Participatory defense

Last updated

Participatory defense is a community organizing model that empowers individuals and communities to actively participate in the defense of their loved ones facing criminal charges. Developed in 2009 in the United States, this model seeks to transform the criminal justice system. Participatory defense enhances the influence of essential stakeholders—individuals accused of crimes, their relatives, and their communities—in efforts to reform the system. [1] It enables these stakeholders to evolve from being mere recipients of services from attorneys and other experts to becoming proactive contributors who demand increased transparency, accountability, and equity from criminal justice systems. [2]

Contents

According to Raj Jayadev, founder of the Participatory Defense Network and Silicon Valley De-bug, there are four main components to the Participatory Defense model, which include community organizing, storytelling, courtroom advocacy, and community healing. [3] Participatory Defense aims to empower communities to take ownership of the criminal justice system, build relationships within the community, humanize defendants, provide emotional support, and achieve better outcomes for defendants and their families. [3] Participatory Defense has successfully created a sense of justice and accountability within the community. [4] [5] [6] Moreover, Participatory Defense challenges the traditional role of defense attorneys by engaging communities in the legal process and using personal narratives to humanize, shifting the narrative away from criminality and towards individual circumstances and needs. [7]

History

Participatory defense emerges in the early 2000s from social movements that underscored the need for community-driven approaches to criminal justice [8] Police injustices, including racial profiling, excessive use of force, and wrongful convictions, are prevalent issues within the criminal justice system and disproportionately affect communities of color. Several articles have examined the harmful impact of police injustices on communities and individuals. These impacts prompted widespread advocacy efforts aimed at reforming the legal landscape, exploring alternative models, and addressing systemic inequities. Grassroots organizers and legal advocates began to prioritized community empowerment and engagement [9] . The emergence of participatory defense in 2009 represented a significant milestone in this endeavor, as it provided a structured framework for communities to actively participate in the defense of their loved ones facing criminal charges [8] . Drawing inspiration from community organizing principles and social justice movements, participatory defense sought to democratize the legal process by elevating the voices and experiences of those most affected by the criminal justice system.

Impact

Participatory defense has had major success and community impact throughout the United States and can be seen in the experiences of the individuals and communities that have participated in it. [10] Police injustices, including racial profiling, excessive use of force, and wrongful convictions, are prevalent issues within the criminal justice system and disproportionally affect communities of color. [11] Several articles, have examined the harmful impact of police injustices on communities and individuals. [12] These articles highlight the need for systemic change to address these issues and help provide insight into the ongoing challenges and complexities of the criminal justice system, as well as the potential for community-based initiatives to create meaningful change. Participatory Defense emerged to address these concerns. [13] [14] [5]

Several scholars have written about and promote Participatory Defense as a promising approach to improve the quality of legal representation for low income and under resourced defendants. Participatory Defense can empower clients, shift the narrative away from criminality, and achieve better outcomes for defendants and their families. Several studies have shown evidence that Participatory Defense programs have a positive impact on clients' and families' sense of empowerment and agency within the criminal justice system, leading to reduced sentences and increased chances of acquittal. [15] [16] [17] [18]

Case studies

Tyrone Brown was a Texas teenager sentenced to life in prison in 1990 for a crime he committed as a juvenile. His case garnered national attention due to concerns over the fairness of his trial and the severity of his sentence. Participatory defense organizers worked tirelessly to mobilize community support and advocate for Brown's release. They organized rallies, collected petitions, and engaged in media outreach to raise awareness about his case. [19] Ultimately, their efforts paid off, and in 2010, Tyrone Brown was granted parole after serving 17 years in prison [20] . His release was attributed in part to the overwhelming support generated by the participatory defense campaign.

In San Jose, California, participatory defense has become a cornerstone of community-driven efforts to reform the criminal justice system. Through partnerships with local organizations like Silicon Valley De-bug [21] , participatory defense has empowered individuals and families to navigate the complexities of the legal system. By providing training, resources, and ongoing support, participatory defense organizers have helped countless defendants secure more favorable outcomes in their cases. [22] These outcomes include reduced sentences, dismissals of charges, and greater accountability from law enforcement and legal authorities. Moreover, participatory defense has fostered a sense of collective agency and solidarity within communities, challenging the notion that justice is solely the purview of legal professionals. [23] It has sparked conversations about systemic injustices and inspired broader efforts to reimagine public safety and community well-being.

Related Research Articles

In United States law, an Alford plea, also called a Kennedy plea in West Virginia, an Alford guilty plea, and the Alford doctrine, is a guilty plea in criminal court, whereby a defendant in a criminal case does not admit to the criminal act and asserts innocence, but accepts imposition of a sentence. This plea is allowed even if the evidence to be presented by the prosecution would be likely to persuade a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This can be caused by circumstantial evidence and testimony favoring the prosecution, and difficulty finding evidence and witnesses that would aid the defense.

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own. The case extended the right to counsel, which had been found under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to impose requirements on the federal government, by imposing those requirements upon the states as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice</span> Justice to those who have committed crimes

Criminal justice is the delivery of justice to those who have been accused of committing crimes. The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and the prisons system.

Legal aid is the provision of assistance to people who are unable to afford legal representation and access to the court system. Legal aid is regarded as central in providing access to justice by ensuring equality before the law, the right to counsel and the right to a fair trial. This article describes the development of legal aid and its principles, primarily as known in Europe, the Commonwealth of Nations and in the United States.

A public defender is a lawyer appointed to represent people who otherwise cannot reasonably afford to hire a lawyer to defend themselves in a trial. Several countries provide people with public defenders, including the UK, Belgium, Hungary and Singapore, and some states of Australia. Brazil is the only country in which an office of government-paid lawyers with the specific purpose of providing full legal assistance and representation to the needy free of charge is established in the constitution. The Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, requires the US government to provide legal counsel to indigent defendants in criminal cases. Public defenders in the United States are lawyers employed by or under contract with county, state or federal governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miscarriage of justice</span> Conviction of a person for a crime that they did not commit

A miscarriage of justice occurs when an unfair outcome occurs in a criminal or civil proceeding, such as the conviction and punishment of a person for a crime they did not commit. Miscarriages are also known as wrongful convictions. Innocent people have sometimes ended up in prison for years before their conviction has eventually been overturned. They may be exonerated if new evidence comes to light or it is determined that the police or prosecutor committed some kind of misconduct at the original trial. In some jurisdictions this leads to the payment of compensation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic psychotherapy</span> Psychological treatment of violent offenders

Forensic psychotherapy is the application of psychological knowledge to the treatment of offender-patients who commit violent acts against themselves or others. This form of treatment allows for a therapist to potentially understand the offender and their mental state. It gives the individual providing treatment the opportunity to examine further whether the offender’s criminal behavior was a conscious act or not, what exactly their association with violent behavior is, and what possible motives could have driven them. The discipline of forensic psychotherapy is one that requires the involvement of individuals other than simply the therapist and patient. A therapist may collaborate with other professionals, such as physicians, social workers, nurses and other psychologists in order to best serve the offenders’ needs. Whether the treatment is successful or not relies on a multitude of things, but typically ensuring that a systemic approach is taken and that all involved in the treatment process are well informed and supportive has proven to be the most effective. In addition to group work forensic psychotherapy may also involve therapeutic communities, individual interaction with victims as well as offenders, and family work. In order for this specialized therapy to be as effective as possible, it demands the compliance of not only the patient and therapist, but of the rest of society as well. The main focus of forensic psychotherapy is not to condone the acts of the offender, but to obtain a psychodynamic understanding of the offender in order to attempt to provide them with an effective form of treatment to help them take responsibility for any crimes committed and to prevent the perpetration of crimes by the offender in the future. Guidelines have been set to ensure proficiency in the field of Forensic Psychology.

Legal aid in the United States is the provision of assistance to people who are unable to afford legal representation and access to the court system in the United States. In the US, legal aid provisions are different for criminal law and civil law. Criminal legal aid with legal representation is guaranteed to defendants under criminal prosecution who cannot afford to hire an attorney. Civil legal aid is not guaranteed under federal law, but is provided by a variety of public interest law firms and community legal clinics for free or at reduced cost. Other forms of civil legal aid are available through federally-funded legal services, pro bono lawyers, and private volunteers.

A political trial is a criminal trial with political implications. When the trial is carried out without the minimum guarantees of the rule of law, the political trial is the expression of a totalitarian or authoritarian system, where the administration of justice as a whole is political.

Founded in 1972, the Asian Law Caucus (ALC) is the United States' first legal aid and civil rights organization serving low-income Asian-Pacific American communities. The ALC focuses housing rights, immigration and immigrant rights, labor and employment issues, student advocacy (ASPIRE), civil rights and hate violence, national security and criminal reform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grand juries in the United States</span> Groups of citizens empowered by United States federal or state law to conduct legal proceedings

Grand juries in the United States are groups of citizens empowered by United States federal or state law to conduct legal proceedings, chiefly investigating potential criminal conduct and determining whether criminal charges should be brought. The grand jury originated under the law of England and spread through colonization to other jurisdictions as part of the common law. Today, however, the United States is one of only two jurisdictions, along with Liberia, that continues to use the grand jury to screen criminal indictments. Japan also uses the system similar to civil grand juries used by some U.S. states to investigate corruption and other more systemic issues.

Bail in the United States refers to the practice of releasing suspects from custody before their hearing, on payment of bail, which is money or pledge of property to the court which may be refunded if suspects return to court for their trial. Bail practices in the United States vary from state to state.

Jonathan A. Rapping is an American criminal defense attorney, founder and president of Gideon's Promise, professor of law at Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, and visiting professor of law at Harvard Law School. Rapping received the MacArthur "Genius" Award in 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orleans Public Defenders</span>

The Orleans Public Defenders (OPD) office provides legal assistance to individuals charged with a crime in New Orleans, Louisiana state courts who are financially unable to retain private counsel. Courts within their jurisdiction include the Louisiana District Courts, Juvenile and Family Courts, Louisiana Circuit Courts of Appeal, and the Louisiana Supreme Court. Orleans Parish District Attorney prosecutes alleged felony and misdemeanor violations of Louisiana state law that occur within the jurisdiction of New Orleans. Alleged federal law violations by indigent defendants are prosecuted and defended in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Criminal justice reform seeks to address structural issues in criminal justice systems such as racial profiling, police brutality, overcriminalization, mass incarceration, and recidivism. Criminal justice reform can take place at any point where the criminal justice system intervenes in citizens’ lives, including lawmaking, policing, and sentencing.

The National Justice Project (NJP) is a not for profit legal service established to promote human rights, social justice and to fight against disadvantage and discrimination in Australia through strategic legal action, effective advocacy and communication.

Sentencing reform is the effort to change perceived injustices in the lengths of criminal sentences. It is a component of the larger concept of criminal justice reform. In the U.S. criminal justice system, sentencing guidelines are criticized for being both draconian and racially discriminatory. Additionally, they are cited as the main contributor to the growing and excessive prison population known as mass incarceration.

The Lammy Review is a 2017 review on discrimination within the policing and criminal justice systems in the UK, led by David Lammy and commissioned by David Cameron and Theresa May. The Lammy Review found significant racial bias in the UK justice system.

Indigenous peoples in Canada are significantly overrepresented in the Canadian justice system. They make up approximately 30 per cent of all incarcerated individuals in Canada despite being approximately 4 per cent of the total population. Explanations for this overrepresentation include historical injustices – and the contemporary outcomes which are results of that history – faced by Indigenous peoples, as well as structural issues within the current criminal justice system itself. These issues include over-policing, ineffective representation in court, inadequate application of bail, and over-sentencing, which are all indications of systemic racism. While these issues affect Indigenous peoples broadly, there are specific implications for Indigenous women and youth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raj Jayadev</span> American community organizer (born 1975)

Raj Jayadev is an American community organizer and criminal justice advocate. He is the founder of the Silicon Valley De-bug, a grassroots organization that supports people who have been impacted by the criminal justice system and their loved ones, advocating for criminal justice reform, economic justice, housing and immigrant rights. De-bug is a multi-media platform that centers the stories of marginalized communities in California. In 2018, Jayadev received a MacArthur Fellow Award for his work with the organization.

References

  1. ↑ Godsoe, Cynthia (2018-05-01). "Participatory Defense: Humanizing the Accused and Ceding Control to the Client". Mercer Law Review. 69 (3). ISSN   0025-987X.
  2. ↑ Moore, Janet. "MAKE THEM HEAR YOU: PARTICIPATORY DEFENSE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM" (PDF).
  3. 1 2 Transforming the Courts Through Family and Community Participation: The ACJP Model , retrieved 2023-04-04
  4. ↑ Mothers in Charge - Participatory Defense in Philadelphia , retrieved 2023-04-04
  5. 1 2 "Non-Violent Three-Strikers Go Free with Justice Project's Help". San Jose Inside. 2014-06-12. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  6. ↑ "De-bug's role as legal watchdog grows". The Mercury News. 2010-04-04. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  7. ↑ Cilia, Ava. "Participatory Defense: What It Is and Why It Deserves Our Attention | Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review" . Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  8. 1 2 Moore, Janet. "MAKE THEM HEAR YOU: PARTICIPATORY DEFENSE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM" (PDF).
  9. ↑ Flores, Walter; Samuel, Jeannie (2019-06-14). "Grassroots organisations and the sustainable development goals: no one left behind?". The BMJ. 365: l2269. doi:10.1136/bmj.l2269. ISSN   0959-8138. PMC   6566843 . PMID   31201160.
  10. ↑ 1,862 fewer years in prison , retrieved 2023-04-04
  11. ↑ "Racial Disparities in Law Enforcement Stops". Public Policy Institute of California. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  12. ↑ Weintraub, Daniel (2010-05-23). "A Silicon Valley Group Gives Voice to Voiceless". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  13. ↑ Kadah, Jana (2022-06-06). "Silicon Valley families find faults with DA's handling of police shootings". San José Spotlight. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  14. ↑ Favro • •, Marianne. "Nearly a Third of SJPD Officers Had Complaints Against Them in 2021: Report". NBC Bay Area. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  15. ↑ "How to Improve Your Public Defense Office". www.publicdefenders.us. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  16. ↑ Godsoe, Cynthia (2018-10-05). "Participatory Defense: Humanizing the Accused and Ceding Control to the Client". Mercer Law Review. Rochester, NY. SSRN   3261308.
  17. ↑ Pennington, Liana. “An Empirical Study of One Participatory Defense Program Facilitated by a Public Defender Office.” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, vol. 14, 2017 2016, pp. 603–27.
  18. ↑ "A New Way Forward: Participatory Defense Symposium Illuminates and Inspires". Berkeley Law. Retrieved 2023-04-04.
  19. ↑ Moore, Janet. "MAKE THEM HEAR YOU: PARTICIPATORY DEFENSE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM" (PDF).
  20. ↑ Press, The Associated (2007-03-11). "Inmate Given Life After Drug Use Is Pardoned in Texas". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2024-05-08.
  21. ↑ "Silicon Valley De-Bug". www.siliconvalleydebug.org. Retrieved 2024-05-08.
  22. ↑ "TRAININGS". participatorydefense. Retrieved 2024-05-08.
  23. ↑ Wolfe, Joel D. (1985). "A Defense of Participatory Democracy". The Review of Politics. 47 (3): 370–389. doi:10.1017/S0034670500036925. ISSN   0034-6705. JSTOR   1406809.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.