| Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority | |
|---|---|
| Decided May 18, 2023 | |
| Full case name | Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority |
| Docket no. | 21-1454 |
| Citations | 598 U.S. ___ ( more ) |
| Holding | |
| The Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over a State National Guard labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for the purpose of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it hires and supervises dual-status technicians serving in their civilian role. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson |
| Dissent | Alito, joined by Gorsuch |
| Laws applied | |
| Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute | |
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over a state National Guard labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for the purpose of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it hires and supervises dual-status technicians serving in their civilian role. [1] [2]
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .