Parenting law in Australia

Last updated

Parenting law in Australia encompasses a number of areas of law including:

Contents

In Australia, a child is a person under 18 years old. The majority of the legislation about parenting in Australia does not apply once a child reaches the age of 18.

Parenting law under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

Part VII of the Family Law Act provides power for certain courts to make orders about the parenting of children. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia manages the majority of this work, but in some cases it is conducted by state courts (particularly in regional areas). In Western Australia, the Family Court of Western Australia has jurisdiction over almost all parenting issues.

The Family Law Act applies to the children of married and unmarried parents. The majority of parenting matters falling under the Family Law Act involve separated parents, but the jurisdiction can apply to children of intact relationships (for example, an application may be made by a grandparent to spend time with a child of a married couple.

Part VII has been amended significantly in 1995, 2006, and 2011.

"Best interests" test

Best interests or best interests of the child is a child rights principle, which derives from Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which says that “in all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration”. Assessing the best interests of a child means to evaluate and balance “all the elements necessary to make a decision in a specific situation for a specific individual child or group of children”.

The best interests of the child in question must be the "paramount consideration" when a court makes a parenting order under the Family Law Act. [1] To determine the best interests of a child the court must take into account the two primary considerations (the benefit to the child of having a meaningful relationship with both parents and the need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm) and a number of additional considerations (such as the views of the child and the capacity of the child's parents to provide for their needs). [2]

Parental responsibility

Parental responsibility means all of the duties, powers, responsibilities and authority that parents have in relation to children. [3] Each parent automatically has parental responsibility for their children, unless amended by court order. [4]

Parental responsibility where no orders are in place

If there are no orders in place, each parent can, in theory, independently make decisions about the care of the child. In practice, parents are usually required to make major decisions for a child jointly. For example:

  • Many schools will require the agreement of both parents to enrol a child, whether there are orders in place for parental responsibility or not;
  • If a parent moves a significant distance from the other parent without agreement, the other parent may bring an application in court to seek the return of the child;
  • State laws may require the consent of both parents for certain medical procedures or treatment.

Shared parental responsibility

If an order is made that 2 or more persons are to share parental responsibility, then:

  • those persons must make decisions about "major long-term issues" jointly; [5]
  • other issues (day-to-day issues) can be made independently.

"Major long-term issues" is defined as issues "about the care, welfare and development of the child of a long-term nature" including:

  • their education;
  • their religious and cultural upbringing;
  • their health;
  • their name;
  • changes to their living arrangements that make it significantly more difficult for the child to spend time with a parent. [6]

There is no obligation for parents to jointly agree on decisions that are not about "major long-term issues".


"Live with" and "spend time with" arrangements

Previously referred to as "custody", orders can be made under the Family Law Act specifying who a child lives with and who they spend time with.

The term "lives with" is generally used when for the parent with whom the child spends more than 50% of the time, or for both parents in equal time arrangements. There is no practical difference between "lives with" and "spends time with".

The question of how much time children spend with each parent (if any) is based on the "best interests" test, where the court must decide what arrangements are in the child's best interests.

Equal time arrangements

It is a common misconception that the Family Law Act specifies that children should spend equal time with each parent. That is commonly inappropriate, particularly for children under school age.

The most common arrangements made in Australia are for children to live with their mother and spend regular time with their father. [7] Equal time arrangements occur in approximately 9% of separated families. [7]

Recording agreements and resolving disputes

Parenting Plans

Separated parents can enter into a Parenting Plan pursuant to the Family Law Act, dealing with whom a child is to live, the time a child spends with another person, the allocation of parental responsibility and other matters. [8]

A Parenting Plan is not enforceable by a Court. It cannot be registered in a Court (post amendments made in 2003). [8] They are however, very commonly used and can be very useful for separated parents who do not want the inflexibility and cost involved in obtaining court orders.

Family Dispute Resolution

Any prospective parties to parenting proceedings under the Family Law Act are required to obtain a "section 60I certificate". [9] This certificate is obtained from a family dispute resolution practitioner, who will attempt to conduct a mediation (family dispute resolution) between the relevant parties.

Parties are exempt from the requirement to obtain a certificate in certain circumstances, including where there has been family violence or circumstances of urgency. [9]

The Federal Circuit and Family Court Rules 2021 place further obligations on prospective applicants to attempt to resolve proceedings before filing an application. [10] [11]

Parents can agree to record their agreement by way of consent orders. If there is no current court case, they can apply to the court to record the orders. [12] If agreement is reached during proceedings, consent orders can be made by the Registrar or Judge who is managing the matter.

The court must agree that the proposed orders are in the best interests of the subject child before they will be made.

Application to a Court

Parties who cannot resolve their parenting dispute can apply for a court with jurisdiction under the Family Law Act to make parenting orders. These applications are generally made to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (or the Family Court of Western Australia in Western Australia).

Almost all parenting proceedings before a court will involve:

Issues in Family Law Act proceedings

Independent Children's Lawyers

The Court may appoint an Independent Children's Lawyer (an ICL) to represent a child's interests. [14] An ICL does not act on the instructions of the child, but must form an independent view and act in relation to what the ICL believes is the best interests of the child. [15] This contrasts to most state courts, where an ICL will act on the instructions of a child once they reach the age of 12. The test for when an ICL should be appointed considers factors including whether there are allegations of abuse, intractable conflict between the parties, a child of mature years and others. [16]

Relocation

Relocation matters are those in which a party seeks to move the residence of the child a substantial distance, so that it would impact on the time that the child spends with the other party. The Family Law Act does not address relocation matters and a body of case law has developed.

The best interests of the child remains the paramount consideration. The Court must consider all alternatives to a "coercive order" requiring a parent to move. [17] The relocating party is not required to "justify" the reason to relocate. [18]

Multiple applications (so called rule in Rice v Asplund)

The Family Law Act does not limit a party filing further parenting proceedings after previous proceedings have been resolved, provided that the child is under the age of 18. The Court however will strike out applications that do not demonstrate a significant change of circumstances justifying a further application. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family Court of Australia</span>

The Family Court of Australia was a superior Australian federal court of record which deals with family law matters, such as divorce applications, parenting disputes, and the division of property when a couple separate. Together with the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, it covered family law matters in all states and territories of Australia except for Western Australia, which has a separate Family Court. Its core function was to determine cases with the most complex law, facts and parties, to cover specialised areas in family law, and to provide national coverage as the national appellate court for family law matters.

Child custody, conservatorship and guardianship describe the legal and practical relationship between a parent and the parent's child, such as the right of the parent to make decisions for the child, and the parent's duty to care for the child.

Child support is an ongoing, periodic payment made by a parent for the financial benefit of a child following the end of a marriage or other similar relationship. Child maintenance is paid directly or indirectly by an obligor to an obligee for the care and support of children of a relationship that has been terminated, or in some cases never existed. Often the obligor is a non-custodial parent. The obligee is typically a custodial parent, a caregiver, or a guardian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fathers' rights movement in the United Kingdom</span>

The fathers' rights movement in the United Kingdom consists of a large number of diverse pressure groups, ranging from charities and self-help groups to civil disobedience activists in the United Kingdom, who started to obtain wide publicity in 2003. Studies show the majority of the UK population support the need for change and protection of fathers rights to meet the responsibility through 50:50 contact. The movement's origin can be traced to 1974 when Families Need Fathers (FNF) was founded. At the local level, many activists spend much time providing support for newly separated fathers, most of whom are highly distraught. Although some have been accused of being sexist by some commentators, these groups also campaign for better treatment for excluded mothers, women in second marriages, other step-parents and grandparents – all of whom suffer discrimination in respect of contact with their (grand) child(ren).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Children Act 1989</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Children Act 1989 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom that received royal assent on 16 November 1989 and came into substantial force across all three jurisdictions of the United Kingdom on 14 October 1991. In 1995, for the purposes of devolution, the Act was replaced by parallel legislation in Scotland and Northern Ireland. And in 2016, Part III of the Act was replaced in Wales.

In the United Kingdom and the nations of the European Union, parental responsibility refers to the rights and privileges which underpin the relationship between the children and the children's parents and those adults who are granted parental responsibility by either signing a 'parental responsibility agreement' with the mother or getting a 'parental responsibility order' from a court. The terminology for this area of law now includes matters dealt with as contact and residence in some states.

Child custody is a legal term regarding guardianship which is used to describe the legal and practical relationship between a parent or guardian and a child in that person's care. Child custody consists of legal custody, which is the right to make decisions about the child, and physical custody, which is the right and duty to house, provide and care for the child. Married parents normally have joint legal and physical custody of their children. Decisions about child custody typically arise in proceedings involving divorce, annulment, separation, adoption or parental death. In most jurisdictions child custody is determined in accordance with the best interests of the child standard.

Australian family law is principally found in the federal Family Law Act 1975 and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Rules 2021 as well as in other laws and the common law and laws of equity, which affect the family and the relationship between those people, including when those relationships end. Most family law is practised in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia and the Family Court of Western Australia. Australia recognises marriages entered into overseas as well as divorces obtained overseas if they were effected in accordance with the laws of that country. Australian marriage and "matrimonial causes" are recognised by sections 51(xxi) and (xxii) of the Constitution of Australia and internationally by marriage law and conventions, such as the Hague Convention on Marriages (1978).

In family law, contact, visitation and access are synonym terms that denotes the time that a child spends with the noncustodial parent, according to an agreed or court specified parenting schedule. The visitation term is not used in a shared parenting arrangement where both parents have joint physical custody.

Residence may refer to various parts of English law including taxation, immigration, and family law. This article deals exclusively with English family law. See residence in English law for disambiguation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family Law Act 1975</span>

The Family Law Act 1975(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia. It has 15 parts and is the primary piece of legislation dealing with divorce, parenting arrangements between separated parents (whether married or not), property separation, and financial maintenance involving children or divorced or separated de facto partners: in Australia. It also covers family violence. It came into effect on 5 January 1976, repealing the Matrimonial Causes Act 1961, which had been largely based on fault. On the first day of its enactment, 200 applications for divorce were filed in the Melbourne registry office of the Family Court of Australia, and 80 were filed in Adelaide, while only 32 were filed in Sydney.

The Youth Justice Court of the Northern Territory is an Australian court which hears and determines cases concerning crimes committed by children under the age of 18 years in the Northern Territory.

The fathers' rights movement has simultaneously evolved in many countries, advocating for shared parenting after divorce or separation, and the right of children and fathers to have close and meaningful relationships. This article provides details about the fathers' rights movement in specific countries.

The fathers' rights movement in Australia focus on issues of erosion of the family unit, child custody, shared parenting, child access, child support, domestic violence against men, false allegations of domestic violence, child abuse, the reintroduction of fault into divorce proceedings, gender bias, the adversarial family court system and secrecy issues.

Life imprisonment is the most severe criminal sentence available to the State and Territory Supreme Courts in Australia. Most cases attracting the sentence are murder. It is also imposed, albeit rarely, for sexual assault, manufacturing and trafficking commercial quantities of illicit drugs, and offences against the justice system and government security.

<i>MRR v GR</i> Court case in Australia about who a child should live with

MRR v GR was an Australian family law case concerning who the child should live with where the father wanted to remain living in Mount Isa, Queensland while the mother wanted to return to live in Sydney, NSW. The Family Law Act 1975 makes the "best interests of the child" the paramount consideration when making a parenting order. The High Court of Australia decided that a Federal Magistrate erred by failing to consider the "reasonable practicability" of a parenting order with an equal time arrangement that required the mother to live in Mount Isa. The matter was decided on 3 December 2009 with reasons subsequently published on 3 March 2010.

<i>Gronow v Gronow</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

Gronow v Gronow, was a decision of the High Court of Australia.

Law in Australia with regard to children is often based on what is considered to be in the best interest of the child. The traditional and often used assumption is that children need both a mother and a father, which plays an important role in divorce and custodial proceedings, and has carried over into adoption and fertility procedures. As of April 2018 all Australian states and territories allow adoption by same-sex couples.

Forced adoption is the practice of removing children permanently from their parents and the subsequent adoption of those children, following intervention by the Children's Services department of a Local Authority in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Act 2011</span> Australian Act of Parliament that amends the Family Law Act 1975

The Family Law Legislation Amendment Act 2011 is an Act of the Australian Parliament that amends the Family Law Act 1975. It has four parts and its main amendments involve how courts define and respond to allegations of child abuse and domestic violence.

References

  1. ↑ "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 60CA Child's best interests paramount consideration in making a parenting order". www5.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  2. ↑ "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 60CC How a court determines what is in a child's best interests". www5.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  3. ↑ "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 61B Meaning of parental responsibility". classic.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  4. ↑ "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 61C Each parent has parental responsibility (subject to court orders)". classic.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  5. ↑ "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 65DAC Effect of parenting order that provides for shared parental responsibility". classic.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  6. ↑ "Family Law Act 1975 - Section 4: Interpretation". Austlii.
  7. 1 2 "Parenting arrangements after separation". Australian Institute of Family Studies. 2 October 2019. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  8. 1 2 "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 63C Meaning of parenting plan and related terms". www5.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  9. 1 2 "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 60I Attending family dispute resolution before applying for Part VII order". www5.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  10. ↑ AG. "Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021". www.legislation.gov.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  11. ↑ "Before you file – pre-action procedure for parenting cases (prescribed brochure) | Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia". www.fcfcoa.gov.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  12. ↑ "Application for consent orders (do it yourself kit) | Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia". www.fcfcoa.gov.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  13. ↑ "Central Practice Direction – Family Law Case Management | Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia". www.fcfcoa.gov.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  14. ↑ "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 68L Court order for independent representation of child's interests". classic.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  15. ↑ "FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 68LA Role of independent children's lawyer". classic.austlii.edu.au. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  16. ↑ In the Matter Of: Re K Appeal, 10 March 1994, retrieved 23 December 2021
  17. ↑ Oswald & Karrington, 16 August 2016, retrieved 23 December 2021
  18. ↑ Styles & Palmer, 11 June 2014, retrieved 23 December 2021
  19. ↑ Rice, M.A. and Asplund, C.J., 22 November 1978, retrieved 23 December 2021
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.