Open Course Library

Last updated

Open Course Library (OCL) is an effort by the State of Washington to identify and make available digitally, to community and technical college instructors and students across that state, free textbooks, interactive assignments, and videos. Instructional materials can be "a smorgasbord of teaching modules and exercises developed by other open-learning projects. . . Interactive-learning Web sites and even instructional videos on YouTube . . ." [1] However, OCL is not an OER publishing project, although it did contribute to the development of some widely used resources. [2] [3] Goals include: lowering textbook costs for students, providing new resources for faculty to use in their courses; and fully engaging in the global OER or open educational resources discussion. [4]

Contents

The project was funded by matching grants of $750,000 from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Washington State legislature. [5] In 2009–2010 the affected Washington State student body totaled 470,000 and was increasing. [6] Many of the materials made available are open educational resources or OERs. Specifically, they include syllabi, course activities, readings, and assessments and some are paired with low cost textbooks, costing $30 or less. [7] In subjects across the sciences and humanities, the OCL team created curriculum support for Washington State's most popular 81 courses in the state's 34 community and technical colleges. [8] Instructors were free to use the materials as they wish, in part or an entire course. [9] The project was headed by Cable Green, then eLearning Director for the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges.

It emerged from a two-year discussion that ultimately produced a Strategic Technology Plan. The plan outlines a unified vision known as Washington Student Completion Initiative. [10]

Process and organizational structure

OCL participants were selected from a grant proposal competition. The process, which led to production of the materials, was open and several preliminary Town Meetings were used employing Eluminate Live.[ clarification needed ] All participants were welcome. The meetings are archived. Topics for discussion included interactions with publishers, content presentation, copyright policies, and various Creative Commons licenses. [11]

Successful applicants received $15,000 to complete a course redesign. Librarians, instructional designers and institutional researchers were also asked to apply. Like faculty, these successful applicants also received grants of $15,000. Each winning faculty member or team designed a ready-to-use digital course module. Teams were composed of community college instructors, librarians, and web-designers. [12] In fall 2011 the first 42 courses created were released. The use of OCL materials is not mandated for Washington's community colleges and technical schools. Faculty course designers, however, are asked to adopt what they have designed. There were over 25,000 visits from 125 countries over the first four months. [13] Nonetheless, there have been challenges: good material is not always available online for adoption and sometimes the best materials (for instance translations of primary sources published in foreign languages) are not available free. [14]

Resource availability

Courses are made accessible using the WashingtonOnline learning system. Externally, OCL partners with the Saylor Foundation, the Connexions Consortium, and the Open Courseware Consortium. The Saylor site can be used access course content by self-learners. [15]

Open Course Library and Open Educational Resources

A goal of the project requires instructors to become aware of the open educational resources (OERs) that are already available. A complementary goal is to share their content and adaptation by contributing to a global effort. Both directly and indirectly, Cable Green, the project's then director, observed that it has resulted in the building of networks with like-minded individuals and institutions irrespective of geography. An interest was also expressed in gauging use of materials and modules for the tenure and advancement of participants. [16]

Reasons for the effort

A 2009 New York Times article reported that college students spend between $700 and $1,000 annually on textbooks. [17] Full-time tuition in the Washington system is approximately $3,000 annually, with textbooks costing approximately $1,000 annually. [18] Community college tuition is lower than at most traditional four-year institutions, and, therefore, textbook costs may be proportionally higher. Any number of digital copies of a free textbook can be made for the price of one. Print-on demand copies generally cost under $10. Representative Reuven Carlyle (D-Seattle, Washington House of Representatives) estimates that because of OCL community college students saved over $1.25 million in textbook costs during the 2011–2012 school year. [19] OCL seeks to contribute to the creation of better courses and to reduce costs for students. In this way it seeks to respond positively to the "completion" concerns outlined in the state's tipping point research report of 2008. [20] On 17 June 2010 the Washington State Board for Community & Technical Colleges (SBCTC) approved a state-level open licensing policy. [21] All digital works created using grant funds administered by SBCTC must now carry a Creative Commons Attribution-only (CC BY) license. This license allows materials created by one institution to be updated by another. [22] It was within this context that OCL was launched in 2010. Nicole Allen, a textbook advocate for the national Student Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) commended the state for putting its money where its mouth is. [23]

Effectiveness assessment

The results are reported in Affordable Textbooks for Washington Students: An Updated Cost Analysis of the Open Course Library (2013), [24] an update of Affordable Textbooks for Washington's Students: A Cost Analysis of the Open Course Library (2011). [25] The latter reported on the first phase of courses in October 2011. In April 2013 the State Board announced the completion of all 81 courses and the updated report was released. The report concluded:

On the other hand, in January 2014 The Chronicle of Higher Education reported that the effort to make free or low cost materials available in 42 courses was making little progress. [27] Based on a survey of community-college stores, with responses from 25 campuses, only nine said that any materials had been used in 17 of the 42 courses. Only 2,386 of the 98,130 students enrolled in these courses, in 75 of the eligible 2,722 sections, used the materials. In 16 of the 75 sections students paid nothing; in the other 59 sections the average cost was $25. [28] These numbers reported the work of OnCampus Research, an arm of the National Association of College Stores, which in fall 2013 sent a survey to 34 campus stores in the Washington Community and Technical College system. The survey focused on the first 42, or phase one, courses. It showed, according to the director of OnCampus Research, "that the recommendation of specific free or lower-priced course materials for popular courses did not equate to significant use of these materials by faculty." [29] However, Marty Brown, executive director of the Washington State Board of Community and Technical Colleges, took exception in a Chronicle of Higher Education piece he explained: "The study analyzes the use of OCL materials based on adoption information from campus bookstores. This methodology provides an incomplete picture, as bookstores are not always aware when faculty members assign free, digital resources. Therefore, the study's findings do not justify its conclusion that OCL has resulted in "insignificant" savings to students. The Student PIRGs estimates the OCL has saved students more than $5.5-million, more than triple the original investment. We believe this is very significant." [30] SPARC referred to the same presumed misunderstanding. [31]

One reviewer states that OCL is best at "presenting introductory college course material in a condensed, simple manner via Google docs or presentations." It is noted, however, that the materials are not highly refined. Further observing that "there's something to be said about grabbing an algebra quiz or those French vocabulary words quickly." [32] A doctoral dissertation focused specifically on the project concludes in its abstract: ". . . that while faculty may be motivated to adopt new innovations like OER, for some, the time it takes to identify and integrate OER into courses presents a significant barrier to adoption." [33]

Long-term impact

Washington State communities have integrated OCL into educational efforts in innovative ways. For instance, Bellevue College, Washington, the state's largest community college, with help with a grant from the U.S. Department of Education, purchased 500 inexpensive netbook laptop computers in November 2011 for its students to rent for $35 per quarter to "download and read Internet material." The anticipation was that the machines would also be used with OCL material. [34] Since its initiation, OCL is credited with inspiring open textbook initiatives by the legislatures of California (2012), British Columbia (2012) and actions by the legislatures of Illinois, Minnesota, and Virginia all similar to California's. North Dakota proposed a resolution asking faculty and college administrations to support the use of open textbooks. Further, the Trade Adjustment Community College and Career Training grants program requires that all material created using federal funds be available to the public through an open license. Materials produced through this vehicle will be added to the OCL. [35]

The Saylor Foundation will create modular versions of the courses. Project Kaleidoscope intends to modify OCL materials to meet the needs of California's community college students. The department of education in São Paulo Brazil plans Portuguese translations of the courses. [36]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open educational resources</span> Open learning resource

Open educational resources (OER) are teaching, learning, and research materials intentionally created and licensed to be free for the end user to own, share, and in most cases, modify. The term "OER" describes publicly accessible materials and resources for any user to use, re-mix, improve, and redistribute under some licenses. These are designed to reduce accessibility barriers by implementing best practices in teaching and to be adapted for local unique contexts.

OpenStax CNX, formerly called Connexions, is a global repository of educational content provided by volunteers. The open source platform is provided and maintained by OpenStax, which is based at Rice University. The collection is available free of charge, can be remixed and edited, and is available for download in various digital formats.

The Ohio Library and Information Network (OhioLINK) is a consortium of Ohio's college and university libraries and the State Library of Ohio. Serving more than 800,000 students, faculty, and staff at 88 institutions with 117 libraries, OhioLINK's membership includes 16 public universities, 23 community/technical colleges, 48 private colleges and the State Library of Ohio. OhioLINK serves faculty, students, staff and other researchers via campus-based integrated library systems, the OhioLINK central site, and Internet resources.

An open-source curriculum (OSC) is an online instructional resource that can be freely used, distributed and modified. OSC is based on the open-source practice of creating products or software that opens up access to source materials or codes. Applied to education, this process invites feedback and participation from developers, educators, government officials, students and parents and empowers them to exchange ideas, improve best practices and create world-class curricula. These "development" communities can form ad-hoc, within the same subject area or around a common student need, and allow for a variety of editing and workflow structures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open education</span> Educational movement

Open education is an educational movement founded on openness, with connections to other educational movements such as critical pedagogy, and with an educational stance which favours widening participation and inclusiveness in society. Open education broadens access to the learning and training traditionally offered through formal education systems and is typically offered through online and distance education. The qualifier "open" refers to the elimination of barriers that can preclude both opportunities and recognition for participation in institution-based learning. One aspect of openness or "opening up" education is the development and adoption of open educational resources in support of open educational practices.

An open textbook is a textbook licensed under an open license, and made available online to be freely used by students, teachers and members of the public. Many open textbooks are distributed in either print, e-book, or audio formats that may be downloaded or purchased at little or no cost.

The Tufts OpenCourseWare (OCW) project, was a web-based publication of educational material from a number of Tufts University courses, providing open sharing of free, searchable, high-quality course content to educators, students, and self-learners throughout the global community. The Tufts OCW initiative encouraged the publication and free exchange of course materials on the World Wide Web. First launched in June 2005, Tufts OCW provided materials with strong representation from Tufts' health sciences schools, some of which were equivalent to textbooks in depth. All materials on the Tufts OCW site were accessible and free of charge. As Tufts OCW is not a distance learning program, no registration, applications, prerequisites, or fees are required and no credit is granted. Tufts ended funding for its Open Courseware initiative in 2014, and content on the Tufts OCW web site was removed on June 30, 2018.

Open.Michigan is a collection of open initiatives and projects at the University of Michigan (U-M). Open.Michigan supports the open access and use of U-M resources for teaching, learning, and research. Open.Michigan promotes open content licensing and supports the reuse, redistribution, and remixing of educational materials for use by others worldwide. Some of the key efforts underway under the Open.Michigan umbrella include U-M's Open Educational Resources publishing activities, development of software tools that support creating open content, and various open content repositories.

Lyryx Learning (Lyryx) is an educational software company offering open educational resources (OERs) paired with online homework & exams for undergraduate introductory courses in Mathematics & Statistics and Business & Economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massive open online course</span> Education service on the web

A massive open online course or an open online course is an online course aimed at unlimited participation and open access via the Web. In addition to traditional course materials, such as filmed lectures, readings, and problem sets, many MOOCs provide interactive courses with user forums or social media discussions to support community interactions among students, professors, and teaching assistants (TAs), as well as immediate feedback to quick quizzes and assignments. MOOCs are a widely researched development in distance education, first introduced in 2008, that emerged as a popular mode of learning in 2012, a year called the "Year of the MOOC".

The Saylor Academy, formerly known as the Saylor Foundation, is a non-profit organization headquartered in Washington, DC. It was established in 1999 by its sole trustee, Michael J. Saylor. Since 2008, the focus of the foundation has been its Free Education Initiative which has led to the creation of 241 courses representing 10 of the highest enrollment majors in the US.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education</span> 501(c)(3) non-profit organization

The Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education (ISKME), is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2002. Located in Half Moon Bay, California, its mission is to make learning and knowledge sharing participatory, equitable, and open.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open educational practices</span>

Open educational practices (OEP) are part of the broader open education landscape, including the openness movement in general. It is a term with multiple layers and dimensions and is often used interchangeably with open pedagogy or open practices. OEP represent teaching and learning techniques that draw upon open and participatory technologies and high-quality open educational resources (OER) in order to facilitate collaborative and flexible learning. Because OEP emerged from the study of OER, there is a strong connection between the two concepts. OEP, for example, often, but not always, involve the application of OER to the teaching and learning process. Open educational practices aim to take the focus beyond building further access to OER and consider how in practice, such resources support education and promote quality and innovation in teaching and learning. The focus in OEP is on reproduction/understanding, connecting information, application, competence, and responsibility rather than the availability of good resources. OEP is a broad concept which can be characterised by a range of collaborative pedagogical practices that include the use, reuse, and creation of OER and that often employ social and participatory technologies for interaction, peer-learning, knowledge creation and sharing, empowerment of learners, and open sharing of teaching practices.

MERLOT is an online repository and international consortium of institutions of higher education, industry partners, professional organizations and individuals. MERLOT partners and members are devoted to identifying, peer reviewing, organizing and making available existing online learning resources in a range of academic disciplines for use by higher education faculty and students.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">OER Commons</span> Freely accessible online library

OER Commons is a freely accessible online library that allows teachers and others to search and discover open educational resources (OER) and other freely available instructional materials.

OpenStax is a nonprofit educational technology initiative based at Rice University. Since 2012, OpenStax has created peer-reviewed, openly-licensed textbooks, which are available in free digital formats and for a low cost in print. Most books are also available in Kindle versions on Amazon.com and in the iBooks Store. OpenStax's first textbook was College Physics, which was published online, in print, and in iBooks in 2012. OpenStax launched OpenStax Tutor Beta in June 2017, adaptive courseware based on cognitive science principles, machine learning, and OpenStax content. However, it was announced in October 2022 that Tutor was being discontinued.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boundless (company)</span>

Boundless was an American company, founded in 2011, which created free and low-cost textbooks and distributed them online. In April 2015, it was acquired by Valore. The combined company is based in Boston, Massachusetts.

Open Educational Practices in Australia refers to the development, implementation and use of Open educational resources (OER), open access, open learning design, open policies, and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) to open up education in Australia.

Open educational resources in Canada are the various initiatives related to open education, open educational resources (OER), open pedagogies (OEP), open educational practices (OEP), and open scholarship that are established nationally and provincially across Canadian K-12 and higher education sectors, and where Canadian based inititatives extend to international collaborations.

The Community College Consortium for Open Educational Resources (CCCOER) promotes the awareness of open educational policies, practices, and resources. CCCOER is part of Open Education Global. CCCOER describes itself as a community of practice for open education, providing various resources, support, and opportunities for collaboration for learning, planning, and implementing successful open educational programs at community colleges and technical colleges. This support includes webinars, online advocacy events and conferences, a community email list, community blog, workshops and presentations throughout North America, as well as generally raising awareness of open education and supporting the needs of students and faculty at colleges adopting open educational resources and full degree pathways.

References

  1. ↑ Overland, Martha Ann (14 January 2011). "State of Washington to Offer Online Materials, Instead of Textbooks, for 2-Year Colleges". The Chronicle of Higher Education. 57 (19): A12–A13.
  2. ↑ Allen, Nicole (18 February 2014). "Back to Facts: Washington's Open Course Library" . Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  3. ↑ "Open Course Library: Success Stories" . Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  4. ↑ Caswell, Tom (2 May 2012). "Case Study 2: The Open Course Library of the Washington State Colleges". EDUCAUSE. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  5. ↑ Overland, Martha Ann (9 January 2011), "State of Washington to Offer Online Materials as Texts; Money-saving effort at 2-year colleges faces vexing problems", The Chronicle of Higher Education
  6. ↑ Caswell, Tom (2 May 2012). "Case Study 2: The Open Course Library of the Washington State Colleges". EDUCAUSE. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  7. ↑ "Open Course Library: About". Open Course Library. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  8. ↑ Park, Jane (4 June 2010). "The Open Course Library Project". The Open Course Library Project – Creatrive Commons.
  9. ↑ "Open Course Library: About". Open Course Library. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  10. ↑ Park, Jane (4 March 2010). "The Open Course Library Project – Creative Commons". Creative Commons. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  11. ↑ Park, Jane (4 March 2010). "The Open Course Library Project – Creative Commons". Creative Commons. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  12. ↑ Goodwin, Mary Ann Lund (2011). The Open Course Library: Using Open Educational Resources to Improve Community College Access. Doctoral Dissertation, Washington State University. p. 7.
  13. ↑ Oberland, Martha Ann (9 January 2011). "State of Washington to Offer Materials as Texts: Money-saving effort at 2-year colleges faces vexing problems". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  14. ↑ Overland, Martha Ann (14 January 2011). "State of Washington to Offer Online Materials, Instead of Textbooks, for 2-Year Colleges". The Chronicle of Higher Education. 57 (19): A12–A13.
  15. ↑ Caswell, Tom (2 May 2012). "Case Study 2: The Open Course Library of the Washington State Colleges". EDUCAUSE. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  16. ↑ Caswell, Tom (4 March 2010). "The Open Course Library Project – Creative Commons". EDUCAUSE. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  17. ↑ Lewin, Tamar (1 November 2009). "Bookstores and Beyond". The New York Times.
  18. ↑ Redd, Stacy (24 May 2011). "Tom Caswell and the Open Course Library: Making Education Truly Accessible". Education Insider News Blog. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  19. ↑ "Legislative Taxes Aim at $9 Billion Textbook Industry". States News Service. 5 March 2012.
  20. ↑ Park, Jane (4 March 2010). "The Open Course Library Project – Creative Commons". Creative Commons. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  21. ↑ Caswell, Tom (2 May 2012). "Case Study 2: The Open Course Library of the Washington State Colleges". EDUCAUSE. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  22. ↑ Caswell, Tom (2 May 2012). "Case Study 2: The Open Course Library of the Washington State Colleges". EDUCAUSE. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  23. ↑ Long, Katherine (7 November 2010). "Washington's 2-year colleges out to beat the high cost of textbooks". The Seattle Times. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  24. ↑ Allen, Nicole (2013). "Affordable Textbooks For Washington's Students: An Updated Cost Analysis of the Open Course Library" (PDF). Student Public Interest Research Groups.
  25. ↑ Allen, Nicole (2011). Affordable Textbooks For Washington's Students: A Cost Analysis of the Open Course Library (PDF). Student Public Interest Research Groups.
  26. ↑ "Updated Cost Analysis of Open Course Library", Student PIRGs, 30 April 2013
  27. ↑ Biemiller, Lawrence (31 January 2014). "Open Course Library Sees Little Use in Washington Community Colleges". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  28. ↑ Biemiller, Lawrence (13 January 2014). "Open Course Library Sees Little Use in Washington's Community Colleges". The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  29. ↑ "Use of Free or Low-Cost Materials Slow to Catch On", Education Letter, 12 February 2014
  30. ↑ Brown, Marty (6 February 2014), "Bookstores' Study Mischaracterizes Washington State Open-Text Effort [letter]", The Chronicle of Higher Education
  31. ↑ Allen, Nicole (18 February 2014). "Back to Facts: Washington's Open Course Library". SPARC. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  32. ↑ Fox, Carolyn (11 July 2012). "Open Course Library's best resource: introductory college course materials". OpenSource.com. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  33. ↑ Goodwin, Mary Ann Lund (2011). The Open Course Library: Using Open Educational Resources to Improve Community College Access – Abstract. Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University.
  34. ↑ Overland, Martha Ann (9 January 2011), "Textbooks? So Last Century, Rent a Netbook Instead", The Chronicle of Higher Education
  35. ↑ Allen, Nicole (30 April 2013). "Affordable Textbooks for Washington's College Students: An Updated Cost Analysis of the Open Course Library" (PDF). Student Public Interest Research Groups. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
  36. ↑ Allen, Nicole (30 April 2013). "Affordable Textbooks for Washington's College Students: An Updated Cost Analysis of the Open Course Library" (PDF). Student Public Interest Research Groups. Retrieved 11 April 2014.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.