Seclusion and restraint practices in the U.S. education system

Last updated

Woman in padded cell/seclusion room A woman is standing alone in a padded cell with her arms out Wellcome V0041242.jpg
Woman in padded cell/seclusion room

Restraint and seclusion is a highly controversial practice in the special education system involving holding students down physically or involuntarily locking students in seclusion rooms. [1] In United States public schools, the practices of restraint and seclusion are not regulated on the federal level. All but four of the 50 U.S. states have regulations on portions of these practices. [2]

Contents

Misuse of restraint and seclusion

Seclusion and restraint are often misused in both public and private schools causing severe injury and trauma for students. Restraint and seclusion are often used as punishment for minor behavioral problems. [2] [3] These issues have caused people to call the practices a human rights issue, disabled rights issue, and civil rights issue. There is a recorded surveillance video of an 8 year old being dragged by 3 staff members into a seclusion room/padded cell with no windows. After the door had been opened he was found laying in his own blood. His mother had called it a battle between adults and a child and said "I challenge the experts to show us anywhere how this helps the behavior. How this isn’t traumatizing. Because you can’t. There is no positive thing that comes from this," Linda said. "It doesn't change behavior. It re-traumatizes children. And it opens them up to injuries and all other kinds of things. Why are you continuing to do this?" [2]

Types of rooms for seclusion

Seclusion can occur in any room someone can be locked alone in. most fit the definition for padded cells. [4] While most seclusion rooms could be called padded cells not all are padded. [5]

Types of seclusion room

Practices

Poster protesting the school practices, relating to the death of Max Benson ShineOnMax 1.png
Poster protesting the school practices, relating to the death of Max Benson

Restraints are defined by the U.S. Department of Education as "a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely". [6]

Prone restraints are a practice where students are physically held, face-down, on the floor. [6]

Seclusion is defined by the Department of Education as "the involuntary confinement of a student alone in a room or area from which the student is physically prevented from leaving". [6]

Legality by state

Although these practices are not regulated at the federal level, federal guidelines suggest these practices should never be used except if a student's behavior "poses imminent danger of serious physical harm to self or others". [6]

Connecticut

Restraint and seclusion are legal in Connecticut. The acts were recorded to have taken place tens of thousands of times per year for over a decade, especially to Black students and students with autism. A bill introduced in 2023, SB 1200, would replace seclusion with a time-out in an unlocked room and limit when restraint is allowed. [7] [8]

New York

In 2024, the Salmon River Central School District in upstate New York was investigated after photos revealed wooden “timeout boxes” in classrooms, raising concerns that the structures constituted prohibited seclusion, particularly for students with disabilities. The district removed the boxes, placed multiple administrators on leave, and faced condemnation from state officials and the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal Council, highlighting the legal ban on seclusion and its disproportionate harm to marginalized students. [9]

Vermont

Prone restraints are permitted in Vermont, though strictly limited. In 2022, Harwood Union Unified School District put a temporary halt to the practice while a task force would examine the district's use of the tactics. [6]

Summary of state laws

State laws on seclusion and restraint: [10]

State lawsRegulation against useSeclusion banProne restraint banMechanical restraint banChemical restraint ban
Alabama
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Alaska
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Arizona
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
Arkansas
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
California
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
Colorado
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svg [N 1] Yes check.svgYes check.svg
Connecticut
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
Delaware
Yellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svg
District of Columbia
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
Florida
Yellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg Partial
Georgia
Yes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Hawaii
Yes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Idaho
X mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svg
Illinois
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Indiana
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svg
Iowa
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Kansas
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Kentucky
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Louisiana
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg Partial
Maine
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Maryland
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial [N 2] Yes check.svgYes check.svgYellow check.svg Partial
Massachusetts
Yes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Michigan
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Minnesota
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
Mississippi
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Missouri
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialX mark.svg [N 3]
Montana
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg Partial
Nebraska
X mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svg
Nevada
Yellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
New Hampshire
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
New Jersey
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
New Mexico
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
New York
Yellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
North Carolina
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
North Dakota
[N 4]
X mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svg
Ohio
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Oklahoma
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Oregon
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Pennsylvania
Yellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
Rhode Island
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svg
South Carolina
X mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svgX mark.svg
South Dakota
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
Tennessee
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Texas
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svg
Utah
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Vermont
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Virginia
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svg
Washington
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg Partial
West Virginia
Yellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYes check.svgYellow check.svg Partial
Wisconsin
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svg
Wyoming
Yellow check.svg PartialYellow check.svg PartialYes check.svgYes check.svgYellow check.svg Partial

See also

References

Explanatory notes

  1. Colorado is unique among states in defining prone restrains as lasting more than five minutes, unless it is in the prone position. [10]
  2. Banned in public schools and limited in non-public schools. [10]
  3. State officials "would not recommend" the use of chemical restraints, but have not banned the practice. [10]
  4. A spokesperson for the North Dakota Department of Public Instruction stated: "North Dakota has no state laws or regulations about the use of restraint or seclusion in schools. The North Dakota Legislature has [repeatedly] declined to approve bills on this subject. ... [There is] a North Dakota School Boards Association suggested policy on restraint and seclusion which many of our school districts have adopted. The existence of the School Boards Association’s suggested policy on seclusion and restraint, and the fact that many districts have adopted it, has been used in the Legislature as a reason not to adopt a state law on the same subject. A School Boards Association manual that includes the suggested policy raises this point. 'One way to preserve local control of the restraint or seclusion policy is to demonstrate to lawmakers that North Dakota schools have, on their own, adopted restraint and seclusion policies that contain reasonable and practical protections for students and staff,' the statement says." [10]

Citations

  1. "Restraint and Seclusion - NYRA". August 2, 2018. Retrieved April 2, 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 Streman, Joce; Brauer, Alex; Nejman, Andrea (March 21, 2022). "Kids locked away, held down: Investigating 'seclusion & restraint' practices at schools". WZTV. Retrieved April 2, 2024.
  3. Gaines, Lee V. (June 6, 2023). "Indiana isn't holding schools accountable for forcibly isolating and restraining students". WFYI Public Media. Retrieved April 3, 2024.
  4. "Padded Cell".
  5. "Civil Rights Division | What is Seclusion?". www.justice.gov. August 23, 2022. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 D'Auria, Peter (September 19, 2022). "In one Vermont school district, the practice of physically restraining students has drawn scrutiny". VTDigger. Retrieved March 20, 2023.
  7. Putterman, Alex (March 15, 2023). "Parents, advocates speak against restraint, seclusion in CT". CT Insider. Retrieved March 20, 2023.
  8. Putterman, Alex (October 27, 2022). "'Major red flag': CT students restrained, secluded thousands of times". CT Insider. Retrieved March 20, 2023.
  9. Closson, Troy (December 20, 2025). "A 'Timeout Box' in an Elementary School Draws Outrage: 'This is Not OK'".
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 "How often schools in your state reported restraint, seclusion use". Times Union. Retrieved March 20, 2023.