Response to Intervention

Last updated

In education, Response to Intervention (RTI or RtI) is an approach used to provide early, systematic, and appropriately intensive supplemental instruction and academic support to children who are at risk for or already underperforming as compared to appropriate grade or age level standards. However, to better reflect the transition to a broader approach to intervention, there has been a shift in recent years from the terminology referring to RTI to MTSS, which stands for "Multi-Tiered System of Supports." [1] MTSS represents the latest framework of support that is being implemented to systematically meet the wider needs which influence student learning and performance.

Contents

Description

The RTI framework encompasses tiered levels of support and interventions to adequately meet students' academic needs. [1] It was originally developed as another method for supporting students appearing below-grade level in demonstrating academic skills and identifying students with learning disabilities. However, to broaden RTI and meet the wider range of needs that can affect students' performance, there was a shift to labeling this as one of the approaches of a Multi-Tier System of Supports (MTSS) occurring in schools and the professional literature. [2]

Within the RTI process that is embodied by the MTSS framework, instruction is differentiated using varying tiers of intervention, progress monitoring of students' performance, and flexible groupings to meet the academic needs of students. [3] The level of support that is provided to individual students intensifies as the tiers increase in number.

Tier 1 instruction is the broadest tier of support that is provided to all general education students, which covers all core content and grade-level standards. Instruction and the academic supports provided in this tier are differentiated to meet students' needs and learning styles. [3] Students who appear below-grade level on academic screening assessments will often qualify for Tier 2 instruction, which typically involves evidence-based interventions focused on specific content or skills, and is often taught in a small-group setting. [3] Standardized universal screeners and regular progress monitoring assessments are used to evaluate students' proficiency in performing specific skills, as well as determine any necessary modifications to the instruction or appropriate interventions for those appearing as below grade level. [3] Universal screeners are given to all students and help to identify those who may be at risk of falling below grade-level. [4] In a similar way, benchmark assessments are also administered to measure students' proficiency levels with performing certain skills, although typically given periodically at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year. Using both screeners and benchmark assessments helps to systematically identify those needing additional support who may appear below grade level, or are at risk of falling below grade level, and plan appropriate interventions. To evaluate students' learning more regularly, progress monitoring assessments are administered to assess students' proficiency in independently applying a specific skill and inform any adjustments to the instruction. Students who continue to perform below grade level on benchmark assessments, and show little to no response to the Tier 2 interventions, may then be found eligible for Tier 3 intervention, which consists of either small-group, or in some cases one-to-one, instruction. [3] Those who do not advance after receiving Tier 3 intervention(s) will qualify for a referral to special education. [3]

Using a tiered approach to intervention helps schools to determine students' specific instructional levels across subject areas and inform instructional support. Through administering educational assessments and conducting a critical analysis of the data collected, schools can provide academic support to students at an appropriate level of intensity under the RTI framework.

A study of the nationwide implementation of MTSS reflected that a greater number of states in the U.S. are integrating MTSS as a broader approach to provide services to students with learning disabilities, English Language Learners, and academically advanced students. [1] Whereas RTI focuses primarily on meeting the academic needs of students, MTSS takes into account other factors which influence student performance. MTSS as a whole offers educators a data-based approach to assess students' current levels of academic performance and provide targeted interventions, while also evaluating ways of continuing to promote their overall social-emotional growth. [1]

The systematic shift toward MTSS in schools provides educators with a framework that allows them to target a more diverse range of students' academic, behavioral, and social-emotional needs by using data to inform intensive instructional supports and interventions. [5] MTSS has been adopted nationally as an umbrella term to reference a multi-tiered and more whole-child approach to meeting students' learning needs and supporting all areas of their development. [1] Whereas RTI focuses on providing tiered academic interventions, MTSS delivers a more comprehensive approach. As MTSS integrates components of both the RTI and PBIS (Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports) frameworks, it produces challenges for schools to successfully balance and employ to improve student outcomes. [6] However, when implemented with fidelity and uses of best practices to support students across grade levels and subject areas, this framework can yield positive academic and behavioral results. [6]

Reasons for Implementation

There are at least four main reasons for implementing RTI to address the academic needs of students: 1) To increase achievement for all students; 2) To reduce racial/ethnic disproportionate representation of minority students in special education; 3) To increase collaboration and integration of general and special education; and 4) To identify students with learning disabilities through a different lens than the IQ-achievement discrepancy model. [7]

A study evaluating the effects of supplemental reading interventions under MTSS and RTI initiatives found that when Tier 2 intervention is integrated with high levels of fidelity, consistency, and intensity, it is possible for students’ reading outcomes to improve. [4] The same study supports the existing research surrounding the use of Tier 2 intervention to improve student reading performance, especially in schools with low reading achievements levels, and across varying school districts. [4] Setting reading goals that students are also made aware of can help them toward developing reading self-concept, which influences reading fluency skills and promotes the importance of goal setting in reading intervention programs. [8] Students involved in multiple-component reading intervention programs show significant improvement, and students in different socioeconomic, racial, and intellectual quotient groups make equivalent gains. [9]

MTSS is also very useful when working with students who have severe emotional problems. The structure and evaluation process for RTI encompassed by MTSS will help this particular group of students to be successful in the academic environment. [10]

Proponents feel that response to intervention is the best opportunity for giving all students the additional time and support needed to learn at high levels, [11] and see great benefit in that it applies to the classroom teachers, paraeducators, counselors, and the administration. The RTI process under MTSS can help identify students who are at-risk, guide adjustments to instruction, monitor student progress, and then make other recommendations as necessary. The objective is that with minor adjustments or simple interventions, students may respond and achieve at higher levels.

When broader MTSS initiatives are implemented using tiered methods of assessments and interventions, schools are able to support the academic performance of students. Through research of MTSS, it has also been found that students' academic performance improved when the proper social-emotional and behavioral supports are implemented with fidelity. [1] Utilizing MTSS frameworks with the resources available to them, schools are able to respond to the comprehensive needs of students which impact their learning.

Fidelity of Implementation

When implementing an MTSS model, it is important to ensure that instruction and interventions in place are conducted with fidelity.

Factors that can reduce fidelity when implementing instruction include: [12]

Factors that can increase fidelity include: [13]

By systematically integrating models of MTSS, schools are able to ensure that interventions are being delivered appropriately to students within each of the three levels of support. When MTSS practices are implemented with consistency, studies have found evidence of positive academic and behavioral outcomes among students. [6] Schools that implement components of MTSS following a clear set of procedures are equipped to appropriately address a variety of students' behavioral, social-emotional, and academic needs.

Challenges Influencing Implementation Fidelity

Certain barriers exist in schools which can affect their ability to achieve adequate implementation fidelity of MTSS frameworks. Although many schools may recognize the need to administer Tier 2 assessments and instruction, they are forced to fully consider the systems and supports that are required to deliver sustained MTSS practices prior to their implementation. [4] The successful integration of MTSS initiatives in schools is shaped by the context in which it they are being coordinated, when considering the existing programs and resources available, the potential staffing arrangements that can be assigned, and the decisions being made around instruction. [3] Recognizing the different structures and supports needed by the students, schools are able to properly prepare for the successful integration of MTSS efforts.

Another challenge is the variation that can occur among schools’ models of MTSS, as they adjust the systems and supports that are put in place to meet the complex academic and behavioral needs of their students. Variability exists among schools in their definitions of what qualifies as “intensive” instruction and interventions. [14] These definitions can be swayed by the varying data that is collected from using different assessments to evaluate their particular body of students. For all schools to achieve the successful integration of MTSS, it is critical that there is a balance between the implementation of fidelity and the customization of the systems and supports that are developed. [5] When designing their own MTSS models, schools follow a series of problem-solving and informed decision making. The use of data-informed decisions will enable schools to determine whether the structure of MTSS being implemented is sufficient toward meeting the intended student achievement outcomes. [5] Utilizing a critical and systematic approach toward integrating MTSS can help schools determine the specific interventions required to meet a range of students' academic, social-emotional, and behavioral needs, and ensure the successful launching of MTSS.

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Zhang, Jingyuan; Martella, Ronald C; Kang, Sungwoo; Yenioglu, Busra Yilmaz (Fall 2023). "Response to Intervention (RTI)/Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS): A Nationwide Analysis". Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies. 7 (1): 26.
  2. ↑ Gresham, F.; Reschly, D.; Shinn, M. R. (2010). "RTI as a driving force in educational improvement: Historical legal, research, and practice perspectives". In Shinn, M. R.; Walker, H. M. (eds.). Interventions for academic achievement problems in a three-tier model, including RTI. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists. pp. 47–77.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Miesner, Helen, Rose; Blair, Elizabeth E.; Packard, Chiara C.; MACGREGOR, Lyn; Grodsky, Eric (August 2023). "Instructional Coordination for Response to Intervention: How Organizational Contexts Shape Tier 2 Interventions in Practice". American Journal of Education: 565–592.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. 1 2 3 4 Coyne, Michael D.; Oldham, Ashley; Dougherty, Shaun M.; Leonard, Kaitlin; Koriakin, Taylor; Gage, Nicholas A.; Burns, Darci; Gillis, Margie. "Evaluating the Effects of Supplemental Reading Intervention within an MTSS or RTI Reading Reform Initiative Using a Regression Discontinuity Design". Exceptional Children. 84 (4): 350–67 – via EBSCOhost.
  5. 1 2 3 Morrison, Julie Q.; Russell, Christine; Dyer, Stephanie; Metcalf, Terri; Rahschulte, Rebecca L. (July 2014). "Organizational Structures and Processes to Support and Sustain Effective Technical Assistance in a State-Wide Multi-Tiered System of Support Initiative". Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2 (3): 129–37.
  6. 1 2 3 Scott, Terrance M.; Gage, Nicholas A.; Hirn, Regina G.; Lingo, Amy Shearer; Burt, Jon (2019). "An examination of the association between MTSS implementation fidelity measures and student outcomes". Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 63 (4): 308–316.
  7. ↑ Sawyer, R.; Holland, D.; Detgen, A. "State policies and procedures and selected local implementation practices in response to intervention in the six southeast region states" (PDF). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, regional educational laboratory southeast. Retrieved Feb 6, 2015.
  8. ↑ Quirk, M.; Schwaneflugel, P. J.; Webb, M. Y. (2009). "A short-term longitudinal study of the relationship between motivation to read and reading fluency skill in second grade". Journal of Literacy Research. 41 (2): 196–227. doi:10.1080/10862960902908467. PMC   2838245 . PMID   20300541.
  9. ↑ Morris, R. D.; Lovett, M. W.; Wolf, M.; Sevcik, R. A.; Steinbach, K. A.; Frijters, J. C.; Shapiro, M. B. (2012). "Multiple-component remediation for developmental reading disabilities: IQ, socioeconomic status, and race as factors in remedial outcome". Journal of Learning Disabilities. 45 (2): 99–127. doi:10.1177/0022219409355472. PMC   9872281 . PMID   20445204. S2CID   13388168.
  10. ↑ Pearce, I. R. (2009). "Helping children with emotional difficulties: A response to intervention investigation" (PDF). The Rural Educator. 30 (2): 34–36.
  11. ↑ Buffum, Austin; Mattos, Mike; Weber, Chris (October 1, 2010). "The Why Behind RTI". ascd.org.
  12. ↑ Johnson, E., Mellard, D.F., Fuchs, D., & McKnight, M.A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.
  13. ↑ Burns, Matthew; Gibbons, Kimberly (2012). Implementing response to intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  14. ↑ Weisenburgh-Snyder, Amy B.; Malmquist, Susan K.; Robbins, Joanne K.; Lipshin, Alison M. "A Model of MTSS: Integrating Precision Teaching of Mathematics and a Multi-Level Assessment System in a Generative Classroom". Learning Disabilities- A Contemporary Journal. 13 (1): 21–41 – via EBSCOhost.

Related Research Articles

Special education is the practice of educating students in a way that accommodates their individual differences, disabilities, and special needs. This involves the individually planned and systematically monitored arrangement of teaching procedures, adapted equipment and materials, and accessible settings. These interventions are designed to help individuals with special needs achieve a higher level of personal self-sufficiency and success in school and in their community, which may not be available if the student were only given access to a typical classroom education.

School psychology is a field that applies principles from educational psychology, developmental psychology, clinical psychology, community psychology, and behavior analysis to meet the learning and behavioral health needs of children and adolescents. It is an area of applied psychology practiced by a school psychologist. They often collaborate with educators, families, school leaders, community members, and other professionals to create safe and supportive school environments.

An Individualized Education Program (IEP) is a legal document under United States law that is developed for each public school child in the U.S. who needs special education. It is created through a team of the child's parent(s) and district personnel who are knowledgeable about the child's needs. IEPs must be reviewed every year to keep track of the child's educational progress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inclusion (education)</span> Where disabled students spend most of their time with non-disabled students

Inclusion in education refers to all students being able to access and gain equal opportunities to education and learning. It arose in the context of special education with an individualized education program or 504 plan, and is built on the notion that it is more effective for students with special needs to have the said mixed experience for them to be more successful in social interactions leading to further success in life. The philosophy behind the implementation of the inclusion model does not prioritize, but still provides for the utilization of special classrooms and special schools for the education of students with disabilities. Inclusive education models are brought into force by educational administrators with the intention of moving away from seclusion models of special education to the fullest extent practical, the idea being that it is to the social benefit of general education students and special education students alike, with the more able students serving as peer models and those less able serving as motivation for general education students to learn empathy.

Special education in the United States enables students with exceptional learning needs to access resources through special education programs. These programs did not always exist. "The idea of excluding students with any disability from public school education can be traced back to 1893, when the Massachusetts Supreme Court expelled a student merely due to poor academic ability". This exclusion would be the basis of education for all individuals with special needs for years to come. In 1954, Brown v. Board of Education sparked the belief that the right to a public education applies to all individuals regardless of race, gender, or disability. Finally, special education programs in the United States were made mandatory in 1975 when the United States Congress passed the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) "(sometimes referred to using the acronyms EAHCA or EHA, or Public Law 94-142) was enacted by the United States Congress in 1975, in response to discriminatory treatment by public educational agencies against students with disabilities." The EAHCA was later modified to strengthen protections to students with disabilities and renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). IDEA requires states to provide special education and related services consistent with federal standards as a condition of receiving federal funds.

English-language learner is a term used in some English-speaking countries such as the United States and Canada to describe a person who is learning the English language and has a native language that is not English. Some educational advocates, especially in the United States, classify these students as non-native English speakers or emergent bilinguals. Various other terms are also used to refer to students who are not proficient in English, such as English as a second language (ESL), English as an additional language (EAL), limited English proficient (LEP), culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD), non-native English speaker, bilingual students, heritage language, emergent bilingual, and language-minority students. The legal term that is used in federal legislation is 'limited English proficient'. The instruction and assessment of students, their cultural background, and the attitudes of classroom teachers towards ELLs have all been found to be factors in the achievement of these students. Several methods have been suggested to effectively teach ELLs, including integrating their home cultures into the classroom, involving them in language-appropriate content-area instruction early on, and integrating literature into their learning programs.

Positive behavior support (PBS) uses tools from applied behaviour analysis and values of normalisation and social role valorisation theory to improve quality of life, usually in schools. PBS uses functional analysis to understand what maintains an individual's challenging behavior and how to support the individual to get these needs met in more appropriate way, instead of using 'challenging behaviours'. People's inappropriate behaviors are difficult to change because they are functional; they serve a purpose for them. These behaviors may be supported by reinforcement in the environment. People may inadvertently reinforce undesired behaviors by providing objects and/or attention because of the behavior.

Direct instruction (DI) is the explicit teaching of a skill set using lectures or demonstrations of the material to students. A particular subset, denoted by capitalization as Direct Instruction, refers to the approach developed by Siegfried Engelmann and Wesley C. Becker that was first implemented in the 1960s. DI teaches by explicit instruction, in contrast to exploratory models such as inquiry-based learning. DI includes tutorials, participatory laboratory classes, discussions, recitation, seminars, workshops, observation, active learning, practicum, or internships. Model includes "I do" (instructor), "We do", "You do".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Learning disability</span> Range of neurodevelopmental conditions

Learning disability, learning disorder, or learning difficulty is a condition in the brain that causes difficulties comprehending or processing information and can be caused by several different factors. Given the "difficulty learning in a typical manner", this does not exclude the ability to learn in a different manner. Therefore, some people can be more accurately described as having a "learning difference", thus avoiding any misconception of being disabled with a possible lack of an ability to learn and possible negative stereotyping. In the United Kingdom, the term "learning disability" generally refers to an intellectual disability, while conditions such as dyslexia and dyspraxia are usually referred to as "learning difficulties".

Curriculum-based measurement, or CBM, is also referred to as a general outcomes measures (GOMs) of a student's performance in either basic skills or content knowledge.

A resource room is a separate, remedial classroom in a school where students with educational disabilities, such as specific learning disabilities, are given direct, specialized instruction and academic remediation and assistance with homework, and related assignments as individuals or in groups.

Positive education is an approach to education that draws on positive psychology's emphasis of individual strengths and personal motivation to promote learning. Unlike traditional school approaches, positive schooling teachers use techniques that focus on the well-being of individual students. Teachers use methods such as developing tailored goals for each student to engender learning and working with them to develop the plans and motivation to reach their goals. Rather than pushing students to achieve at a set grade level, seen through the emphasis of standardized testing, this approach attempts to customize learning goals to individual students' levels. Instead of setting students to compete against one another, learning is viewed as a cooperative process where teachers learn to respect their students and each student's input is valued.

Classwide Peer Tutoring (CWPT) is a variation of peer-mediated instruction that has been used in elementary, middle school, and high school classrooms. In CWPT students form pairs and take turns in the roles of tutor and student. Students earn points for their teams by participating in the tutoring and the winning team is recognized. Researchers have investigated CWPT's effectiveness in several different academic areas.

Positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) is a set of ideas and tools used in schools to improve students' behavior. PBIS uses evidence and data-based programs, practices, and strategies to frame behavioral improvement relating to student growth in academic performance, safety, behavior, and establishing and maintaining positive school culture. PBIS tries to address the behavioral needs of at-risk students and the multi-leveled needs of all students, in an effort to create an environment that promotes effective teaching and learning in schools. Researchers such as Robert H. Horner believe that PBIS enhances the school staff's time for delivering effective instructions and lessons to all students.

Data-driven instruction is an educational approach that relies on information to inform teaching and learning. The idea refers to a method teachers use to improve instruction by looking at the information they have about their students. It takes place within the classroom, compared to data-driven decision making. Data-driven instruction works on two levels. One, it provides teachers the ability to be more responsive to students’ needs, and two, it allows students to be in charge of their own learning. Data-driven instruction can be understood through examination of its history, how it is used in the classroom, its attributes, and examples from teachers using this process.

Lynn Fuchs is an educational psychologist known for research on instructional practice and assessment, reading disabilities, and mathematics disabilities. She is the Dunn Family Chair in Psychoeducational Assessment in the Department of Special Education at Vanderbilt University.

Inclusive Classroom is a term used within American pedagogy to describe a classroom in which all students, irrespective of their abilities or skills, are welcomed holistically. It is built on the notion that being in a non-segregated classroom will better prepare special-needs students for later life. In the United States, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 guaranteed civil rights to disabled people, though inclusion of disabled students progressed slowly until the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, after which almost half of US students with disabilities were soon in general classrooms.

Newcomer education is the specialized teaching of refugees, migrants, asylees and immigrants who have resettled in a host country, with the goal of providing the knowledge and skills necessary to integrate into their country of refuge. Education is the primary way by which newcomers can adjust to the linguistic, social, and cultural environments of their new communities. Newcomer education aims to empower newcomers with a sense of self-efficacy and social integration, as well as giving them the skills to pursue employment or higher education. Newcomer education also aims to help address trauma, culture shock, and other negative effects of forced displacement. Education for newcomers can provide long-term prospects for stability of individuals, communities, countries and global society.

Disproportionality in special education refers to the unequal representation of certain demographic groups in restrictive placement and discipline, particularly in the United States' public school system. Disproportionality is often displayed as the under- or overrepresentation of specific racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, or culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) groups in special education compared to their presence in the overall student population. A child's race and ethnicity may significantly influence the likelihood of being misidentified as needing special education services, raising concerns about fairness, equity, and the potential impact on students' educational outcomes.

References

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.