Papyrus Salt 124

Last updated

The Papyrus Salt 124 (also known as the British Museum Papyrus 10055) is an ancient Egyptian papyrus dating to the beginning of the 20th Dynasty. This papyrus is a copy of a letter addressed to the vizier of the time, most likely Hori. [1]

Contents

It brings various complaints against Paneb, a chief-workman at Deir el-Medina, a workmen’s community at Thebes, where the papyrus was most likely found. [2] This papyrus gives insight into both the nature of the judicial system, and some of the corrupt practices that may have taken place in Deir el-Medina and other such workers' communities at the time.

Origin of the papyrus

This papyrus is located in the archives of the British Museum, from one of the collections of early 19th century Egyptologist Henry Salt. Rather than being excavated by Salt, this papyrus was purchased in Egypt, probably in Deir el-Medina near the city of Thebes. [3] A translation did not emerge until 1870, when François Chabas published a translation and short summary. [4] It was not until 1929, when Jaroslav Černý published an English language translation that Egyptologists began to take an interest in both the papyrus and the story of Paneb. [5]

Though the dating of the papyrus is not exact, scholars have attempted to infer the date around which it was written. A later complaint in year 29 of the reign of Ramesses III provides a valuable clue. A descendant of Paneb, bringing his own accusations to the authorities, references a trial of Paneb for one of the crimes he is accused of in the papyrus, under Vizier Hori. [6] However, Hori held office from the reign of the Pharaoh Siptah up until the reign of Ramesses III, so scholars have sought to narrow the time down further. Dominique Valbelle proposed that Paneb had not been removed from office until after year 5 of Ramesses III, due to a papyrus dating to that year that listed Paneb's son Aapahte as still working, unlikely in the event that his father was dismissed from his position. However, later dating has proven that papyrus to date to year 5 of the reign of Siptah, when Paneb was unquestionably in power. [7]

Contents of the papyrus

The Papyrus Salt 124 is 38 by 62 centimeters, and is made of three sheets glued together. Černý assumes that since the middle sheet is 27 centimeters wide, the other sheets were originally of comparable width, meaning that the third sheet (23 centimeters wide) might have been slightly cropped, while the first sheet (12 centimeters wide) was definitely damaged at some point, and several lines are incomplete, particularly on the first column of the recto, the front side of the papyrus. [8] The frame of the papyrus is 45.4 by 68.3 centimeters (British Museum). Černý describes the papyrus as "very thin," with "a yellowish brown color" and "relatively pale" ink. The first column of the recto has at least one line missing, while the last line legible, line 21, is incomplete, as are the bottom lines of every column except the second column of the verso, which is left blank at the bottom of the page. [9] Nevertheless, the British Museum rates the condition of the papyrus as "fair" (British Museum).

The handwriting of the document, which is in hieratic, is of high quality, as is the spelling. However, the grammar is very poor. Černý attempts to explain this discrepancy by guessing that the writing was the work of a scribe in the area, with the author, Amennakht, dictating the contents of the letter. This would make sense, given the low literacy rates at the time. [10]

The papyrus takes the form of a letter to the vizier, with the express intent of proving that the conduct of Paneb is unfit for the office of foreman. [11] It takes the form of a list of accusations against Paneb. However, many of these offenses were clearly not punishable offenses, but merely unethical actions taken by Paneb added to add weight to the overall message. [12] As such, the charges are extremely broad, from ordering his men to do work for his personal benefit [13] to murder. [14]

However, despite the fact that the papyrus is in the form of a letter to the vizier, it was probably just a personal copy. According to Černý, a letter to the vizier would have begun with a long address enumerating the numerous titles of the vizier. In addition, such a letter would be in the archives of the Vizier, and would not have made their way into the hands of Henry Salt. [15]

Accusations against Paneb

The author of the papyrus, Amennakht, describes himself as a workman and the son of the former chief-workman Nebnefer. His brother, Neferhotep, took over as chief-workman at the death of his father, and was killed by an “enemy”. [16] This enemy is interpreted as either foreign enemies or a domestic army during Amenmesse’s usurpation of Thebes. [17] Though Amennakht felt entitled to become the chief-workman, the vizier, Preemhab, gave the role to Paneb. [18] Though he believes that the role is not Paneb’s to begin with, he proceeds to list accusations of varying severity so as to better justify his contention that Paneb should be removed from the role of chief-workman.

Bribery

The first accusation lobbied against Paneb is the charge that he gave Preemhab five of Neferhotep's servants, with the implication that this gift is what secured the position for Paneb, not any legitimate claim to be chief workman. [19] He is also accused of giving something to a scribe by the name of Kenherkhepeshef, "something," or nkt, being an Egyptian term for a payment or bribe. This bribe was given to the scribe as payment for getting Paneb out of trouble. [20]

Adultery and sexual assault

Paneb was accused of many charges of sexual assault and adultery, though there are many ambiguities in the text which make the exact nature of the charges unclear. The charges are special in that they are alleged by his son Aapehty to the door-keepers, [21] who are the people who stand at the door of the tomb at work-sites, but also serve various other functions, including possible legal functions. Though Černý seems to think that the door-keepers might have served the role of bailiffs, A.G. McDowell, a prominent Egyptologist in the study of Deir el-Medina, speculates that the door-keepers' legal function was small, and that Aapehty only testified to them because they stood in a public part of the worksite. [22]

He swore under oath the alleged cases of debauchery, including an instance in which Aapehty himself took part. All the cases of debauchery were with married women, aside from one daughter, who was also the woman Aapehty debauched. [23] The word Černý translates as "debauched" does not necessarily imply mutual consent, so it is ambiguous whether or not Paneb and Aapehty's actions could be classified as rape. [24] However, it is made clear that Paneb violated a woman by force at least once (though this is Amennakht’s assertion, not Aapehty's), when he took a woman named Yemenwaw's clothing, "threw her on top of [a] wall and violated her". [25]

Theft and misuse of labour

While Paneb was accused of an excess of crimes by Amennakht, the various charges of embezzlement and misuse of labour are particularly emphasized, and appear to cause the most trouble that Paneb runs into. The first of Amennakht’s charges outside of those directly relating to Amennakht's political interests deal with Paneb’s theft of the tomb of Seti II, including the covering of Seti's chariot, storehouses from the tomb, and five doors, though 4 were found later. He stole incense, special oil and wine, and a special statue inscribed with the king's name, and though Amenakht attests to reporting these actions, Paneb took an oath saying "I did not upset a stone in the neighbourhood of the Place of Pharaoh". [26]

In addition to straightforward theft, Paneb also resorted to misappropriating labour and other resources for his own ends. According to Amennakht, Paneb ordered his stone workers not only to steal stone from the worksite of Seti II, but to use this stone to build columns for his personal tomb. [27] In one case, he not only ordered his workers to make a plaited bed, but made their wives weave clothing for him. [28] In addition, he stole several work tools, breaking one (Recto 2.13). Some tools were apparently of great value, as the workers searched for an entire month for a tool he stole before he snuck it back onto the worksite. [29]

In addition to the theft from his worksite, he also stole from other tombs. He stole from the tomb of a workman by the name of Nakhtmin and stole his bed, possibly a stele, and other unnamed objects. [30] He also stole a (mummified or model) goose from the funeral of the daughter of Ramesses II and later swore that he had not. [31] In fact, he had a propensity towards exploring tombs in general, as Amennakht accuses him of entering three tombs, [32] presumably to steal goods, but it seems to have had an element of rebelliousness to it, as he also sat on the sarcophagus of Seti II, a great sign of disrespect to both Seti II and the institution of kingship in Egypt. [33]

Violence

As part of Amennakht’s character defamation of Paneb, he wrote charges that would make Paneb seem "like a mad man," as Amennakht most definitely saw him. [34] As part of this, there are many charges which portray Paneb as an angry, emotionally unstable chief-workman, which he may well have been. Amennahkt even pits the former chief-workman Neferhotep against Paneb, stating that Paneb chased after Neferhotep, smashed open doors when Neferhotep hid in a room, and threatened to kill him. Though he did not kill Neferhotep, he instead beat nine men over the course of one night. [35] This apparently led to Neferhotep complaining to the Vizier at the time, Amenmose, who attempted to punish Paneb, only to be fired when Paneb complained directly to the Pharaoh at the time, Amenmesse.

Though his confrontation with Neferhotep is perhaps most strongly related to Amennakht’s ambitions, there are other instances of violent outbursts. In one instance he told the other chief workman (there are two chief workmen at any one time [36] ) that he was going to attack and kill him, though the absence of any further explanation in the papyrus indicates that nothing came of the threat. [37] He is further accused of beating up workmen at a night-party, going up on top of a wall, and throwing bricks at people. [38]

Other

In addition to threatening to kill Neferhotep, Paneb later makes Amenakht swear to not visit the temple of his mother and father, and sent a town crier to declare that "no one should look at the family of the chief workman Nebnufer, when he goes to bring offerings to Amun, their god". [39] This might be seen as a means of destabilizing Amenakht as a political threat, by cutting off the connection to his ancestors.

Reliability of Amennakht

The Papyrus Salt 124 is clearly written with the intention of proving that Paneb’s conduct "is indeed unworthy of this office" of chief-workman, [40] and that, as Neferhotep's brother, Amennakht is the rightful successor. [41] Amenakht has every incentive to paint Paneb in a bad light. However, there is correlating evidence for some of his claims, including records under king Siptah detailing the interruptions in work due to personal jobs that Paneb made his workers accomplish, including weaving a bed of straps and fattening his ox, as stated in Recto 2.19-20. [42]

However, that does not necessarily prove Amennakht's case, as M.L. Bierbrier points out in his essay "Paneb Rehabilitated?", which points out that, though succession to the role of chief workman is usually within the family, Neferhotep had in a way adopted Paneb, and the fact that he had inherited Neferhotep's property with which to bribe the vizier serves as further evidence that he was seen as a sort of son to Neferhotep, who was childless. [43]

Consequences of the letter

Though there is no evidence of the reception of this letter by the vizier, we do know from a later trial with a descendant of Paneb that Paneb was eventually put on trial for the theft of stones from the tomb worksite under Vizier Hori. We also know that in year 11 of Ramesses III a successor named Nekhemmut is named as successor to Paneb, a worker unrelated to Neferhotep or Amennakht. [44]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deir el-Medina</span> Ancient Egyptian village in the Valley of the Kings

Deir el-Medina, or Dayr al-Madīnah, is an ancient Egyptian workmen's village which was home to the artisans who worked on the tombs in the Valley of the Kings during the 18th to 20th Dynasties of the New Kingdom of Egypt The settlement's ancient name was Setmaat, and the workmen who lived there were called "Servants in the Place of Truth". During the Christian era, the temple of Hathor was converted into a Monastery of Saint Isidorus the Martyr from which the Egyptian Arabic name Deir el-Medina is derived.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramesses IX</span> Egyptian pharaoh of the 20th dynasty

Neferkare Setepenre Ramesses IX was the eighth pharaoh of the Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt. He was the third longest serving king of this Dynasty after Ramesses III and Ramesses XI. He is now believed to have assumed the throne on I Akhet day 21 based on evidence presented by Jürgen von Beckerath in a 1984 GM article. According to the latest archaeological information, Ramesses IX died in Regnal Year 19 I Peret day 27 of his reign. Therefore, he enjoyed a reign of 18 years, 4 months and 6 days. His throne name, Neferkare Setepenre, means "Beautiful Is The Soul of Re, Chosen of Re." Ramesses IX is believed to be the son of Mentuherkhepeshef, a son of Ramesses III, since Mentuherkhopshef's wife, the lady Takhat bears the prominent title of King's Mother on the walls of tomb KV10, which she usurped and reused in the late 20th Dynasty; no other 20th Dynasty king is known to have had a mother with this name. Ramesses IX was, therefore, probably a grandson of Ramesses III.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Setnakhte</span> First pharaoh of the 20th dynasty

Userkhaure-setepenre Setnakhte was the first pharaoh (1189 BC–1186 BC) of the Twentieth Dynasty of the New Kingdom of Egypt and the father of Ramesses III.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seti II</span> Pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty

Seti II was the fifth pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt and reigned from c. 1203 BC to 1197 BC. His throne name, Userkheperure Setepenre, means "Powerful are the manifestations of Re, the chosen one of Re." He was the son of Merneptah and Isetnofret II and occupied the throne during a period known for dynastic intrigue and short reigns, and his rule was no different. Seti II had to deal with many serious plots, most significantly the accession of a rival king named Amenmesse, possibly a half brother, who seized control over Thebes and Nubia in Upper Egypt during his second to fourth regnal years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramesses X</span> Ninth ruler of the 20th dynasty of Ancient Egypt

Khepermaatre Ramesses X was the ninth pharaoh of the 20th Dynasty of Ancient Egypt. His birth name was Amonhirkhepeshef. His prenomen or throne name, Khepermaatre, means "The Justice of Re Abides."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramesses VI</span> Fifth ruler of the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt

Ramesses VI Nebmaatre-Meryamun was the fifth ruler of the Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt. He reigned for about eight years in the mid-to-late 12th century BC and was a son of Ramesses III and queen Iset Ta-Hemdjert. As a prince, he was known as Ramesses Amunherkhepeshef and held the titles of royal scribe and cavalry general. He was succeeded by his son, Ramesses VII Itamun, whom he had fathered with queen Nubkhesbed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramesses VII</span> Ancient Egyptian sixth pharaoh of the 20th dynasty

Usermaatre Setepenre Meryamun Ramesses VII was the sixth pharaoh of the 20th Dynasty of Ancient Egypt. He reigned from about 1136 to 1129 BC and was the son of Ramesses VI. Other dates for his reign are 1138–1131 BC. The Turin Accounting Papyrus 1907+1908 is dated to Year 7 III Shemu day 26 of his reign and has been reconstructed to show that 11 full years passed from Year 5 of Ramesses VI to Year 7 of his reign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amenmesse</span> Egyptian pharaoh

Amenmesse was the fifth pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty in Ancient Egypt, possibly the son of Merneptah and Queen Takhat. Others consider him to be one of the innumerable sons of Ramesses II. Very little is known about this pharaoh, who ruled Egypt for only three to four years. Various Egyptologists date his reign between 1202 BC–1199 BC or 1203 BC–1200 BC with others giving an accession date of 1200 BC. Amenmesse means "born of or fashioned by Amun" in Egyptian. Additionally, his nomen can be found with the epithet Heqa-waset, which means "Ruler of Thebes". His royal name was Menmire Setepenre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bay (chancellor)</span>

Bay, also called Ramesse Khamenteru, was an important Asiatic official in ancient Egypt, who rose to prominence and high office under Seti II Userkheperure Setepenre and later became an influential powerbroker in the closing stages of the 19th Dynasty. He used to be possibly identified with Irsu mentioned in the Great Harris Papyrus, although no contemporary source connects Bay with Irsu and the connection has since been disproven due to the differences in the years that they died.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siptah</span> Pharaoh of the Nineteenth Dynasty

Akhenre Setepenre Siptah or Merneptah Siptah was the penultimate ruler of the Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt. His father's identity is currently unknown. Both Seti II and Amenmesse have been suggested although the fact that Siptah later changed his royal name or nomen to Merneptah Siptah after his Year 2 suggests rather that his father was Merneptah. If correct, this would make Siptah and Seti II half-brothers since both of them were sons of Merneptah.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abbott Papyrus</span>

The Abbott Papyrus serves as an important political document concerning the tomb robberies of the Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt during the New Kingdom. It also gives insight into the scandal between the two rivals Pawero and Paser of Thebes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramessesnakht</span>

Ramessesnakht was High Priest of Amun during many years in the 20th Dynasty. He was appointed as the High Priest at Thebes under Ramesses IV. He served in office until the reign of Ramesses IX. It was during Ramessesnakht's tenure that the power and importance of the Amun priesthood grew over Egypt while the Pharaoh's power began to noticeably decline.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paser (vizier)</span>

Paser was an ancient Egyptian noble who served as vizier during the reigns of Seti I and Ramesses II in the 19th Dynasty. He would later also become High Priest of Amun.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramose (TT7)</span>

Ramose was an ancient Egyptian scribe and artisan who lived in Deir el-Medina on the west bank of the Nile, opposite Thebes, during the reigns of Ramesses II. He held the position of Scribe of the Tomb, the highest administrative position for a scribe in Deir el-Medina, from around years 5 to 38 of Ramesses II's reign. He was buried in a tomb in the village necropolis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehotep II</span>

The ancient Egyptian noble Prehotep II was Vizier in the latter part of the reign of Ramesses II, during the 19th Dynasty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt</span> Egyptian dynasty from 1295 to 1186 BC

The Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt, also known as the Ramessid dynasty, is classified as the second Dynasty of the Ancient Egyptian New Kingdom period, lasting from 1292 BC to 1189 BC. The 19th Dynasty and the 20th Dynasty furthermore together constitute an era known as the Ramesside period. This Dynasty was founded by Vizier Ramesses I, whom Pharaoh Horemheb chose as his successor to the throne.

The Will of Naunakhte is a papyrus found at the workmen's village of Deir el-Medina that dates to the 20th Dynasty during the reign of Ramesses V. Discovered by the French Institute in 1928, the will outlines the division of assets by an Egyptian mother among her children.

This page list topics related to ancient Egypt.

Paneb was a chief at Deir el-Medina, a workmen's community at Thebes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deir el-Medina strikes</span> Ancient Egyptian strike

The Deir el-Medinastrikes were a series of strikes by the artisans who worked on the tombs in the Egyptian Valley of the Kings, the most notable of which occurred in the 29th year of the reign of Ramesses III. The primary cause of the strike was Ramesses' inability to provide supplies, including wheat rations, to the workers and their families, and workers were forced to buy their own wheat. The workers pleaded with the site officials, who ignored their complaints. The workers then went on strike and marched en masse to the office of the vizier, who authorised the release of grain from the funerary temples, and the workers returned to work temporarily.

References

  1. ↑ (Černý, 1929, 256)
  2. ↑ (Černý, 1929, 251)
  3. ↑ (McDowell, 1999, 191)
  4. ↑ (Černý, 243)
  5. ↑ (McDowell, 1990, 209)
  6. ↑ (Černý, 256)
  7. ↑ (Bierbrier, 2000, 53)
  8. ↑ (Černý, 243-244)
  9. ↑ (Černý, 244)
  10. ↑ (Černý, 257–258)
  11. ↑ (Verso 2.1)
  12. ↑ (McDowell, 1990, 210)
  13. ↑ (Recto 2.19–20)
  14. ↑ (Verso 2.4)
  15. ↑ (Černý, 251)
  16. ↑ (Recto 1.1-2)
  17. ↑ (Vernus, 71)
  18. ↑ Recto 1.3–4)
  19. ↑ (Recto 1.3)
  20. ↑ (Vernus, 72)
  21. ↑ (Recto 2.1)
  22. ↑ (McDowell, 1990, 46)
  23. ↑ (Recto 1.2-3)
  24. ↑ (Vernus, 76)
  25. ↑ (Recto 1.1)
  26. ↑ (Recto 1.5-16)
  27. ↑ (Recto 2.5-6)
  28. ↑ (Recto 1.19)
  29. ↑ (Verso 1.9)
  30. ↑ (Verso 1.1)
  31. ↑ (Verso 1.11-12) (Vernus, 182)
  32. ↑ (Recto 1.17)
  33. ↑ (Recto 1.11–12)
  34. ↑ (Verso 2.3)
  35. ↑ (Recto 2.14-16)
  36. ↑ (Vernus, 75)
  37. ↑ (Recto 2.21)
  38. ↑ (Verso 1.4–5)
  39. ↑ (Verso 1.13–16)
  40. ↑ (Verso 2.1)
  41. ↑ (Recto 1.3)
  42. ↑ (Vernus, 79)
  43. ↑ (Bierbrier, 2000, 52)
  44. ↑ (Bierbrier, 1982, 111)

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.