Diversion program

Last updated

A diversion program, also known as a pretrial diversion program or pretrial intervention program, in the criminal justice system is a form of pretrial sentencing that helps remedy the behavior leading to the arrest. Administered by the judicial or law enforcement systems, they often allow the offender to avoid conviction and include a rehabilitation program to prevent future criminal acts. Availability and the operation of such systems differ in different countries.

Contents

Operation and functions

A criminal justice diversion program deals mainly with first-time offenders, allowing them to avoid a criminal record by undertaking certain actions to benefit the offender, their victims, and the wider community. [1]

When a criminal offender joins a rehabilitation program to help remedy the behavior leading to the original arrest, it allows the offender to avoid conviction and, in some jurisdictions, avoid a criminal record. The programs are often run by a police department, court, district attorney's office, or outside agency. [2] Problem-solving courts typically include a diversion component as part of their program. The purposes of diversion are generally thought to include relief to the courts, police department, and probation office, better outcomes compared to the direct involvement of the court system, and an opportunity for the offender to avoid prosecution by completing various requirements for the program. [3] These requirements may include:

Diversion programs often frame these requirements as an alternative to court or police involvement or, if these institutions are already involved, further prosecution. Successful completion of program requirements often leads to a dismissal or reduction of the charges, while failure may bring back or heighten the penalties involved. Charges dismissed because of a diversion program will still lead to additional criminal history points under the US Sentencing Guidelines if there was a finding of guilt by a court or the defendant pleaded guilty or otherwise admitted guilt in open court, provided that the deferred disposition or deferred adjudication was not a juvenile matter. [4]

Diversion and juvenile justice

Juvenile diversion is based on the theory that processing certain youth through the juvenile justice system may do more harm than good. [5] Programs meant to divert juvenile delinquents are often fundamentally different from the programs intended for adults.[ citation needed ] Many times, youth will present with substance abuse and mental health issues, which may be the underlying causes of such delinquency.

A juvenile diversion program can be used as an intervention strategy for first-time offenders who have broken the law and found themselves in the juvenile justice system ("Juvenile Diversion Programs"). [6] There are many benefits to this program, including avoiding the child from being influenced by more severe criminals in a juvenile detention center; allowing the courts to use resources that are needed for those juvenile delinquents who are an actual threat to society; and getting the child help with drug addiction or family issues. [7]

By country

Australia

Australia has a federal system of government, in which the various states and territories have separate law enforcement agencies and judicial systems. [8] There have been court diversionary programs in operation since the late 20th century. They take different forms, and in the 21st century, they usually take the form of adjourning a criminal case by a magistrates court. At the same time, a defendant undertakes a rehabilitation program, often for substance abuse. Some programs may be undertaken before or after the determination of guilt, while others are only available after conviction and before sentencing. They are usually only available for people with little prior contact with the justice system and for minor offenses. [9]

Programs include those for people with disabilities or special needs; sex workers; homeless people; [9] or Indigenous Australians. Diversionary programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are operated by Koori Court in Victoria; [10] Youth Koori Court in New South Wales; [11] Aboriginal Community Court in Western Australia; [12] and, from 2002 to 2012, Murri Court in Queensland. [13]

Georgia

In the country of Georgia, diversion programs give a first-time offender juvenile a chance to avoid a criminal record and conviction in exchange for a commitment to comply with a specific set of requirements. [14] The purpose of the obligatory activities is to positively influence the offender and help them become a better citizen of society. [15]

A juvenile diversion and mediation program was initiated in 2010 as a pilot project to be implemented in four cities: Tbilisi, Rustavi, Batumi, and Kutaisi. [16] As Andro Gigauri, a high official at the Ministry of Justice of Georgia and the author of the program, anticipated, [17] in 2011, the diversion and mediation program expanded with the adoption of the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia. [18] Since 2013, the diversion program applies to all first-time offenders (without geographical limitations) who commit a non-violent crime, in cases where the alleged offender is up to 21 years old. Since 2015, the juvenile diversion and mediation program is also regulated under the Juvenile Justice Code of Georgia. [19]

Between 2010 and 2019, more than 4,000 juveniles benefited from the diversion and mediation program in Georgia, and only nine committed a repeated crime. [20]

The prosecuting attorney makes the decision on juvenile diversion. [21] A social worker is then assigned to the case to assess the biopsychosocial profile of the juvenile. [22] At the end of the assessment, the social worker recommends a set of requirements to be included in a diversion contract. [23] The mediation process begins with the victim's consent. [24] A neutral and independent mediator is assigned to the case. [25] The mediator's tasks are: facilitating dialogue between the offender and the victim; helping with the reconciliation process; and reaching an agreement on damage restitution. [26]

United Kingdom

Diversion can ensure that people with mental health problems who enter (or are at risk of entering) the criminal justice system are identified and provided with appropriate mental health services, treatment, and any other support they need. In the UK, the Centre for Mental Health has shown that such diversion represents good value for money, with well-designed interventions helping to reduce re-offending by a third. [27] The need for joined-up services was the focus of a Centre for Mental Health lecture in 2011, in which NHS Confederation chairman Sir Keith Pearson emphasized the need to use custody more effectively and divert those who need it into treatment. [28]

In February 2012, the UK government pledged to roll out a national liaison and diversion service by 2014, with 101 sites duly announced by the Department of Health. [29] Diversion has also been found to be a key element of a more practical approach for young adults in the criminal justice process. [30] A two-year UK pilot organized by the Centre for Mental Health, with support and funding from the Department of Health and the Youth Justice Board, looked into how to ensure that children and young people with mental health and other problems get the help they need as soon as they enter the youth justice system. [31]

United States

The availability of diversion programs depends on the jurisdiction, the nature of the crime (usually non-violent offenses), and, in many cases, the exercise of prosecutorial discretion. A 2016 New York Times investigation revealed that some prosecutors charged substantial fees for and received significant revenue from diversion programs. [32] Those fees can operate as a barrier to impecunious defendants accessing diversion. Pleading guilty is sometimes a prerequisite to accessing a diversion program. This means that if a defendant proceeds to a diversion program and then fails to pay the fee for the program, the defendant can be brought back to court and proceed directly to conviction and sentencing. [32]

Some jurisdictions in the United States may provide diversion programs for drunk driving charges. [33] One such program is the Victim Impact Panel (VIP), administered by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) since 1982. MADD typically charges a $25 "donation" (which is defined as voluntary), even for court-mandated attendance; MADD reported $2,657,293 one year for such donations on its nonprofit tax-exempt returns. [34]

In Florida, several counties offer a diversion program for veterans of the U.S. Armed Forces. Those who qualify and complete the program will have the criminal charge dismissed and can get the case expunged from their record. [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

A plea bargain is an agreement in criminal law proceedings, whereby the prosecutor provides a concession to the defendant in exchange for a plea of guilt or nolo contendere. This may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to a less serious charge, or to one of the several charges, in return for the dismissal of other charges; or it may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to the original criminal charge in return for a more lenient sentence.

Probation in criminal law is a period of supervision over an offender, ordered by the court often in lieu of incarceration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recidivism</span> Person repeating an undesirable behavior following punishment

Recidivism is the act of a person repeating an undesirable behavior after they have experienced negative consequences of that behavior, or have been trained to extinguish it. Recidivism is also used to refer to the percentage of former prisoners who are rearrested for a similar offense.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines</span> Rules for sentencing convicts in the U.S. federal courts system

The United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines are rules published by the U.S. Sentencing Commission that set out a uniform policy for sentencing individuals and organizations convicted of felonies and serious misdemeanors in the United States federal courts system. The Guidelines do not apply to less serious misdemeanors or infractions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Probation and parole officer</span> Officials who supervise the conduct of offenders on community supervision

A probation or parole officer is an official appointed or sworn to investigate, report on, and supervise the conduct of convicted offenders on probation or those released from incarceration to community supervision such as parole. Most probation and parole officers are employed by the government of the jurisdiction in which they operate, although some are employed by private companies that provide contracted services to the government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juvenile court</span> Court to try minors for legal offenses

Juvenile court, also known as young offender's court or children's court, is a tribunal having special authority to pass judgements for crimes committed by children who have not attained the age of majority. In most modern legal systems, children who commit a crime are treated differently from legal adults who have committed the same offense.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice system of Japan</span>

Within the criminal justice system of Japan, there exist three basic features that characterize its operations. First, the institutions—police, government prosecutors' offices, courts, and correctional organs—maintain close and cooperative relations with each other, consulting frequently on how best to accomplish the shared goals of limiting and controlling crime. Second, citizens are encouraged to assist in maintaining public order, and they participate extensively in crime prevention campaigns, apprehension of suspects, and offender rehabilitation programs. Finally, officials who administer criminal justice are allowed considerable discretion in dealing with offenders.

A teen court is a problem-solving court within the juvenile justice system where teens charged with certain types of offenses can be sentenced by a jury of same-aged peers. Their purpose is to provide an alternative disposition for juveniles who have committed a delinquent act, have committed a minor offense, or have been charged with a misdemeanor, and are otherwise eligible for diversion. Depending on their training, community support, and agreements with traditional court systems, most teen or youth courts are recognized as valid, legal venues for the process of hearing cases, sentencing and sentence fulfillment. Teen courts and their verdicts are not authorized by public law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American juvenile justice system</span> Aspect of American justice system

The American juvenile justice system is the primary system used to handle minors who are convicted of criminal offenses. The system is composed of a federal and many separate state, territorial, and local jurisdictions, with states and the federal government sharing sovereign police power under the common authority of the United States Constitution. The juvenile justice system intervenes in delinquent behavior through police, court, and correctional involvement, with the goal of rehabilitation. Youth and their guardians can face a variety of consequences including probation, community service, youth court, youth incarceration and alternative schooling. The juvenile justice system, similar to the adult system, operates from a belief that intervening early in delinquent behavior will deter adolescents from engaging in criminal behavior as adults.

Mental health courts link offenders who would ordinarily be prison-bound to long-term community-based treatment. They rely on mental health assessments, individualized treatment plans, and ongoing judicial monitoring to address both the mental health needs of offenders and public safety concerns of communities. Like other problem-solving courts such as drug courts, domestic violence courts, and community courts, mental health courts seek to address the underlying problems that contribute to criminal behavior.

A presentence investigation report (PSIR) is a legal document that presents the findings of an investigation into the "legal and social background" of a person convicted of a crime before sentencing to determine if there are extenuating circumstances which should influence the severity or leniency of a criminal sentence. The PSIR is a "critical" document prepared by a probation officer via a system of point allocation, so that it may serve as a charging document and exhibit for proving criminal conduct. The PSIR system is widely implemented today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth incarceration in the United States</span>

The United States incarcerates more of its youth than any other country in the world, through the juvenile courts and the adult criminal justice system, which reflects the larger trends in incarceration practices in the United States. In 2010, approximately 70,800 juveniles were incarcerated in youth detention facilities alone. As of 2006, approximately 500,000 youth were brought to detention centers in a given year. This data does not reflect juveniles tried as adults. As of 2013, around 40% were incarcerated in privatized, for-profit facilities.

Trial as an adult is a situation in which a juvenile offender is tried as if they were an adult, whereby they may receive a longer or more serious sentence than would otherwise be possible if they were charged as a juvenile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ginger Lerner-Wren</span> American judge

Judge Ginger Lerner-Wren is a county court judge in the Criminal Division of the 17th Judicial Circuit, Broward County, Florida. She is an adjunct professor, Nova Southeastern University, Criminal Justice Institute, Doctoral (On-line).

Bail in the United States refers to the practice of releasing suspects from custody before their hearing, on payment of bail, which is money or pledge of property to the court which may be refunded if suspects return to court for their trial. Bail practices in the United States vary from state to state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Incarceration prevention in the United States</span> Methods to reduce prison populations in America

Incarceration prevention refers to a variety of methods aimed at reducing prison populations and costs while fostering enhanced social structures. Due to the nature of incarceration in the United States today caused by issues leading to increased incarceration rates, there are methods aimed at preventing the incarceration of at-risk populations.

The Youth Koori Court (YKC) is a court tailored to the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people who engage with the criminal justice system in the state of New South Wales, Australia. It operates out of the Children's Court of New South Wales. The first such court was established in the western Sydney suburb of Parramatta in 2015, with another created in Surry Hills to serve the city of Sydney in early 2019, and the first regional YKC established in Dubbo in 2022. The YKC involves older members of the Aboriginal community to help the youths to engage with their culture, among other measures.

The Sequential Intercept Model clarifies five points at which standard processing of crimes can be intervened with community-based actions, so that individuals with mental and psychiatric disorders would not have to further penetrate the criminal justice system. By understanding and using the model, communities can develop a series of strategies to increase diversion of individuals with mental disorder from the criminal justice system and to help them receive proper community-based treatments.

The Nunga Court, also known as Aboriginal Sentencing Court, is a type of specialist community court for sentencing Aboriginal people in South Australia. Such courts exist at several locations throughout the state, as a sentencing option for eligible Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders who plead guilty of an offence.

The Code of Criminal Procedure, sometimes called the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1965 or the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1965, is an Act of the Texas State Legislature. The Act is a code of the law of criminal procedure of Texas.

References

  1. ↑ "Criminal Justice Diversion Program". Magistrates Court of Victoria, Australia. Archived from the original on September 14, 2009.
  2. ↑ "Diversion Program". Pueblo, Colorado. Pueblo County, Colorado. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
  3. 1 2 Diversion Archived 2012-02-23 at the Wayback Machine , The John Howard Society of Niagara, Canada. Accessed 2012-3-3.
  4. ↑ US Sentencing Guidelines, 4A1.2(f), 2011 revision; and see note 9: "Diversionary Dispositions.—Section 4A1.2(f) requires counting prior adult diversionary dispositions if they involved a judicial determination of guilt or an admission of guilt in open court. This reflects a policy that defendants who receive the benefit of a rehabilitative sentence and continue to commit crimes should not be treated with further leniency."
  5. ↑ Diversion Programs: An Overview, Juvenile Justice Bulletin September 1999, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs. Accessed 2012-3-3.
  6. ↑ "Juvenile Diversion Programs". www.crimesolutions.gov. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  7. ↑ Cocozza, Joseph J. "Diversion From the Juvenile Justice System: The Miami-Dade Juvenile Assessment Center Post-Arrest Diversion Program". Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection.
  8. ↑ "Jurisdiction and hierarchy of courts". State Library of NSW . May 11, 2017. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
  9. 1 2 "Court Diversion Programs". Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration . Retrieved July 24, 2022.
  10. ↑ Larsen, Ann-Claire; Milnes, Peter (2011). "A cautionary note on therapeutic jurisprudence for Aboriginal offenders". ELaw Journal: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law. 18 (1). Murdoch University: 1–27. Archived from the original on February 27, 2017. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
  11. ↑ "Youth Koori Court". Children's Court of New South Wales. August 13, 2020. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
  12. ↑ "Aboriginal Community Court". Department of the Attorney-General (WA). Archived from the original on August 29, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  13. ↑ "Qld Government announces closure of Murri courts program for Indigenous offenders". Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet. October 3, 2012. Retrieved July 24, 2022.
  14. ↑ "Juvenile Offender Will Have Chance to Expiate His/Her Crime". HUMANRIGHTS.GE. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  15. ↑ Ministry of Justice of Georgia. "CRIME & DIVERSION". Diversion. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  16. ↑ "Juvenile Offender Will Have Chance to Expiate His/Her Crime". HUMANRIGHTS.GE. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  17. ↑ "Diversion Program: Step One". Tabula. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  18. ↑ "საქართველოს სისხლის სამართლის საპროცესო კოდექსში ცვლილების შეტანის შესახებ". სსიპ ”საქართველოს საკანონმდებლო მაცნე”. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  19. ↑ "JUVENILE JUSTICE CODE". სსიპ ”საქართველოს საკანონმდებლო მაცნე”. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  20. ↑ "CRIME & DIVERSION". Diversion. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  21. ↑ "Juvenile Justice Code of Georgia". სსიპ "საქართველოს საკანონმდებლო მაცნე". Article 38.
  22. ↑ Ibid., Article 27
  23. ↑ Ibid.
  24. ↑ Ibid., Article 39
  25. ↑ Ministry of Justice of Georgia. "MEDIATION". Diversion. Retrieved February 13, 2020.
  26. ↑ Ibid.
  27. ↑ "Diversion: the business case for action" (PDF). Centre for Mental Health, Rethink and the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 3, 2013.
  28. ↑ Keith Pearson JP (February 15, 2011). "Mental Health, Criminal Justice and the Big Society: Everybody's Responsibility". Archived from the original on April 2, 2013.
  29. ↑ Burstow, Paul (January 12, 2012). "Health and Criminal Justice Liaison and Diversion Programme: Hansard Written Answers". TheyWorkForYou.
  30. ↑ "Diversion is a key element of a more practical approach for young adults in the criminal justice process". May 23, 2012. Archived from the original on December 31, 2012.
  31. ↑ "Young people in the criminal justice system". Archived from the original on September 11, 2010.
  32. 1 2 Dewan, Shaila; Lehren, Andrew W. (December 12, 2016). "After a Crime, the Price of a Second Chance". The New York Times. Retrieved January 1, 2017.
  33. ↑ "Misdmeanor/DUI Pretrial diversion Information" (PDF). Orange County Corrections Department. May 2015. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
  34. ↑ Overbey, Chris (January 2006). Drinking And Driving War in America. Lulu. pp. 45–46. ISBN   978-1-4116-7022-8.
  35. ↑ "Diversion Programs". Office of the State Attorney. Retrieved May 23, 2017.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.