Samuel Griffith Society

Last updated

The Samuel Griffith Society
Established1992
Chair Ian Callinan
Executive Director Xavier Boffa
Website www.samuelgriffith.org

The Samuel Griffith Society is an Australian conservative [1] legal organisation founded in 1992 by a group led by former Chief Justice of Australia Sir Harry Gibbs, former Senator John Stone, businessman Hugh Morgan and legal academic Greg Craven. [2] [1] Named after Sir Samuel Griffith, one of the architects of the Australian Constitution, the society describes its aims as being: "to undertake and support research into [Australia's] constitutional arrangements, to encourage and promote widespread debate about the benefits of federalism, and to defend the present Constitution." [3] It holds annual conferences, runs an annual national constitutional law essay competition and publishes an annual journal of conference proceedings entitled "Upholding the Australian Constitution". [4] [5] [6]

Contents

It is one of a number of groups including the H. R. Nicholls Society, Bennelong Society and Lavoisier Group, that were promoted by Australian business leader and political activist Ray Evans. [7]

The Society is currently led by former High Court Justice Ian Callinan. [8]

Aims and objectives

The Society's aims have been described by author Dominic Kelly as to pursue "a renewed federalism" and to oppose "the Mabo judgment and the proposed Australian republic." [9]

Current activities

The Samuel Griffith Society has held more than thirty conferences since 1992. [10] [11] Recent conference speakers have included former Prime Minister Tony Abbott, Chief Justice Susan Kiefel, Senator Amanda Stoker and Senator James Paterson. [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] Conference discussion topics have included the Mabo decision, Australia remaining a constitutional monarchy, the possible introduction of a Bill of rights and the controversial section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. [21] [22] [23] [24]

In 2019, the Society was granted deductible gift recipient status. [25] This was soon followed by the appointment of the Society's first full-time Executive Director. [26]

According to James Allan: "The Society’s members remain stalwart supporters of federalism, in line with the clear and unmistakable intentions of those who drafted our Constitution and worked to see it ratified, and despite the truly abysmal track record of our High Court in federalism disputes since 1920." [27] In recent times, the Society has spoken out against the High Court's decision in Love v Commonwealth. [28] In October 2021, Executive Director Xavier Boffa called for the decision to be reconsidered, describing it as "quite a surprise to many in the legal community, introducing a controversial new notion of nationality detached from birth or naturalisation". [29]

The Society has been criticised as "a temperamentally conservative body concerned with dry constitutional matters." [1] In 2021, the Society's decision to invite controversial One Nation MP Mark Latham to speak at its 32nd conference was derided for failing "to mention his current political party, or the decade he spent representing Labor in Federal Parliament". [30] It has also been linked to conservative efforts to influence judicial appointments in Australia, including the appointment of Justice Simon Steward to the High Court of Australia. [31] [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist Society</span> American conservative legal organization

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies (FedSoc) is an American conservative and libertarian legal organization that advocates for a textualist and originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., it has chapters at more than 200 law schools and features student, lawyer, and faculty divisions; the lawyers division comprises more than 70,000 practicing attorneys in ninety cities. Through speaking events, lectures, and other activities, it provides a forum for legal experts of opposing views to interact with members of the legal profession, the judiciary, and the legal academy. It is one of the most influential legal organizations in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Australia</span> Apex court of Australia

The High Court of Australia is the apex court of the Australian legal system. It exercises original and appellate jurisdiction on matters specified in the Constitution of Australia and supplementary legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary Gaudron</span> 20th and 21st-century Australian judge

Mary Genevieve Gaudron, is an Australian lawyer and judge, who was the first female Justice of the High Court of Australia. She was the Solicitor-General of New South Wales from 1981 until 1987 before her appointment to the High Court. After her retirement in 2002, she joined the International Labour Organization, serving as the President of its Administrative Tribunal from 2011 until 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Griffith</span> Australian politician

Sir Samuel Walker Griffith was an Australian judge and politician who served as the inaugural Chief Justice of Australia, in office from 1903 to 1919. He also served a term as Chief Justice of Queensland and two terms as Premier of Queensland, and played a key role in the drafting of the Australian Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ian Callinan</span> Former Justice of the High Court of Australia

Ian David Francis Callinan AC KC is a former Justice of the High Court of Australia, the highest court in the Australian court hierarchy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federation of Australia</span> Process by which six separate British self-governing colonies became the country of Australia

The Federation of Australia was the process by which the six separate British self-governing colonies of Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, and Western Australia agreed to unite and form the Commonwealth of Australia, establishing a system of federalism in Australia. The colonies of Fiji and New Zealand were originally part of this process, but they decided not to join the federation. Following federation, the six colonies that united to form the Commonwealth of Australia as states kept the systems of government that they had developed as separate colonies, but they also agreed to have a federal government that was responsible for matters concerning the whole nation. When the Constitution of Australia came into force, on 1 January 1901, the colonies collectively became states of the Commonwealth of Australia.

<i>Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd</i> Judgement of the High Court of Australia

Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd, commonly known as the Engineers case, was a landmark decision by the High Court of Australia on 31 August 1920. The immediate issue concerned the Commonwealth's power under s51(xxxv) of the Constitution but the court did not confine itself to that question, using the opportunity to roam broadly over constitutional interpretation.

The reserved powers doctrine was a principle used by the inaugural High Court of Australia in the interpretation of the Constitution of Australia, that emphasised the context of the Constitution, drawing on principles of federalism, what the Court saw as the compact between the newly formed Commonwealth and the former colonies, particularly the compromises that informed the text of the constitution. The doctrine involved a restrictive approach to the interpretation of the specific powers of the Federal Parliament to preserve the powers that were intended to be left to the States. The doctrine was challenged by the new appointments to the Court in 1906 and was ultimately abandoned by the High Court in 1920 in the Engineers' Case, replaced by an approach to interpretation that emphasised the text rather than the context of the Constitution.

Gregory Joseph Craven is an Australian academic, who was the vice-chancellor and president of the Australian Catholic University from January 2008 to January 2021. On 8 April 2020, the ACU chancellor, John Fahey, announced Craven's planned retirement in an email to staff and students, which was to become effective in January 2021. His successor was named as Zlatko Skrbis, who took up his appointment as ACU's fourth Vice Chancellor on 11 January 2021.

The Bennelong Society was a conservative think-tank dedicated to Indigenous Australian affairs. The society was named after the Eora man Bennelong, who served as an interlocutor between the Indigenous Australian and British cultures, both in Sydney and in the United Kingdom almost from the start of British settlement of Australia in 1788. It was affiliated with conservative commentators in debates on Indigenous affairs. The society was established to:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh Morgan (businessman)</span> Australian business executive and director

Hugh Matheson MorganACMAusIMMFTSE, is an Australian businessman and former CEO of Western Mining Corporation. He was President of the Business Council of Australia from 2003 to 2005. The Howard government appointed him to the board of the Reserve Bank of Australia in 1996, where he remained until 2007. He also was the Founding Chairman of Asia Society Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harrison Moore</span>

Sir William Harrison Moore KBE CMG, usually known as Harrison Moore or W. Harrison Moore, was an Australian lawyer and academic who was a professor at the University of Melbourne and the third dean of the Melbourne University Law School.

<i>DEmden v Pedder</i>

D'Emden v Pedder was a significant Australian court case decided in the High Court of Australia on 26 April 1904. It directly concerned the question of whether salary receipts of federal government employees were subject to state stamp duty, but it touched on the broader issue within Australian constitutional law of the degree to which the two levels of Australian government were subject to each other's laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Susan Kiefel</span> Australian judge (born 1954)

Susan Mary Kiefel is an Australian lawyer and barrister who was the 13th Chief Justice of Australia from 2017 to 2023. She concurrently served on the High Court of Australia from 2007 to 2023, previously being a judge of both the Supreme Court of Queensland and the Federal Court of Australia. Kiefel is the first woman to serve in the position of Chief Justice.

Ray Evans was an Australian businessperson, political conservative, and campaigner against climate change mitigation efforts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Australia</span> Supreme law of Australia

The Constitution of Australia is the supreme law of Australia. It is a written constitution that sets down the political structure of Australia as a federation under a constitutional monarchy governed with a parliamentary system and outlines the structure and powers of the Commonwealth of Australia's three constituent parts: the executive, legislature, and judiciary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert French</span> Former Chief Justice of Australia

Robert Shenton French is an Australian lawyer and judge who served as the twelfth Chief Justice of Australia, in office from 2008 to 2017. He has been the chancellor of the University of Western Australia since November 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of Australia</span> Presiding justice of the High Court of Australia

The chief justice of Australia is the presiding justice of the High Court of Australia and the highest-ranking judicial officer in the Commonwealth of Australia. The incumbent is Stephen Gageler, since 6 November 2023.

<i>Love v Commonwealth</i> 2020 case in High Court of Australia

Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth is a High Court of Australia case that held that Aboriginal Australians could not be classified as aliens under section 51(xix) of the Australian Constitution. The case was decided on 11 February 2020.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Kelly, Dominic (2016) Privilege and its discontents, The Monthly
  2. ↑ "About Us".
  3. ↑ "The Samuel Griffith Society".
  4. ↑ National Library of Australia, Catalogue
  5. ↑ "Published papers".
  6. ↑ Deakin Law Students' Society The National Sir Samuel Griffith Prize 2016
  7. ↑ Kelly, Dominic (2019), Political Troglodytes and Economic Lunatics: The Hard Right in Australia, La Trobe University Press, Melbourne, Australia, ISBN   9781743820766, "The H.R. Nicholls Society [...], the Samuel Griffith Society (1992, constitutional issues), the Bennelong Society [...], and the Lavoisier Group [...] were each established by Western Mining Corporation executives Hugh Morgan and Ray Evans, with the assistance of various other figures associated with the political right."
  8. ↑ Callinan, Ian (2019) "Concluding Remarks", Upholding the Australian Constitution.
  9. ↑ Kelly, Dominic (2019), Political Troglodytes and Economic Lunatics: The Hard Right in Australia The Guardian, "On constitutional issues, the Samuel Griffith Society wanted a renewed federalism, and fought passionately against the Mabo judgment and the proposed Australian republic."
  10. ↑ Kelly, Dominic (2019), Political Troglodytes and Economic Lunatics: The Hard Right in Australia, La Trobe University Press, Melbourne, Australia, ISBN   9781743820766, "The Samuel Griffith Society has held thirty conferences since 1992, following the same weekend format as the H.R. Nicholls Society."
  11. ↑ Victorian Bar, Samuel Griffith Society Program 2019
  12. ↑ https://www.themonthly.com.au/blog/dominic-kelly/2016/17/2016/1471402108/privilege-and-its-discontents Kelly, Dominic (2016) Privilege and its discontents, The Monthly
  13. ↑ Abbott, Tony (2018) Address at the Samuel Griffith Society
  14. ↑ Kiefel, Susan (2018) The High Court Justices and the Weight of War, High Court of Australia
  15. ↑ Merritt, Chris (2020) "Constitution cries out for saviours", The Australian
  16. ↑ Merritt, Chris (2021) "Legal basis for border closures fades", The Australian
  17. ↑ Martin, Sarah and Karp, Paul (2021) "Gerard Rennick demanding Morrison government challenge Queensland border ban in high court", The Guardian Australia
  18. ↑ Karp, Paul (2021) "Government accused of ‘shirking responsibility’ in bid to overturn ruling against Aboriginal deportation", The Guardian Australia
  19. ↑ James Paterson
  20. ↑ Paterson, James (2020) "Let’s never allow a High Court to usurp parliament", The Australian
  21. ↑ National Observer Winter 1999
  22. ↑ Kelly, Dominic (2019), Political Troglodytes and Economic Lunatics: The Hard Right in Australia, La Trobe University Press, Melbourne, Australia, ISBN   9781743820766, "From the mid-1980s through until 1993 there were numerous articles on threats to the Constitution and Australia's British institutions, the proposed republic and the Mabo debate, all of which became the central preoccupations of the Samuel Griffith Society."
  23. ↑ Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, Leading Federalist Society To Discuss Republic
  24. ↑ Merritt, Chris (2018) Silencing alternative opinions is an offensive affront to human rights, The Australian
  25. ↑ Lawson, Kirsten (2019), Gifts to conservative think tank Samuel Griffith Society now tax deductible, The Canberra Times
  26. ↑ "The Samuel Griffith Society".
  27. ↑ Allan, James, (2015). https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2015/09/still-care-constitution/
  28. ↑ Merritt, Chris (2020) "Judging the High Court’s justices", The Australian
  29. ↑ Karp, Paul (2021) "Government accused of ‘shirking responsibility’ in bid to overturn ruling against Aboriginal deportation", The Guardian Australia
  30. ↑ Brook, Stephen and Hutchinson, Samantha (2021), Liberal-linked society puts Mark Latham on a pedestal, The Age
  31. ↑ Patrick, Aaron (2020) "In epic struggle for the High Court, conservatives find a candidate", Australian Financial Review
  32. ↑ Pelly, Michael (2021) "A High Court Steward for conservatives", Australian Financial Review
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.