Post-orbital constriction

Last updated
Australopithecus africanus top2 (University of Zurich).JPG
MNH - Kauterisation.jpg
Top view of Australopithecus africanus skull with post-orbital constriction (left) and modern human skull without (right)

In physical anthropology, post-orbital constriction is the narrowing of the cranium (skull) just behind the eye sockets (the orbits, hence the name) found in most non-human primates and early hominins. This constriction is very noticeable in non-human primates, slightly less so in Australopithecines, even less in Homo erectus and completely disappears in modern Homo sapiens. [1] Post-orbital constriction index in non-human primates and hominin range in category from increased constriction, intermediate, reduced constriction and disappearance. [1] The post-orbital constriction index is defined by either a ratio of minimum frontal breadth (MFB), behind the supraorbital torus, divided by the maximum upper facial breadth (BFM), bifrontomalare temporale, or as the maximum width behind the orbit of the skull. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

Cranial Evolution

Post-orbital constriction for various hominids [1]
Increased constriction
Gorilla 0.57
P. aethiopicus
(KNM WT 17000)
0.57
P. boisei
(KNM-ER 406)
0.57
Intermediate
Dryopithecus
(RUD 77)
0.73
Sahelanthropus
(TM 266-01-060-1)
0.59
Australopithecus 0.66
P. robustus 0.70
Homo habilis
(OH 24, KNM-ER 1813)
0.72
H. rudolfensis 0.70
H. ergaster 0.75
Orangutan 0.66
Chimpanzee 0.70
Reduced constriction
Praeanthropus 0.80
Absolutely reduced constriction
Homo sapiens 0.92

Measurement of cranial capacity in hominis has been long used to examine the evolutionary development of increased brain size, allowing for comparing and contrasting among hominin skulls and between primates and hominins. Similarly, the post-orbital constriction index has become a form to compare and contrast craniums with the possibility of determining the relative age and evolutionary place of a new found hominin. Cranial capacity and post-orbital constriction index can demonstrate a correlation between increased brain size and reduced post-orbital constriction. [4] For example, the average cranial capacity for Australopithecines is 440 cc, and the post-orbital constriction index is 0.66. [1] [5] However, with the evolutionary change in brain size in Australopithecines to the Homo genus, the average cranial capacity for Homo Habilis is 640 cc, and the post-orbital constriction index is 0.72. [1] [5] More specifically, in a departure from Homo erectus , Homo sapiens manifests a absolutely reduced post-orbital constriction (post-orbital constriction disappears) and a post-orbital constriction index of 0.92 due to increase in cranial capacity, about 1,350 cc. [1] [6] From the Australopithecines to the Homo genus, along with an increase in cranial capacity, a transition from intermediate constriction to reduced constriction is visible, and eventually disappearance. Brain growth has changed both the appearance of the sagittal crest and post-orbital constriction. [4] KNM-ER 406, the skull of a Paranthropus, brain volume estimated to 410 cm3 with a visible sagittal crest and mild or intermediate post-orbital constriction but KNM-ER 37333, the skull of a Homo erectus, brain volume of 850 cm3 with no visual sagittal crest and an almost not present or reduced post-orbital constriction. [4]

Minatogawa I and IV and Dali

Minatogawa I-IV cranium were discovered in Okinawa Island in 1970-1971. [7] The skulls and other fossils found associated were dated to be 15,000-20,000 years old, with a chance of being slightly older. [7] In a study led by Daisuke Kubo, Reiko T. Kono, and Gen Suwa, the craniums for Minatogawa I and IV were further examined to identify cranial capacity and concluded that Minatogawa I's estimated cranial size is 1335 cc and Minatogawa IV's is 1170 cc, [7] very close to the average cranial size of modern Homo sapiens. Kubo, et al. identify two possible forms of measuring post-orbital constriction, established by measuring the anterior, closer to the face, and posterior of the cranium. [7] Researchers conclude that both crania demonstrate a marked or almost reduced post-orbital constriction in both measurements of post-orbital constriction, compared to modern Homo sapiens. [7]

The Dali cranium was discovered in 1978 in Dali County, Shaanxi. [8] The cranium is described to be large with some robust features similar to early Western Homo sapiens and noticeable differentiation from the cranium of Homo erectus found in Zhoukoudian. [8] The Dali cranium was found to exhibit a pronounced or almost reduced post-orbital constriction with a post-orbital constriction index of 0.85, [8] much stronger than primates and early hominin and falling fairly close to the post-orbital constriction index of Homo sapiens. The Dali cranium is an example of the evolutionary development of post-orbital constriction as brain size enlarges and develops similar features found in modern Homo sapiens.

Temporalis Muscle

In species such as baboons and African great apes, an increase in the available capacity of the infratemporal fossa is simultaneously accompanied by a constriction in the sagittal plane. [7] As such, the anterior and posterior portions of the anterior temporalis muscle are inversely correlated in size, with the anterior being larger. [7] Although the temporalis muscle is used for chewing, there is no evidence that the supraorbital structure of primates is dependent upon their respective chewing habits or dietary preferences. [9]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Homo ergaster</i> Extinct species or subspecies of archaic human

Homo ergaster is an extinct species or subspecies of archaic humans who lived in Africa in the Early Pleistocene. Whether H. ergaster constitutes a species of its own or should be subsumed into H. erectus is an ongoing and unresolved dispute within palaeoanthropology. Proponents of synonymisation typically designate H. ergaster as "African Homo erectus" or "Homo erectus ergaster". The name Homo ergaster roughly translates to "working man", a reference to the more advanced tools used by the species in comparison to those of their ancestors. The fossil range of H. ergaster mainly covers the period of 1.7 to 1.4 million years ago, though a broader time range is possible. Though fossils are known from across East and Southern Africa, most H. ergaster fossils have been found along the shores of Lake Turkana in Kenya. There are later African fossils, some younger than 1 million years ago, that indicate long-term anatomical continuity, though it is unclear if they can be formally regarded as H. ergaster specimens. As a chronospecies, H. ergaster may have persisted to as late as 600,000 years ago, when new lineages of Homo arose in Africa.

<i>Meganthropus</i> Hominin fossil

Meganthropus is an extinct genus of non-hominin hominid ape, known from the Pleistocene of Indonesia. It is known from a series of large jaw and skull fragments found at the Sangiran site near Surakarta in Central Java, Indonesia, alongside several isolated teeth. The genus has a long and convoluted taxonomic history. The original fossils were ascribed to a new species, Meganthropus palaeojavanicus, and for a long time was considered invalid, with the genus name being used as an informal name for the fossils.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sagittal keel</span> Feature sometimes found in the human skull

In the human skull, a sagittal keel, or sagittal torus, is a thickening of part or all of the midline of the frontal bone, or parietal bones where they meet along the sagittal suture, or on both bones. Sagittal keels differ from sagittal crests, which are found in some earlier hominins and in a range of other mammals. While a proper crest functions in anchoring the muscles of mastication to the cranium, the keel is lower and rounded in cross-section, and the jaw muscles do not attach to it.

<i>Homo rhodesiensis</i> Species of primate (fossil)

Homo rhodesiensis is the species name proposed by Arthur Smith Woodward (1921) to classify Kabwe 1, a Middle Stone Age fossil recovered from Broken Hill mine in Kabwe, Northern Rhodesia. In 2020, the skull was dated to 324,000 to 274,000 years ago. Other similar older specimens also exist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maba Man</span> Hominin fossil

Maba Man is a pre-modern hominin whose remains were discovered in 1958 in caves near the town called Maba, near Shaoguan city in the north part of Guangdong province, China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brow ridge</span> Bony ridge located above the eye sockets of all primates

The brow ridge, or supraorbital ridge known as superciliary arch in medicine, is a bony ridge located above the eye sockets of all primates and some other animals. In humans, the eyebrows are located on their lower margin.

He County or Hexian is a county in the east of Anhui Province, People's Republic of China, under the jurisdiction of Ma'anshan. It has a population of 650,000 and an area of 1,412 square kilometres (545 sq mi). The government of He County is located in Liyang Town.

KNM ER 406 is an almost complete fossilized skull of the species Paranthropus boisei. It was discovered in Koobi Fora, Kenya by Richard Leakey and H. Mutua in 1969. This species is grouped with the Australopitecine genus, Paranthropus boisei because of the robusticity of the skull and the prominent characteristics. This species was found well preserved with a complete cranium but lacking dentition. He was known for his robust cranial features that showed the signs of adaptation of the ecological niches. The big chewing muscles attached to the sagittal crest are traits of this adaptation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dali Man</span> Hominin fossil

Dali man is the remains of a late Homo erectus or archaic Homo sapiens who lived in the late-mid Pleistocene epoch. The remains comprise a complete fossilized skull, which was discovered by Liu Shuntang in 1978 in Dali County, Shaanxi Province, China.

<i>Homo erectus</i> Extinct species of archaic human

Homo erectus is an extinct species of archaic human from the Pleistocene, with its earliest occurrence about 2 million years ago. Its specimens are among the first recognizable members of the genus Homo.

<i>Australopithecus sediba</i> Two-million-year-old hominin from the Cradle of Humankind

Australopithecus sediba is an extinct species of australopithecine recovered from Malapa Cave, Cradle of Humankind, South Africa. It is known from a partial juvenile skeleton, the holotype MH1, and a partial adult female skeleton, the paratype MH2. They date to about 1.98 million years ago in the Early Pleistocene, and coexisted with Paranthropus robustus and Homo ergaster / Homo erectus. Malapa is interpreted as having been a natural death trap, the base of a long vertical shaft which creatures could accidentally fall into. A. sediba was initially described as being a potential human ancestor, and perhaps the progenitor of Homo, but this is contested and it could also represent a late-surviving population or sister species of A. africanus which had earlier inhabited the area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SK 847</span> Hominin fossil

SK 847 is the abbreviated designation for the fossilized fragments of a Homo habilis cranium, discovered in South Africa, which was dated to an age between 1.8 and 1.5 million years. This fossil shares morphological traits with the early African Homo erectus, sometimes known as Homo ergaster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ndutu cranium</span> Hominin fossil

The Ndutu skull is the partial cranium of a hominin that has been assigned variously to late Homo erectusHomo rhodesiensis, and early Homo sapiens, from the Middle Pleistocene, found at Lake Ndutu in northern Tanzania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chellean Man</span> Hominin fossil

Olduvai Hominid number 9, known as the Chellean Man, is a fossilized skull cap of an early hominin, found in LLK II, Olduvai Gorge by Louis S. B. Leakey in 1960. It is believed to be ca. 1.4 million years old. Its cranial capacity is estimated at than 1067 cm3, the largest value among all known African Homo erectus specimens. OH 9 is significant because the features it carried and its correlation to the species classification it resides in.

Xujiayao, located in the Nihewan Basin in China, is an early Late Pleistocene paleoanthropological site famous for its archaic hominin fossils.

Jinniushan is a Middle Pleistocene paleoanthropological site, dating to around 260,000 BP, most famous for its archaic hominin fossils. The site is located near Yingkou, Liaoning, China. Several new species of extinct birds were also discovered at the site.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dmanisi hominins</span> Hominid species or subspecies discovered in Dmanisi, Georgia

The Dmanisi hominins, Dmanisi people, or Dmanisi man were a population of Early Pleistocene hominins whose fossils have been recovered at Dmanisi, Georgia. The fossils and stone tools recovered at Dmanisi range in age from 1.85 to 1.77 million years old, making the Dmanisi hominins the earliest well-dated hominin fossils in Eurasia and the best preserved fossils of early Homo from a single site so early in time, though earlier fossils and artifacts have been found in Asia. Though their precise classification is controversial and disputed, the Dmanisi fossils are highly significant within research on early hominin migrations out of Africa. The Dmanisi hominins are known from over a hundred postcranial fossils and five famous well-preserved skulls, referred to as Dmanisi Skulls 1–5.

<i>Homo longi</i> Archaic human from China, 146,000 BP

Homo longi is an extinct species of archaic human identified from a nearly complete skull, nicknamed 'Dragon Man', from Harbin on the Northeast China Plain, dating to at minimum 146,000 years ago during the Middle Pleistocene. The skull was discovered in 1933 along the Songhua River while the Dongjiang Bridge was under construction for the Manchukuo National Railway. Due to a tumultuous wartime atmosphere, it was hidden and only brought to paleoanthropologists in 2018. The original describers postulated H. longi represents a member of the Denisovans, though this is unconfirmable without genetic testing. They also considered modern humans to be more closely related to H. longi than to the European Neanderthals, but DNA evidence suggests Denisovans are more closely related to Neanderthals than modern humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salé cranium</span> Enigmatic Middle Pleistocene hominin specimen

The Salé cranium is a pathological specimen of enigmatic Middle Pleistocene hominin discovered from Salé, Morocco by quarrymen in 1971. Since its discovery, the specimen has variously been classified as Homo sapiens, Homo erectus, Homo rhodesiensis/bodoensis, or Homo heidelbergensis. Its pathological condition and mosaic anatomy has proved difficult to classify. It was discovered with few faunal fossils and no lithics, tentatively dated to 400 ka by some sources.

The Narmada Human, originally the Narmada Man, is a species of extinct human that lived in central India during the Middle and Late Pleistocene. From a skull cup discovered from the bank of Narmada River in Madhya Pradesh in 1982, the discoverer, Arun Sonakia classified it was an archaic human and gave the name Narmada Man, with the scientific name H. erectus narmadensis. Analysis of additional fossils from the same location in 1997 indicated that the individual could be a female, hence, a revised name, Narmada Human, was introduced. It remains the oldest human species in India.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cameron, David W. (2004). Bones, stones, and molecules : "out of Africa" and human origins. Groves, Colin P. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. ISBN   978-0-12-156933-4. OCLC   162571244.
  2. Monson, Ta; Brasil, Mf; Stratford, Dj; Hlusko, Lj (2017). "Patterns of craniofacial variation and taxonomic diversity in the South African Cercopithecidae fossil record". Palaeontologia Electronica. doi: 10.26879/690 . ISSN   1094-8074.
  3. Kimbel, William H.; White, Tim D.; Johanson, Donald C. (August 1984). "Cranial morphology ofAustralopithecus afarensis: A comparative study based on a composite reconstruction of the adult skull". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 64 (4): 337–388. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330640403. ISSN   0002-9483. PMID   6435455.
  4. 1 2 3 Gamble, Clive (2014). Settling the Earth: The Archeology of Deep Human History. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 148–151.
  5. 1 2 "Human evolution - Increasing brain size". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-05-23.
  6. "Archaic Homo sapiens | Learn Science at Scitable". www.nature.com. Retrieved 2020-05-23.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KUBO, DAISUKE; KONO, REIKO T.; SUWA, GEN (2012). "Endocranial proportions and postorbital morphology of the Minatogawa I and IV Late Pleistocene Homo sapiens crania from Okinawa Island, Japan". Anthropological Science. 120 (2): 179–194. doi: 10.1537/ase.110804 . ISSN   0918-7960.
  8. 1 2 3 Rukang, Wu (2016-09-16). Rukang, Wu; Olsen, John W (eds.). Paleoanthropology and Paleolithic Archaeology in the People's Republic of China. doi:10.4324/9781315423135. ISBN   9781315423135.
  9. Picq, Pascal (1994). "Craniofacial size and proportions and the functional significance of the supraorbital region in primates". Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie. 80 (1): 51–63. doi:10.1127/zma/80/1994/51. JSTOR   25757416.