Reference Re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act (Nfld)

Last updated
Reference Re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act (Nfld)
Supreme court of Canada in summer.jpg
Hearing: September 28 - October 1, 1982
Judgment: May 3, 1984
Citations [1984] 1 S.C.R. 297
Prior history Newfoundland Court of Appeal
RulingAppeal allowed
Holding
Where the pith and substance of provincial legislation is intra-provincial, it may have incidental extra-territorial effects.
Court membership
Chief Justice: Bora Laskin
Puisne Justices: Roland Ritchie, Brian Dickson, Jean Beetz, Willard Estey, William McIntyre, Julien Chouinard, Antonio Lamer, Bertha Wilson
Reasons given
Unanimous reasons byMcIntyre J.

Reference Re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act (Nfld) [1984] 1 S.C.R. 297 is a famous constitutional reference question put to the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court found that legislation passed by the government of Newfoundland to take back water rights contracted out to the province of Quebec was unconstitutional. The decision had a huge impact on both provinces, as the Churchill Falls generating station is one of the biggest producers of hydro-electric power in the region and the agreement guarantees Quebec will receive a majority of the revenue from the Falls until 2034.

Contents

Background

By an Act of the Province of Newfoundland, the Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation (CFLCo) developed hydro-electric generators at the Churchill Falls, in Labrador. In 1969, the company, controlled by the British Newfoundland Development Corporation (BRINCO) entered an agreement with Hydro-Québec, a public utility owned by the government of Quebec, to sell a large majority of the power generated by the Falls at a low fixed rate for the next 65 years.

After buying out BRINCO's shares in 1974, the government of Newfoundland began to explore ways to get a greater portion of the power generated from the Falls. In 1980, the legislature passed the Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act, which reverted ownership of the Falls to the provincial government, repealed the Act that granted the land to the CF(L)Co, expropriated the company's assets, including Hydro-Québec's participation in the joint venture. [1]

The province submitted a reference to the Newfoundland Court of Appeal, which found it intra vires (within the power of) the province.

Supreme Court of Canada judgment

The Court stated that the Act was ultra vires the province and so struck it down. In performing pith and substance analysis on the legislation by looking at the Act's purpose and effect, the Court found that the Act was colourable. That is, the form of the Act appears to address a valid matter but in substance actually addresses a matter outside its authority. The "Pith and Substance" of the Act, its dominant feature or purpose, was to interfere with the right of Hydro-Québec granted by the agreement with Churchill Falls Corp to receive power from across the provincial border.

See also

Related Research Articles

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

Danny Williams (politician) Canadian politician

Daniel E. Williams, is a Canadian politician, businessman and lawyer who served as the ninth Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador between November 6, 2003, and December 3, 2010. Williams was born and raised in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador. Before entering politics Williams was a highly successful lawyer and businessman. After becoming Leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador in 2001, he was elected to the House of Assembly in a by-election for the district of Humber West in Corner Brook.

Pith and substance is a legal doctrine in Canadian constitutional interpretation used to determine under which head of power a given piece of legislation falls. The doctrine is primarily used when a law is challenged on the basis that one level of government has encroached upon the exclusive jurisdiction of another level of government.

Twin Falls was the site of a hydroelectric power station was developed there by the British Newfoundland Development Corporation (Brinco) to deliver power to mining operations in Labrador City and Wabush.

Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro energy generation company in parts of Canada and the United States

Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro , commonly known as Hydro, is a provincial Crown corporation that generates and delivers electricity for Newfoundland and Labrador, Quebec, and the north-eastern areas of the United States. The company is a subsidiary of Nalcor Energy.

Bay dEspoir Hydroelectric Power Station Dam in CanadaNewfoundland and Labrador

The Bay D'Espoir Hydroelectric Development, built by the Newfoundland and Labrador Power Commission is located on the south coast of Newfoundland near the rural community of Bay d'Espoir. It was the second major hydroelectric project undertaken on Newfoundland.

The British Newfoundland Development Corporation, or BRINCO, was incorporated by a consortium of British companies in 1953, which undertook industrial development opportunities in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador. The company was involved in the construction of the Churchill Falls Generating Station.

Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited Canadian electric company

The Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation, also known as CF(L)Co or CFLco is a Canadian electric company. The company was founded in 1961 and is based in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador. Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corporation Limited operates as a subsidiary of Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro.

The electricity sector in Canada has played a significant role in the economic and political life of the country since the late 19th century. The sector is organized along provincial and territorial lines. In a majority of provinces, large government-owned integrated public utilities play a leading role in the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. Ontario and Alberta have created electricity markets in the last decade in order to increase investment and competition in this sector of the economy.

Canadian constitutional law is the area of Canadian law relating to the interpretation and application of the Constitution of Canada by the courts. All laws of Canada, both provincial and federal, must conform to the Constitution and any laws inconsistent with the Constitution have no force or effect.

<i>British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd</i> Pivotal Canadian lawsuit against the tobacco industry

British Columbia v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 473, 2005 SCC 49, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada where the Court found that the provincial Tobacco Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act, which allowed the government to sue tobacco companies, was constitutionally valid. Imperial Tobacco Canada is an indirect subsidiary of British American Tobacco.

Section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867, also known as the property and civil rights power, grants the provincial legislatures of Canada the authority to legislate on:

13. Property and Civil Rights in the Province.

<i>Royal Bank of Canada v R</i>

Royal Bank of Canada v R, is a notable Canadian constitutional decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council where the Council limited the province's ability to create laws in relation to extraprovincial contractual rights.

Nalcor Energy

Nalcor Energy is a provincial energy corporation which is headquartered in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador. A provincial Crown corporation under the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Nalcor Energy was created in 2007 to manage the province's energy resources. There are five lines of business which include Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro, the Churchill Falls Generating Station, The Lower Churchill Project, Oil and Gas and The Bull Arm Fabrication Site.

<i>Canadian Western Bank v Alberta</i>

Canadian Western Bank v Alberta [2007] 2 S.C.R. 3 is a landmark decision in Canadian constitutional law by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) relating to the division of powers between Federal and Provincial legislative bodies.

Churchill Falls Generating Station Dam in Newfoundland and Labrador,Canada

The Churchill Falls Generating Station is a hydroelectric underground power station in Labrador. At 5,428 MW, it is the tenth largest in the world, and the second-largest in Canada, after the Robert-Bourassa generating station in northwestern Quebec.

Menihek Hydroelectric Generating Station Dam in Newfoundland and Labrador

The Menihek Hydroelectric Generating Station is a conventional hydroelectric generating station at Menihek Lake in Labrador. The dam and powerhouse are located in the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador, 40 km (25 mi) south of the isolated town of Schefferville, Quebec and two First Nations communities: Matimekosh-Lac-John and Kawawachikamach. The generating station, two 69 kV power lines and the distribution networks in each community form an independent electricity network, off the main North American grid.

<i>Newfoundland and Labrador v AbitibiBowater Inc</i>

Newfoundland and Labrador v AbitibiBowater Inc, 2012 SCC 67 is a ruling by the Supreme Court of Canada dealing with whether an obligation incurred under regulatory action constitutes a claim under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, thus becoming subject to a stay of proceedings.

<i>Quebec (AG) v Canada</i> (AG)

Quebec (AG) v Canada (AG)2015 SCC 14 is a Canadian constitutional law case concerning the federal government's ability to destroy information related to the Canadian long-gun registry pursuant to the federal criminal law power.

References

  1. Hydro-Québec owns 34.2% of CF(L)Co.

Further reading