R v Pittwood

Last updated

R v Pittwood
Steam Locomotive, Kingswear Ferry Level Crossing - geograph.org.uk - 1535092.jpg
CourtCrown Court / Assizes
Full case name Regina v. Pittwood
Citation[1902] TLR 37
Court membership
Judge sittingJury trial presided by Mr Justice Wright
Case opinions
Depending on the facts, such as the contract in this case, there is a duty to act in the criminal law to save others from physical harm, including in the law of manslaughter.
Keywords
  • manslaughter
  • omission
  • failure in duty to act to save others from physical harm

R v Pittwood [1902] is a case in English criminal law as to omission, specifically the duty to act to save others from physical harm, finding an omission that amounted to manslaughter. [1] [2]

Contents

Facts

Railway crossing keeper, Pittwood, failed in his duty (by contract owed to his employer) to close a level crossing gate, leading to the death of a wagon driver after a train crashed into his horse and cart. [2]

Judgment

He was found guilty of manslaughter. [3]

Mr Justice Wright ruled that depending on the facts, such as the contract in this case, there is a duty to act in the criminal law to save others from physical harm, including in the law of manslaughter. [2]

References

  1. Halsbury's Laws of England , volume 25: "Circumstances", paragraph 6 (5th edition)
  2. 1 2 3 Card, Cross and Jones: Criminal Law 16th Ed., Prof. Richard Card (ed.), Reed Elsevier (printed by CPI Bath, Bath, UK), 2004. at 2.10 (p. 60)
  3. Hails, F. G. (June 1966). "Manslaughter" . Police Journal. 39 (6): 306. doi:10.1177/0032258X6603900612.  via  HeinOnline (subscription required)