SoundExchange

Last updated
SoundExchange
FoundedSeptember 22, 2003
Type Non-profit
760742496
Location
Area served
International
Services Royalty distribution
Key people
Michael Huppe
(President and CEO) [1]
Website www.soundexchange.com

SoundExchange is an American non-profit collective rights management organization spun off from the RIAA in 2003. It is the sole organization designated by the U.S. Congress to collect and distribute digital performance royalties for sound recordings.

Contents

History

SoundExchange was created as a division of the RIAA in 2000. In 2001, major record labels and artists agreed on a standard for paying royalties earned from cable and satellite music services, and SoundExchange made its first payment, distributing $5.2 million in royalties to recording artists and labels. [2] In 2002, four years after the Digital Millennium Copyright Act granted webcasters an automatic license to play copyrighted music provided that a royalty was paid, a lengthy arbitration process was concluded, and a royalty rate was set. SoundExchange was spun off from the RIAA and became an independent non-profit corporation in 2003. [3] [4]

SoundExchange's first executive director was John Simson, a musician, attorney, and artist manager. [5] Simson left the organization in 2011 and was replaced by Michael Huppe. In 2018 it was announced that the organization had extended his contract through 2021. [6] [7] He also serves as the chairman of the board of SXWorks, a subsidiary created by SoundExchange following its acquisition of the Canadian Musical Reproduction Rights Association (CMRRA). SXWorks provides administration and back office services to publishers to support multiple licensing configurations. [8]

In 2012, the company announced that it had paid over $1 billion in royalties since 2003. [9] As of 2018, it had paid more than $5 billion, [10] with recording artists and rights holders paid $884 million in 2016 alone. [7] [8]

In 2021, the company expanded royalty collections to include Private copying levy royalties, [11] which was previously collected by the Alliance of Artists and Recording Companies (AARC) since 1993. AARC ceased operations at the end of 2021.

Purpose

SoundExchange exists to administer statutory licenses for sound recording copyrights, primarily through the collection and distribution of royalties for sound recording performances occurring under the jurisdiction of federal law. An administrative fee is deducted from royalties before they are distributed, with the remainder divided between the performing artists on a given recording, and the copyright owner of that recording. As of 2023, the organization collects more than $1 billion annually [12] for distribution.

SoundExchange handles the following duties with respect to statutory licenses:

SoundExchange collects and distributes royalties for all artists and copyright owners covered under the statutory licenses. It has collection agreements with more than 40 international performance rights organizations around the world, [13] allowing it to collect and pay royalties to recording artists and rights owners when their music is played in those countries. In 2017, SoundExchange expanded into music publisher administration with its acquisition of Canadian mechanical rights society Canadian Musical Reproduction Rights Agency (CMRRA). [14]

Authority and structure

SoundExchange is designated by the Librarian of Congress as the sole organization authorized to collect royalties paid by services making ephemeral phonorecords or digital audio transmissions of sound recordings, or both, under the statutory licenses set forth in 17 U.S.C. § 112 and 17 U.S.C. § 114. As of January 1, 2003, SoundExchange is designated by the United States Copyright Office to also distribute the collected royalties to copyright owners and performers entitled under and pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 114(g)(2). Incorporated in the State of Delaware, SoundExchange is exempt from taxation under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code. It operates, in part, pursuant to Copyright Office regulations set forth in 37 C.F.R. Parts 370, 380, 382, 383 and 384. [15]

Royalty rate setting

As required by the United States Code, SoundExchange, along with other interested parties, participates in each periodic rate-making proceedings to establish rates that compensate copyright owners and performers for the use of copyrighted sound recordings. Such rate setting proceedings may be resolved through proceedings through the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB). [16]

A 2007 royalty rate increase was reported as establishing a rate that would "render Internet radio unsustainable, or at the very least, more ad-laden than terrestrial radio." [17] Critics charged that in negotiating the royalty, SoundExchange was concerned primarily with major labels and their artists. [18] Thousands of internet broadcasters participated in a "day of silence" protest by cancelling their programming on June 26, 2007. [19]

In 2016, SoundExchange's rate proposal to the Copyright Royalty Board would more than double Sirius XM's royalty payments. [20]

Satellite radio

In December 2017, the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) increased the Sirius XM royalty rate from 11.5% of revenue to 15.5% of revenue through 2022. [21] The CRB also rendered a decision on royalty rates paid by Muzak and Music Choice in December 2017, reducing the royalty rates paid by those services from 8.5% of revenue to 7.5% of revenue. [22]

In 2015 SoundExchange sued Muzak for underpayments of royalties to artists and rights holders. Because its royalty rate was established before the DMCA was enacted, Muzak's streaming services to Dish Network subscribers was allowed a grandfathered rate standard that resulted in lower royalty rates. The SoundExchange lawsuit sought to implement the standard royalty rate for new subscriptions on Muzak's streaming services to other cable/satellite TV providers. [23]

Webcasting

The CRB judges established webcasting rates (per song, per listener) on December 16, 2015, for the 2016–2020 term – $0.0017 for non-subscription performances and $0.0020 for subscription performances for commercial webcasters in 2017, with rates for each subsequent year adjusted upward or downward, according to the Consumer Price Index for the year. As of 2018, webcasting rates were $0.0018 for non-subscription services and $0.0023 for subscription services. [24]

Projects and initiatives

In March 2016 SoundExchange introduced an online service to allow music services to locate metadata for 20 million sound recordings in its database. The service allows users to search SoundExchange's database of international standard recording rates, unique identifiers for sound recordings. [25] [26]

In January 2018 the SoundExchange subsidiary SXWorks launched NOI (Notice of Intention) Lookup. It allows songwriters and publishers to search a U.S. copyright database which indexes "Address Unknown" notices, the term used when a music service files an intention to use a musical work, but claims that they cannot locate the copyright owner. A free tool, it allows copyright owners to identify their work. In 2017, an average of 2.5 million monthly address unknown NOI filings were submitted to the US Copyright Office by music services. [27]

Criticism

In 2019, SoundExchange introduced the "Overlaps & Disputes" feature for rights holders utilizing their software. [28] However, this feature triggered concerns among independent rights holders. Some artists, particularly those distributing their music through independent platforms, expressed frustration through blog posts and video-sharing platforms. [29] [30] Allegations of "Royalty Raiding" emerged, with claims that major labels, notably Warner Music Group, were disputing performance royalties of independent artists.

A dispute arises when a right holder submits a form to SoundExchange asserting that an existing claim on a composition's performance rights is invalid, and they are the legal right holder. [31] The prevalence of such complaints has led to speculations of major labels, with their extensive repertoires and industry dominance, may mass-dispute rights holders' claims to redirect income from self-managed indie artists. Opinions on responsibility vary, with some attributing predatory behavior to major labels, while others argue that artists should exercise due diligence in managing their rights and finances within the music industry.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Broadcast Music, Inc.</span> Performing rights organization in the United States

Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) is a performance rights organization in the United States. It collects blanket license fees from businesses that use music, entitling those businesses to play or sync any songs from BMI's repertoire of over 22.4 million musical works. On a quarterly basis, BMI distributes the money to songwriters, composers, and music publishers as royalties to those members whose works have been performed.

A copyright collective is a non-governmental body created by copyright law or private agreement which licenses copyrighted works on behalf of the authors and engages in collective rights management. Copyright societies track all the events and venues where copyrighted works are used and ensure that the copyright holders listed with the society are remunerated for such usage. The copyright society publishes its own tariff scheme on its websites and collects a nominal administrative fee on every transaction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Audio Home Recording Act</span>

The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 (AHRA) amended the United States copyright law by adding Chapter 10, "Digital Audio Recording Devices and Media". The act enabled the release of recordable digital formats such as Sony's Digital Audio Tape without fear of contributory infringement lawsuits.

APRA AMCOS consists of Australasian Performing Right Association (APRA) and Australasian Mechanical Copyright Owners Society (AMCOS), both copyright management organisations or copyright collectives which jointly represent over 100,000 songwriters, composers and music publishers in Australia and New Zealand. The two organisations work together to license public performances and administer performance, communication and reproduction rights on behalf of their members, who are creators of musical works, aiming to ensure fair payments to members and to defend their rights under the Australian Copyright Act (1968).

Music licensing is the licensed use of copyrighted music. Music licensing is intended to ensure that the owners of copyrights on musical works are compensated for certain uses of their work. A purchaser has limited rights to use the work without a separate agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Fox Agency</span> Copyright collection society

The Harry Fox Agency (HFA) is a provider of rights management and collector and distributor of mechanical license fees on behalf of music publishers in the United States. HFA has over 48,000 music publishing clients and issues the largest number of licenses for physical and digital formats of music. It was founded in 1927 by the National Music Publishers Association. The agency was sold to performing rights organization SESAC in 2015, which was itself acquired by The Blackstone Group in 2017.

Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) is a British music copyright collective. It is a private limited company that is registered in the UK. PPL was founded by Decca Records and EMI and incorporated on 12 May 1934, and undertakes collective rights management of sound recordings on behalf of its record-company members, and distributes the fees collected to both its record company members and performer members. As of 2022, PPL collected royalties for over 140,000 performers and recording rightsholders.

In copyright law, a mechanical license is a license from the holder of a copyright of a composition or musical work, to another party to create a "cover song", reproduce, or sample a portion of the original composition. It applies to copyrighted work that is neither a free/open source item nor in the public domain.

Production music is recorded music that can be licensed to customers for use in film, television, radio and other media. Often, the music is produced and owned by production music libraries.

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) is a U.S. system of three copyright royalty judges who determine rates and terms for copyright statutory licenses and make determinations on distribution of statutory license royalties collected by the U.S. Copyright Office of the Library of Congress. The board, made up of three permanent copyright royalty judges, was created under the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, which became effective on May 31, 2005, when the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel system was phased out. These administrative judges are appointed by the Librarian of Congress.

The Internet Radio Equality Act (IREA), originally introduced as H.R. 2060, is proposed legislation by Rep Jay Inslee (D) WA to nullify the May 1, 2007, determination of the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB) modifying the current webcast radio royalties and fees retroactively to January 1, 2006. The previous system charged radio stations a per performance rate of $0.000768, and it was that same rate from 1998-2005. The new system, effective May 1, 2007, increased that per-performance rate to the following levels: 2006=$0.0008, 2007=$0.0011, 2008=$0.0014, 2009=$0.0018, and 2010=$0.0019. This bill was introduced on April 26, 2007 by Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) and Rep. Donald Manzullo (R-IL) and has been cosponsored by over 100 members of the Congress. It was introduced in the Senate as S. 1353 on May 10 by Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sam Brownback (R-KS). The bill's proponents claim that "the majority of webcasters will go bankrupt and silent" when the Copyright Royalty Board's decision takes effect unless the bill passes.

The Canadian Musical Reproduction Rights Agency Ltd. (CMRRA) is a music licensing agency based in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Founded in 1975, CMRRA is a music licensing collective representing music rights-holders who range in size from large multinational music publishers to individual songwriters. On their behalf, CMRRA issues licences to individuals or organizations for the reproduction of songs on various media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet radio</span> Digital audio service transmitted via the Internet

Internet radio, also known as Online radio, web radio, net radio, streaming radio, e-radio and IP radio, is a digital audio service transmitted via the Internet. Broadcasting on the Internet is usually referred to as webcasting since it is not transmitted broadly through wireless means. It can either be used as a stand-alone device running through the Internet, or as a software running through a single computer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Music Reports</span>

Music Reports provides music rights licensing, administration, royalty accounting, and software development and hosting. Music Reports operates the largest registry of worldwide music rights and related business information.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act</span> Copyright law in the United States

The Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 (DPRA) is a United States Copyright law that grants owners of a copyright in sound recordings an exclusive right “to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.” The DPRA was enacted in response to the absence of a performance right for sound recordings in the Copyright Act of 1976 and a fear that digital technology would stand in for sales of physical records. The performance right for sound recordings under the DPRA is limited to transmissions over a digital transmission, so it is not as expansive as the performance right for other types of copyrighted works. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), enacted in 1998, modified the DPRA.

Music royalties are royalty payments for the writing and performing of music. Unlike other forms of intellectual property, have a strong linkage to individuals – composers (score), songwriters (lyrics) and writers of musical plays – in that they can own the exclusive copyright to created music and can license it for performance independent of corporates. Recording companies and the performing artists that create a "sound recording" of the music enjoy a separate set of copyrights and royalties from the sale of recordings and from their digital transmission.

Raditaz was an internet radio streaming music service for the web, iOS, and Android. Raditaz was a free product, and users could create stations, listen to over 200 customised stations, and utilize a tagging system to personalize their own stations. Users could find stations not just based on artists, songs, and genres, but also based on metadata tags, such as @work, @gym, #happy, or @driving. Raditaz had a location layer that enables users to listen to and share stations that trending throughout the US. The "explore" feature let a user discover the latest music trends by location. Users could also share songs or stations by email, Facebook, Twitter or Pinterest. Raditaz had more than 23 million songs and used The Echo Nest music intelligence platform for creating stations. When a user input the name of a specific band, artist or song, Raditaz could create a station based on that musician along with similar artists. Users also had the option to add an additional nine artists to customize a station further. Listeners could adjust the popularity level of the artists and songs found within the station. The site went offline in 2012 to undergo a complete makeover, with new features expected. The Raditaz revenue model is location-based advertising, but no target date for ads has been set.

Re:Sound is the non-profit performance rights organization in Canada that collects and administers Neighbouring Rights royalties on behalf of recording artists, including featured artists and session musicians and record labels in Canada. Re:Sound was founded in 1997 and in French is referred to as Ré:Sonne.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Music Modernization Act</span> United States copyright law

The Orrin G. Hatch–Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act, or Music Modernization Act or MMA is United States legislation signed into law on October 11, 2018, aimed to modernize copyright-related issues for music and audio recordings due to new forms of technology such as digital streaming. It is a consolidation of three separate bills introduced during the 115th United States Congress.

Spoken Giants is the first global rights administration company for the owners and creators of spoken word copyrights. Spoken Giants represents comedians, podcast authors, speech writers, and other spoken word creators.

References

  1. ↑ "Michael Huppe - SoundExchange". soundexchange.com. SoundExchange. Retrieved 16 July 2024.
  2. ↑ Leeds, Jeff (November 8, 2001). "Record Labels, Artists Reach Services Accord" . Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  3. ↑ Harmon, Amy (2002-06-21). "TECHNOLOGY; Internet Radio Criticizes Rate On Royalties". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2018-01-10.
  4. ↑ "Battle Royalty". Los Angeles Times. 2007-06-11. ISSN   0458-3035 . Retrieved 2018-01-10.
  5. ↑ Birnbaum, Jeffrey H. (2007-07-03). "Jeffrey H. Birnbaum - Radio Royalties: Reprising Ol' Blue Eyes' Battle". The Washington Post . ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2018-01-10.
  6. ↑ "SoundExchange Board Extends President/CEO Michael Huppe's Contract". MusicRow - Nashville's Music Industry Publication - News, Songs From Music City. 2018-01-10. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  7. 1 2 "SoundExchange Extends CEO Michael Huppe Through 2021". Billboard. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  8. 1 2 Christman, Ed (May 15, 2017). "SoundExchange Is Officially Buying CMRRA, A Move Reflecting Evolving Digital Markets". Billboard. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
  9. ↑ Greenburg, Zack O'Malley. "SoundExchange Passes $1 Billion Mark In Music Royalties Paid". Forbes. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  10. ↑ Variety Staff (2018-03-15). "SoundExchange Passes $5 Billion Mark in Streaming Royalty Distributions". Variety. Retrieved 2018-03-21.
  11. ↑ "SoundExchange Announces Expansion into Private Copy Royalty Collection and Distribution".
  12. ↑ Wang, Amy X. The $1 Billion Waiting For Artists Who Know Where To Look. Rolling Stone. 2019-03-27. Retrieved 2024-02-26.
  13. ↑ "International Collection - SoundExchange". SoundExchange. Retrieved 2018-03-22.
  14. ↑ "Michael Huppe signs 4-year extension to continue as SoundExchange CEO - Music Business Worldwide". Music Business Worldwide. 2018-01-10. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  15. ↑ "Notice of Designation As Collective Under Statutory License filed with the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-10-30. Retrieved 2008-10-16.
  16. ↑ Steele, Anne (December 15, 2017). "Sirius XM Satellite Radio to Pay Higher Royalty Rate Starting in 2018". Dow Jones (via Morningstar). Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  17. ↑ "U.S. Copyright Royalty Board Rejects Webcasters, Embraces SoundExchange". WIRED. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  18. ↑ "New Royalty Rules May Reshape Internet Radio". NPR.org. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  19. ↑ Musgrove, Mike (2007-06-26). "Web Radio Stations Hope Silence Speaks Volumes About Fee Hike". The Washington Post . ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  20. ↑ Christman, Ed (25 October 2016). "SiriusXM May See Its Digital Royalties Nearly Double If New Proposal Is Greenlit". Billboard. Retrieved 16 July 2024.
  21. ↑ Bliss, Karen (April 25, 2017). "SoundExchange CEO Points to SiriusXM's Growth for Royalty Rate Increase Optimism". Billboard. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  22. ↑ Flanagan, Andrew (April 3, 2015). "SoundExchange Files Its Second Lawsuit Over Improper Royalties". Billboard. Retrieved 2 January 2018.
  23. ↑ "BRIEF-Mood media announces update to court proceedings involving its subsidiary MuzakLLC". Reuters. April 26, 2017. Retrieved 2018-01-10.
  24. ↑ "CRB Announces Webcasting Royalty Rates for 2016-2020 – Lower Rates for Broadcasters Who Stream, Minimal Change for Pureplay Webcasters | Broadcast Law Blog". Broadcast Law Blog. 2015-12-17. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  25. ↑ "SoundExchange Debuts Search Tool for Song Codes". Billboard. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  26. ↑ "SoundExchange Launches Free 20 Million Song Search Database". hypebot. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  27. ↑ "SoundExchange's SXWorks launches free tool to fix widespread NOI copyright problem in the US - Music Business Worldwide". Music Business Worldwide. 2018-01-23. Retrieved 2018-01-24.
  28. ↑ Mills, Ben (2021-12-06). "My Catalog Update: Overlaps & Disputes - "Bulk Resolution" & Other Enhancements". SoundExchange. Retrieved 2023-10-06.
  29. ↑ "SoundExchange Overlaps & Disputes". MusicLibraryReport. Retrieved 2023-10-06.
  30. ↑ What to do about Soundexchange disputes , retrieved 2023-10-06
  31. ↑ Mills, Ben (2019-11-06). "Understanding My Catalog: A Guide To "Overlaps & Disputes"". SoundExchange. Retrieved 2023-10-06.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.