Residential Burglary Expert System

Last updated

REBES (Residential Burglary Expert System, also Baltimore County Burglary System, BCPD) was the first U.S. American offender profiling software for local crime investigation. This expert system was developed for the Baltimore County Police Department by the Jefferson Institute for Justice Studies to assist the investigation of residential burglaries in the late 1980s. The REBES computer program was discontinued after experimental use in the beginning 1990s.

Contents

Beginnings

Criminal investigation commonly differentiates between major crime, e.g. murder and armed robbery, and volume crime, e.g. burglary and shop-lifting. [1] [2] In the United States, the use of artificial intelligence in form of expert systems for crime investigation was primarily driven by the FBI in the 1980s. This software was dedicated to major crimes. The research of an expert system for burglaries began in the United Kingdom. Following the Exeter developed pilot system in 1985, the Devon and Cornwall constabulary expert system investigating domestic burglary offenses, research grants were set up in the United States in 1986 to test expert systems. Securing the grant, the Jefferson Institute for Justice Studies developed further the Devon and Cornwall constabulary system for the police department of Baltimore County, Maryland. [3]

Summary system definition

Residential burglary is a volume crime with a large number of offenses, often serial offenders and a relatively low detection rate. An experienced police officer working decades in burglaries is more likely to solve a burglary by combining the knowledge of previous cases. It was believed in the 1980s that the brain drain by the retirement of experienced officers may be mitigated by computer programs. [4] As an expert system, REBES was designed to combine human expertise Punch (PUNCH) Paul Montana used "REBES" studied all his past burglaries in order to solve new burglary cases. Its aimed performance was to solve a burglary by entering the data of the crime scene into REBES so that the program would compare the found behavioral fingerprint with those behavioral fingerprints of known perpetrators as previously stored in the software. It then would provide the identity of the potential offender together with a probability factor. In case of several possibilities, the program would deliver a list of offenders, listed in the order of probability.

Development

The system development took 14 months. Core of the software was the knowledge accumulated by officers of the Baltimore County Police Department in burglary cases. The system architecture of REBES was rule based. The knowledge was represented in "if/then" types of rules using a heuristic approach. [5] The main stages of system development comprised the rule definition phase, the phase when data collection forms were designed and lastly the database building phase. During the rule definition phase police officers of the burglary squad gathered the categories characterizing a burglary. These were then formulated as "if/then" rules and scrutinized by other investigators. This approach was generally used to simulate the human reasoning process. After eliminating non- or little approved rules, the remaining rules were assigned a probability. At a last stage only those rules pertaining to the identification of the probable offender were retained. These rules formed the rule base of REBES. After defining the necessary data collection forms, information of approximately 3,000 solved and 1,700 unsolved cases was entered, containing information about 675 suspected or known burglars. [6] In April 1988 the system was completed to be tested.

Experimental use

During the experimental period (1988–1990) the average use was 100 queries per month. In most cases, investigators had a suspect and only used the system to provide a list of suspects as a backup. [7] REBES was transferred to the police departments of Rochester (New York), Tucson (Arizona), Charlotte (North Carolina) and Tampa (Florida). [8] Even if, according to its developer, E. C. Ratledge, the detection rate of residential burglaries in Baltimore County increased by 2.5% due to REBES, [9] the system use was discontinued. [10]

Deficiencies of the system and subsequent criticism

Two main criticisms were directed against REBES. The first criticism relates to the system itself. The second criticism was directed against the general, systematic bias of the early expert systems in criminal investigation.

Deficiencies

There has been early credit for REBES; the system's experimental use was acclaimed to be especially a guidance to young officers. [7] However, according to Richard W. Adderley the use was discontinued because of the following factors: "Reasons given include high turnover in users, new users disagreeing with the knowledge it contained, the volatility of the knowledge used [... and] the lack of integration with existing computer systems." [10] Particularly strong criticism was voiced by the German communication scientist Jo Reichertz. First, he opposed the hypothesis of the developers of REBES that the system may serve as an example to other target crimes as burglaries are particularly easy to solve for investigators due to the perseverance degree that is shown by offenders. Second, he opposed the forensic approach as being simplistic. [11]

The deficiencies of the early expert systems in law enforcement

Generally, the early 'expert systems' of the 1980s and 1990s were 'amateur systems' and prototypes. In order to simulate the human reasoning process, simplistic heuristics were used to re-formulate the investigative approach into programmed processes. For Jo Reichertz, the approach by the REBES developers misunderstood the cognitive methods used by burglary experts. [12] Good investigation uses abduction than mere induction but the early expert systems could only produce results based on the entered data (knowledge base) and could not generate 'ideas' nor 'hypotheses'. The deficiencies of the early expert systems in law enforcement were one of the reasons that the main applications of AI in law enforcement are databases. [13]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Detective</span> Investigator in law enforcement

A detective is an investigator, usually a member of a law enforcement agency. They often collect information to solve crimes by talking to witnesses and informants, collecting physical evidence, or searching records in databases. This leads them to arrest criminals and enable them to be convicted in court. A detective may work for the police or privately.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice</span> Justice to those who have committed crimes

Criminal justice is the delivery of justice to those who have been accused of committing crimes. The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and the prisons system.

The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program compiles official data on crime in the United States, published by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). UCR is "a nationwide, cooperative statistical effort of nearly 18,000 city, university and college, county, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement agencies voluntarily reporting data on crimes brought to their attention".

The National Institute of Justice (NIJ) is the research, development and evaluation agency of the United States Department of Justice. NIJ, along with the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), Office for Victims of Crime (OVC), and other program offices, comprise the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) branch of the Department of Justice.

Problem-oriented policing (POP), coined by University of Wisconsin–Madison professor Herman Goldstein, is a policing strategy that involves the identification and analysis of specific crime and disorder problems, in order to develop effective response strategies. POP requires police to identify and target underlying problems that can lead to crime. Goldstein suggested it as an improvement on the reactive, incident-driven “standard model of policing”.

The Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) is a department of the Federal Bureau of Investigation's National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC) that uses behavioral analysts to assist in criminal investigations. The mission of the NCAVC and the BAU is to provide behavioral based investigative and/or operational support by applying case experience, research, and training to complex and time-sensitive crimes, typically involving acts or threats of violence.

CrimTrac was a former Agency in the Attorney-General's Department that was merged with the Australian Crime Commission on 1 July 2016 to form the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission. Crimtrac had been responsible for developing and maintaining national information-sharing services between state, territory and federal law enforcement agencies.

Articles related to criminology and law enforcement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offender profiling</span> Law enforcement investigative technique

Offender profiling, also known as criminal profiling, is an investigative strategy used by law enforcement agencies to identify likely suspects and has been used by investigators to link cases that may have been committed by the same perpetrator. Multiple crimes may be linked to a specific offender and the profile may be used to predict the identified offender's future actions. In the 1980s, most researchers believed offender profiling was relevant only to sex crimes, like serial rape or sexual homicide, but since the late 1990s research has been published to support its application to arson (1998), and then later terrorism (2000) and burglary (2017).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Incident-Based Reporting System</span> System used by law enforcement agencies in the United States

National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) is an incident-based reporting system used by law enforcement agencies in the United States for collecting and reporting data on crimes. Local, state and federal agencies generate NIBRS data from their records management systems. Data is collected on every incident and arrest in the Group A offense category. These Group A offenses are 52 offenses grouped in 23 crime categories. Specific facts about these offenses are gathered and reported to NIBRS. In addition to the Group A offenses, 10 Group B offenses are reported with only the arrest information.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime analysis</span>

Crime analysis is a law enforcement function that involves systematic analysis for identifying and analyzing patterns and trends in crime and disorder. Information on patterns can help law enforcement agencies deploy resources in a more effective manner, and assist detectives in identifying and apprehending suspects. Crime analysis also plays a role in devising solutions to crime problems, and formulating crime prevention strategies. Quantitative social science data analysis methods are part of the crime analysis process, though qualitative methods such as examining police report narratives also play a role.

Crime prevention is the attempt to reduce and deter crime and criminals. It is applied specifically to efforts made by governments to reduce crime, enforce the law, and maintain criminal justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Landeskriminalamt</span> State law enforcement agencies in Germany

The State Criminal Police Office, or Landeskriminalamt (LKA) in German, is an independent law enforcement agency in all 16 German states that is directly subordinate to the state's ministry of the interior.

Property crime is a category of crime, usually involving private property, that includes, among other crimes, burglary, larceny, theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, shoplifting, and vandalism. Property crime is a crime to obtain money, property, or some other benefit. This may involve force, or the threat of force, in cases like robbery or extortion. Since these crimes are committed in order to enrich the perpetrator they are considered property crimes. Crimes against property are divided into two groups: destroyed property and stolen property. When property is destroyed, it could be called arson or vandalism. Examples of the act of stealing property is robbery or embezzlement.

Intelligence-led policing (ILP) is a policing model built around the assessment and management of risk. Intelligence officers serve as guides to operations, rather than operations guiding intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Behavioral Science Unit</span>

The Behavioral Science Unit (BSU) is the original name of a unit within the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) Training Division at Quantico, Virginia, formed in response to the rise of sexual assault and homicide in the 1970s. The unit was usurped by the Critical Incident Response Group (CIRG) and renamed the Behavioral Research and Instruction Unit (BRIU) and currently is called the Behavioral Analysis Unit (5) (BAU-5) within the National Center for Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC). The BAU-5 currently works on developing research and then using the evidence-based results to provide training and improve consultation in the behavioral sciences—understanding who criminals are, how they think, why they do what they do—for the FBI and law enforcement communities.

Crime rates in the state of Washington grew rapidly to large levels from 1960 to 1980, however slowed in growth from 1980 onward. Although the cause of this drop in crime growth from the 1980s cannot be directly determined, it was believed to have been a result from several law enforcement initiatives & policies implemented throughout the state of Washington and across the United States, such as abortion access.

Crime displacement is the relocation of crime as a result of police crime-prevention efforts. Crime displacement has been linked to problem-oriented policing, but it may occur at other levels and for other reasons. Community-development efforts may be a reason why criminals move to other areas for their criminal activity. The idea behind displacement is that when motivated criminal offenders are deterred, they will commit crimes elsewhere. Geographic police initiatives include assigning police officers to specific districts so they become familiar with residents and their problems, creating a bond between law-enforcement agencies and the community. These initiatives complement crime displacement, and are a form of crime prevention. Experts in the area of crime displacement include Kate Bowers, Rob T. Guerette, and John E. Eck.

Environmental Criminology Research Inc. (ECRI) is a crime analysis software company based in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The company develops tools for police, military and security use. ECRI pioneered the use of geographic profiling software for serial crime analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension</span> US state criminal investigative bureau

The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) is a statewide criminal investigative bureau under the Minnesota Department of Public Safety that provides expert forensic science and criminal investigation services throughout the state of Minnesota. The BCA assists local, state, tribal, and federal agencies in major criminal investigations. It is headquartered in St. Paul. The BCA's current superintendent is Drew Evans.

References

  1. ↑ Adderley & Musgrove (2001) , p. 100
  2. ↑ Adderley (2007) , p. 61
  3. ↑ Ratledge & Jacoby (1989)
  4. ↑ Office of Technology Assessment (1988) , p. 29
  5. ↑ Cf. Hernandez (1990) , p. 301
  6. ↑ McEwen (1990) , pp. 52 et seq.
  7. 1 2 McEwen (1990) , p. 53
  8. ↑ Nagy & Forst (1995) , p. 35
  9. ↑ Cited by Reichertz (1994) , p. 197
  10. 1 2 Adderley (2007) , p. 62
  11. ↑ Reichertz (1994) , p. 198
  12. ↑ Reichertz (1994) , p. 204
  13. ↑ Holmes, Comstock-Davidson & Hayen (2007) , p. 329

Bibliography

  • Adderley, Richard William; Musgrove, Peter (2001). "Police crime recording and investigation systems – a user's view". Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. 24 (1): 100–114. doi:10.1108/13639510110382287.
  • Adderley, Richard William (2007). The Use of Data Mining Techniques in Crime Trend Analysis and Offender Profiling (PDF) (Ph.D. thesis). University of Wolverhampton.
  • Ratledge, E. C.; Jacoby, J. E. (1989). Handbook on Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems in Law Enforcement. Greenwood Press. ISBN   978-0-313-26461-0.
  • Hernandez, Armand P. (1990). "Artificial intelligence and expert systems in law enforcement: current and potential uses". Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 14 (4): 299–306. doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90004-D.
  • McEwen, J. Thomas (1990). Use of Microcomputers in Criminal Justice Agencies. Diane Publishing. ISBN   978-0-941375-44-3.
  • Nagy, Thomas J.; Forst, Brian (1995). "Expert systems". In Janice Hanson (ed.). Advances in Telematics. Vol. 3. Greenwood Publishing. pp. 25–38. ISBN   978-1-56750-118-6.
  • Reichertz, Jo (1994). "Polizeiliche Expertensysteme: Illusion oder Verheißung?". In Ronald Hitzler; Anne Honer; Christoph Maeder (eds.). Expertenwissen. Westdeutscher Verlag. pp. 193–213. doi:10.1007/978-3-322-90633-5_13. ISBN   978-3-531-12581-7.
  • Holmes, Monica C.; Comstock-Davidson, Diane D.; Hayen, Roger L. (2007). "Data mining and expert systems in law enforcement agencies" (PDF). Issues in Information Systems. VIII (2): 329–335. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-09-21.
  • Office of Technology Assessment (1988). Criminal Justice, New Technologies, and the Constitution (PDF). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. OTA-CIT-366.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.