Smart irrigation controllers (also known as weather-based irrigation controllers or WBICs) are irrigation control devices that automatically adjust watering schedules based on real-time environmental conditions. Unlike traditional sprinkler timers that operate on a fixed schedule (e.g., "Monday, Wednesday, Friday"), smart controllers monitor weather, soil moisture, and evaporation rates to determine the precise water requirements of the landscape.
The primary goal of smart irrigation technology is to improve water use efficiency by reducing outdoor water waste, which helps prevent runoff and promotes plant health by avoiding overwatering.[1]
Types of Control Logic
Smart controllers are generally categorized by the method they use to determine watering needs: Climatological (Weather-based) or Soil-based.
Weather-Based (ET) Controllers
Weather-based controllers use local meteorological data to calculate Evapotranspiration (ET)—the combined loss of water from soil evaporation and plant transpiration. The controller adjusts the irrigation runtime daily to replace only the water lost since the last cycle.
There are three main methods for acquiring this weather data:
Signal-Based: The controller connects to a local Wi-Fi or cellular network to receive a daily ET signal from a remote weather station or a network of public weather data sources (such as NOAA or private services).
On-Site Sensors: The controller is physically connected to a mini-weather station installed on the property that measures temperature, solar radiation, and sometimes rainfall. This allows for site-specific calculation.
Historical (Climate-Based): The controller uses a pre-programmed curve of historical average weather data for the specific region. This is generally considered the least accurate method as it cannot account for real-time anomalies like a sudden heatwave or cool spell.
Soil Moisture-Based Controllers
These controlers use Soil moisture sensors buried in the root zone of the landscape. They operate on a "closed-loop" feedback system:
Bypass Mode: The system attempts to run on a schedule, but the sensor interrupts the electrical circuit if the soil moisture is above a set threshold.
On-Demand Mode: The system has no fixed schedule; it initiates irrigation only when the soil moisture content drops below a user-defined threshold (Management Allowed Depletion).
Mechanism of Action
Smart controllers replace the standard "clock" logic of traditional timers with dynamic scheduling algorithms.
Water Budgeting: The controller calculates a percentage adjustment (e.g., 80% or 120%) applied to the base schedule. For example, on a cool, cloudy day, the "Water Budget" might drop to 60%, reducing a 10-minute runtime to 6 minutes.
Cycle and Soak: To prevent runoff on clay soils or slopes, smart controllers often break a long runtime into shorter cycles (e.g., three 5-minute cycles instead of one 15-minute cycle), allowing water to infiltrate the soil in between.
Rain Pause/Skip: Unlike a simple rain sensor that cuts power during a storm, cloud-connected controllers can look ahead at the forecast and cancel irrigation before rain arrives.
Certification and Standards
EPA WaterSense (United States)
In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) creates prformance specifications for smart controllers under the WaterSense program. To earn the label, controllers must be tested by a third party and prove they can adequately meet plant water needs without overwatering.[2]
SWAT Testing
The Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT) initiative, led by the Irrigation Association, develops testing protocols to evaluate the efficacy of climatological and soil-based control technologies.
Benefits and Limitations
Benefits
Water Conservation: Studies indicate smart controllers can save between 20% and 50% of landscape water compared to traditional timers, primarily by eliminating watering during rainy or cool periods.[3]
Convenience: Many modern controllers offer smartphone apps, allowing users to control the system remotely and receive alerts about leaks or wiring faults.
Limitations
Setup Complexity: Accurate operation requires precise programming of site data (soil type, plant type, slope, sprinkler nozzle efficiency). Incorrect inputs can lead to severe underwatering or overwatering.
Connectivity: Signal-based controllers rely on consistent Wi-Fi or cellular connections. Connection failures may cause the device to revert to a default (often inefficient) backup schedule.
↑Nautiyal, M. (2021). "Smart irrigation systems: A review of the current state of the art". Agricultural Water Management. 245: 106629.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.