Prior authorization

Last updated

Prior authorization is a utilization management process used by some health insurance companies in the United States to determine if they will cover a prescribed procedure, service, or medication.

Contents

Overview

Prior authorization is a check run by some insurance companies or third-party payers in the United States before they will agree to cover certain prescribed medications or medical procedures. [1] There are a number of reasons that insurance providers require prior authorization, including age, medical necessity, the availability of a generic alternative, or checking for drug interactions. [1] [2] A failed authorization can result in a requested service being denied or in an insurance company requiring the patient to go through a separate process known as "step therapy" or "fail first." Step therapy dictates that a patient must first see unsuccessful results from a medication or service preferred by the insurance provider, typically considered either more cost effective or safer, before the insurance company will cover a different service. [2] [3]

Process

After a request comes in from a qualified provider, the request will go through the prior authorization process. The process to obtain prior authorization varies from insurer to insurer but typically involves the completion and faxing of a prior authorization form; according to a 2018 report, 88% are either partially or entirely manual. [4]

At this point, the medical service may be approved or rejected, or additional information may be requested. If a service is rejected, the healthcare provider may file an appeal based on the provider's medical review process. [5] [6] In some cases, an insurer may take up to 30 days to approve a request. [7]

Streamlining the prior authorization process includes standardizing processes for different prior authorization workflows, reducing manual touches, and improving efficiency. Providers should also work closely with payers to ensure that they understand the requirements for each prior authorization. This means capturing the necessary information upfront and securing an agreement from the payer to cover the services. Providers should also track the status of prior authorizations to ensure that they are approved in a timely manner so that payments are not delayed [8]

Purpose and costs

Insurers have stated that the purpose of prior authorization checks is to provide cost savings to consumers by preventing unnecessary procedures as well as the prescribing of expensive brand name drugs when an appropriate generic is available. [9] [10] In addition, a prior authorization for a new prescription may help prevent potentially-dangerous drug interactions. [2] A 2009 report from the Medical Board of Georgia showed that as many as 800 medical services require prior authorizations. [11]

According to Medical Economics in 2013, physicians have expressed frustration with the current prior authorization process with regards to time spent interacting with insurance providers and the costs incurred based on that time. [12] A 2009 study published in Health Affairs reported that primary care physicians spent 1.1 hours per week fulfilling prior authorizations, nursing staff spent 13.1 hours per week, and clerical staff spent 5.6 hours. [13] A 2012 study in the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine found that the annual cost per physician to conduct prior authorizations was between $2,161 and $3,430. [14] The cost to health plans was reported at between $10 and $25 per request by 2013. [1] It was estimated in 2009 that prior authorization practices cost the US healthcare system between $23 and $31 billion annually. [13]

Legislative and technological developments

There have been a number of legislative and technological developments that attempt to make the prior authorization process more efficient.[ citation needed ]

In 2011, the American Medical Association made recommendations that a uniform prior authorization form should be adopted along with real-time electronic processing. The organization described a next generation prior authorization process which would involve a physician ordering a medical service, their staff completing a standardized request form, and an electronic submission process that would give same-day approval or denial of the request. The reasoning behind a denial would be clearly stated, allowing physicians to easily submit an appeal. [5]

In February 2012, the Maryland Health Care Commission presented a plan to the state legislature, which outlined a standardized, electronic filing system for prior authorization requests. [15] In response to a 2012 bill concerning the e-filing of prescriptions, the Kansas Board of Pharmacies advocated for an electronic prior authorization process, which would generate immediate approval for prescriptions. [1] In 2013, the Arizona House of Representatives formed a committee to research the prior authorization process and make recommendations. [16] [17] Also, by 2013 a Washington State Senate proposal was submitted, which would require the state Insurance Commissioner to develop a standardized prior authorization form. [7]

As of May 2013, the National Council for Prescription Drug Programs had adopted a standardized process for the exchange of electronic prior authorizations. [18] The American Medical Association found that the average annual savings per physician from using an electronic prior authorization process to be approximately $1,742. [19] Additionally, a case study conducted by Prime Therapeutics, a pharmacy benefit manager, demonstrated a 90% reduction in payer response time through electronic prior authorization systems compared with the manual prior authorization process. [20]

In 2019, a consensus statement from several healthcare organizations supported standardizing the process. [21]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare (United States)</span> US government health insurance program

Medicare is a federal health insurance program in the United States for people age 65 or older and younger people with disabilities, including those with end stage renal disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. It was begun in 1965 under the Social Security Administration and is now administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act</span> United States federal law concerning health information

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 is a United States Act of Congress enacted by the 104th United States Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on August 21, 1996. It aimed to alter the transfer of healthcare information, stipulated the guidelines by which personally identifiable information maintained by the healthcare and healthcare insurance industries should be protected from fraud and theft, and addressed some limitations on healthcare insurance coverage. It generally prohibits healthcare providers and businesses called covered entities from disclosing protected information to anyone other than a patient and the patient's authorized representatives without their consent. The bill does not restrict patients from receiving information about themselves. Furthermore, it does not prohibit patients from voluntarily sharing their health information however they choose, nor does it require confidentiality where a patient discloses medical information to family members, friends or other individuals not employees of a covered entity.

Health insurance or medical insurance is a type of insurance that covers the whole or a part of the risk of a person incurring medical expenses. As with other types of insurance, risk is shared among many individuals. By estimating the overall risk of health risk and health system expenses over the risk pool, an insurer can develop a routine finance structure, such as a monthly premium or payroll tax, to provide the money to pay for the health care benefits specified in the insurance agreement. The benefit is administered by a central organization, such as a government agency, private business, or not-for-profit entity.

Medical billing is a payment practice within the United States healthcare system. The process involves the systematic submission and processing of healthcare claims for reimbursement. Once the services are provided, the healthcare provider creates a detailed record of the patient's visit, including the diagnoses, procedures performed, and any medications prescribed. This information is translated into standardized codes using the appropriate coding system, such as ICD-10-CM or Current Procedural Terminology codes—this part of the process is known as medical coding. These coded records are submitted by medical billing to the health insurance company or the payer, along with the patient's demographic and insurance information. Most insurance companies use a similar process, whether they are private companies or government sponsored programs. The insurance company reviews the claim, verifying the medical necessity and coverage eligibility based on the patient's insurance plan. If the claim is approved, the insurance company processes the payment, either directly to the healthcare provider or as a reimbursement to the patient. The healthcare provider may need to following up on and appealing claims.

Single-payer healthcare is a type of universal healthcare in which the costs of essential healthcare for all residents are covered by a single public system.

The term managed care or managed healthcare is used in the United States to describe a group of activities intended to reduce the cost of providing health care and providing American health insurance while improving the quality of that care. It has become the predominant system of delivering and receiving American health care since its implementation in the early 1980s, and has been largely unaffected by the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

...intended to reduce unnecessary health care costs through a variety of mechanisms, including: economic incentives for physicians and patients to select less costly forms of care; programs for reviewing the medical necessity of specific services; increased beneficiary cost sharing; controls on inpatient admissions and lengths of stay; the establishment of cost-sharing incentives for outpatient surgery; selective contracting with health care providers; and the intensive management of high-cost health care cases. The programs may be provided in a variety of settings, such as Health Maintenance Organizations and Preferred Provider Organizations.

Health care prices in the United States of America describe market and non-market factors that determine pricing, along with possible causes as to why prices are higher than in other countries.

A National Provider Identifier (NPI) is a unique 10-digit identification number issued to health care providers in the United States by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The NPI has replaced the Unique Physician Identification Number (UPIN) as the required identifier for Medicare services, and is used by other payers, including commercial healthcare insurers. The transition to the NPI was mandated as part of the Administrative Simplifications portion of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA).

Utilization management (UM) or utilization review is the use of managed care techniques such as prior authorization that allow payers, particularly health insurance companies, to manage the cost of health care benefits by assessing its appropriateness before it is provided using evidence-based criteria or guidelines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare for All Act</span> Proposed U.S. healthcare reform legislation

The Medicare for All Act, also known as the Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act or United States National Health Care Act, is a bill first introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Representative John Conyers (D-MI) in 2003, with 38 co-sponsors. In 2019, the original 16-year-old proposal was renumbered, and Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) introduced a broadly similar, but more detailed, bill, HR 1384, in the 116th Congress. As of November 3, 2019, it had 116 co-sponsors still in the House at the time, or 49.8% of House Democrats.


Medicare Advantage is a type of health plan offered by Medicare-approved private companies that must follow rules set by Medicare. Most Medicare Advantage Plans include drug coverage. Under Part C, Medicare pays a sponsor a fixed payment. The sponsor then pays for the health care expenses of enrollees. Sponsors are allowed to vary the benefits from those provided by Medicare's Parts A and B as long as they provide the actuarial equivalent of those programs. The sponsors vary from primarily integrated health delivery systems to unions to other types of non profit charities to insurance companies. The largest sponsor is a hybrid: the non-profit interest group AARP using UnitedHealth.

Healthcare reform in the United States has a long history. Reforms have often been proposed but have rarely been accomplished. In 2010, landmark reform was passed through two federal statutes: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed March 23, 2010, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which amended the PPACA and became law on March 30, 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Taiwan</span>

Healthcare in Taiwan is administered by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of the Executive Yuan. As with other developed economies, Taiwanese people are well-nourished but face such health problems as chronic obesity and heart disease. In 2002 Taiwan had nearly 1.6 physicians and 5.9 hospital beds per 1,000 population. In 2002, there were 36 hospitals and 2,601 clinics in the country. Per capita health expenditures totaled US$752 in 2000. Health expenditures constituted 5.8 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2001 ; 64.9 percent of the expenditures were from public funds. Overall life expectancy in 2019 was averaged at 81 years.

Step therapy, also called step protocol or a fail first requirement, is a managed care approach to prescription. It is a type of prior authorization requirement that is intended to control the costs and risks posed by prescription drugs. The practice begins medication for a medical condition with the most cost-effective drug therapy and progresses to other more costly or risky therapies only if necessary.

Electronic prescription is the computer-based electronic generation, transmission, and filling of a medical prescription, taking the place of paper and faxed prescriptions. E-prescribing allows a physician, physician assistant, pharmacist, or nurse practitioner to use digital prescription software to electronically transmit a new prescription or renewal authorization to a community or mail-order pharmacy. It outlines the ability to send error-free, accurate, and understandable prescriptions electronically from the healthcare provider to the pharmacy. E-prescribing is meant to reduce the risks associated with traditional prescription script writing. It is also one of the major reasons for the push for electronic medical records. By sharing medical prescription information, e-prescribing seeks to connect the patient's team of healthcare providers to facilitate knowledgeable decision making.

Usual, customary, and reasonable (UCR) is an American method of generating health care prices, described as "more or less whatever doctors decided to charge". According to Steven Schroeder, Wilbur Cohen inserted UCR into the Social Security Act of 1965 "in an unsuccessful attempt to placate the American Medical Association". Health insurers determine what they deem to be "usual, customary and reasonable" and pay only a percentage of that.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in the United States</span>

Healthcare in the United States is largely provided by private sector healthcare facilities, and paid for by a combination of public programs, private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. The U.S. is the only developed country without a system of universal healthcare, and a significant proportion of its population lacks health insurance. The United States spends more on healthcare than any other country, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of GDP; however, this expenditure does not necessarily translate into better overall health outcomes compared to other developed nations. Coverage varies widely across the population, with certain groups, such as the elderly and low-income individuals, receiving more comprehensive care through government programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.

An accountable care organization (ACO) is a healthcare organization that ties provider reimbursements to quality metrics and reductions in the cost of care. ACOs in the United States are formed from a group of coordinated health-care practitioners. They use alternative payment models, normally, capitation. The organization is accountable to patients and third-party payers for the quality, appropriateness and efficiency of the health care provided. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, an ACO is "an organization of health care practitioners that agrees to be accountable for the quality, cost, and overall care of Medicare beneficiaries who are enrolled in the traditional fee-for-service program who are assigned to it".

Specialty drugs or specialty pharmaceuticals are a recent designation of pharmaceuticals classified as high-cost, high complexity and/or high touch. Specialty drugs are often biologics—"drugs derived from living cells" that are injectable or infused. They are used to treat complex or rare chronic conditions such as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, hemophilia, H.I.V. psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease and hepatitis C. In 1990 there were 10 specialty drugs on the market, around five years later nearly 30, by 2008 200, and by 2015 300.

De facto denial or functional denial is a situation that can occur in health insurance and workers' compensation insurance when a claim is not denied outright, but in practical terms it is not covered. If cost reduction by an insurer is the reason for de facto denials as part of utilization management, it can lead to healthcare rationing through denials of care or coverage, delays in care, and unexpected financial risks to patients.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 David R. Schoech; Dr. Robert Haneke; Chad Ullom; Dr. Jim Garrelts; Michael Lonergan; Dr. John Worden; Nancy Kirk; Debra Billingsley (January 2013). Study on Electronic Transmission of Prior Authorization and Step Therapy Protocols (PDF) (Report). Kansas Board of Pharmacies. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 August 2016. Retrieved 15 May 2014.[ dead link ]
  2. 1 2 3 Thomas Reinke (December 2012). "Prior Authorization for Safety, Not Just for Economy". Managed Care Magazine. Retrieved 20 May 2014.
  3. Brian Albright (1 January 2010). "Parity Rules: Worth the Wait? Delayed Release of Parity Implementation Rules Keeps Everyone". Behavioral Healthcare. Retrieved 20 May 2014.[ dead link ]
  4. "Council of Affordable Quality Healthcare CORE updates rules for prior authorization". FierceHealthcare. Retrieved 2019-06-05.
  5. 1 2 American Medical Association (June 2011). Standardization of prior authorization process for medical services white paper (PDF) (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 September 2016. Retrieved 15 May 2014.
  6. Douglas Moeller (1 August 2009). "Manage medical advances with automated prior authorization". Managed Healthcare Executive. Archived from the original on 9 March 2016. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  7. 1 2 Valerie Bauman (8 February 2013). "Proposal seeks to streamline health-insurance paperwork logjam". Puget Sound Business Journal. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  8. "Cutting Through Prior Authorization Headaches,Strategies for Providers". AGS Health. Retrieved 2024-05-09.
  9. Michelle Saxton (25 August 2005). "Medicaid to require prior OK for outpatient surgeries". The Charleston Gazette. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  10. Ken Terry (19 October 2007). "Prior Authorization Made Easier". Medical Economics. Retrieved 30 May 2014.
  11. Medical Association of Georgia (January 2009). A Study of Prior Authorization/Precertification of Physician Services (PDF) (Report). The Exchange Atlanta. Retrieved 15 May 2014.
  12. Jeffrey Bendix (10 October 2013). "Curing the prior authorization headache". Medical Economics. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  13. 1 2 Lawrence P. Casalino; Sean Nicholson; David N. Gans; Terry Hammons; Dante Morra; Theodore Karrison; Wendy Levinson (May 2009). What Does It Cost Physician Practices To Interact With Health Insurance Plans? (Report). Health Affairs. Retrieved 15 May 2014.
  14. Christopher P. Morley; David J. Badolato; John Hickner; John W. Epling (22 August 2012). The Impact of Prior Authorization Requirements on Primary Care Physicians' Offices: Report of Two Parallel Network Studies (Report). Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. Retrieved 15 May 2014.
  15. Gene Ransom (9 February 2012). "Insurance 'prior authorization' wastes time, money". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  16. Todd Levine (7 February 2014). "In Arizona, getting patient therapies approved is an out-of-date proposition". Arizona Capitol Times. The Dolan Company. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  17. Arizona State Legislator (28 March 2013). "Bill Text: AZ HB2400". House Bill 2400. LegiScan. Retrieved 22 May 2014.
  18. Jennifer Webb (1 July 2013). "Real time prior auth standards approved". Managed Healthcare Executive. Advanstar Communications, Inc. Retrieved 29 May 2014.
  19. "Electronic Prior Authorization Toolkit". ama-assn.org. American Medical Association. Retrieved 29 May 2014.
  20. "Prime Therapeutics Electronic Prior Authorization Program Provides Efficiencies for Health Care Professionals and Their Patients". Clinical Trials Week. 6 January 2014. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 29 May 2014.
  21. "Prior Authorization Overhaul Sought". Managed Care magazine. 2018-09-03. Retrieved 2019-04-16.