Schlagenhauf v. Holder

Schlagenhauf v. Holder
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 23, 1964
Full case name	Schlagenhauf v. Holder
Citations	379 U.S. 104 ( more )
Holding
Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows courts to order a defendant to submit to a medical examination.
Court membership
Chief Justice Earl Warren Associate Justices Hugo Black  · William O. Douglas Tom C. Clark  · John M. Harlan II William J. Brennan Jr.  · Potter Stewart Byron White  · Arthur Goldberg
Case opinions
Majority	Goldberg, joined by Warren, Brennan, Stewart, White
Concur/dissent	Black, joined by Clark
Concur/dissent	Douglass
Dissent	Harlan II

Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows courts to order a defendant to submit to a medical examination. ^{[1] [2]} The case came to stand for the notion that mandamus can be appropriate when there is a recurring dispute over interpretations of the Rules. ^[3]

References

1. Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104 (1964)
2. Mishkin, Paul J. (1965). "The Supreme Court, 1964 Term" . Harvard Law Review. 79 (1): 168–170. doi:10.2307/1338859. ISSN   0017-811X. JSTOR   1338859.
3. Salpeter, Alan N.; Salomon, Richard A.; Jacobs, Caryn (1987). "Discovery from Those at the Top". Litigation. 13 (4): 18. ISSN   0097-9813. JSTOR   29759186.

External links

• Text of Schlagenhauf v. Holder, 379 U.S. 104 (1964) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia