Perruchet effect

Last updated

The Perruchet effect is a psychological phenomenon in which a dissociation is shown between conscious expectation of an event and the strength or speed of a response to the event. [1] This can be demonstrated by sequential analyses of consecutive trials such as eye blinking conditioning, electrodermal shocks and cued go/no-go task. [2] [1] [3] The dissociation design differentiates the automatic associative strength and propositional expectation's effects on associative learning and conditioning, i.e., the cognitive learning process with relationship between events. [4] [5]

Contents

The effect is named after Pierre Perruchet, who first proposed a conditioning paradigm to take separate accounts of two mechanisms underlying associative learning processes: [6]

  1. The automatic formation of links between two events, whereas repeated pairing of the events should enhance the associative strength of conditioned response.
  2. The propositional reasoning on the relationship between two events, in which inferences drawn from the sequential presentation of events would cast a conscious expectancy on the next event. [7]

Thus, it contrasts traditional strength theory in associative learning and expectancy theory in propositional learning. [7] [2]

The Perruchet effect is considered a type of non-local influence on behavior. [8] It goes against the view that conscious inferences about the relations between events are the offshoot of human conditioned responses, [9] and challenges the single-processing model on propositional learning. [10] To date, the Perruchet effect is one of the strongest pieces of evidence supporting dual-processing model of associative learning. [5]

Original study

In 1985, Perruchet conducted an eyeblink conditioning paradigm to evaluate the expectancy theory in human conditioning. [6] A neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) - a musical tone was paired with an unconditioned stimulus – an air-puff of nitrogen gas (US) to participants’ eyes. Based on classical conditioning, after repeated trials with air-puffs of nitrogen gas right after the tone (CS-US pairs), participants are expected to acquire and exhibit conditioned responses - eye blinking when the tone was presented alone (CS-alone).

There were two types of trials: CS-alone and CS-US pairs. During the experiment, trial sequences were generated in randomised intermittent - in each trial, presentations of CS-alone and CS-US pairs had equal chances of 50%. The participants were fully informed of such randomisation. The strength of conditioned responses in different lengths of trial runs (i.e., sequences with same type of consecutive trials) was then recorded. [7]

The results showed a double dissociation in associative learning: from runs of CS-alone events in decreasing lengths (4-1), to runs of CS-US pairs in increasing lengths (1-4), the frequency of conditioned responses increased in function of preceding trial runs, while the expectancy rating decreased in accordance with the gambler’s fallacy. Perruchet remarked that in the paradigm, conditioned responses were better predicted with associative strength, which presented itself in an increasing trend. [2]

Variations

Research has shown that in electrodermal conditionings i.e., skin conductance paradigms, the conscious expectancy of stimuli is essential towards generating conditioned responses. [3]  

Reaction time paradigms were also developed to examine the Perruchet effect in other conditioning formats, e.g., in cued go/no-go and simple reaction time (RT) tasks. [1] In general, the participants displayed a shortened performance time, yet decreased expectancy on the task appearance in the next trial, showcasing the same dissociation from conditioned responses.

Theoretical basis

The Perruchet paradigm was designed with the foundation of two contrasting theories, strength theory and expectancy theory.

Strength theory

The strength theory is based on the traditional model of associative learning and concerns automatic link formations via event contingencies. [11] For example, in classical conditioning, the theory suggests that repeated enhancement in association between CS and US (i.e., presentation of CS-US pairs) strengthens the unconsciously perceived link. With established literature on associative memory and classical conditioning, the strength or speed of a conditioned response should in turn increase with the strength of associative link.

Expectancy theory

Many literatures support the importance of conscious awareness in conditioning. [10] In particular, the propositional model of associative learning suggests that the inference from CS to US brings a conscious expectancy of US based on CS. The propositional knowledge (inference) then generates conditioned response.

In Perruchet’s paradigm, the expectancy of participants can be manifested by the gambler’s fallacy - a false belief (or cognitive bias) that if an event has occurred less frequently than normal in the past, it becomes more likely to happen in the future. This is an incorrect perception as the likelihood of each event happening is always constant (if given), and the probabilities of events are independent from each other, i.e., the outcome of next event should have no relation with any previous event. [2] Such a cognitive bias can be partially explained by representative heuristics, which suggest that our perceived likelihood of events is largely dependent on the representation of a small sample of previous events. This causes us to neglect information on any given objective probability, and subjectively misinterpret likelihood of future events based on recent sequences of events. [12]

Under such belief, participants are predicted to have a higher expectancy for US occurrence with longer lengths of CS-alone runs, and lower expectancy for CS-US occurrence with longer lengths of CS-US pair runs. In other words, the subjective ratings of expectancy should decrease as a function of lengths from longest CS-alone runs to longest CS-US pair runs. [2]

Significance

Dual-processing theory

The dual-processing model of associative learning accounts for both primitive, implicit system of automatic link formations and conscious, effortful system of contingency inferences in associative learning. [13]  

The Perruchet effect supports the dual-processing theory with the dissociation of conscious expectancy from conditioned response, as occurrences of dissociation can be used to infer the existence of distinctive sets of cognitive mechanisms. [14] Further, the account for expectancy via gambler’s fallacy remains as the “strongest available evidence” for the occurrence of conditioning without presence of awareness. [5]

Single-processing theory (or propositional model of learning)

An alternative view is the single-processing model of learning, which proposes that associative learning only depends on the non-automatic, conscious processing system of propositional evaluations. For instance, conditioned responses are completely attributed to conscious expectancy of events. [5] [15]

Based on recent reviews, most of the existing research on associative learning support this model. The Perruchet effect is one of the notable exceptions that challenges its foundation, as the demonstrated dissociation suggests a separation in conditioning with conscious and unconscious accounts. [15]

Thus, many have attempted to theorise alternative explanations for the Perruchet effect. Possible confounding factors such as potential non-associative influences and unconditioned stimuli sensitizations are identified. For instance, in the eye blinking conditioning, the generation of conditioned responses, blinking can be solely due to the recency of unconditioned stimuli, air-puff, still being in effect. [5]

Related Research Articles

Operant conditioning, also called instrumental conditioning, is a learning process where behaviors are modified through the association of stimuli with reinforcement or punishment. In it, operants—behaviors that affect one's environment—are conditioned to occur or not occur depending on the environmental consequences of the behavior.

Classical conditioning is a behavioral procedure in which a biologically potent physiological stimulus is paired with a neutral stimulus. The term classical conditioning refers to the process of an automatic, conditioned response that is paired with a specific stimulus.

Motor learning refers broadly to changes in an organism's movements that reflect changes in the structure and function of the nervous system. Motor learning occurs over varying timescales and degrees of complexity: humans learn to walk or talk over the course of years, but continue to adjust to changes in height, weight, strength etc. over their lifetimes. Motor learning enables animals to gain new skills, and improves the smoothness and accuracy of movements, in some cases by calibrating simple movements like reflexes. Motor learning research often considers variables that contribute to motor program formation, sensitivity of error-detection processes, and strength of movement schemas. Motor learning is "relatively permanent", as the capability to respond appropriately is acquired and retained. Temporary gains in performance during practice or in response to some perturbation are often termed motor adaptation, a transient form of learning. Neuroscience research on motor learning is concerned with which parts of the brain and spinal cord represent movements and motor programs and how the nervous system processes feedback to change the connectivity and synaptic strengths. At the behavioral level, research focuses on the design and effect of the main components driving motor learning, i.e. the structure of practice and the feedback. The timing and organization of practice can influence information retention, e.g. how tasks can be subdivided and practiced, and the precise form of feedback can influence preparation, anticipation, and guidance of movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Picture superiority effect</span> Psychological phenomenon

The picture superiority effect refers to the phenomenon in which pictures and images are more likely to be remembered than are words. This effect has been demonstrated in numerous experiments using different methods. It is based on the notion that "human memory is extremely sensitive to the symbolic modality of presentation of event information". Explanations for the picture superiority effect are not concrete and are still being debated.

The Rescorla–Wagner model ("R-W") is a model of classical conditioning, in which learning is conceptualized in terms of associations between conditioned (CS) and unconditioned (US) stimuli. A strong CS-US association means that the CS signals predict the US. One might say that before conditioning, the subject is surprised by the US, but after conditioning, the subject is no longer surprised, because the CS predicts the coming of the US. The model casts the conditioning processes into discrete trials, during which stimuli may be either present or absent. The strength of prediction of the US on a trial can be represented as the summed associative strengths of all CSs present during the trial. This feature of the model represented a major advance over previous models, and it allowed a straightforward explanation of important experimental phenomena, most notably the blocking effect. Failures of the model have led to modifications, alternative models, and many additional findings. The model has had some impact on neural science in recent years, as studies have suggested that the phasic activity of dopamine neurons in mesostriatal DA projections in the midbrain encodes for the type of prediction error detailed in the model.

Belief bias is the tendency to judge the strength of arguments based on the plausibility of their conclusion rather than how strongly they support that conclusion. A person is more likely to accept an argument that supports a conclusion that aligns with their values, beliefs and prior knowledge, while rejecting counter arguments to the conclusion. Belief bias is an extremely common and therefore significant form of error; we can easily be blinded by our beliefs and reach the wrong conclusion. Belief bias has been found to influence various reasoning tasks, including conditional reasoning, relation reasoning and transitive reasoning.

Extinction is a behavioral phenomenon observed in both operantly conditioned and classically conditioned behavior, which manifests itself by fading of non-reinforced conditioned response over time. When operant behavior that has been previously reinforced no longer produces reinforcing consequences the behavior gradually stops occurring. In classical conditioning, when a conditioned stimulus is presented alone, so that it no longer predicts the coming of the unconditioned stimulus, conditioned responding gradually stops. For example, after Pavlov's dog was conditioned to salivate at the sound of a metronome, it eventually stopped salivating to the metronome after the metronome had been sounded repeatedly but no food came. Many anxiety disorders such as post traumatic stress disorder are believed to reflect, at least in part, a failure to extinguish conditioned fear.

Artificial grammar learning (AGL) is a paradigm of study within cognitive psychology and linguistics. Its goal is to investigate the processes that underlie human language learning by testing subjects' ability to learn a made-up grammar in a laboratory setting. It was developed to evaluate the processes of human language learning but has also been utilized to study implicit learning in a more general sense. The area of interest is typically the subjects' ability to detect patterns and statistical regularities during a training phase and then use their new knowledge of those patterns in a testing phase. The testing phase can either use the symbols or sounds used in the training phase or transfer the patterns to another set of symbols or sounds as surface structure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blocking effect</span> Elaboration on classical conditioning in psychology

In Kamin's blocking effect the conditioning of an association between two stimuli, a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US) is impaired if, during the conditioning process, the CS is presented together with a second CS that has already been associated with the unconditioned stimulus.

Implicit attitudes are evaluations that occur without conscious awareness towards an attitude object or the self. These evaluations are generally either favorable or unfavorable and come about from various influences in the individual experience. The commonly used definition of implicit attitude within cognitive and social psychology comes from Anthony Greenwald and Mahzarin Banaji's template for definitions of terms related to implicit cognition: "Implicit attitudes are introspectively unidentified traces of past experience that mediate favorable or unfavorable feeling, thought, or action toward social objects". These thoughts, feelings or actions have an influence on behavior that the individual may not be aware of.

There is evidence suggesting that different processes are involved in remembering something versus knowing whether it is familiar. It appears that "remembering" and "knowing" represent relatively different characteristics of memory as well as reflect different ways of using memory.

Recognition memory, a subcategory of explicit memory, is the ability to recognize previously encountered events, objects, or people. When the previously experienced event is reexperienced, this environmental content is matched to stored memory representations, eliciting matching signals. As first established by psychology experiments in the 1970s, recognition memory for pictures is quite remarkable: humans can remember thousands of images at high accuracy after seeing each only once and only for a few seconds.

In psychology, implicit memory is one of the two main types of long-term human memory. It is acquired and used unconsciously, and can affect thoughts and behaviours. One of its most common forms is procedural memory, which allows people to perform certain tasks without conscious awareness of these previous experiences; for example, remembering how to tie one's shoes or ride a bicycle without consciously thinking about those activities.

The late positive component or late positive complex (LPC) is a positive-going event-related brain potential (ERP) component that has been important in studies of explicit recognition memory. It is generally found to be largest over parietal scalp sites, beginning around 400–500 ms after the onset of a stimulus and lasting for a few hundred milliseconds. It is an important part of the ERP "old/new" effect, which may also include modulations of an earlier component similar to an N400. Similar positivities have sometimes been referred to as the P3b, P300, and P600. Here, we use the term "LPC" in reference to this late positive component.

Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) is a memory phenomenon where remembering causes forgetting of other information in memory. The phenomenon was first demonstrated in 1994, although the concept of RIF has been previously discussed in the context of retrieval inhibition.

Spontaneous recovery is a phenomenon of learning and memory that was first named and described by Ivan Pavlov in his studies of classical (Pavlovian) conditioning. In that context, it refers to the re-emergence of a previously extinguished conditioned response after a delay. Such a recovery of "lost" behaviors can be observed within a variety of domains, and the recovery of lost human memories is often of particular interest. For a mathematical model for spontaneous recovery see Further Reading.

External inhibition is the observed decrease of the response of a conditioned reaction when an external (distracting) stimulus that was not part of the original conditioned response set is introduced. This effect was first observed in Ivan Pavlov's classical conditioning studies where the dogs would salivate less when presented with the sound of the tuning fork in the distracting context of a passing truck. External inhibition is important for its main principle in classical conditioning where a conditioned response may decrease in magnitude after the external stimulus is introduced. This is especially advantageous for when trying to disassociate conditioned stimulus and responses. A practical example is where students who become anxious upon standing in front of the class to give a presentation may feel less anxiety if their friends were sitting in front of the student presenting. The positive association of speaking to friends may distract the student from associating speaking to the entire class with anxiety.

Pavlovian-instrumental transfer (PIT) is a psychological phenomenon that occurs when a conditioned stimulus that has been associated with rewarding or aversive stimuli via classical conditioning alters motivational salience and operant behavior. Two distinct forms of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer have been identified in humans and other animals – specific PIT and general PIT – with unique neural substrates mediating each type. In relation to rewarding stimuli, specific PIT occurs when a CS is associated with a specific rewarding stimulus through classical conditioning and subsequent exposure to the CS enhances an operant response that is directed toward the same reward with which it was paired. General PIT occurs when a CS is paired with one reward and it enhances an operant response that is directed toward a different rewarding stimulus.


Human contingency learning (HCL) is the observation that people tend to acquire knowledge based on whichever outcome has the highest probability of occurring from particular stimuli. In other words, individuals gather associations between a certain behaviour and a specific consequence. It is a form of learning for many organisms.

Association in psychology refers to a mental connection between concepts, events, or mental states that usually stems from specific experiences. Associations are seen throughout several schools of thought in psychology including behaviorism, associationism, psychoanalysis, social psychology, and structuralism. The idea stems from Plato and Aristotle, especially with regard to the succession of memories, and it was carried on by philosophers such as John Locke, David Hume, David Hartley, and James Mill. It finds its place in modern psychology in such areas as memory, learning, and the study of neural pathways.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Livesey, EJ; Costa, DS (2014). "Automaticity and conscious control in single and choice response time versions of the Perruchet effect". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67 (4): 646–64. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.824014. PMID   23972053. S2CID   25592690.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Perruchet, Pierre (April 2015). "Dissociating conscious expectancies from automatic link formation in associative learning: a review on the so-called Perruchet effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Learning and Cognition. 41 (2): 105–127. doi:10.1037/xan0000060. ISSN   2329-8464. PMID   25867141.
  3. 1 2 McAndrew, A.; Jones, F. W.; McLaren, R. P.; McLaren, I. P. L. (April 2012). "Dissociating expectancy of shock and changes in skin conductance: an investigation of the Perruchet effect using an electrodermal paradigm". Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Behavior Processes. 38 (2): 203–208. doi:10.1037/a0026718. ISSN   1939-2184. PMID   22250788.
  4. ↑ Hoosain, Rumjahn (2017). The Timing of Neural and Behavioral Events: Its Relation to Human Experience. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. pp. 92–93. ISBN   9781681237718.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Mitchell, Chris J.; Houwer, Jan De; Lovibond, Peter F. (April 2009). "The propositional nature of human associative learning". Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 32 (2): 183–198. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000855. hdl: 1854/LU-790882 . ISSN   1469-1825. PMID   19386174. S2CID   646516.
  6. 1 2 Perruchet, Pierre (1985-01-01). "Expectancy for airpuff and conditioned eyeblinks in humans". Acta Psychologica. 58 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(85)90032-0. ISSN   0001-6918.
  7. 1 2 3 Perruchet, Pierre (1985-10-01). "A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning". The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science. 20 (4): 163–170. doi:10.1007/BF03003653. ISSN   1936-3567. PMID   4069791. S2CID   38142122.
  8. ↑ Murphy, Robin; Msetfi, Rachel (2014). Individual differences in associative learning. Laussane: Frontiers Media SA. p. 28. ISBN   9782889192908.
  9. ↑ Destrebecqz, Arnaud; Vande Velde, Michaël; San Anton, Estibaliz; Cleeremans, Axel; Bertels, Julie (2019-06-01). "Saving the Perruchet effect: A role for the strength of the association in associative learning" (PDF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72 (6): 1379–1386. doi:10.1177/1747021818791079. ISSN   1747-0218. PMID   29991319. S2CID   51615572.
  10. 1 2 De Houwer, Jan (2009-02-01). "The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models". Learning & Behavior. 37 (1): 1–20. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.1.1 . ISSN   1532-5830. PMID   19122048. S2CID   102322107.
  11. ↑ Destrebecqz, Arnaud; Vande Velde, Michaël; San Anton, Estibaliz; Cleeremans, Axel; Bertels, Julie (June 2019). "Saving the Perruchet effect: A role for the strength of the association in associative learning". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 72 (6): 1379–1386. doi:10.1177/1747021818791079. ISSN   1747-0226. PMID   29991319. S2CID   51615572.
  12. ↑ Ayton, Peter; Fischer, Ilan (December 2004). "The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness?". Memory & Cognition. 32 (8): 1369–1378. doi: 10.3758/bf03206327 . ISSN   0090-502X. PMID   15900930. S2CID   15852299.
  13. ↑ Weidemann, Gabrielle; McAndrew, Amy; Livesey, Evan J.; McLaren, Ian P. L. (October 2016). "Evidence for multiple processes contributing to the Perruchet effect: Response priming and associative learning". Journal of Experimental Psychology. Animal Learning and Cognition. 42 (4): 366–379. doi:10.1037/xan0000117. hdl: 10871/22468 . ISSN   2329-8464. PMID   27732048.
  14. ↑ Dunn, John C.; Kirsner, Kim (February 2003). "What can we infer from double dissociations?". Cortex; A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior. 39 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70070-4. ISSN   0010-9452. PMID   12627749. S2CID   17298525.
  15. 1 2 DIANA, RACHEL A.; REDER, LYNNE M.; ARNDT, JASON; PARK, HEEKYEONG (February 2006). "Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13 (1): 1–21. doi:10.3758/bf03193807. ISSN   1069-9384. PMC   2387212 . PMID   16724763.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.