Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Decided May 18, 2023 | |
Full case name | Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority |
Docket no. | 21-1454 |
Citations | 598 U.S. ___ ( more ) |
Holding | |
The Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over a State National Guard labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for the purpose of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it hires and supervises dual-status technicians serving in their civilian role. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas |
Dissent | Alito, joined by Gorsuch |
Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over a state National Guard labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for the purpose of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it hires and supervises dual-status technicians serving in their civilian role. [1] [2]
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .