Pathetic fallacy

Last updated
John Ruskin at Glenfinlas, Scotland (1853-54), by John Everett Millais. Millais Ruskin.jpg
John Ruskin at Glenfinlas, Scotland (1853–54), by John Everett Millais.

The phrase pathetic fallacy is a literary term for the attribution of human emotion and conduct to things found in nature that are not human. It is a kind of personification that occurs in poetic descriptions, when, for example, clouds seem sullen, when leaves dance, or when rocks seem indifferent. The English cultural critic John Ruskin coined the term in the third volume of his work Modern Painters (1856). [2] [3] [4]

Contents

History of the phrase

The meanings of the component terms have changed significantly since Ruskin's coinage. [5] Ruskin's original definition is "emotional falseness", or the falseness that occurs to one's perceptions when influenced by violent or heightened emotion. For example, when a person is unhinged by grief, the clouds might seem darker than they are, or perhaps mournful or uncaring. [6] [7] The word "fallacy" in modern usage refers primarily to an example of flawed reasoning, but for Ruskin and writers of the 19th century and earlier, fallacy could be used to mean simply a "falseness". [8] Similarly, the word "pathetic" simply meant for Ruskin "emotional" or "pertaining to emotion." [9]

Ruskin coined the term pathetic fallacy to help explain his theory of the role of truth in art. For him, "nothing [can] be good or useful, ... which [is] untrue." [6] And yet, he notes, good poetry often includes "falsehoods" such as the ascription of emotion to inanimate objects. To resolve this apparent paradox, he posits that usages of pathetic fallacy succeed when the perceptual error in question is due to a heightened emotional state: "so long as we see that the feeling is true, we pardon, or are even pleased by, the confessed fallacy." [6] However, in his view, the greatest poets exercise extreme restraint in this regard. He praises the author of a French ballad: "there is not, from beginning to end of it, a single poetical expression, except in one stanza. ... [I]n the very presence of death, for an instant, his own emotions conquer him. He records no longer the facts only, but the facts as they seem to him." [6]

While Ruskin's essay plainly praises and disparages use of the pathetic fallacy in various contexts, his phrase has been remembered as a "pejorative", [10] used to criticize the sentimentality that was common to the poetry of the late 18th century, especially among poets like Burns, Blake, Wordsworth, Shelley, and Keats. Wordsworth supported this use of personification based on emotion by claiming that "objects ... derive their influence not from properties inherent in them . . . but from such as are bestowed upon them by the minds of those who are conversant with or affected by these objects." [11] However Tennyson, in his own poetry, began to refine and diminish such expressions, and introduced an emphasis on what might be called a more scientific comparison of objects in terms of sense perception. The old order was beginning to be replaced by the new just as Ruskin addressed the matter, and the use of the pathetic fallacy markedly began to disappear[ citation needed ]. As a critic, Ruskin proved influential and is credited with having helped to refine poetic expression. [10]

Examples

Ruskin's first example is these lines of a poem:

They rowed her in across the rolling foam—
The cruel, crawling foam . . .

Ruskin then points out that "the foam is not cruel, neither does it crawl. The state of mind which attributes to it these characters of a living creature is one in which the reason is unhinged by grief"—these lines work for Ruskin "not because they fallaciously describe foam, but because they faithfully describe sorrow." [12]

The following, a stanza from the poem "Maud" (1855) by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, demonstrates what John Ruskin, in Modern Painters, said was an "exquisite" instance of the use of the pathetic fallacy: [12]

There has fallen a splendid tear
  From the passion-flower at the gate.
She is coming, my dove, my dear;
  She is coming, my life, my fate.
The red rose cries, "She is near, she is near;"
  And the white rose weeps, "She is late;"
The larkspur listens, "I hear, I hear;"
  And the lily whispers, "I wait." (Part 1, XXII, 10)

Science

A pathetic fallacy such as "Nature abhors a vacuum" may help explain a scientific concept, though some caution against using pathetic fallacies in science writing for not being strictly accurate. [13] [14]

See also

Related Research Articles

A genre of arts criticism, literary criticism or literary studies is the study, evaluation, and interpretation of literature. Modern literary criticism is often influenced by literary theory, which is the philosophical analysis of literature's goals and methods. Although the two activities are closely related, literary critics are not always, and have not always been, theorists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Dryden</span> English poet and playwright (1631–1700)

John Dryden was an English poet, literary critic, translator, and playwright who in 1668 was appointed England's first Poet Laureate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matthew Arnold</span> English poet and cultural critic (1822–1888)

Matthew Arnold was an English poet and cultural critic. He was the son of Thomas Arnold, the headmaster of Rugby School, and brother to both Tom Arnold, literary professor, and William Delafield Arnold, novelist and colonial administrator. He has been characterised as a sage writer, a type of writer who chastises and instructs the reader on contemporary social issues. He was also an inspector of schools for thirty-five years, and supported the concept of state-regulated secondary education.

Russian formalism was a school of literary theory in Russia from the 1910s to the 1930s. It includes the work of a number of highly influential Russian and Soviet scholars such as Viktor Shklovsky, Yuri Tynianov, Vladimir Propp, Boris Eichenbaum, Roman Jakobson, Boris Tomashevsky, Grigory Gukovsky who revolutionised literary criticism between 1914 and the 1930s by establishing the specificity and autonomy of poetic language and literature. Russian formalism exerted a major influence on thinkers like Mikhail Bakhtin and Juri Lotman, and on structuralism as a whole. The movement's members had a relevant influence on modern literary criticism, as it developed in the structuralist and post-structuralist periods. Under Stalin it became a pejorative term for elitist art.

William Kurtz Wimsatt Jr. was an American professor of English, literary theorist, and critic. Wimsatt is often associated with the concept of the intentional fallacy, which he developed with Monroe Beardsley in order to question the importance of an author's intentions for the creation of a work of art.

Hypallage is a figure of speech in which the syntactic relationship between two terms is interchanged, or – more frequently – a modifier is syntactically linked to an item other than the one that it modifies semantically. The latter type of hypallage, typically resulting in the implied personification of an inanimate or abstract noun, is also called a transferred epithet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Love's Philosophy</span>

"Love's Philosophy" is a poem by Percy Bysshe Shelley published in 1819.

Pity is a sympathetic sorrow evoked by the suffering of others. The word is comparable to compassion, condolence, or empathy. It derives from the Latin pietas. Self-pity is pity directed towards oneself.

Sentimentality originally indicated the reliance on feelings as a guide to truth, but in current usage the term commonly connotes a reliance on shallow, uncomplicated emotions at the expense of reason.

Affective fallacy is a term from literary criticism used to refer to the supposed error of judging or evaluating a text on the basis of its emotional effects on a reader. The term was coined by W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley in 1949 as a principle of New Criticism which is often paired with their study of The Intentional Fallacy.

In literary criticism, an objective correlative is a group of things or events which systematically represent emotions.

This glossary of literary terms is a list of definitions of terms and concepts used in the discussion, classification, analysis, and criticism of all types of literature, such as poetry, novels, and picture books, as well as of grammar, syntax, and language techniques. For a more complete glossary of terms relating to poetry in particular, see Glossary of poetry terms.

— From Cantos 27 and 56, In Memoriam A.H.H., by Alfred Tennyson, published this year

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ode: Intimations of Immortality</span> Poem by William Wordsworth

"Ode: Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood" is a poem by William Wordsworth, completed in 1804 and published in Poems, in Two Volumes (1807). The poem was completed in two parts, with the first four stanzas written among a series of poems composed in 1802 about childhood. The first part of the poem was completed on 27 March 1802 and a copy was provided to Wordsworth's friend and fellow poet, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who responded with his own poem, "Dejection: An Ode", in April. The fourth stanza of the ode ends with a question, and Wordsworth was finally able to answer it with seven additional stanzas completed in early 1804. It was first printed as "Ode" in 1807, and it was not until 1815 that it was edited and reworked to the version that is currently known, "Ode: Intimations of Immortality".

Reification is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity. In other words, it is the error of treating something that is not concrete, such as an idea, as a concrete thing. A common case of reification is the confusion of a model with reality: "the map is not the territory".

<i>The Well Wrought Urn</i> 1947 essay collection by Cleanth Brooks

The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry is a 1947 collection of essays by Cleanth Brooks. It is considered a seminal text in the New Critical school of literary criticism. The title contains an allusion to the fourth stanza of John Donne's poem, "The Canonization", which is the primary subject of the first chapter of the book.

In literature, the paradox is an anomalous juxtaposition of incongruous ideas for the sake of striking exposition or unexpected insight. It functions as a method of literary composition and analysis that involves examining apparently contradictory statements and drawing conclusions either to reconcile them or to explain their presence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Lucy poems</span> Five poems written by William Wordsworth

The Lucy poems are a series of five poems composed by the English Romantic poet William Wordsworth (1770–1850) between 1798 and 1801. All but one were first published during 1800 in the second edition of Lyrical Ballads, a collaboration between Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge that was both Wordsworth's first major publication and a milestone in the early English Romantic movement. In the series, Wordsworth sought to write unaffected English verse infused with abstract ideals of beauty, nature, love, longing, and death.

The sublime in literature refers to the use of language and description that excites the senses of the reader to a degree that exceeds the ordinary limits of that individual's capacities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English Romantic sonnets</span>

The sonnet was a popular form of poetry during the Romantic period: William Wordsworth wrote 523, John Keats 67, Samuel Taylor Coleridge 48, and Percy Bysshe Shelley 18. But in the opinion of Lord Byron sonnets were “the most puling, petrifying, stupidly platonic compositions”, at least as a vehicle for love poetry, and he wrote no more than five.

References

  1. Grieve, Alastair. "Ruskin and Millais at Glenfinlas", The Burlington Magazine, Vol. 138, No. 1117, pp. 228–234, April 1996. JSTOR   886970
  2. The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy 2nd ed., (2005). Thomas Mautner, Editor. p. 455.
  3. Abrams, M.H.; Harpham, G.G. (2011) [1971]. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. p. 269. ISBN   9780495898023. LCCN   2010941195.
  4. The New Encyclopædia Britannica, 15th ed., (1988), vol. 9, p. 197.
  5. Fowler, H.W. (1994) [1926]. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage . Wordsworth Collection. Wordsworth Editions. p.  425. ISBN   9781853263187.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Ruskin, John (1856). "XII: Of the Pathetic Fallacy". Modern Painters. Vol. iii, pt. 4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  7. Hurwit, Jeffrey M. (1982). "Palm Trees and the Pathetic Fallacy in Archaic Greek Poetry and Art". The Classical Journal. 77 (3). The Classical Association of the Middle West and South: 193–199. JSTOR   3296969.
  8. "Fallacy". The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. 1st ed. 1909.
  9. "Pathetic". The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. 1st ed. 1909.
  10. 1 2 Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, Alex Preminger, Ed., Princeton University Press, 1974 ISBN   0-691-01317-9
  11. Wordsworth, William. Knight, William Angus, editor. The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth, Vol. 4. W Paterson (1883) pp. 199
  12. 1 2 Ruskin, J., "Of the Pathetic Fallacy", Modern Painters vol. III part 4. (1856)
  13. Pager-McClymont, K. (2022). Linking Emotions to Surroundings: A Stylistic Model of Pathetic Fallacy. Language and Literature, 31(3), 428-454. doi : 10.1177/09639470221106021
  14.  Hansen, Wallace R. Suggestions to Authors of the Reports of the United States Geological Survey. U.S. Government Printing Office. University of Minnesota. (1991). p. 154. ISBN   9780160285660.

Further reading