Ontario Fault Determination Rules

Last updated
Ontario Accident Fault Rules
Ontario in Canada 2.svg
Parliament of Ontario
  • R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 668: FAULT DETERMINATION RULES
Citation Visit Regulation
Territorial extent Ontario
Enacted by Parliament of Ontario
Effective December 31, 1990
Administered by Financial Services Commission of Ontario
Amends
October 17, 2018
Related legislation
Ontario Insurance Act
Summary
Regulate car accident fault in the province of Ontario
Keywords
Car accident, accident fault
Status: In force

The Ontario Fault Determination Rules (commonly known as the Fault Rules or FDR) is a regulation under the Ontario Insurance Act enacted by the Parliament of Ontario to judge driver responsibility after car accidents in Ontario. The Fault Rules say which driver was responsible for an accident. Accidents are either 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100% at fault. If the driver is from Ontario, the portion not at fault percentage is covered under Ontario's mandatory to buy Direct Compensation insurance, and the at fault portion is covered under the optional to buy Collision insurance.

Contents

A fault rating between 50–100% might affect the driver's and insurance policyholder's future risk factor and therefore future insurance rates. [1] Note auto claim's using Specified Perils/Comprehensive for events like theft, vandalism, or hail damage are not subject to a fault rule (but may affect insurance rates and coverage depending on policyholder's claim history).

The Fault Rules are for most every accident in Ontario. However, under some rare conditions the Fault Rules do not apply and accident responsibility is determined by car accident case law. Car accidents outside of Ontario are governed by the Provincial or State where it happened. Each respective regulation is similar to these Fault Rules, but differences do exist, see the correct jurisdiction's fault rules for their details.

Basic Rules

The Fault Rules have several basic conditions. These conditions specify that insurance companies have to use them when determining fault, and that circumstances like weather or road conditions do not matter when determining which driver was responsible.

The conditions are:

RuleSection
Insurance companies determine fault, through direct or indirection action of its insured persons, using the fault rules.2.1 [2]
Fault is determined without caring about the circumstances, including the weather conditions, the road conditions, visibility, or actions of pedestrians.3.a [3]
Location of the damage on a car, isn't evidence of what happened at the accident.3.b [4]

Evidence

Determining car accident fault requires knowing what happened at the accident. Re-creating an accident can be difficult. To deal with this most fault rules have a version for knowing the details of the accident, and not knowing (ex. accidents in the middle of an all-way stop).

The following are the ways accident details are collected.

  • Driver accounts to either an insurance adjuster or police officer.
  • Independent witnesses.
  • On site police reports (if the police say for sure what happened).
  • Dashboard camera video.

How much at fault

A car accident can have one or several Fault Rules that apply. If an accident has only one Fault Rule, then the one rule's rating puts each driver 0–100% at fault.

If there are several rules that apply then the rules below apply too.

RuleSection
If multiple rules apply to an insured person, then the one that gives the least fault is used.4.1 [5]
However, despite 4.1, if each insured driver breaks a fault rule so each driver is both 0% at fault, and 100% at fault, then each driver is 50% at fault4.2 [6]

What if no Fault Rule applies

There are some rare accidents when no fault rule can apply.
If that happens then these rules apply:
RuleSection
If an incident is not described in any of the Fault Rules, then an insured driver is judged according to the ordinary rules of the road (case law).5.1 [7]
If there isn't enough information to know what happened, then the insured driver is judged according to the case law.5.2 [8]

The Fault Rules

The below sections are the actual Fault Rules. Each is divided into sections describing where the two (or more) cars are relative to each other.

Rear End

Rule"A""B"Section
Section 6.x applies when automobile "A" is struck from the rear by "B"

and both vehicle's are in the same lane, going in the same direction.

n/an/a6.1 [9]

Rule 6.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If driver "A" is stopped or in forward motion, and is rear ended by driver "B".0%100%6.2 [10]
Ontario fdr 6 2 ex1.gif

Rule 6.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If "A" is turning, either right or left, to enter a private road or driveway.0%100%6.3 [11]

Rule 6.4

Rule"A""B"Section
If "A" is going forward, and entering a road side parking place.0%100%6.4 [12]
Ontario fdr 6 4 ex1.gif

Entering a roadway

Rule"A""B"Section
Section 7 applies when "B" is entering a road from a parking

place, private road, or driveway.

n/an/a7.1 [13]

Rule 7.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If accident happens when "B" is leaving a parking place while "A" is passing it.0%100%7.2 [14]
Ontario fdr 7 2 ex1.gif

Rule 7.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If accident happens when "B" entering the roadway from a private road or driveway "A" is passing it, and there are no traffic controls.0%100%7.3 [15]
Ontario fdr 7 3 ex1.gif

Entering from On Ramp

Rule 8

Rule"A""B"Section
If accident happens when "B" entering the roadway from an on-ramp.0%100%8.0 [16]
Ontario fdr 8 ex1.gif

Multi Car Rear End - Chain Reaction

Rule"A""B""C"Section
Section 9.x applies when more than two cars are in a rear end accident.n/an/an/a9.1 [17]
Fault is only between cars that touch.n/an/an/a9.2 [18]

Rule 9.3 a-b

Rule"A""B""C"Section
If all vehicles are in motion, and "A" is lead, "B" is middle and "C" is last.n/an/an/a9.3 [19]
In collision between "A" and "B".0%50%n/a9.3.a [20]
In collision between "B" and "C".n/a0%100%9.3.b [21]
Ontario fdr 9 3 ex1.gif

Rule 9.4 a-b

Rule"A""B""C"Section
If only "C" vehicle is in motion when collision happensn/an/an/a9.4 [22]
In collision between "A" and "B".0%0%n/a9.4.a [23]
In collision between "B" and "C".n/a0%100%9.4.b [24]
Ontario fdr 9 4 ex1.gif

Sideswipes

Rule"A""B"Section
This rule applies when "A" and "B" collide and are going the same direction, and in adjacent lanes.n/an/a10.1 [25]

Rule 10.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If neither "A" or "B" change lanes, and both are on or over the centre line when sideswipe happens.50%50%10.2 [26]
Ont fdr 10 2 ex1.gif

Rule 10.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If the location of "A" or "B" cannot be confirmed when sideswipe happens.50%50%10.3 [27]
Ont fdr 10 3 ex1.gif

Rule 10.4

Rule"A""B"Section
If the collision happens when "B" is changing lanes.0%100%10.4 [28]

Rule 10.5

Rule"A""B"Section
If the collision happens when "A" is turning left at an intersection and "B" is overtaking "A" to pass it.25%75%10.5 [29]
Ont fdr 10 5 ex1.gif

Rule 10.6

Rule"A""B"Section
If the collision happens when "A" is turning left at a private road or driveway and "B" is overtaking "A" to pass it.50%50%10.6 [30]
Ont fdr 10 6 ex1.gif

Rule 10.7

Rule"A""B"Section
If the collision happens when "A" is turning left at a private road or driveway and "B" is passing several other cars stopped behind "A" to pass it.0%100%10.7 [31]
Ont fdr 10 7 ex1.gif

Pile Ups

Rule"A""B""C"Section
This rule applies when three or more vehicles are going in the same direction but adjacent lanes.n/an/an/a11.1 [32]

Rule 11.2

Rule"A""B""C"Section
For each collision between two automobiles involved in a pile-up.50%50%50%11.2 [33]
IMAGE

Sideswipe - Opposite Directions

Rule"A""B"Section
This rule applies when "A" and "B" collide and they are going

towards each other, and in adjacent lanes.

n/an/a12.1 [34]

Rule 12.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If neither "A" or "B" changes lanes and both are on or over the centre lane when sideswipe happens.50%50%12.2 [35]
Ont fdr 12 2 ex1.gif

Rule 12.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If the location of "A" and "B"cannot be determined when the sideswipe happens50%50%12.3 [36]
Ont fdr 12 3 ex1.gif

Rule 12.4

Rule"A""B"Section
If the automobile "B"is over the centre line when the collision happens.0%100%12.4 [37]
Ont fdr 12 4 ex1.gif

Rule 12.5

Rule"A""B"Section
If the automobile "B"turns left into the path of "A"0%100%12.5 [38]
Ont fdr 12 5 1 ex1.gif  :: Ont fdr 12 5 ex2.gif

Rule 12.6

Rule"A""B"Section
If the automobile "B"is leaving a parking place or is entering the road from a private road or driveway, and "A" is overtaking to pass another vehicle when the collision happens.0%100%12.6 [39]
Ont fdr 12 6 ex1.gif

Intersection with no traffic controls

Rule"A""B"Section
Rules 13.x apply to accidents that happen at an intersection with no traffic controls (ex. no stop signs, yield signs, or traffic lights).n/an/a13.1 [40]

Rule 13.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If the automobile "A" enters the intersection first.0%100%13.2 [41]
Ontario fdr 13 2.gif

Rule 13.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If automobile "A" and "B" enter at the same time, and "A" is to the right.0%100%13.3 [42]
Ontario fdr 13 3.gif

Rule 13.4

Rule"A""B"Section
If it can't be established who entered the intersection first.50%50%13.4 [43]
Ontario fdr 13 4.gif

Intersection with traffic signs

Rule"A""B"Section
Rules 14.x apply to accidents that happen at an intersection with traffic signs (ex. stop or yield signs).n/an/a14.1 [44]

Rule 14.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If collision happens because automobile "B" doesn't obey the stop sign.0%100%14.2 [45]
Ontario fdr 14 2.gif

Rule 14.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If "A" and "B" both fail to obey the stop sign.50%50%14.3 [46]
Ontario fdr 14 3.gif

Rule 14.4

Rule"A""B"Section
If it cannot be established who didn't stop at the stop sign.50%50%14.4 [47]
Ontario fdr 14 4.gif

Rule 14.5

Rule"A""B"Section
If at an all-way stop sign "A" arrives first and stops.0%100%14.5 [48]
Ontario fdr 14 5.gif

Rule 14.6

Rule"A""B"Section
If at an all-way stop sign "A" and "B" arrive at the same time and stop, but "A" is to the right.0%100%14.6 [49]
Ontario fdr 14 6.gif

Rule 14.7

Rule"A""B"Section
If it cannot be established who arrived at the stop sign first.50%50%14.7 [50]
Ontario fdr 14 7.gif

Intersection with traffic signals

Rule"A""B"Section
Rules 15.x apply to accidents that happen at an intersection with traffic signals.n/an/a15.1 [51]

Rule 15.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If the automobile "B" fails to obey a traffic signal.0%100%15.2 [52]
Ontario fdr 15 2.gif

Rule 15.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If it can't be established who disobey the traffic signal.50%50%15.3 [53]
Ontario fdr 15 3.gif

Rule 15.4

Rule"A""B"Section
If the traffic signs don't work, then the intersection is treated like an all-way stop.n/an/a15.4 [54]
There is no graphic for this rule.

Parking lots

Rule"A""B"Section
Rules 16.x apply to accidents in a parking lot.n/an/a16.1 [55]

Who Has Right of Way in Parking Lots

Rule"A""B"Section
Thoroughfare means a road for passing into, through, or out of a parking lot. Drivers on a thoroughfare have 1st priority.n/an/a16.5 [56]
Feeder lane means a road in a parking lot that isn't a thoroughfare.n/an/a16.5 [57]

Rule 16.3

Rule"A""B"Section
If automobile "A" is leaving a feeder lane, and doesn't yield to automobile "B" who is on a thoroughfare.100%0%16.3 [58]
Ontario fdr 16 3.gif

Rule 16.4

Rule"B""A"Section
If automobile "B" is leaving a parking space, and doesn't yield to automobile "A" who is on a feeder lane or thoroughfare.100%0%16.4 [59]
Ontario fdr 16 4 ex1.gif  :: Ontario fdr 16 4 ex2.gif

Parked Car

Rule 17.1

Rule"A""B"Section
If automobile "B" is parked when hit by automobile "A".100%0%17.1 [60]
Ontario fdr 17 1 ex1.gif

Rule 17.2

Rule"A""B"Section
If automobile "A" is illegally parked, or stopped when hit by "B" and the accident happens outside a city, town, or village.100%0%17.2 [61]
There is no graphic for this rule.

Rule 18 a-d

Rule"A""B"Section
If the accident happens because driver "A" fails to obey:
  • a. Police officer's direction.
  • b. Do not enter sign.
  • c. Do not pass sign.
  • d. Do not turn sign.
100%0%18 a-d [62]
There are no graphics for these rules.

Rule 19 a

Rule"A""B"Section
If driver "A" was reversing or backing up.100%0%19.a [63]
Ontario fdr 19 a ex1.gif

Rule 19 b

Rule"A""B"Section
If driver "A" was making a U-turn.100%0%19.b [64]
Ontario fdr 19 b ex1.gif

Rule 19 c

Rule"A""B"Section
If driver "A", or a passenger in "A", opens or leaves a door open.100%0%19.c [65]
Ontario fdr 19 c ex1.gif

Driving Offences

RuleSection
For the purpose of the Fault Rules, a driver is considered to be charged with a driver offence.20.1 [66]
If, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with operating the automobile while his or her ability to operate the automobile was impaired by alcohol or a drug.20.1 a [67]
If, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with driving while his or her blood alcohol level exceeded the limits permitted by law.20.1 b [68]
If, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with an indictable offence related to the operation of the automobile20.1 c [69]
If the driver, as a result of the incident, is asked to provide a breath sample and he or she is charged with failing or refusing to provide the sample.20.1 d [70]
If the driver, as a result of the incident, is asked to perform physical coordination tests or submit to an evaluation and he or she is charged with failing or refusing to comply with the demand20.1 e [71]
if, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with exceeding the speed limit by 16 or more kilometres per hour.20.1 f [72]

How Driving Offences Change Fault

RuleSection
The degree of fault of the insured shall be determined in accordance with the ordinary rules of law, and not in accordance with these rules20.2 [73]
If the driver of automobile “A” involved in the incident is charged with a driving offence; and20.2 a [74]
If the driver of automobile “B” is wholly or partly at fault, as otherwise determined under these rules, for the incident.20.2 b [75]

Notes

  1. "Law Document English View". Ontario.ca. 2014-07-24. Retrieved 2022-01-18.
  2. FDR S. 2.1 "An insurer shall determine the degree of fault of its insured for loss or damage arising directly or indirectly from the use or operation of an automobile in accordance with these rules.".
  3. FDR S. 3.a "The degree of fault of an insured is determined without reference to, (a) the circumstances in which the incident occurs, including weather conditions, road conditions, visibility or the actions of pedestrians.".
  4. FDR S. 3.b "The degree of fault of an insured is determined without reference to, (b) the location on the insured’s automobile of the point of contact with any other automobile involved in the incident.".
  5. FDR S.4 (1) "If more than one rule applies with respect to the insured, the rule that attributes the least degree of fault to the insured shall be deemed to be the only rule that applies in the circumstances.".
  6. FDR S.4 (2) "Despite subsection (1), if two rules apply with respect to an incident involving two automobiles and if under one rule the insured is 100 per cent at fault and under the other the insured is not at fault for the incident, the insured shall be deemed to be 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  7. FDR S. 5 (1) "If an incident is not described in any of these rules, the degree of fault of the insured shall be determined in accordance with the ordinary rules of law.".
  8. FDR S. 5 (2) "If there is insufficient information concerning an incident to determine the degree of fault of the insured, it shall be determined in accordance with the ordinary rules of law unless otherwise required by these rules.".
  9. FDR. S. 6.1 "This section applies when automobile “A” is struck from the rear by automobile “B”, and both automobiles are travelling in the same direction and in the same lane.".
  10. FDR. S. 6.2 "If automobile “A” is stopped or is in forward motion, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  11. FDR. S. 6.3 "B hit A in rear – Insd turning right or left to road or drive, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  12. FDR. S. 6.4 "If automobile “A” is in forward motion and is entering a parking place on either the right or the left side of the road, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  13. FDR. S. 7 (1). "This section applies when automobile “A” collides with automobile “B” while automobile “B” is entering a road from a parking place, private road or driveway.".
  14. FDR. S. 7 (2). "This section applies when automobile “A” collides with automobile “B”, and both automobiles are travelling in the same direction and in adjacent lanes.".
  15. FDR. S. 7 (3). "If the incident occurs when automobile “B” is entering a road from a private road or a driveway and automobile “A” is passing the private road or driveway and, if there are no traffic signals or signs, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  16. FDR. S. 8. "If automobile “A” collides with automobile “B” on a controlled access road while automobile “B” is entering the road from an entrance lane, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  17. FDR. S. 9 (1). "This section applies with respect to an incident involving three or more automobiles that are travelling in the same direction and in the same lane (a “chain reaction”).".
  18. FDR. S. 9 (2). "The degree of fault for each collision between two automobiles involved in the chain reaction is determined without reference to any related collisions involving either of the automobiles and another automobile.".
  19. FDR S. 9 (3). "If all automobiles involved in the incident are in motion and automobile “A” is the leading vehicle, automobile “B” is second and automobile “C” is the third vehicle.".
  20. FDR S. 9 (3)(a). "In the collision between automobiles “A” and “B”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  21. FDR S. 9 (3)(b). "In the collision between automobiles “B” and “C”, the driver of automobile “B” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “C” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  22. FDR S. 9 (4). "If only automobile “C” is in motion when the incident occurs.".
  23. FDR S. 9 (4)(a). "In the collision between automobiles “A” and “B”, neither driver is at fault for the incident".
  24. FDR S. 9 (4)(b). "In the collision between automobiles “B” and “C”, the driver of automobile “B” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “C” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  25. FDR. S. 10 (1). "This section applies when automobile “A” collides with automobile “B”, and both automobiles are travelling in the same direction and in adjacent lanes.".
  26. FDR. S. 10 (2). "If neither automobile “A” nor automobile “B” changes lanes, and both automobiles are on or over the centre line when the incident (a “sideswipe”) occurs, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  27. FDR. S. 10 (3). "If the location on the road of automobiles “A” and “B” when the incident (a “sideswipe”) occurs cannot be determined, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  28. FDR. S. 10 (4). "If the incident occurs when automobile “B” is changing lanes, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  29. FDR. S. 10 (5). "If the incident occurs when automobile “A” is turning left at an intersection and automobile “B” is overtaking automobile “A” to pass it, the driver of automobile “A” is 25 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 75 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  30. FDR. S. 10 (6). "If the incident occurs when automobile “A” is turning left at a private road or a driveway and automobile “B” is overtaking automobile “A” to pass it, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  31. FDR. S. 10 (7). "If the incident occurs when automobile “A” is turning left at a private road or a driveway and automobile “B” is passing one or more automobiles stopped behind automobile “A”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  32. FDR. S. 11 (1). "This section applies with respect to an incident involving three or more automobiles that are travelling in the same direction and in adjacent lanes (a “pile-up”).".
  33. FDR. S. 11 (2). "For each collision between two automobiles involved in the pile-up, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  34. FDR S. 12 (1). "This section applies when automobile “A” collides with automobile “B”, and the automobiles are travelling in opposite directions and in adjacent lanes.
  35. FDR S. 12 (2). "If neither automobile “A” nor automobile “B” changes lanes and both automobiles are on or over the centre lane when the incident (a “sideswipe”) occurs, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.
  36. FDR S. 12 (3). "If the location on the road of automobiles “A” and “B” when the incident (a “sideswipe”) occurs cannot be determined, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.
  37. FDR S. 12 (4). "If automobile “B” is over the centre line of the road when the incident occurs, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
  38. FDR S. 12 (5). "If automobile “B” turns left into the path of automobile “A”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
  39. FDR S. 12 (6). "If automobile “B” is leaving a parking place or is entering the road from a private road or driveway, and if automobile “A” is overtaking to pass another automobile when the incident occurs, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
  40. FDR S. 13 (1). "This section applies with respect to an incident that occurs at an intersection that does not have traffic signals or traffic signs.".
  41. FDR S. 13 (2). "If automobile “A” enters the intersection before automobile “B”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  42. FDR S. 13 (3). "If automobiles “A” and “B” enter the intersection at the same time and automobile “A” is to the right of automobile “B” when in the intersection, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  43. FDR S. 13 (4). "If it cannot be established whether automobile “A” or “B” entered the intersection first, the driver of each automobile shall be deemed to be 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  44. FDR S. 14 (1). "This section applies with respect to an incident that occurs at an intersection with traffic signs.
  45. FDR S. 14 (2). "If the incident occurs when the driver of automobile “B” fails to obey a stop sign, yield sign or a similar sign or flares or other signals on the ground, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
  46. FDR S. 14 (2). "If the driver of each automobile fails to obey a stop sign, the driver of each automobile is 50 per cent at fault for the incident.
  47. FDR S. 14 (4). "If it cannot be established who failed to obey a stop sign, the driver of each automobile shall be deemed to be 50 per cent at fault for the incident.
  48. FDR S. 14 (5). "If, at an all-way stop intersection, automobile “A” arrives at the intersection first and stops, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
  49. FDR S. 14 (5). "If, at an all-way stop intersection, both automobiles arrive at the intersection at the same time and stop, with automobile “A” to the right of automobile “B”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.
  50. FDR S. 14 (7). "If it cannot be established who arrived at the all-way stop intersection first, the driver of each automobile shall be deemed to be 50 per cent at fault for the incident.
  51. FDR S. 15 (1). "This section applies with respect to an incident that occurs at an intersection with traffic signals.".
  52. FDR S. 15 (2). "If the driver of automobile “B” fails to obey a traffic signal, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  53. FDR S. 15 (3). "If it cannot be established whether the driver of either automobile failed to obey a traffic signal, the driver of each automobile shall be deemed to be 50 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  54. FDR S. 15 (4). "If the traffic signals at the intersection are inoperative, the degree of fault of the drivers shall be determined as if the intersection were an all-way stop intersection.".
  55. FDR S. 16 (1). "This section applies with respect to incidents in parking lots.".
  56. FDR S. 16 (5). "In this section, “thoroughfare” means a main road for passage into, through or out of a parking lot.".
  57. FDR S. 16 (5). "In this section, “feeder lane” means a road in a parking lot other than a thoroughfare.".
  58. FDR S. 16 (3). "If automobile “A” is leaving a feeder lane and fails to yield the right of way to automobile “B” on a thoroughfare, the driver of automobile “A” is 100 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is not at fault for the incident.".
  59. FDR S. 16 (4). "If automobile “B” is leaving a parking space and fails to yield the right of way to automobile “A” on a feeder lane or a thoroughfare, the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault for the incident.".
  60. FDR S. 17 (1). "If automobile “A” is parked when it is struck by automobile “B”, the driver of automobile “A” is not at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is 100 per cent at fault for the incident.".
  61. FDR S. 17 (2). "If automobile “A” is illegally parked, stopped or standing when it is struck by automobile “B” and if the incident occurs outside a city, town or village, the driver of automobile “A” is 100 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is not at fault for the incident.".
  62. FDR S. 18 (a-d)). "The driver of automobile “A” is 100 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is not at fault for an incident in which automobile “A” collides with automobile “B” when the driver of automobile “A” fails to obey; (a) a police officer’s direction; (b) a do not enter sign; (c) a prohibited passing sign; or (d) a prohibited turn sign.".
  63. FDR S. 19 (a). "The driver of automobile “A” is 100 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is not at fault for an incident that occurs, (a) when automobile “A” is backing up;".
  64. FDR S. 19 (b). "The driver of automobile “A” is 100 per cent at fault and the driver of automobile “B” is not at fault for an incident that occurs, (b) when automobile “A” is making a U-turn.".
  65. FDR S. 19 (b). "when the driver of, or a passenger in, automobile “A” opens the automobile door or leaves the door open.".
  66. FDR S. 20 (1). "For the purposes of this Regulation, a driver is considered to be charged with a driving offence.".
  67. FDR S. 20 (1)(a). "if, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with operating the automobile while his or her ability to operate the automobile was impaired by alcohol or a drug.".
  68. FDR S. 20 (1)(b). "if, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with driving while his or her blood alcohol level exceeded the limits permitted by law;".
  69. FDR S. 20 (1)(c). "if, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with an indictable offence related to the operation of the automobile;".
  70. FDR S. 20 (1)(d). "if the driver, as a result of the incident, is asked to provide a breath sample and he or she is charged with failing or refusing to provide the sample;".
  71. FDR S. 20 (1)(e). "if, as a result of the incident, the driver is charged with exceeding the speed limit by sixteen or more kilometres per hour.".
  72. "FDR S. 20 (1)(f)". Ontario.ca. 2014-07-24. Retrieved 2022-01-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  73. FDR S. 20 (2). "The degree of fault of the insured shall be determined in accordance with the ordinary rules of law, and not in accordance with these rules,".
  74. FDR S. 20 (2)(a). "if the driver of automobile “A” involved in the incident is charged with a driving offence; and".
  75. FDR S. 20 (2)(b). "if the driver of automobile “B” is wholly or partly at fault, as otherwise determined under these rules, for the incident.".

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Traffic</span> Phenomenon of movement by humans on foot or using vehicles

Traffic comprises pedestrians, vehicles, ridden or herded animals, trains, and other conveyances that use public ways (roads) for travel and transportation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Speed limit</span> Maximum legal speed of vehicles

Speed limits on road traffic, as used in most countries, set the legal maximum speed at which vehicles may travel on a given stretch of road. Speed limits are generally indicated on a traffic sign reflecting the maximum permitted speed, expressed as kilometres per hour (km/h) or miles per hour (mph) or both. Speed limits are commonly set by the legislative bodies of national or provincial governments and enforced by national or regional police and judicial authorities. Speed limits may also be variable, or in some places nonexistent, such as on most of the Autobahnen in Germany.

Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure used to relate the quality of motor vehicle traffic service. LOS is used to analyze roadways and intersections by categorizing traffic flow and assigning quality levels of traffic based on performance measure like vehicle speed, density, congestion, etc. In a more general sense, levels of service can apply to all services in asset management domain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jaywalking</span> Pedestrian crossing of a carriageway outside of a crosswalk

Jaywalking is the act of pedestrians walking in or crossing a roadway that has traffic if that act contravenes traffic regulations. The term originated in the United States as a derivation of the phrase jay-drivers, people who drove horse-drawn carriages and automobiles on the wrong side of the road, before taking its current meaning. Jaywalking was coined as the automobile arrived in the street in the context of the conflict between pedestrian and automobiles, more specifically the nascent automobile industry.

Vehicle insurance is insurance for cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other road vehicles. Its primary use is to provide financial protection against physical damage or bodily injury resulting from traffic collisions and against liability that could also arise from incidents in a vehicle. Vehicle insurance may additionally offer financial protection against theft of the vehicle, and against damage to the vehicle sustained from events other than traffic collisions, such as keying, weather or natural disasters, and damage sustained by colliding with stationary objects. The specific terms of vehicle insurance vary with legal regulations in each region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dual carriageway</span> Type of road

A dual carriageway (BrE) or a divided highway (AmE) is a class of highway with carriageways for traffic travelling in opposite directions separated by a central reservation (BrE) or median (AmE). Roads with two or more carriageways which are designed to higher standards with controlled access are generally classed as motorways, freeways, etc., rather than dual carriageways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bicycle law in California</span>

Bicycle law in California is the parts of the California Vehicle Code that set out the law for persons cycling in California, and a subset of bicycle law in the United States. In general, pretty much all the same rights and responsibilities that apply to car drivers apply to bicycle riders as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bicycle safety</span> Safety practices to reduce risk associated with cycling

Bicycle safety is the use of road traffic safety practices to reduce risk associated with cycling. Risk can be defined as the number of incidents occurring for a given amount of cycling. Some of this subject matter is hotly debated: for example, which types of cycling environment or cycling infrastructure is safest for cyclists. The merits of obeying the traffic laws and using bicycle lighting at night are less controversial. Wearing a bicycle helmet may reduce the chance of head injury in the event of a crash.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turn on red</span> Traffic principle

Turn on red is a principle of law permitting vehicles at a traffic light showing a red signal to turn into the direction of traffic nearer to them when the way is clear, without having to wait for a green signal. North American traffic engineers first introduced this rule as a fuel savings measure, despite detrimental effects to the safety of pedestrians.

Many countries have adopted a penalty point or demerit point system under which a person’s driving license is revoked or suspended based on the number of points they’ve accumulated over a specific period of time, points are given for traffic offenses or infringements committed by them in that period. The demerit points schemes of each jurisdiction varies. These demerit schemes are usually in addition to fines or other penalties which may be imposed for a particular offence or infringement, or after a prescribed number of points have been accumulated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insurance Corporation of British Columbia</span> Provincial crown corporation in British Columbia

The Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC) is a provincial Crown corporation in British Columbia providing insurance. ICBC was created in 1973 by the NDP government of Premier Dave Barrett.

Priority to the right is a right-of-way system, in which the driver of a vehicle is required to give way to vehicles approaching from the right at intersections. The system is stipulated in Article 18.4.a of the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic for countries where traffic keeps to the right and applies to all situations where it is not overridden by priority signs, including side roads and roundabouts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">All-way stop</span> Road intersection with stop signs on all approaches

An all-way stop – also known as a four-way stop – is a traffic management system which requires vehicles on all the approaches to a road intersection to stop at the intersection before proceeding through it. Designed for use at low traffic-volume locations, the arrangement is common in the United States, Canada, Mexico, South Africa, and Liberia, as well as in a number of, usually rural, locations in Australia where visibility on the junction approaches is particularly poor. The stop signs at such intersections may be supplemented with additional plates stating the number of approaches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geometric design of roads</span> Geometry of road design

The geometric design of roads is the branch of highway engineering concerned with the positioning of the physical elements of the roadway according to standards and constraints. The basic objectives in geometric design are to optimize efficiency and safety while minimizing cost and environmental damage. Geometric design also affects an emerging fifth objective called "livability," which is defined as designing roads to foster broader community goals, including providing access to employment, schools, businesses and residences, accommodate a range of travel modes such as walking, bicycling, transit, and automobiles, and minimizing fuel use, emissions and environmental damage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hit and run</span> Failing to stop after causing or contributing to a traffic collision

In traffic laws, a hit and run or a hit-and-run is the criminal act of causing a traffic collision and not stopping afterwards. It is considered a supplemental crime in most jurisdictions.

Vehicle insurance in the United States is designed to cover the risk of financial liability or the loss of a motor vehicle that the owner may face if their vehicle is involved in a collision that results in property or physical damage. Most states require a motor vehicle owner to carry some minimum level of liability insurance. States that do not require the vehicle owner to carry car insurance include Virginia, where an uninsured motor vehicle fee may be paid to the state, New Hampshire, and Mississippi, which offers vehicle owners the option to post cash bonds. The privileges and immunities clause of Article IV of the U.S. Constitution protects the rights of citizens in each respective state when traveling to another. A motor vehicle owner typically pays insurers a monthly fee, often called an insurance premium. The insurance premium a motor vehicle owner pays is usually determined by a variety of factors including the type of covered vehicle, marital status, credit score, whether the driver rents or owns a home, the age and gender of any covered drivers, their driving history, and the location where the vehicle is primarily driven and stored. Most insurance companies will increase insurance premium rates based on these factors, and less frequently, offer discounts.

In legal terminology, the assured clear distance ahead (ACDA) is the distance ahead of any terrestrial locomotive device such as a land vehicle, typically an automobile, or watercraft, within which they should be able to bring the device to a halt. It is one of the most fundamental principles governing ordinary care and the duty of care for all methods of conveyance, and is frequently used to determine if a driver is in proper control and is a nearly universally implicit consideration in vehicular accident liability. The rule is a precautionary trivial burden required to avert the great probable gravity of precious life loss and momentous damage. Satisfying the ACDA rule is necessary but not sufficient to comply with the more generalized basic speed law, and accordingly, it may be used as both a layman's criterion and judicial test for courts to use in determining if a particular speed is negligent, but not to prove it is safe. As a spatial standard of care, it also serves as required explicit and fair notice of prohibited conduct so unsafe speed laws are not void for vagueness. The concept has transcended into accident reconstruction and engineering.

Increases in the use of autonomous car technologies are causing incremental shifts in the responsibility of driving, with the primary motivation of reducing the frequency of traffic collisions. Liability for incidents involving self-driving cars is a developing area of law and policy that will determine who is liable when a car causes physical damage to persons or property. As autonomous cars shift the responsibility of driving from humans to autonomous car technology, there is a need for existing liability laws to evolve in order to reasonably identify the appropriate remedies for damage and injury. As higher levels of autonomy are commercially introduced, the insurance industry stands to see higher proportions of commercial and product liability lines, while personal automobile insurance shrinks.

The death of Elaine Herzberg was the first recorded case of a pedestrian fatality involving a self-driving car, after a collision that occurred late in the evening of March 18, 2018. Herzberg was pushing a bicycle across a four-lane road in Tempe, Arizona, United States, when she was struck by an Uber test vehicle, which was operating in self-drive mode with a human safety backup driver sitting in the driving seat. Herzberg was taken to the local hospital where she died of her injuries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ontario Automobile Policy 1</span>

The Ontario Automobile Policy is a regulation under the Ontario Insurance Act enacted by the Parliament of Ontario to cover financial damages to persons and property after a car crash. All private companies registered to sell auto insurance in Ontario, are required to use the OAP for their private car insurance policy. The OAP is the legal contract that connects an Ontario driver with every Ontario based insurance company.

References

R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 668: FAULT DETERMINATION RULES Ontario Insurance Act Financial Services Commission of Ontario