South Carolina General Assembly members that included the House speaker, President Pro Tem of the Senate, Chairman of the House Judiciary, and two former House Majority Leaders.
The Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory is a series of false allegations that Joe Biden, while he was vice president of the United States, improperly withheld a loan guarantee and took a bribe to pressure Ukraine into firing prosecutor general Viktor Shokin to prevent a corruption investigation of Ukrainian gas company Burisma and to protect his son, Hunter Biden, who was on the Burisma board. As part of efforts by Donald Trump and his campaign in the Trump–Ukraine scandal, which led to Trump's first impeachment, these falsehoods were spread in an attempt to damage Joe Biden's reputation and chances during the 2020 presidential campaign, and later in an effort to impeach him.
Fani Taifa Willis is an American attorney. She is the district attorney of Fulton County, Georgia, which contains most of Atlanta, serving since 2021. She is the first woman to hold the office. Willis investigated the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, which resulted in indictments against Donald Trump and 18 alleged co-conspirators on charges of racketeering and other crimes. Willis also investigated and apprehended rapper Young Thug and members of his YSL record label on charges of racketeering and gang-related crimes in violation of Georgia's RICO Act.
Two related investigations by New York State and City officials were opened by 2020 to determine whether the Trump Organization has committed financial fraud. One of these is a criminal case being conducted by the Manhattan district attorney (DA) and the other is a civil case being conducted by the New York State Attorney General (AG). The DA's case has led to two of the organization's subsidiary companies being found guilty of 17 charges including tax fraud and the indictment of Donald Trump, while the AG has succeeded in imposing an independent monitor to prevent future fraud by the organization.
The Trump fake electors plot was a scheme to submit illegitimate certificates of ascertainment to falsely claim U.S. president Donald Trump had won the Electoral College vote in certain states, following Trump's loss in the 2020 United States presidential election. After the results of the 2020 election determined Trump had lost, the scheme was devised by him, his associates, and Republican Party officials in seven states, and it formed a part of Trump and his associates' attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election. The intent of the scheme was to pass the illegitimate certificates to then-vice president Mike Pence in the hope he would count them, rather than the authentic certificates, and thus overturn Joe Biden's victory. This scheme was defended by a fringe legal theory developed by Trump attorneys Kenneth Chesebro and John Eastman, detailed in the Eastman memos, which claimed a vice president has the constitutional discretion to swap official electors with an alternate slate during the certification process, thus changing the outcome of the electoral college vote and the overall winner of the presidential race. The scheme came to be known as the Pence Card. By June 2024, dozens of Republican state officials and Trump associates had been indicted in four states for their alleged involvement. The federal Smith special counsel investigation is investigating Trump's role in the events. According to testimony Trump was aware of the fake electors scheme, and knew that Eastman's plan for Pence to obstruct the certification of electoral votes was a violation of the Electoral Count Act.
The United States Justice Department investigation into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election began in early 2021 with investigations and prosecutions of hundreds of individuals who participated in the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol. By early 2022, the investigation had expanded to examine Donald Trump's inner circle, with the Justice Department impaneling several federal grand juries to investigate the attempts to overturn the election. Later in 2022, a special counsel was appointed. On August 1, 2023, Trump was indicted. The indictment also describes six alleged co-conspirators.
John Luman Smith is an American attorney who has served in the United States Department of Justice as an assistant U.S. attorney, acting U.S. attorney, and head of the department's Public Integrity Section. He was also the chief prosecutor at the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, an international tribunal at The Hague tasked with investigating and prosecuting war crimes in the Kosovo War.
Three days after Donald Trump announced his campaign for the 2024 United States presidential election, a special counsel investigation was opened by U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland on November 18, 2022, to continue two investigations initiated by the Justice Department (DOJ) regarding former U.S. President Donald Trump. Garland appointed Jack Smith, a longtime federal prosecutor, to lead the independent investigations. Smith was tasked with investigating Trump's role in the January 6 United States Capitol attack and Trump's mishandling of government records, including classified documents.
The United States House Oversight Committee investigation into the Biden family is an ongoing investigation since January 2023 by the United States House of Representatives into U.S. President Joe Biden and his family. The investigation was initiated on January 11, and includes examination of the foreign business activities of Biden's son, Hunter, and brother, James, as well as Twitter's involvement in the Hunter Biden laptop controversy.
In February 2021, Fulton County, Georgia, district attorney Fani Willis launched a criminal investigation into alleged efforts by then-president Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the certified 2020 election victory of Democratic candidate Joe Biden and award the state's electoral college votes to Trump. A special grand jury recommended indictments in January 2023, followed by a grand jury that indicted Trump and 18 allies in August 2023. The charges include conspiracy, racketeering and other felonies.
United States of America v. Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira is a federal criminal case against Donald Trump, the 45th president of the United States; Walt Nauta, his personal aide and valet; and Mar-a-Lago maintenance chief Carlos De Oliveira. The grand jury indictment brought 40 felony counts against Trump related to his alleged mishandling of classified documents after his presidency, to which he pleaded not guilty. The case marks the first federal indictment of a former U.S. president.
United States of America v. Donald J. Trump was a federal criminal case against Donald Trump, the president of the United States from 2017 to 2021, regarding his alleged participation in attempts to overturn the 2020 U.S. presidential election, including his involvement in the January6 Capitol attack.
References
↑ Luke Broadwater; Maggie Haberman (August 12, 2023). "Republicans Wanted a Special Counsel Investigation of Hunter Biden. Now Many Oppose It". The New York Times. But on Friday, after Mr. Garland elevated Mr. Weiss to special counsel status, Republicans in Congress reacted publicly not with triumph, but with outrage. "David Weiss can't be trusted and this is just a new way to whitewash the Biden family's corruption," Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee wrote on X,...
↑ Thrush, Glenn; Schmidt, Michael; Cameron, Chris (July 26, 2023). "Judge Delays Hunter Biden Plea Deal". The New York Times. Retrieved June 12, 2024. From the start, the judge seemed highly skeptical of the unusual deal — which offered Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, questioning why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When she asked Leo Wise, a prosecutor, if there was any precedent for the proposed deal, he replied, "No, your honor."
↑ Gurman, Sadie; Linskey, Annie; Tau, Byron (July 27, 2023). "Hunter Biden's Courtroom Reversal Extends His Legal Limbo, Political Exposure". Wall Street Journal. Washington, D.C. Retrieved July 28, 2023. In court on Wednesday, prosecutors said there was still the possibility of additional charges against the younger Biden under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires anyone acting on behalf of a foreign government to file reports on their activities with the Justice Department ... The judge asked if the continuing investigation could yield additional charges, such as violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. "Yes," prosecutor Leo Wise replied.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
