Silent Talker Lie Detector

Last updated

The Silent Talker Lie Detector is an attempt to increase the accuracy of the most common lie detector, the polygraph, which does not directly measure whether the subject is truthful, but records physiological measures that are associated with emotional responses. The Silent Talker gives the evaluator access to viewing microexpressions by adding a camera to the process. The creators claim that microexpressions are actual indicators of lying, while many other things could cause an emotional response. Since microexpressions are fleeting, the camera allows the examiner to capture data that otherwise would have been missed. However, the scientific community is not convinced that this system accomplishes what it claims and some call it pseudoscience.

Contents

Functionality

The Silent Talker is a camera system which observes and analyzes nonverbal communication in the form of microexpression while a subject is being interviewed, and is marketed as a tool for credibility assessment. Silent Talker was invented between 2000 and 2002 by a team at Manchester Metropolitan University. [1] The system claims to avoid numerous problems with previous lie detection devices by using an artificial neural network. [2]

Polygraphs are used under the hypothesis that most people do not lie or deceive without some feelings of anxiety or nervousness. This stems from the idea that most people either feel bad that they are lying or are afraid that they will get caught or will be in trouble if they lie. It is this fear and guilt that produces the anxiety and nervousness. When a person feels this way they exhibit difficult to detect involuntary physiological changes that can be detected with a polygraph. Most polygraph examiners will say that they do not test specifically for lies, but for these deceptive reactions. The Silent Talker camera allows the examiner to add microexpressions that may be more directly associated with actual lying. And, since microexpressions are more difficult for the subject to control, theoretically they could provide the examiner with better data.

Polygraph examination results are not generally court admissible because they are considered fundamentally unreliable and there is a fear that jurors would, without question, believe all results of a polygraph." [3]

Unreliability

In a Psychology Today article, Arash Emamzadeh writes that while there are no easy ways to detect lying, the cognitive approach may increase accuracy. [4] Other sources give advice about what techniques people usually use to determine if a speaker is being truthful. These articles focus on non-verbal behavior of the speaker with an emphasis on unconscious behaviors. [5]

Microexpressions are an example of body language that is both often unconscious and not usually something that the examiner would be able to notice. The Silent Talker system adds a camera to the usual polygraph to catch these microexpressions so that they can be analyzed as part of the analysis of the truthfulness of the speaker. Ekman explains that "micro expressions are facial expressions that occur within a fraction of a second. This involuntary emotional leakage exposes a person's true emotions." [6] However, the evidence doesn't show that this device actually makes a difference in the interpretation of the results. [7]

A 2019 article for The Intercept stated that "some academics are questioning the value of the system, which they say relies on pseudoscience to make its decisions about travelers’ honesty," and that "The technology is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what humans do when being truthful and deceptive." [7]

The Guardian reports that the accuracy of polygraph results from 57 studies was "far from satisfactory." There are many examples of how the devices do not work because the physiological response being measured may be a result of the stress of the situation or conversely the actually guilty person may not experience these reactions. In one example, there was an effective detector of actual lies. It was a photocopier that spit out preprinted pages saying "He's lying" that was able to elicit confessions when the guilty person believed the system worked. [8]

In a detailed review of the history and research involving the Silent Talker and other polygraph results, Jake Bittle has written that there is danger in using a technical device to ascertain whether a psychological process is being correctly evaluated. This danger can be amplified if the device is able to make more human-like conclusions as is the case with AI. There are many anecdotes about failures of the system which has never be able to achieve better than an 80% rate of success. [9]

Since the test results can easily be incorrect, they are rarely admissible in court. If the lawyers wish to have the results included in a trial, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued standards for admissibility of scientific tests that must be submitted before a judge makes the decision. However the polygraph is commonly used in police investigations. [10]

An analysis of the use of the silent talker being used for border crossings was completed by The Intercept. They concluded that this system is not only cumbersome and expensive but gave a false report that a traveler was lying when that was not actually the case. This example clearly shows the dangers of using this system, including that it may be used to deny entry to travelers who are incorrectly deemed to be untruthful. [7]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polygraph</span> Device that attempts to infer lying

A polygraph, often incorrectly referred to as a lie detector test, is a junk science device or procedure that measures and records several physiological indicators such as blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and skin conductivity while a person is asked and answers a series of questions. The belief underpinning the use of the polygraph is that deceptive answers will produce physiological responses that can be differentiated from those associated with non-deceptive answers; however, there are no specific physiological reactions associated with lying, making it difficult to identify factors that separate those who are lying from those who are telling the truth.

The "fruit machine" was a device developed in Canada by Frank Robert Wake, a psychology professor with Carleton University in the 1950s that was supposed to be able to identify gay men. The subjects were made to view pornography; the device then measured the diameter of the pupils of the eyes, perspiration, and pulse for a supposed erotic response.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermographic camera</span> Imaging device using infrared radiation

A thermographic camera is a device that creates an image using infrared (IR) radiation, similar to a normal camera that forms an image using visible light. Instead of the 400–700 nanometre (nm) range of the visible light camera, infrared cameras are sensitive to wavelengths from about 1,000 nm to about 14,000 nm (14 μm). The practice of capturing and analyzing the data they provide is called thermography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Ekman</span> American psychologist (born 1934)

Paul Ekman is an American psychologist and professor emeritus at the University of California, San Francisco who is a pioneer in the study of emotions and their relation to facial expressions. He was ranked 59th out of the 100 most cited psychologists of the twentieth century. Ekman conducted seminal research on the specific biological correlations of specific emotions, attempting to demonstrate the universality and discreteness of emotions in a Darwinian approach.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microexpression</span> Innate result of voluntary, involuntary, and conflicting emotional responses

A microexpression is a facial expression that only lasts for a short moment. It is the innate result of a voluntary and an involuntary emotional response occurring simultaneously and conflicting with one another, and occurs when the amygdala responds appropriately to the stimuli that the individual experiences and the individual wishes to conceal this specific emotion. This results in the individual very briefly displaying their true emotions followed by a false emotional reaction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leonarde Keeler</span> Co-inventor of the polygraph

Leonarde Keeler was the co-inventor of the polygraph. He was named after the polymath Leonardo da Vinci, and preferred to be called Nard. He was a Berkeley high school student and amateur magician. He was captivated by John Augustus Larson's machine, a "cardio-pneumo psychogram", with the goal of detecting deception, and worked on it to produce the modern polygraph.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Motion detector</span> Electrical device which utilizes a sensor to detect nearby motion

A motion detector is an electrical device that utilizes a sensor to detect nearby motion. Such a device is often integrated as a component of a system that automatically performs a task or alerts a user of motion in an area. They form a vital component of security, automated lighting control, home control, energy efficiency, and other useful systems.

Lie detection is an assessment of a verbal statement with the goal to reveal a possible intentional deceit. Lie detection may refer to a cognitive process of detecting deception by evaluating message content as well as non-verbal cues. It also may refer to questioning techniques used along with technology that record physiological functions to ascertain truth and falsehood in response. The latter is commonly used by law enforcement in the United States, but rarely in other countries because it is based on pseudoscience.

Lie detector is the popular term for a polygraph, a device that measures and records physiological indices, under the belief that these are useful for lie detection.

Interpersonal deception theory (IDT) is one of a number of theories that attempts to explain how individuals handle actual deception at the conscious or subconscious level while engaged in face-to-face communication. The theory was put forth by David Buller and Judee Burgoon in 1996 to explore this idea that deception is an engaging process between receiver and deceiver. IDT assumes that communication is not static; it is influenced by personal goals and the meaning of the interaction as it unfolds. IDT is no different from other forms of communication since all forms of communication are adaptive in nature. The sender's overt communications are affected by the overt and covert communications of the receiver, and vice versa. IDT explores the interrelation between the sender's communicative meaning and the receiver's thoughts and behavior in deceptive exchanges.

<i>The Moment of Truth</i> (American game show) American game show

The Moment of Truth is an American game show based on the Colombian Nada más que la verdad format. Contestants answer a series of 21 increasingly personal and embarrassing questions to receive cash prizes. The show was hosted by Mark L. Walberg and ran on the Fox network from January 23, to August 28, 2008.

The bogus pipeline is a fake polygraph used to get participants to truthfully respond to emotional/affective questions in a survey. It is a technique used by social psychologists to reduce false answers when attempting to collect self-report data. As an example, social desirability is a common reason for warped survey results.

The Wizards Project was a research project at the University of California, San Francisco led by Paul Ekman and Maureen O'Sullivan that studied the ability of people to detect lies. The experts identified in their study were called "Truth Wizards". O'Sullivan spent more than 20 years studying the science of lying and deceit. The project was originally named the Diogenes Project, after Diogenes of Sinope, the Greek philosopher who would look into people's faces using a lamp, claiming to be looking for an honest man.

Zvonimir Roso was a Croatian criminologist and psychologist, one of South-eastern Europe's foremost authorities in the science of polygraph and the founder of what is now known as "Zagreb School of Polygraph".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lidar traffic enforcement</span>

Lidar has a wide range of applications; one use is in traffic enforcement and in particular speed limit enforcement, has been gradually replacing radar since 2000. Current devices are designed to automate the entire process of speed detection, vehicle identification, driver identification and evidentiary documentation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Augustus Larson</span> American police officer and inventor (1892–1965)

John Augustus Larson was a Police Officer and Forensic Psychiatrist and became famous for his invention of the modern polygraph device used in forensic investigations. He was the first American police officer with an academic doctorate and to use the polygraph in criminal investigations. After a famed career in criminal investigation, he died of a heart attack in Nashville, Tennessee, at the age of 73.

Othello error occurs when a suspicious observer discounts cues of truthfulness. Essentially the Othello error occurs, Paul Ekman states, "when the lie catcher fails to consider that a truthful person who is under stress may appear to be lying," their non-verbal signals expressing their worry at the possibility of being disbelieved. A lie-detector or polygraph may be deceived in the same way by misinterpreting nervous signals from a truthful person. The error is named after William Shakespeare's tragic play Othello; the dynamics between the two main characters, Othello and Desdemona, are a particularly well-known example of the error in practice.

Mark G. Frank is a communication professor and department chair, and an internationally recognized expert on human nonverbal communication, emotion, and deception. Dr. Frank conducts research and does training on micro expressions of emotion and of the face. His research studies include other nonverbal indicators of deception throughout the rest of the body. He is the Director of the Communication Science Center research laboratory that is located on the North Campus of the University at Buffalo. Under his guidance, a team of graduate researchers conduct experiments and studies for private and government entities. Frank uses his expertise in communication and psychology to assist law enforcement agencies in monitoring both verbal and nonverbal communication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coronavirus breathalyzer</span> Diagnostic medical device

A coronavirus breathalyzer is a diagnostic medical device enabling the user to test with 90% or greater accuracy the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in an exhaled breath. As of the first half of 2020, the idea of a practical coronavirus breathalyzer was concomitantly developed by unrelated research groups in Australia, Canada, Finland, Germany, Indonesia, Israel, Netherlands, Poland, Singapore, United Kingdom and USA.

fMRI lie detection is a field of lie detection using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). FMRI looks to the central nervous system to compare time and topography of activity in the brain for lie detection. While a polygraph detects anxiety-induced changes in activity in the peripheral nervous system, fMRI purportedly measures blood flow to areas of the brain involved in deception.

References

  1. ↑ "BBC - Radio 4 - The Material World 30/1/2003". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 2022-04-19.
  2. ↑ Rothwell, Janet; Bandar, Zuhair; O'Shea, James; McLean, David (2006-09-01). "Silent talker: A new computer-based system for the analysis of facial cues to deception". Applied Cognitive Psychology. 20 (6): 757–777. doi: 10.1002/acp.1204 .
  3. ↑ Crime Museum. "What is a polygraph?". Natalee Holloway Resource Center. Retrieved 7 February 2023.
  4. ↑ Emamzadeh, Arash. "How To Detect Lies". Psychology Today. Retrieved 7 February 2023.
  5. ↑ Griffin, Trudi; Tieperman, Janice. "How To Know If Someone Is Lying". Wiki How. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  6. ↑ Ekman, Paul. "Micro Expressions". Paul Ekman Group. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  7. 1 2 3 Gallager, Ryan. "WE TESTED EUROPE'S NEW LIE DETECTOR FOR TRAVELERS — AND IMMEDIATELY TRIGGERED A FALSE POSITIVE". The Intercept. Retrieved 18 February 2023.
  8. ↑ Katwala, Amit (5 September 2019). "The race to create a perfect lie detector – and the dangers of succeeding". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  9. ↑ Bittle, Jake. "Lie detectors have always been suspect. AI has made the problem worse". MIT technology Review. MIT. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
  10. ↑ Katz, Deanne (16 January 2013). "Are Lie Detectors Admissible in Court?". Find Law. Retrieved 10 February 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.