Rhetorical stance

Last updated

Rhetorical stance refers to the deliberate choices made by a communicator in shaping and presenting their message. It encompasses the strategic decisions regarding language, style, and tone that are employed to achieve a specific communicative purpose. This concept is deeply rooted in rhetorical theory and is a fundamental aspect of effective communication across various disciplines, including literature, public speaking, and academic writing.

Contents

Rhetorical stance is the position or perspective that a writer or speaker adopts to convey a message to an audience. [1]

It involves choices in tone, style, and language to persuade, inform, entertain, or engage the audience. Rhetorical stance can include elements such as the use of ethos (establishing credibility), pathos (appealing to emotions), and logos (logical reasoning) to shape the overall impact of a communication. [2] [3]

Purpose

The application of a rhetorical stance plays a role in refining arguments. Within the realm of rhetorical composition, the persona, audience, and contextual factors form the foundation of persuasive rhetoric.

According to scholars James L. Golden, Goodwin Berquist, and William Coleman, authors and speakers often utilize learned arguments and varied communication skills to effectively convey an intended message. [4] Aristotle stated that the arguments accessible for any given subject are contingent upon the unique circumstances of the rhetorical situation, [5] while Lloyd Bitzer contended that the availability of arguments is shaped by the intricate relationships between the author, audience, context, and purpose of the discourse. [6] Wayne Booth defined rhetoric as "the art of persuasion."

In Booth's perspective, a proficient author or speaker, when adopting a rhetorical stance, harmonizes three fundamental components within their discourse: the speaker, the argument, and the audience. This equilibrium is achieved through the use of a voice that conveys character, the explicit presentation of all pertinent arguments concerning the subject matter, and thoughtful consideration of the audience's distinct characteristics and dispositions. Booth's argument asserts that a speaker who neglects the interplay between themselves and their audience, solely relying on the information they present about the subject, "will produce scholarly essays that lack reader engagement, composed not for an audience but merely for inclusion in bibliographies." [7]

Communicators may choose to include or exclude specific points from their argument or adjust their tone to align with the expectations of their target audience.

Context

Authors strategically position themselves in relation to their audience by considering pertinent contextual elements that impact the communicative situation. Brian Street advocates for an expansive interpretation of "context," encompassing "conceptual systems, political structures, economic processes, and so on," rather than merely focusing on a 'network' or 'interaction'". [8] On the other hand, Stephen Levinson adopts a more specific definition, confining relevant contextual elements to immediate and observable events. Various real-world factors, such as current affairs, politics, natural disasters, religious or social norms, or war, can significantly influence an author's or speaker's perspective.[ citation needed ]

The rhetorical triangle and tetrahedron

Rhetorical Tetrahedron
Rhetorical Triangle Rhetorical Tetrahedron.png
Rhetorical Tetrahedron
Rhetorical Triangle Rhetorical Triangle.png
Rhetorical Triangle

Aristotle established the classic triad of ethos, pathos, and logos (the Aristotelian triad of appeals) that serves as the foundation of the rhetorical triangle. [9] The rhetorical triangle evolved from its original, sophisticated model into what rhetorician Sharon Crowley describes as the "postmodern" rhetorical triangle, the rhetorical tetrahedron. [10] The expanded rhetorical triangle now emphasizes context by integrating situational elements.

The original version includes only three points: the writer/speaker (ethos), the audience (pathos), and the message itself (logos). All the points affect one another, so mastering each creates a persuasive rhetorical stance. [11]

The rhetorical tetrahedron carries those three points along with context. Context can help explain the "why" and "how" something is written by introducing the setting in which it was created. [12]

Audience

According to Aristotle and twentieth-century rhetoricians, experienced speakers begin the process of adopting a rhetorical stance with an analysis of the audience. Professional authors and speakers use their knowledge of the subject and establish credibility to help influence how their message is received. [13] Rhetorician George Campbell explained how one can influence their audience by applying argumentative and emotional tones. [14] Aristotle emphasized the consideration of human nature and emotion to achieve an understanding of one’s audience and a relationship necessary for achieving persuasion. [15] [ failed verification ] According to Kenneth Burke, the author creates this impression by demonstrating an understanding of the audience’s needs and by "substantiating" intellectual and empathetic relationships between oneself and the audience. [16] Following Aristotle's theory, Roman Senator Cicero explained that by adapting to the emotions of the audience, one can be successful in gaining their respect and attention. [17] Similarly, according to Ross Wintered, speakers and authors adjust their rhetorical stance to accommodate a particular audience. [18] When the speaker is talking, they alter their rhetorical stance and use various techniques for different audiences based on the particular situation. [18] There are also several ways in which a speaker or writer can make their audience feel a connection or relation to them. Speakers use anchorage and relay to appeal to their audience. Anchorage uses images to assist the speaker in getting specific points across, while relay uses moving images, such as videos, comic strips, etc. to do the same. A particular pronoun can make the audience feel either included or excluded. If the author says, for example, "All of us Europeans are well traveled," it implies that all of "us" Europeans agree with the fact that "we" are well traveled. However, if a non-European is in the audience, they will not feel a connection to the speaker or author, making them feel very antagonistic. [19]

Usage

Many academic courses incorporate rhetorical stance. Speech and English departments, especially, have implemented this tactic in their educational plans. In speech classes, rhetorical stance is used when the speaker is addressing the audience. Also, a speaker not only takes a rhetorical stance in public addresses, formal arguments, or academic essays but in all communications. Although the bulk of the discussion on rhetorical stance is generally found in academia, a myriad of "other-than-academic communities," such as business, [20] law and politics, [21] [22] journalism and media, [23] and religious institutions [24] utilize and discuss theories of rhetorical stance.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public speaking</span> Performing a speech to a live audience

Public speaking, also called oratory, is the act or skill of delivering speeches on a subject before a live audience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetoric</span> Art of persuasion

Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. It is one of the three ancient arts of discourse (trivium) along with grammar and logic/dialectic. As an academic discipline within the humanities, rhetoric aims to study the techniques that speakers or writers use to inform, persuade, and motivate their audiences. Rhetoric also provides heuristics for understanding, discovering, and developing arguments for particular situations.

<i>Kairos</i> Right or opportune moment

Kairos is an ancient Greek word meaning 'the right or critical moment'. In modern Greek, kairos also means 'weather' or 'time'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetorical criticism</span>

Rhetorical criticism analyzes the symbolic artifacts of discourse—the words, phrases, images, gestures, performances, texts, films, etc. that people use to communicate. Rhetorical analysis shows how the artifacts work, how well they work, and how the artifacts, as discourse, inform and instruct, entertain and arouse, and convince and persuade the audience; as such, discourse includes the possibility of morally improving the reader, the viewer, and the listener. Rhetorical criticism studies and analyzes the purpose of the words, sights, and sounds that are the symbolic artifacts used for communications among people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Visual rhetoric</span> Communication through visual elements

Visual rhetoric is the art of effective communication through visual elements such as images, typography, and texts. Visual rhetoric encompasses the skill of visual literacy and the ability to analyze images for their form and meaning. Drawing on techniques from semiotics and rhetorical analysis, visual rhetoric expands on visual literacy as it examines the structure of an image with the focus on its persuasive effects on an audience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethos</span> Greek word meaning character

Ethos is a Greek word meaning 'character' that is used to describe the guiding beliefs or ideals that characterize a community, nation, or ideology; and the balance between caution, and passion. The Greeks also used this word to refer to the power of music to influence emotions, behaviors, and even morals. Early Greek stories of Orpheus exhibit this idea in a compelling way. The word's use in rhetoric is closely based on the Greek terminology used by Aristotle in his concept of the three artistic proofs or modes of persuasion alongside pathos and logos. It gives credit to the speaker, or the speaker is taking credit.

Pathos appeals to the emotions and ideals of the audience and elicits feelings that already reside in them. Pathos is a term used most often in rhetoric, as well as in literature, film and other narrative art.

<i>Inventio</i> Canon of rhetoric

Inventio, one of the five canons of rhetoric, is the method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric and comes from the Latin word, meaning "invention" or "discovery". Inventio is the central, indispensable canon of rhetoric, and traditionally means a systematic search for arguments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetoric (Aristotle)</span>

Aristotle's Rhetoric is an ancient Greek treatise on the art of persuasion, dating from the 4th century BCE. The English title varies: typically it is Rhetoric, the Art of Rhetoric, On Rhetoric, or a Treatise on Rhetoric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Composition (language)</span> Assembling words and sentences into a work

The term composition as it refers to writing, can describe authors' decisions about, processes for designing, and sometimes the final product of, a composed linguistic work. In original use, it tended to describe practices concerning the development of oratorical performances, and eventually essays, narratives, or genres of imaginative literature, but since the mid-20th century emergence of the field of composition studies, its use has broadened to apply to any composed work: print or digital, alphanumeric or multimodal. As such, the composition of linguistic works goes beyond the exclusivity of written and oral documents to visual and digital arenas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modes of persuasion</span> Strategies of rhetoric

The modes of persuasion, modes of appeal or rhetorical appeals are strategies of rhetoric that classify a speaker's or writer's appeal to their audience. These include ethos, pathos, and logos, all three of which appear in Aristotle's Rhetoric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chaïm Perelman</span> Belgian philosopher (1912–1984)

Chaïm Perelman was a Belgian philosopher of Polish-Jewish origin. He was among the most important argumentation theorists of the twentieth century. His chief work is the Traité de l'argumentation – la nouvelle rhétorique (1958), with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, translated into English as The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, by John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver (1969).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glossary of rhetorical terms</span>

Owing to its origin in ancient Greece and Rome, English rhetorical theory frequently employs Greek and Latin words as terms of art. This page explains commonly used rhetorical terms in alphabetical order. The brief definitions here are intended to serve as a quick reference rather than an in-depth discussion. For more information, click the terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetoric of science</span>

Rhetoric of science is a body of scholarly literature exploring the notion that the practice of science is a rhetorical activity. It emerged after a number of similarly oriented topics of research and discussion during the late 20th century, including the sociology of scientific knowledge, history of science, and philosophy of science, but it is practiced most typically by rhetoricians in academic departments of English, speech, and communication.

Persuasive writing is a form of written communication intended to convince or influence readers to accept a particular idea or opinion and to inspire action. A wide variety of writings, such as criticisms, reviews, reaction papers, editorials, proposals, advertisements, and brochures, utilize different persuasion techniques to influence readers. Persuasive writing can also be employed in indoctrination. It is often confused with opinion writing; however, while both may share similar themes, persuasive writing is backed by facts, whereas opinion writing is supported by emotions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genre criticism</span>

Genre criticism is a method within rhetorical criticism that analyzes texts in terms of their genre: the set of generic expectations, conventions, and constraints that guide their production and interpretation. In rhetoric, the theory of genre provides a means to classify and compare artifacts in terms of their formal, substantive and contextual features. By grouping artifacts with others which have similar formal features or rhetorical exigencies, rhetorical critics can shed light on how authors use or flout conventions for their own purposes. Genre criticism has thus become one of the main methodologies within rhetorical criticism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neo-Aristotelianism (literature)</span>

Neo-Aristotelianism is a view of literature and rhetorical criticism propagated by the Chicago School — Ronald S. Crane, Elder Olson, Richard McKeon, Wayne Booth, and others — which means.

"A view of literature and criticism which takes a pluralistic attitude toward the history of literature and seeks to view literary works and critical theories intrinsically"

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetorical situation</span> Context of a rhetorical event

The rhetorical situation is an event that consists of an issue, an audience, and a set of constraints. A rhetorical situation arises from a given context or exigence. An article by Lloyd Bitzer introduced the model of the rhetorical situation in 1968, which was later challenged and modified by Richard E. Vatz (1973) and Scott Consigny (1974). More recent scholarship has further redefined the model to include more expansive views of rhetorical operations and ecologies.

Ethopoeia (ee-tho-po-EE-ya) is the ancient Greek term for the creation of a character. Ethopoeia was a technique used by early students of rhetoric in order to create a successful speech or oration by impersonating a subject or client. Ethopoeia contains elements of both ethos and pathos and this is noticeable in the three divisions of ethopoeia. These three divisions are pathetical, ethical and mixed. It is essential to impersonation, one of the fourteen progymnasmata exercises created for the early schools of rhetoric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rhetoric of health and medicine</span>

The rhetoric of health and medicine is an academic discipline concerning language and symbols in health and medicine. Rhetoric most commonly refers to the persuasive element in human interactions and is often best studied in the specific situations in which it occurs. As a subfield of rhetoric, medical rhetoric specifically analyzes and evaluates the structure, delivery, and intention of communications messages in medicine- and health-related contexts. Primary topics of focus includes patient-physician communication, health literacy, language that constructs disease knowledge, and pharmaceutical advertising. The general research areas are described below. Medical rhetoric is a more focused subfield of the rhetoric of science.

References

  1. Booth, Wayne C. (1963). "The Rhetorical Stance". College Composition and Communication. 14 (3): 139–145. doi:10.2307/355048. JSTOR   355048.
  2. "Definition of STANCE" . Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  3. Golden, James L. (1978). The Rhetoric of Western Thought. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. ISBN   0-8403-2916-4.
  4. Golden, James L. (1978). The Rhetoric of Western Thought. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. ISBN   0-8403-2916-4.
  5. Smith, Robin (2022), Zalta, Edward N.; Nodelman, Uri (eds.), "Aristotle's Logic", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2022 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved 2023-11-06
  6. Blitzer, Lloyd (January 1968). "The Rhetorical Situation". Philosophy and Rhetoric.
  7. Booth, Wayne C. (1963). "The Rhetorical Stance". College Composition and Communication. 14 (3): 139–145. doi:10.2307/355048. JSTOR   355048.
  8. Street, Brian (2001). Cushman, Ellen (ed.). The New Literacy Studies. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's. pp. 430–442.{{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  9. Aristotle (1984). "Chapter 3". Rhetoric . Book 1.
  10. Connors, Robert. "Review: "The Methodical Memory Invention in Current-Traditional Rhetoric" by Sharon Crowley" (PDF). Journal of Advanced Composition: 217–221 via JAC.
  11. Hunter, Lynette (1984), "Rhetorical Stance", Rhetorical Stance in Modern Literature, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 58–105, ISBN   978-1-349-07063-3 , retrieved 2023-10-03
  12. "Rhetorical Analysis B : Chiastic Structures and Rhetorical Techniques", Abraham In Galatians : Epistolary and Rhetorical Contexts, Hart Publishing, retrieved 2023-10-03
  13. Aristotle (1984). "Chapter 2". Rhetoric . Book 1.
  14. Campbell, George (1988). Landmarks in Rhetoric and Public Address: The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press: The Nature and Foundations of Eloquence. p. 4. ISBN   9780809314188.
  15. Aristotle. Rhetoric. pp. 1389–1393.
  16. Burke, Kenneth (1962). A Grammar of Motives and A Rhetoric of Motives. Cleveland: The World Publishing Co.
  17. Plato. Phaedrus. pp. 246a–254e.
  18. 1 2 Winterowd, Ross W. (1981). The Contemporary Writer. San Diego, CA: Harcourt.
  19. Lunsford, A.; Connors, R. (1999). The New St. Martin's Handbook . Boston, MA. pp.  26–27. ISBN   978-0312167448.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  20. Ghaziana, Amin (2005). Keywords and Cultural Change: Frame Analysis of Business Model Public Talk 1975-2000. pp. 204, 523–559.
  21. Phillips, Scott (2000). "Judicial Rhetoric, Meaning-Making, and the Institutionalization of Hate Crime Law". Law & Society Review: 343, 567–606.
  22. Holihan, David (2004). "He's Stealing my Issues! Clinton's Crime Rhetoric and the Dynamics of Issue Ownership". Political Behavior: 262, 95–124.
  23. McLuhan, Marshall (1967). The Medium is the Massage. New York: Random House. ISBN   1584230703.
  24. Burke, Kenneth (1970). The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology . Berkeley: U of California Press.